EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.22.18

Thanksgiving EPO Roundup: UPC Lies, Software Patents Considered Harmful and SUEPO Condemns Union-Busting Activities (Which Carry on Under António Campinos)

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 7:58 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Minnoye MAGA

Summary: The latest EPO news, including the habitual lies about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) courtesy of those looking to increase litigation rates

TODAY is a relatively calm day (Thanksgiving in the United States), but that does not mean that EPO scandals can be ignored. There are some bits — not necessarily news — that need highlighting today.

First of all, Bristows LLP has just woken up. It wrote a UPC blog post for the first time in several months (they used to write several times per week). It was published at least 4 times throughout the day (different revisions due to their lousy CMS). As usual, Bristows (Gregory Bacon in this case) is maintaining the illusion, lie and fiction that the UPC is about to happen. But no ‘unitary’ patents exist and UPC is basically dead; even Team UPC nearly quit mentioning that (it’s hard to find mentions of it any longer and EPO management almost never utters those words). The final words from Bristows: “The Italian Ministry of Justice announced in 2016 that a local division of the UPC will be in Milan (in an existing court building at via San Barnaba 50).”

Will? Would? In 2016 or thereabouts Bristows also advertised UPC jobs in the UK — jobs that never existed and will never exist. Is that not against the law?

But it wasn’t just Bristows; “Not to be confused with the much delayed Unitary Patent,” Novagraaf wrote some hours ago as if the UPC is “delayed” rather than dead. This help perpetuate those infamous old lies about inevitability. They belittle the court and show disdain for justice.

Speaking of disdain for justice, how about the EPO granting software patents in Europe in defiance of courts, Parliament and the EPC?

The EPO resumed advocacy of this abomination earlier today (as it does every day). By “emerging technologies” the EPO nowadays means abstract software patents (described using much-hyped words and acronyms). The referenced page is all about “AI” and other such buzzwords.

“One easy solution is to outright forbid patents on software,” Benjamin Henrion noted today, citing and quoting Jonathan Rosenberg’s new article titled “Software Patents Considered Harmful” (in Medium).

It’s quite long and here are the opening words:

Friends and relatives who are not in the technology industry always ask me if I’ve ever gotten a patent. For them, a patent has this sheen of accomplishment. They believe it means you invented something, that you are an innovator, that you’ve done something no one has done before. I give a little chuckle, tell them that yes, I have a few patents (I actually have 90 issued U.S. patents), but that it’s not really a big deal, and thank you for asking. In reality, I’m being polite. I don’t want to burst their bubble, nor do I want to launch into a long tirade. Because, the reality is, that patents — and in particular — software patents — are a plague upon the industry. They hamper innovation. They cost companies millions and millions of dollars in frivolous law suits. They waste time and energy from people who just want to build products. They are anathema to the Internet. Software patents are harmful.

Software patents have three key characteristics which have resulted in their harmfulness. They are vague in terms of what is actually invented. They can be passed along as property. You can sue for infringement without making the product to which the patent applies. Lets cover each in turn.

Software patents may be the subject we’ll focus on this weekend in relation to the American system.

Last but not least, Märpel wrote at around 8PM on Thanksgiving, just to share the following item from Tuesday:

RESOLUTION

SUEPO members in Munich, gathered in a General Assembly, note that:
- The President, Mr Campinos has decided to face Elizabeth Hardon, former Chairman of SUEPO Munich and Chair of the Local Staff Committee Munich, with a new disciplinary committee instigated by the same old Administration which is still in place, and apparently with the same old charges.
- The Tribunal has already castigated the Administration’s behaviour in the cases of Ion Brumme (Judgment 4043) and Malika Weaver (Judgment 4042).
- The President did not take into account the instructions contained in the Resolution CA/26/16 dated 16 March 2016 to inform the Administrative Council of any new disciplinary proceedings concerning a staff representative and to consider the possibility of involvement of an external reviewer for arbitration or mediation.

Further noting that:
- Laurent Prunier, as Secretary of SUEPO The Hague and member of the Central Staff Committee, was dismissed for extraneous motives, similarly to Elizabeth, Malika and Ion.
- Staff representatives face difficulties accommodating their workload in the Appeals Committee with the workload in their other duties, mostly patent examination. Judgments 3971 and 4050 made public these difficulties, resulting in disciplinary measures against Aurélien Pétiaud and Michael Lund, which the Tribunal considered “within the range of acceptability” or “not to be disproportionate”. It is now absolutely clear that those disciplinary measures were politically motivated as part of an intimidation campaign against staff representatives.

Expresses its disappointment about the continuation of the attacks initiated by former President, Mr Battistelli.
Expresses its deep concern that the President’s decision will prevent the restoration of social dialogue and further damage the reputation of the Office.

Urges the President:
- to drop the charges raised against Elizabeth Hardon,
- to reinstate Laurent Prunier in full,
- to provide reparation of the torts inflicted on Aurélien Pétiaud and Michael Lund

Munich, Tuesday 20 November

Union-busting activities have arguably exacerbated under António Campinos, who seemingly uses Bergot as his main attack dog. Less than a week ago SUEPO removed a sort of blog post that it had published a day earlier even though Bergot’s name was removed from the cited page. Nobody could ever explain to us whether this removal was due to another threat like the one in summer or in March (we wrote about that several times back then, even in February).

Update: SUEPO resolution voted by the SUEPO General Assembly held in Munich on Tuesday 20.11.2018 (with slight grammar-related edits)

Pressure is increasing on Campinos. The situation at EPO remains utterly negative: Campinos, who was said to be nominated by the Administrative Council because of his alleged proven record of good performance in the field of social partnership at Alicante, has done absolutely nothing concrete since his arrival last July, to redress the situation of the abusively sanctioned staff representatives all union officials (e.g. whilst solving the pending cases and redressing the past ones).

In reality he is protecting Elodie Bergot who as principal director HR at EPO is personally responsible for the social mess of the past five years. Bergot was behind the abusive sanctioning of all staff representatives and SUEPO officials and will do her best to torpedo “amicable settlements” she hates more than anything else.

Campinos is thus not acting bona fide when he on the one hand, claims to EPO staff he wishes to foster “amicable settlements” over litigations, but on the other hand since months, does nothing concretely to find solutions to the few pending cases of abusive sanctions which destroyed the life of those impacted.

The next step should thus be to involve the Administrative Council and the EU Institutions in Brussels to inform them that nothing has changed at the EPO and how within a few months, Mr Campinos seems to develop into a “mini Battistelli”, apparently happy to finish the work of his mentor.

Campinos’ lack of action is not going to improve the deteriorated reputation of the EPO as an employer as long as Rule of Law and the respect for the Duty of Care owed to all EPO staff are not re-established and seen to be re-established.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Red Hat's Freedom Reduced to Just Online Partner Enablement Network (OPEN) and Microsoft as a Close Partner; Canonical's Ubuntu Just an 'App' for Windows?

    Free software is being snapped up by proprietary software giants and patent bullies that treat it as little more than an 'add-on' for their proprietary offerings



  2. Linux Foundation Apparently Celebrates Sysadmin Day With a Microsoft Windows Site!

    The Linux Foundation shows ‘love’ to actual GNU/Linux (the real thing) by apparently rejecting it and badmouthing it



  3. EPO Looney Tunes – Part 3: The Legal Line-up for G 2/19

    The deck appears to have already been stacked for G 2/19, a decision on EPO judges' exile to Haar (veiled disciplinary action/collective punishment by those whom the judges are supposed to 'oversee')



  4. Links 17/7/2019: VirtualBox 6.0.10 and Mageia 7.1 Releases, Mint Betas

    Links for the day



  5. Links 16/7/2019: Btrfs Gets 'Cleaned Up', Clonezilla Live 2.6.2-15

    Links for the day



  6. EPO Looney Tunes - Part 2: The “Difficult Legacy” and Its Dark Historical Shadow

    Assuming that he was informed, then it seems fair to say that Battistell’s little “joke” at the expense of the Boards was in very bad taste



  7. EPO Noise Machine Turned On as Haar Hearing Kicks Off, Patrick Corcoran Defamed Again

    The EPO does not want people to hear about Haar; it just wants people to hear about how wonderful the EPO is and there are some who have just decided to slander Patrick Corcoran again



  8. Microsoft is 'Doing Kamikaze' (神風) on Linux

    An analogy for what the Linux (only in name!) Foundation and Microsoft mean to Linux — or by extension to GNU/Linux and Free software whose largest repository Microsoft took control of



  9. The 'New' Linux.com Sometimes Feels Like a Microsoft Promotion Site

    Anything that the ‘Linux’ Foundation touches seems to turn into its proprietors’ agenda; one of those proprietors is Microsoft, which has a "Jihad" against Linux



  10. IBM is a Threat to the Internet, Not Just to Software Development (Due to Software Patents Aggression)

    IBM continues its aggression against technology — a fact that’s even more distressing now that IBM calls the shots at Red Hat



  11. EPO Looney Tunes - Part 1: Is D-Day Approaching for Battistelli’s “Difficult Legacy”?

    European patent justice isn’t working within the premises of EPOnia; a bunch of ‘show trials’ may in fact turn out to be just that — a show



  12. Links 16/7/2019: LXD 3.15, Q4OS 3.8 and D9VK 0.13f

    Links for the day



  13. Links 15/7/2019: Vulkan 1.1.115 and Facebook Openwashing

    Links for the day



  14. Microsoft Office 360 Banned

    OpenDocument Format (ODF, a real standard everyone can implement) and Free/libre software should be taught in schools; it's not supposed to be just a matter of privacy



  15. Microsoft, in Its Own Words...

    Sociopathy, incompetence and intolerance of the rule of law, as demonstrated by Microsoft's top managers



  16. Microsoft's WSL is Designed to Weaken GNU/Linux (on the Desktop/Laptop) and Strengthen Vista 10

    What Microsoft does to GNU/Linux on the desktop (and/or laptop) bears much resemblance to what Microsoft did to Java a couple of decades ago



  17. Links 14/7/2019: Linux 5.2.1, Unreal Engine 4.23 Preview, Linux Mint 19.2 Beta

    Links for the day



  18. 25,500 Blog Posts and Pages

    With our thirteenth anniversary just a few months away we're at a pace of about 2,000 posts per year



  19. With WSL Microsoft is Doing to GNU/Linux What It Did to Netscape

    Embrace, extend, extinguish. Some things never really change even if they become an old and repetitive accusation.



  20. Allowing Bad Guests to Become the Hosts

    Why the so-called 'Linux Foundation', a nonprofit that acts more like a PAC controlled by proprietary software companies and people who don't even use Linux, is increasingly becoming a Linux-hostile front group



  21. Honesty and Collaboration Make Free Software Stronger, Microsoft is Inherently a Misfit

    In spite of all the lies Microsoft and its Web sites spew out on a daily basis, nothing has really changed and Microsoft is still attacking Software Freedom (mostly from the inside nowadays, helped by FUD proxies such as WhiteSource and Snyk)



  22. Patent Certainty Waning, But That's Still OK for Patent Trolls

    Patent maximalism remains a threat to everyone but patent lawyers (and patent office chiefs who measure their own performance only by the number of patents granted); best served are the patent trolls who extrajudicially attack already-impoverished parties behind closed doors



  23. GitHub is Microsoft's Proprietary Software and Centralised (Monopoly) Platform, But When Canonical's Account There Gets Compromised Suddenly It's Ubuntu's Fault?

    Typical media distortions and signs that Microsoft already uses GitHub for censorship of Free/Open Source software that does not fit Microsoft's interests



  24. Canonical is Turning Ubuntu Into a More Proprietary Deviant of GNU/Linux

    Ubuntu is becoming more 'Ubinary'; binaries without their source code available are packed up and cooked up for (or baked into) the ISO; this may be good for widespread adoption, but it's not an advancement of freedom, a capitulation rather



  25. Links 13/7/2019: Librem 5 July Update, Project Trident 19.07, KDE Frameworks 5.60.0

    Links for the day



  26. The Problem Isn't Women or Minorities in Free Software But Particular Corporations That Exploit or Steer or Hijack Their Agenda

    If technical issues are being disguised using colours and genders (among other things), then it's important to highlight who's behind it (what company/ies) rather than fling back insults at people because it makes things worse



  27. There's No Such Thing as Cloud Computing, Serverless and All That Other Nonsense

    Buzzwords. Confronted.



  28. Linux is Doing 'Well' Only for Those Who Dislike Software Freedom and Love Control Over Users

    Linux, the kernel, has become a corporate playground or a sandbox that's used to upsell proprietary software, including surveillance; freedom in Linux is gradually being diminished if not completely obliterated and it does not worry the foundations entrusted to guard against it



  29. Consultation About Direction and Future Focus for Techrights

    We invite ideas and recommendations for the future of the site, notably which topics and aspects are worth covering as a matter of higher priority



  30. European Media Continues to Ignore the EPO Crisis While Law Firms and EPO Management Cover Things Up

    The EPO crisis silently deepens because serious problems are lied about, not acknowledged, and the legitimacy of European Patents is greatly diminished, not to mention the EPO's ability to attract talent


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts