EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

04.16.18

The European Patent Office Will Never Hold Its Destroyers Accountable

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 6:59 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

It rewards them with a bonus equivalent to two years of work as EPO President!

Blatterstelli and FBI

Summary: With only one in seven EPO stakeholders believing that Battistelli’s pick (António Campinos) will turn things around for the better, it certainly does not seem like people are happy and there’s no real hope that Battistelli will ever be held accountable for his abuses after his immunity expires

THE staff union of the EPO (SUEPO) has been quiet lately. Very quiet. Maybe they just wait for Battistelli to leave. He has less than 2.5 months left. Then a fellow Frenchman, whose job application he promoted, will inherit the penthouse with the pub.

“Maybe they just wait for Battistelli to leave. He has less than 2.5 months left. Then a fellow Frenchman, whose job application he promoted, will inherit the penthouse with the pub.”We are constantly being told and reminded by people who are familiar with these matters that the successor (Campinos) won’t change anything. All evidence we’ve seen so far suggests so too. In fact, we expect Battistelli to still participate remotely (through Campinos). Battistelli is not retiring, only hibernating in CEIPI (swapping a chair with Campinos). As a reminder see the following older posts:

It’s hard to simply accept that Battistelli goes unpunished; he will walk free. Many EPO employees will be very upset. Who’s to blame? European politicians? German politicians? Dutch politicians? Delegates who mostly come from NPOs (national patent offices)? Probably all the ‘above’… there’s a chain of complicity and coverup. It makes Europe look unjust or rather a place where people can get away with serious abuses as long as they invoke diplomatic immunity.

“All these cowards from large law firms never want to talk about EPO corruption.”There’s another element of complicity in the mix.

All these cowards from large law firms never want to talk about EPO corruption. Very few of them ever did. We could count them on one hand. Complicity by oversight? Apathy? Cowardice?

“The Enlarged Board of Appeal and other Boards are not enjoying any independence upon which sound judgments are to be based.”Look at EPO news these days. Absolutely nothing about scandals. It’s like scandals never happened. They don’t matter. Not even multi-euro 'heists' that are about to happen within weeks. The media, which is paid to participate, isn’t interested in journalism but in pure PR. Battistelli pays them for it (at the expense of the EPO of course).

Bardehle Pagenberg’s Rudolf Teschemacher has just written about “recent developments in EPO case law,” but what about the Boards upon which he bases his entire article? The Enlarged Board of Appeal and other Boards are not enjoying any independence upon which sound judgments are to be based. It’s a massive crisis. The whole EPC is now an ignored piece of paper. EPO is therefore defunct and debased, technically detached from its very founding document. This is what Teschemacher had to say:

Recent decisions passed by three different instances of the EPO have significant effects on the patentability of inventions under European patent law. All of them concerned the validity of patents to be assessed in opposition proceedings. Applicants should be aware of the consequences of these decisions. Avoidable mistakes when filing a European patent application and even previously may later result in the loss of the patent.

No mention of the Patrick Corcoran ‘affair’ and the Boards’ own complaints. To people like Teschemacher it pays more to simply pretend nothing is amiss. How about FRKelly’s Alan Casey? He published this a few hours ago. The EPO is making it more expensive to appeal/object to bogus patents that the Office keeps granting in order to ‘fake’ “success” and make staff redundant. Here’s the key part:

A lower level of appeal fee of €1880 will apply for appeals filed by natural persons and entities referred to in Rule 6(4) EPC, i.e. small and medium-sized enterprises, non-profit organisations, universities and public research organisations. An increased appeal fee of €2255 will apply to all other entities.

We already wrote about this several times before. It’s designed to encourage focus on the ‘patent-granting (or patent-printing) machine’ rather than quality assurance.

“It’s designed to encourage focus on the ‘patent-granting machine’ rather than quality assurance.”Last but not least, hours ago came out this article from August Debouzy (Gregoire Desrousseaux, François Pochart and Geoffroy Thill). They boast about PACE-type programmes and contrariwise slowdowns of the process.

The main problem is that the EPO is running out of work, out of skills, and out of reputation. Not that it bothers law firms. They cash in on trouble. To quote their conclusions:

The new optional postponement procedure of the examination goes against the decreasing duration of the search, examination and opposition procedures initiated during the last few years in the EPO. However, the procedure reveals manifold advantages for applicants. They could maintain a pending application with a broad scope of protection for 3 more years while keeping the opportunity to request an accelerated examination at any time. The applicants shall be able to accelerate or delay the granting procedure of their patents.

This has no impact on quality of underlying assessment (examination); it just means they can metaphorically press “pause”, that’s all.

Is it not curious that not even one law firm bothered mentioning the petition signed by a quarter of examiners to bemoan departure from the EPC and declining patent quality? Only 3 sites that are English-speaking covered it and one that speaks German. As long as nobody is willing enough to bring up these matters in the patent microcosm there’s no hope of resolving the biggest issues. This basically sums up why nothing will change under Campinos, as we explained a week ago. In fact, according to this new article [PDF], when asked whether “António Campinos is the right person to solve the EPO’s problems” only 14.7% of the respondents (patent professionals) said “Yes”. It’s just slightly more than one in seven!

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Reader's Article: Affaire Benalla Strongly Connected to EPO/OEB/EPA and Former President Benoît Battistelli

    A Macron scandal has led French media to finally (and years too late) exploring some of the much more explosive scandals at the EPO, revealing some interesting new details in the process



  2. Language Patent Lawyers Are Using to Warp the Debate and Decrease Public Understanding of Patents

    The patent microcosm, trying to get the public all baffled/confused about the patent system, continues (mis)using words to convey things in misleading ways



  3. USPTO FEES ACT Makes the US Patent Office a Money-Making Machine That Systematically Disregards Patent Quality

    The lingering issues with patent assessment at the US patent office, which unlike US courts isn't quite so impartial an actor (it benefits more from granting than from rejecting)



  4. Guest Post on Ronan Le Gleut and Benalla at the French Senate (in Light of Battistelli's Epic Abuses)

    Thoughts on the possibility that Battistelli will belatedly be held accountable for his abuses, knowing that a senator representing French Citizens residing Abroad comes from the EPO



  5. A Lot of US Patents Are Entirely Bogus, But Apple Was Willing to Pay for Them

    Apple's resistance to Qualcomm's patent aggression was preceded by very heavy ("thermonuclear" by Steve Jobs' description/words) patent wars against Android and even legitimisation of clearly bogus software patents from Amazon



  6. 'Owning' Nature, Thanks to Patent Insanity and People Who Profit From That

    Questionable patents on things that always existed and are merely being explained or reassembled; those sorts of patents typically serve to merely discredit the patent system and courts too increasingly reject such patents (e.g. SCOTUS on Mayo Collaborative Services and Myriad Genetics, Inc.)



  7. Patents Stranger Than Fiction and 'Protection' From Fictional Things

    Fictional things are being treated like "inventions" and insurance companies now look to exploit fear of fictional things (man-made concepts), such as ownership of mere ideas or words



  8. Benoît Battistelli Refuses to Talk to the Media About Bringing Firearms to the EPO

    Benoît Battistelli's highly aggressive approach has attracted the attention of French media; Battistelli has reportedly refused to comment on that matter, knowing that he lacks a defense (same thing happened after he had hauled millions of EPO euros to his other employer)



  9. Patent Law Firms Have Become More Like Marketing Departments With an Aptitude for Buzzwords

    What we're observing, without much reluctance anymore, is that a lot of patent lawyers still push abstract software patents, desperately looking for new trendy terms or adjectives by which to make these seem non-abstract



  10. Interlude: The Need to Counter Misinformation From the Patent and Litigation 'Industry'

    24,500 posts reached; so we pause and reflect, seeing that many sites/blogs of patent maximalists gradually ebb away



  11. Advocacy of the Unitary Patent System Has Become Almost Identical to the 'Leave' (Brexit) Campaign

    The charades of Team UPC carry on in Kluwer Patent Blog — a blog which for a very long time served no purpose other than Unified Patent Court (UPC) advocacy



  12. Open Invention Network is Rendered Obsolete in the Wake of Alice and It's Not Even Useful in Combating Microsoft's Patent Trolls

    Changes at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and in US courts' outcomes may have already meant that patent trolls rather than software patents in general are a growing threat, including those that Microsoft is backing, funding and arming to put legal pressure on GNU/Linux (and compel people/companies to host GNU/Linux instances on Azure for patent 'protection' from these trolls)



  13. Bogus Patents Which Oughtn't Have Been Granted Make Products Deliberately Worse, Reducing Innovation and Worsening Customers' Experience

    How shallow patents — or patent applications that no patent office should be accepting — turn out to be at the core of multi-billion-dollar cases/lawsuits, with potentially a billion people impacted (their products made worse to work around such questionable patents)



  14. EPO is Like a Patent Litigation (Without Actual Trial) Office, Not a Patent Examination Office

    Examination of patent applications isn't taken seriously by an office whose entire existence was supposed to be about examination; bureaucracy at the top of this office has apparently decided that the sole goal is to create more demand (i.e. lawsuits) for the litigation 'industry'



  15. Philippe Cadre From the French National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) Wants to Join António Campinos

    Yet another example of INPI's creeping influence if not 'entryism' at the EPO and this time too patent quality isn't a priority



  16. Links 22/9/2018: Mesa 18.2.1, CLIP OS, GPL Settlement in Artifex/First National Title Insurance Company

    Links for the day



  17. Links 21/9/2018: Cockpit 178, Purism 'Dongle'

    Links for the day



  18. Criticism of Unitary Patent (UPC) Agreement Doomed the UPC and Patent Trolls' Plan -- Along With the Litigation Lobby -- for Unified 'Extortion Vector'

    The Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC) was the trolls' weapon against potentially millions of European businesses; but those businesses have woken up to the fact that it was against their interests and European member states such as Spain and Poland now oppose it while Germany halts ratification



  19. It Wasn't Judges With Weapons in Their Office, It Was Benoît Battistelli Who Brought Firearms to the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The EPO scandals deepen in light of a very major scandal which has occupied the French media for a couple of months



  20. Links 20/9/2018: 2018 Linux Audio Miniconference and Blackboard's Openwashing

    Links for the day



  21. Links 19/9/2018: Chromebooks Get More DEBs, LLVM 7.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  22. Links 18/9/2018: Qt 5.12 Alpha , MAAS 2.5.0 Beta, PostgreSQL CoC

    Links for the day



  23. Today's European Patent Office (EPO) Works for Large, Foreign Pharmaceutical Companies in Pursuit of Patents on Nature, Life, and Essential/Basic Drugs

    The never-ending insanity which is patents on DNA/genome/genetics and all sorts of basic things that are put together like a recipe in a restaurant; patents are no longer covering actual machinery that accomplishes unique tasks in complicated ways, typically assembled from scratch by humans; some supposed 'inventions' are merely born into existence by the natural splitting of organisms or conception (e.g. pregnancy)



  24. The EPO Has Quit Pretending That It Cares About Patent Quality, All It Cares About is Quantity of Lawsuits

    A new interview with Roberta Romano-Götsch, as well as the EPO's promotion of software patents alongside CIPA (Team UPC), is an indication that the EPO has ceased caring about quality and hardly even pretends to care anymore



  25. Qualcomm's Escalating Patent Wars Have Already Caused Massive Buybacks (Loss of Reserves) and Loss of Massive Clients

    Qualcomm's multi-continental patent battles are an effort to 'shock and awe' everyone into its protection racket; but the unintended effect seems to be a move further and further away from 'Qualcomm territories'



  26. Links 17/9/2018: Torvalds Takes a Break, SQLite 3.25.0 Released

    Links for the day



  27. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Helps Prevent Frivolous Software Patent Lawsuits

    PTAB with its quality-improving inter partes reviews (IPRs) is enraging patent maximalists; but by looking to work around it or weaken it they will simply reduce the confidence associated with US patents



  28. Abstract Patents (Things One Can Do With Pen and Paper, Sometimes an Abacus) Are a Waste of Money as Courts Disregard Them

    A quick roundup of patents and lawsuits at the heart of which there's little or no substance; 35 U.S.C. § 101 renders these moot



  29. “Blockchain” Hype and “FinTech”-Like Buzzwords Usher in Software Patents Everywhere, Even Where Such Patents Are Obviously Bunk

    Not only the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) embraces the "blockchain" hype; business methods and algorithms are being granted patent 'protection' (exclusivity) which would likely be disputed by the courts (if that ever reaches the courts)



  30. Qualcomm's Patent Aggression Threatens Rationality of Patent Scope in Europe and Elsewhere

    Qualcomm's dependence on patent taxes (so-called 'royalties' associated with physical devices which it doesn't even make) highlights the dangers now known; the patent thicket has grown too "thick"


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts