EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.14.18

Max Planck Institute Pours More Water on the Dying Unitary Patent (UPC)

Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:38 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Max Planck Institute

Summary: The Max Planck Institute gives another sobering reality check for Team UPC to chew on; there’s still no sign of any progress whatsoever for the UPC because even Team UPC appears to have given up and moved on

THE EPO does not need the UPC and certainly does not want it. The management of the EPO, i.e. Team Battistelli, wants the UPC and has plenty to gain from it, including an excuse to shut down the Boards (or at least making them highly irrelevant, marginal).

“The management of the EPO, i.e. Team Battistelli, wants the UPC and has plenty to gain from it, including an excuse to shut down the Boards (or at least making them highly irrelevant, marginal).”When we refer to the UPC we refer to a dubious court system wherein the accused can be subjected to judgments in a foreign language, issued overseas by judges whose reappointments depend on a subjective measure of ‘performance’. The French head/chief of UPC (this position was promised to France) is possibly Battistelli, who allegedly quite arrogantly assumes he can return to being ‘king’ (of a court this time around) with all the powers ‘reserved’ just for him. It’s for France to benefit from, as usual. Do not forget that António Campinos is also French and the ‘French’ (Forbes France is actually US-controlled) media wrote about him yesterday evening (“Pourquoi La France Doit Rester Présente Dans La Gouvernance Des Brevets Européens”). As we pointed out less than a day ago, Forbes is a patent maximalists’ think tank.

What about think tanks that aren’t beholden/controlled by billionaires? Well, the Germans often take pride in the Max Planck Institute, among few other institutions. And guess what the Max Planck Institute has to say about UPC…

“The French head/chief of UPC (this position was promised to France) is possibly Battistelli, who allegedly quite arrogantly assumes he can return to being ‘king’ (of a court this time around) with all the powers ‘reserved’ just for him.”Florian Müller and Benjamin Henrion point to Team UPC’s Thomas Adam, who himself admitted this problem in a series of three tweets: “From Max Planck Institute for IP : „[...] unitary patent protection cannot be dissociated from the general legal order of the EU’s Internal Market & extended to the UK once it has left the Union. Any such extension is incompatible with the autonomous [] character of EU law and its institutions, will result in a legally split unity for separate and separately regulated markets, and conflict with both the UK’s and the EU’s public interests in defining and implementing a patent policy of their own. [] Since the core objective of the UPC Agrmt is to establish for the adjudication of UP protection a common court of EU Member States that, as such, forms part of the judicial system of the EU, continued participation in the UPC Agrmt of the UK post Brexit _will not be possible_.“”

Benjamin Henrion supplied the direct PDF link [PDF], getting past the paywall.

Perpetuating the two lies of Team UPC (in the UK), the UK-based Patrick Wingrove from a UK-based UPC advocacy site wrote about it last night:

An association of German research institutes has concluded in a paper that extending unitary patent protection to the UK post-Brexit through an international convention would create a “fictitious unity” that is incompatible with EU law

An association of German research institutes concluded in a paper published this week that the UK remaining in the UPC system after Brexit would be incompatible with EU law.

Well, UPC is dead, but Team UPC’s propaganda sites (with track record at that) try hard to keep it afloat in headlines. The key takeaway here is that UPC is only open to EU members and if Britain leaves the Union, then the whole UPC cannot have dependencies in it (as it does) relating to the UK. If the UPC was to be altered (redone), it would open up the possibility of countries like Turkey and some north African nations participating also, necessitating their ratifications as well. Tricky and time-consuming, no?

“The key takeaway here is that UPC is only open to EU members and if Britain leaves the Union, then the whole UPC cannot have dependencies in it (as it does) relating to the UK.”From what I’ve read, Turkey’s patent system is a corrupt thing plagued with nepotism and government favouritism. It’s hard to see why anyone other than a Turkish firm or a Turk would apply for patents there, but days ago there was shameless self-promotional marketing by Fatih Yalinbaş (Nazali) in Mondaq, published under the headline “Reasons For Making First Application In Turkey” (if it sounds like an advertisement, it may be because it really is).

