01.30.19

People Are Dying Because of Low Quality of (Wrongly-Granted) European Patents

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

While the media and so-called ‘IP’ blogs look the other way

Science|BusinessSummary: EPO puff pieces and shallow coverage help distract from the crisis of patent quality in Europe — a crisis that now culminates in real threats to women with breast cancer

ASK anyone at the European Patent Office (EPO) and they’ll tell you that quality of patents isn’t what it used to be. Everyone knows it, even the management. Some people are in the job of publicly denying this (not privately) and many are afraid to openly speak about it. Stakeholders, notably law firms, have already complained although they too have something to lose (clients walking away from them, i.e. fewer patent applicants). SUEPO is being threatened if it dares bring up the subject (we’ve given examples). This is hardly surprising given the rushed pace of work and internal leaks from a couple of years ago.

“This is hardly surprising given the rushed pace of work and internal leaks from a couple of years ago.”Patents are not a game; economies and lives are at stake. It’s not a ‘sport’ and it’s not ‘showbiz’.

Yesterday the EPO retweeted this nonsense which says: “From 2011-2017, European #patent applications for #AutomatedDriving technologies increased fourfold, according to the latest data from the European Patent Office ( @EPOorg).”

They’re merely reclassifying old things for hype waves (e.g. calling algorithms “AI”, even retroactively) and granting fake patents (patent which courts would reject) that are abstract. Science Business, based on what it published earlier this week, is still in the business of writing propaganda/puff pieces for the EPO [1, 2] in order to help software patents agenda in Europe. This is what it has just published:

From 2011 to 2017, European patent applications for automated driving technologies increased fourfold, according to the latest data from the European Patent Office (EPO). This is by far the largest increase in the number of patents, with EPO reporting a 16 per cent increase across all technologies in the same period.

Half of the top 25 companies active in the field of automated driving at the EPO are not traditional automotive companies, including the top four applicants, Samsung, Intel, Qualcomm and LG.

These are patents on things like computer vision, my research discipline, which boils down to implementing mathematics (e.g. geometry) on a computer. Not many of these have anything physical to show. Nothing.

“These are patents on things like computer vision, my research discipline, which boils down to implementing mathematics (e.g. geometry) on a computer.”But wait. It gets worse.

Having previously covered the EPO’s threat to patients with cancer [1, 2], we were interested to see yesterday’s post from IP Kat. Embargoes are being initiated using patents — questionable patents that will kill poorer women with cancer. The mortal damage and great suffering (in the process) caused by dubious European Patents that should never have been granted in the first place isn’t a subject that IP Kat covers. Heck, today IP Kat never even mentions the patent quality problem and the EPO corruption that kills people, sometimes literally. IP Kat has at least given up on UPC jingoism, seeing that it was a lost cause anyway. Here is what IP Kat wrote yesterday:

The English Patents Court recently handed down a decision granting Novartis a preliminary injunction to prevent infringement of its second medical use patent protecting sales of its breast cancer drug everolimus (marketed as Afinitor) – Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited v Dr Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) Limited [2019] EWHC 92 (Pat). Dr Reddy’s opposed the injunction on the basis that the patent in issue is invalid on the basis of added matter but did not otherwise dispute infringement.

What is interesting about the decision is that the High Court reached a “provisional but clear” view at the interim hearing that there is no added matter in claim 1 of the patent. This differs from the EPO’s decision of September 2018 in opposition proceedings, where the patent was found to be invalid for added matter under Art 123(2) EPC (see EPO decision here). The EPO decision is currently under appeal.

[...]

What happened in the EPO opposition proceedings? The EPO applied the principle that selecting items from two lists means that a claim may contravene Article 123(2). This is expressed in the European Patent Office’s case-law textbook in its current edition – see paragraph 1.4.2 of section II.E.1 Article 123(2) EPC). It reached the conclusion that there is no specific pointer to the specific combination therapy claimed (further detail can be found from paragraph 3.2 of the EPO’s decision).

[...]

The judge, Birss J., also proposed writing to the EPO to notify it of the UK infringement proceedings and to request expedition of the EPO appeal. He noted that Dr Reddys are not prevented from raising additional arguments on validity at the UK trial.

Are courts rushing to mob ‘justice’ here? Before the legitimacy of the patent/s in question is even known? That’s what the US ITC did after the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) had rejected a Cisco patent, following an inter partes review (IPR). Do we want an embargo-centric trigger-happy system, such as what Team UPC envisions and lobbies for (on behalf of companies like Novartis, which make a killing out of cancer)?

“Miracles and justice are mutually exclusive. We need justice, not “miracles”.”At the moment, Team UPC hopes that its corruption will yield something, bypassing national courts and handing more power over to an EPO-connected bureaucracy. “Miracle needed,” Heuking Patent Law Team wrote on Twitter yesterday. To quote: “Only 2 months until #Brexit . Agreement regarding the European #UnifiedPatentCourt not in force yet. No decision of the German Constitutional Court on the related complaints yet. No brexit deal. Ongoing debate in the House of Commons. Miracle needed.”

Miracles and justice are mutually exclusive. We need justice, not “miracles”.

“As if there’s no other EPO scandal — a real one — to be covering. IP Kat has instead been covering up, e.g. by deleting all comments about António Campinos and not mentioning him since.”As we explained some weeks ago, the 'Kats' have become part of the problem; they’re not writing about the UPC’s demise and EPO corruption anyway (does not suit their agenda). These Kats’ blog deals with non-scandals, such as the EPO’s drawing requirements — a shallow post that attracted this IP Kat comment: “The Korean Patent Office accepts colour photographs. These could present problems in getting legible drawings for EP filings. In one case where the draftsmen we used had great difficulties, I got much better results using a basic image processing program that came with my ancient Windows 98 PC that could render continuous tone images as contours of different patterns.”

As if there’s no other EPO scandal — a real one — to be covering. IP Kat has instead been covering up, e.g. by deleting all comments about António Campinos and not mentioning him since. Censorship followed by self-censorship.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/1/2021: Krita 4.4.2 Released and JingOS Hype

    Links for the day



  2. Team UPC Keeps Pretending That UPCA Can Still be Resurrected (Even Without the UK, Which is Strictly a Requirement)

    The latest distortion of facts regarding the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Agreement (UPCA) as seen from the lens of people who seek to profit from such distortion



  3. 'Ethical Source' is Not Ethical and Not a Movement But a Misguided Self-Serving PR Stunt

    Something which is neither enforceable nor ethical is being promoted by profoundly unethical media in the pockets of large corporations



  4. InteLeaks – Part XXI: Intel Seeking Advice From a Bunch of Clowns (Harbor 'Research')

    A firm called Harbor 'Research' is making dubious recommendations to Intel; as shown in the above video, there's also an obsession with buzzwords (typically suggestive of a lack of technical grasp/understanding)



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, January 18, 2021



  6. The US Election Was Not Rigged, But the Nomination Process Was (Undermined to Maintain Control by Oligarchy)

    Cheating/driving the left out of the Democratic Party seems like a longstanding tradition and we know who stands to gain from it; moreover, problems remain in the voting process because it's controlled by secret code of companies like Microsoft (in spite of the openwashing)



  7. InteLeaks – Part XX: Redacted (for Names Only) Release of Intel File About Developer eXperience (DX) Meddling in GNU/Linux

    Today (or tonight) we release the first 'phase' of InteLeaks in a sensibly redacted form; coming up next is a surprise from Team Microsoft



  8. Sites in Bed With the EPO and UPC 'Covering' the 'News' Without Mentioning Any of the Overt Abuses

    It is rather sad that blogs like IP Kat have turned into proponents of abusive EPO management and Team UPC increasingly resorts to lying using pseudonyms (to avert criticism and accountability); much of the rebuttal or response that’s hinged on reality/facts can only be found in comments, which are still subjected to a face-saving moderation process (conducted by Team UPC)



  9. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part IV: Stories From the Depths of the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    To reduce or alleviate suspicions and a potential of mistrust the FSF needs to become more transparent and liberate information (such as the real reason Bradley Kuhn left, as noted in the previous part)



  10. Links 18/1/2021: GNU Radio 3.9, Wikipedia at 20

    Links for the day



  11. InteLeaks – Part XIX: Intel's Web 'Experts' Seen as Microsoft Champions Dealing With the Platform Microsoft is Looking to Destroy

    Things aren't rosy at Intel because the hires aren't suitable for the job of documenting and/or presenting GNU/Linux-centric products (whose target audience is Free software developers)



  12. Adding Images as Characters to the Daily Bulletins of Techrights

    Our daily bulletins now have inside them coarse graphics, depicted using characters alone, and the tool used to generate them announced a new release earlier today; we showcase some of its features (in a new video)



  13. Links 18/1/2021: Weekly Summaries and Linux 5.11 RC4

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 17, 2021



  15. The Oligarchs' Parties Will Never Choose the Side of Software Freedom Because Free Software Cannot Bribe Officials

    The tough reality is that next week's (or this coming week's, depending on what Sunday counts as) inauguration ceremony is partly symbolic as all the same and important issues remain largely untouched, for corporations control almost everything of significance



  16. COVID-19 Has Actually Helped Software Freedom Due to Financial and 'Spare Time' Factors

    Developers and users are increasingly exploring what the Free software world has to offer; this is actually measurable and it contradicts claims to the contrary



  17. Future Plans and Using Videos to Complement Text

    Remarks on recent and impending site changes; We are not replacing text with video, we're just trying to enhance the presentation a bit, especially where visuals help make a point or where browsing through Web sites (or leaks) is more suitable than static, linear presentation



  18. InteLeaks – Part XVIII: Intel Does Not Know How to Properly Do Research and It Seems Apparent Unscientific Methods Are Used to Justify Poor Documentation

    There appears to be a severe crisis at Intel; they cannot recruit scientists (or those whom they recruited are walking away) and as a result the company produces bad products with poor documentation (or highly defective chipsets that top-notch marketing cannot compensate for); in this video we walk through some examples of how studies are being conducted (as already noted in Part XVII)



  19. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part III: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Seems More Like a Victim of Destabilisation Campaigns

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF), which turns 36 later this year, is looking to raise money that helps support the GNU Project, soon 38 years old and likely the most important Free software project to exist (ever)



  20. Links 17/1/2021: EasyOS on Raspberry Pi and GNU libsigsegv 2.13

    Links for the day



  21. InteLeaks – Part XVII: The High Cost of Microsoft Windows Users in GNU/Linux Development Teams

    A look inside Intel explains what holds back the technical team, which bemoans the lesser technical people getting in the way and not even using the product that they are writing about



  22. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 16, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 16, 2021



  23. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part II: Why Bradley Kuhn Left the Free Software Foundation (FSF)

    The founder of the FSF is still at the FSF (albeit not publicly) and the person who lobbied to oust him has basically been 'banished' by the founder



  24. Links 16/1/2021: LibreOffice 7.1 Release Candidate, Zeroshell 3.9.5, FreeBSD Report, and GhostBSD 21.01.15

    Links for the day



  25. Free Speech on the Web Not Respected by Companies That Used to Support Software Freedom

    Mozilla does not have to make its Web browser about politics; it can just make an excellent piece of software that is neutral about the Web pages that it renders, based on the user's personal preferences



  26. Suppressed Facts of the Free Software Movement and Its Community of Volunteers – Part I: We Are Under Attack by Corporations and Their Salaried Facilitators

    The corporate takeover (taking over the Commons, produced by volunteers who are motivated by altruism) is a subject we must speak about and somehow tackle; this series will highlight uncomfortable or difficult truths



  27. InteLeaks – Part XVI: Intel Cannot Do Command Line, Even When It's Vastly Simpler and More Suitable for Development

    The Developer eXperience (DX) team at Intel seems to be full of Microsoft drones instead of developers and/or mildly technical people; this has not only harmed the quality of documentation but also upset staff, alienating people who actually understand what developers need (more than buzzwords like "DX")



  28. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, January 15, 2021



  29. Links 15/1/2021: KaOS 2021.01, Whisker Menu 2.5.2, Istio 1.8.2

    Links for the day



  30. InteLeaks – Part XV: Intel is Blind to Blind and Colour-Blind People

    Intel does not seem to grasp very basic concepts associated with accessibility; nevertheless, Intel shamelessly tries painting itself as "woke" and a "justice warrior" (policing speech while overlooking much-needed practical work)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts