Bonum Certa Men Certa

Lots of UPC Noise/News This Week Over a Document Which Merely Weakens Commitment to the UPC

A loud noise



Summary: Lost in the noise created by Team UPC this week is the simple fact that the British government now admits it's willing to abandon all Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement (UPCA) plans

AS we noted earlier this week, the EPO no longer mentions the UPC; neither does IP Kat, which used to do so regularly. The latest emergence of this topic, however, was due to a paper on "no deal Brexit" -- a subject explored by IP Kat's Rosie Burbidge yesterday, in blog posts titled "what does it mean for registered Community designs and trade marks", "what does it mean for exhaustion of rights?" and what will happen to patents - particularly SPCs and the UPC?"

"As we know, the UPC depends on German ratification," she wrote in that last part. "This may not happen before 29 March 2019 (or possibly, at all)."

This is not the sole barrier at all. The UPC(A) faces a lot more than one barrier, yet sites that made it their objective to promote (advocacy) UPC carry on with their usual spiel, trying to trivialise the severity of this. Patrick Wingrove, writing for the patent microcosm in the UK, wrote: "In-house and private practice lawyers discussed artificial intelligence, evolving business models, UK UPC compatibility and the proposed SPC waiver at the European Patent Forum in Munich" ("artificial intelligence" just means software patents in Europe and UPC is how they hope to make courts 'swallow' such bogus, abstract patents).

Watch what Kluwer (maybe Bristows) wrote around midnight (just an hour before) on Monday. It's a blog post which says:

The UK Government issued guidance today on patent issues to allow businesses and citizens to understand what to do in a ‘no Brexit deal’ scenario.

The so-called Technical Notice includes information about the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court, and explains that it is unclear whether the UP system will start before the Brexit date of 29 March 2019, ’with the start date being dependent on ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement by Germany’.


SUEPO has linked to that since. There are no comments.

Well, maybe they missed the 'memo', but there's no UPC for the UK to actually "exit" as the Unitary Patent is dead. Opposition to it has only grown (e.g. in Hungary and Poland).

Looking at other media sites around yesterday, here's another example. This new article promotes the lie that "small businesses" are hurt the most; the same lies Team UPC fancies pushing...

There were more articles about it this week (e.g. [1, 2]), but virtually all of these were composed by law firms rather than actual journalists. It's just marketing; self-promotional 'analyses'...

Graham Burnett-Hall and Tom Taylor of Marks & Clerk (Team UPC) spoke of the challenge in Germany as follows:

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is not yet established and is dependent on ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement by Germany (which itself is dependent on the outcome of an ongoing constitutional challenge). It is currently unknown whether the UPC will be operational before Brexit day, i.e. 29 March 2019. Even in a ‘no deal’ situation, the UK is committed to exploring whether it will be possible to participate in the UPC and unitary patent system. It is worth noting that the UK ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement in April of this year, i.e. after having started with EU withdrawal process, which indicates that continued participation in the UPC is considered by the UK government to be politically acceptable, notwithstanding the fact that the UPC is required to apply relevant EU law in its decisions. If the UK is prevented from being involved with the UPC and unitary patent then patent protection and enforcement in the UK will continue just as it does now.


Well, the UPC is in very bad shape. UPCA is DOA by now. World Intellectual Property Review thought of no better way to cover this than to say "Lawyers concerned by no-deal Brexit guidance on IP exhaustion" (that's the headline: "Lawyers concerned"; because who cares about what actual people and companies that really create something feel or think).

The UPC does not exist, for obvious reasons, and it will never materialise anyway, so headlines like this one also do don't help. But the summary is clear however: "New guidance from UK government shows a change of heart on unified patent court under a 'no-deal' scenario."

Yes, the government now openly admits that it might altogether abandon the UPC. And that's the real news. This whole thing is actually a blow to Team UPC.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Techrights' Statement on Code of Censorship (CoC) and Kent Overstreet: This Was the Real Purpose of Censorship Agreements All Along
Bombing people is OK (if you sponsor the key organisations), opposing bombings is not (a CoC in a nutshell)
[Meme] The Most Liberal Company
"Insurrection? What insurrection?"
apple.com Traffic Down Over 7%, Says One Spyware Firm; Apple's Liabilities Increased Over 6% to $308,030,000,000
Apple is also about 120 billion dollars in debt
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 23, 2024
IRC logs for Saturday, November 23, 2024
[Meme] GAFAMfox
Mozilla Firefox in a state of extreme distress
Google Can Kill Mozilla Any Time It Wants
That gives Google far too much power over its rival... There are already many sites that refuse to work with Firefox or explicitly say Firefox isn't supported
Free (as in Freedom) Software Helps Tackle the Software Liability Issue, It Lets Users Exercise Greater Control Over Programs
Microsofters have been trying to ban or exclude Free software
In the US, Patent Laws Are Up for Sale
This problem is a lot bigger than just patents
ESET Finds Rootkits, Does Not Explain How They Get Installed, Media Says It Means "Previously Unknown Linux Backdoors" (Useful Distraction From CALEA and CALEA2)
FUD watch
Techdirt Loses Its Objectivity in Pursuit of Money
The more concerning aspects are coverage of GAFAM and Microsoft in particular
Links 23/11/2024: Press Sold to Vultures, New LLM Blunders
Links for the day
Links 23/11/2024: "Relationship with Oneself" and Yretek.com is Back
Links for the day
Links 23/11/2024: "Real World" Cracked and UK Online Safety Act is Law
Links for the day
Links 23/11/2024: Celebrating Proprietary Bluesky (False Choice, Same Issues) and Software Patents Squashed
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, November 22, 2024
IRC logs for Friday, November 22, 2024
Gemini Links 23/11/2024: 150 Day Streak in Duolingo and ICBMs
Links for the day
Links 22/11/2024: Dynamic Pricing Practice and Monopoly Abuses
Links for the day
Topics We Lacked Time to Cover
Due to a Microsoft event (an annual malware fest for lobbying and marketing purposes) there was also a lot of Microsoft propaganda
Microsofters Try to Defund the Free Software Foundation (by Attacking Its Founder This Week) and They Tell People to Instead Give Money to Microsoft Front Groups
Microsoft people try to outspend their critics and harass them
[Meme] EPO for the Kids' Future (or Lack of It)
Patents can last two decades and grow with (or catch up with) the kids
EPO Education: Workers Resort to Legal Actions (Many Cases) Against the Administration
At the moment the casualties of EPO corruption include the EPO's own staff
Gemini Links 22/11/2024: ChromeOS, Search Engines, Regular Expressions
Links for the day
This Month is the 11th Month of This Year With Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (So Far It's Happening Every Month This Year, More Announced Hours Ago)
Now they even admit it
Links 22/11/2024: Software Patents Squashed, Russia Starts Using ICBMs
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, November 21, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, November 21, 2024