Turkey is not an EU member. If Brexiters get their way, the UK won’t be either. This means that the UPC goes nowhere and the three Frenchmen (below) remain hopeless, having spent a lot of effort pushing the UPC for many years (self interest, not Europe’s interest).

The three Frenchmen

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Appalling Patent Quality at the European Patent Office, More Lies About the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and Assault on Those Who Warned About It All Along

    The EPO's management prioritises the litigation 'industry' and promotes its interests at the expense of those of science, technology, health and so on; in the meantime it also attacks scientists whom it employs or employed as examiners while severely harming their health



  2. Germany Likes EPO in Munich, Litigation Factory in Düsseldorf and Mannheim (Like Eastern District of Texas)

    The architectural design of Germany as Europe's patents capital, with billions of euros flowing into the pockets of German law firms, more so with a defunct and unjust Unitary Patent (UPC), which is unconstitutional



  3. Links 19/11/2018: Linux 4.20 RC3, New Fedora ISO, GNU OrgaDoc 1.0

    Links for the day



  4. A Fresh Look at Recent 35 U.S.C. § 101 Cases Reveals Rapid Demise of Software Patents Even in District (Lower) Courts

    Contrary to narratives that are being spread by the patents and litigation 'industry', there's anything but a resurgence of patents on algorithms; in the United States they're almost always rejected by courts at all levels



  5. All the Usual Suspects Are Still Working Hard to Harm the Legitimacy if Not Existence of Patent Quality Control

    With David Ruschke out of his role and other former judges leaving the Office one wonders if the new Office leadership is just scheming to hide a decline in patent quality by simply removing quality assessors



  6. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Must Be Based on Justice, Not Profits

    With obviousness grounds, prior art and tests for how abstract ideas may be, there's no excuse left for patent maximalism; will patent offices listen to courts or defy caselaw (in pursuits of fulfilling greed)?



  7. The European Patent Office is Attracting Patent Trolls

    Enforcement of software patents in Europe by the large patent troll (disguised as a pool) MPEG-LA means that European software developers cannot develop software with full multimedia support (not without sudden disruption to their peace)



  8. Patent Maximalists Are Still Upset at the US Supreme Court (Over Alice) and the US Patent Office Carries on As Usual

    In spite of the courts’ continued rejection of software patents — perfectly in line with what the high courts are saying — abstract ideas are still being covered by newly-granted patents



  9. Links 18/11/2018: Cucumber Linux 2.0 Alpha and Latest Outreachy

    Links for the day



  10. The European Patent Office Comes up With a Plethora of New Buzzwords by Which to Refer to Software Patents

    The permissive attitude towards software patents in Europe is harmful to software developers in Europe; the officials, who never wrote a computer program in their entire life, pretend this is not the case by adopting marketing techniques and surrogate terms



  11. Patent Maximalists in Europe Keep Mentioning China Even Though It Barely Matters to European Patents

    EPO waves a "white flag" in the face of China even though Chinese patents do not matter much to Europe (except when the goal is to encourage low patent quality, attracting humongous patent trolls)



  12. Team UPC Has Been Reduced to Lies, Lies, and More Lies about the Unified Patent Court Agreement

    With the Unified Patent Court Agreement pretty much dead on arrival (an arrival that is never reached, either) the UPC hopefuls -- those looking to profit from lots of frivolous patent litigation in Europe -- resort to bald-faced lying



  13. Links 17/11/2018: Mesa 18.3 RC3, Total War: WARHAMMER II, GNOME 3.31.2

    Links for the day



  14. Links 16/11/2018: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Beta, Mesa 18.2.5, VirtualBox 6.0 Beta 2

    Links for the day



  15. Berkheimer or No Berkheimer, Software Patents Remain Mostly Unenforceable in the United States and the Supreme Court is Fine With That

    35 U.S.C. § 101, which is based on cases like Alice and Mayo, offers the 'perfect storm' against software patents; it doesn't look like any of that will change any time soon (if ever)



  16. Ignoring and Bashing Courts: Is This the Future of Patent Offices in the West?

    Andrei Iancu, who is trying to water down 35 U.S.C. § 101 while Trump ‘waters down’ SCOTUS (which delivered Alice), isn’t alone; António Campinos, the new President of the EPO, is constantly promoting software patents (which European courts reject, citing the EPC) and even Australia’s litigation ‘industry’ is dissenting against Australian courts that stubbornly reject software patents



  17. Patent Maximalists Are Still Trying to Figure Out How to Stop PTAB or Prevent US Patent Quality From Ever Improving

    Improvements are being made to US patents because of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), which amends/culls/pro-actively rejects (at application phases) bad patents; but the likes of Andrei Iancu cannot stand that because they're patent maximalists, who personally gain from an over-saturation of patents



  18. Links 15/11/2018: Zentyal 6.0, Deepin 15.8, Thunderbird Project Hiring

    Links for the day



  19. A Question of Debt: António Campinos, Lexology, Law Gazette, and Sam Gyimah

    Ineptitude in the media which dominates if not monopolises UPC coverage means that laws detrimental to everyone but patent lawyers are nowadays being pushed even by ministers (not just those whose clandestine vote is used/bought to steal democracy overnight)



  20. Science Minister Sam Gyimah and the EPO Are Eager to Attack Science by Bringing Patent Trolls to Europe/European Union and the United Kingdom

    Team UPC has managed to indoctrinate or hijack key positions, causing those whose job is to promote science to actually promote patent trolls and litigation (suppressing science rather than advancing it)



  21. USF Revisits EPO Abuses, Highlighting an Urgent Need for Action

    “Staff Representation Disciplinary Cases” — a message circulated at the end of last week — reveals the persistence of union-busting agenda and injustice at the EPO



  22. Links 14/11/2018: KDevelop 5.3, Omarine 5.3, Canonical Not for Sale

    Links for the day



  23. Second Day of EPOPIC: Yet More Promotion of Software Patents in Europe in Defiance of Courts, EPC, Parliament and Common Sense

    Using bogus interpretations of the EPC — ones that courts have repeatedly rejected — the EPO continues to grant bogus/fake/bunk patents on abstract ideas, then justifies that practice (when the audience comes from the litigation ‘industry’)



  24. Allegations That António Campinos 'Bought' His Presidency and is Still Paying for it

    Rumours persist that after Battistelli had rigged the election in favour of his compatriot nefarious things related to that were still visible



  25. WIPO Corruption and Coverup Mirror EPO Tactics

    Suppression of staff representatives and whistleblowers carries on at WIPO and the EPO; people who speak out about abuses are themselves being treated like abusers



  26. Links 13/11/2018: HPC Domination (Top 500 All GNU/Linux) and OpenStack News

    Links for the day



  27. The USPTO and EPO Pretend to Care About Patent Quality by Mingling With the Terms “Patent” and “Quality”

    The whole "patent quality" propaganda from EPO and USPTO management continues unabated; they strive to maintain the fiction that quality rather than money is their prime motivator



  28. Yannis Skulikaris Promotes Software Patents at EPOPIC, Defending the Questionable Practice Under António Campinos

    The reckless advocacy for abstract patents on mere algorithms from a new and less familiar face; the EPO is definitely eager to grant software patents and it explains to stakeholders how to do it



  29. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is Working for Patent Trolls and Patent Maximalists

    The patent trolls' propagandists are joining forces and pushing for a patent system that is hostile to science, technology, and innovation in general (so as to enable a bunch of aggressive law firms to tax everybody)



  30. Team UPC, Fronting for Patent Trolls From the US, is Calling Facts “Resistance”

    The tactics of Team UPC have gotten so tastelessly bad and its motivation so shallow (extortion in Europe) that one begins to wonder why these people are willing to tarnish everything that's left of their reputation


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts