EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.05.19

The EPO Technical/Enlarged Board of Appeal Would, Potentially (If It Enjoyed Actual Independence), Serve a ‘European Alice’ and Eliminate All/Most Software Patents in Europe

Posted in Courtroom, Europe, Law, Patents at 10:46 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Original/full (see the part about AMBA below): English [PDF] | German [PDF]

Boards of Appeal concern

Summary: For over half a decade the judges at the EPO have lacked the independence they need to appropriately govern patent scope; this is a very serious issue because it means that EPO corruption might in fact be the principal barrier in the face of software patents’ abolition

SEEING that the United States now deals (at the highest level) with copyright cases and no patent scope cases (fee shifting does not interest us much, but that can definitely imperil patent trolls), we will press on with our ever-increasing focus on the European Patent Office (EPO). It seems safe to say that nothing is going to change the status quo when it comes to software patents in the US, at least for the time being. Rather than delve into inter partes reviews (IPRs) and Federal Circuit cases (a few mentioned in our daily links this morning; US patent news has been relegated to this), patent maximalists obsess over Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) interactions with examiners regarding mere applications. Focus on what they distract from, not what they distract with. As always. Lies by omission are in law firms’ toolbox of the ‘trade’.

In Europe, unlike the US, software patents are still a major issue. The EPO advertises these every day, at the very least in Twitter (sometimes elsewhere, too). Florian Müller, who had campaigned against such patents a decade and a half ago in Europe, recently told me that he found these EPO tweets disturbing.

“In Europe, unlike the US, software patents are still a major issue. The EPO advertises these every day, at the very least in Twitter (sometimes elsewhere, too).”Team UPC and boosters of software patents in Europe (like Janal Kalis in another continent) took note of what could, in theory, become somewhat of a European Alice (35 U.S.C. § 101/SCOTUS), at least at the EPO level (not European courts, which António Campinos lacks control over). It would be very tricky for Campinos to simply ignore BoA, let alone smack some more judges in acts of overt retribution.

This is what “Patently German” (calling himself after patents) wrote a few days ago about the ‘simulation’ patent (actually a computer program):

The outcome of the referral has in my view implications far beyond simulation programs, for example also to inventions based on machine learning (ML). If you replace in the referral questions “simulation” by “machine learning process”, the same issues arise.

There can be no doubt: If the first two questions of the referral are not answered in the affirmative by the EBA, applicants of various types of computer-implemented inventions in Europe will be in trouble.

So even the software patents zealots acknowledge the importance of this referral, warning that a particular outcome could and would sweep away “various types of computer-implemented inventions [i.e. software patents] in Europe…”

“So even the software patents zealots acknowledge the importance of this referral…”I’ve come across only a few more posts/articles like the above. Certainly there are more on the way because of the possible ramifications. Coverage will, without a shadow of a doubt, be dominated by the patent microcosm. We wrote about it twice before [1, 2] (citing only the patent microcosm), noting in particular the judges’ lack of independence since the start of the term of Campinos. Even the judges admit this and bemoan this. Can they rule in defiance of patent maximalists without putting at jeopardy their job (or extension of tenure)? No, not as things stand. As “EPO Observer” put it a short while ago in this comment: “Haar has been chosen on purpose to remind the board members that they would pay the consequences of unwelcome decisions. So I expect the reminder to work and the members of the Enlarged Board to take the right (for the management decision) , confirming the lawfulness of the relocation to Haar.” Remember what happened to Judge Corcoran (hospitalisation). There are some more new comments of interest there. It’s all about the lack of the Boards’ independence and SUEPO linked to this earlier this week. The EPO has long been a dictaorship and one that violates its own rules.

The above speaks of the Enlarged Board of Appeal, but the same applies to the Technical Board of Appeal.

“If only European people were as active in their opposition to abstract patents as they are in opposition to the copyright ‘reform’ in the EU…”European software patents need to be buried once and for all, not just in the US but in Europe, too. If legal certainty associated with such patents gets obliterated (like in the post-Alice US), there will be no more lawsuits — or far fewer lawsuits — not to mention fewer such applications. Nobody really wants or needs patents that are duds. Even as ‘trophies’, these can be very expensive to earn and maintain. They’re hard to sell, too.

We certainly hope that the situation w.r.t. software patents in Europe might change some time soon. The sad thing is, programming gurus and habitual programmers don’t seem bothered enough to protest, let alone speak out. If only European people were as active in their opposition to abstract patents as they are in opposition to the copyright ‘reform’ in the EU — a subject Florian Müller has been covering a lot lately (with much impact)…

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 24/3/2019: Microsoft Does Not Change; Lots of FOSS Leftovers

    Links for the day



  2. Just Published: Irrational Ignorance at the Patent Office

    Iancu and his fellow Trump-appointed "swamp" at the USPTO are urged to consult academics rather than law firms in order to improve patent quality in the United States



  3. Microsoft Paid the Open Source Initiative. Now (a Year Later) Microsoft is in the Board of the Open Source Initiative.

    The progression of Microsoft entryism in FOSS-centric institutions (while buying key "assets" such as GitHub) isn't indicative of FOSS "winning" but of FOSS being infiltrated (to be undermined)



  4. Jim Zemlin's Linux Foundation Still Does Not Care About Linux Desktops

    We are saddened to see that the largest body associated with Linux (the kernel and more) is not really eager to see GNU/Linux success; it's mostly concerned about its bottom line (about $100,000,000 per annum)



  5. Links 23/3/2019: Falkon 3.1.0 and Tails 3.13.1

    Links for the day



  6. The Unified Patent Court is Dead, But Doubts Remain Over the EPO's Appeal Boards' Ability to Rule Independently Against Patents on Nature and Code

    Patents used to cover physical inventions (such as engines); nowadays this just isn't the case anymore and judges who can clarify these questions lack the freedom to think outside the box (and disobey patent maximalists' dogma)



  7. Patent Law Firms Still Desperate to Find New Ways to Resurrect Dead Software Patents in the United States

    There's no rebound and no profound changes that favour software patents; in fact, judging by caselaw, there's nothing even remotely like that



  8. Links 22/3/2019: Libinput 1.13 RC2 and Facebook's Latest Security Scandal

    Links for the day



  9. Why the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK-IPO) Cannot Ignore Judges, Whereas the EPO Can (and Does)

    The European Patent Convention (EPC) ceased to matter, judges' interpretation of it no longer matters either; the EPO exploits this to grant hundreds of thousands of dodgy software patents, then trumpet "growth"



  10. The European Patent Office Needs to Put Lives Before Profits

    Patents that pertain to health have always posed an ethical dilemma; the EPO apparently tackled this dilemma by altogether ignoring the rights and needs of patients (in favour of large corporations that benefit financially from poor people's mortality)



  11. “Criminal Organisation”

    Brazil's ex-President, Temer, is arrested (like other former presidents of Brazil); will the EPO's ex-President Battistelli ever be arrested (now that he lacks diplomatic immunity and hides at CEIPI)?



  12. Links 21/3/2019: Wayland 1.17.0, Samba 4.10.0, OpenShot 2.4.4 and Zorin Beta

    Links for the day



  13. Team UPC (Unitary Patent) is a Headless Chicken

    Team UPC's propaganda about the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has become so ridiculous that the pertinent firms do not wish to be identified



  14. António Campinos Makes Up Claims About Patent Quality, Only to be Rebutted by Examiners, Union (Anyone But the 'Puff Pieces' Industry)

    Battistelli's propagandistic style and self-serving 'studies' carry on; the notion of patent quality has been totally discarded and is nowadays lied about as facts get 'manufactured', then disseminated internally and externally



  15. Links 20/3/2019: Google Announces ‘Stadia’, Tails 3.13

    Links for the day



  16. CEN and CENELEC Agreement With the EPO Shows That It's Definitely the European Commission's 'Department'

    With headlines such as “EPO to collaborate on raising SEP awareness” it is clear to see that the Office lacks impartiality and the European Commission cannot pretend that the EPO is “dafür bin ich nicht zuständig” or “da kenne ich mich nicht aus”



  17. Decisions Made Inside the European Patent Organisation (EPO) Lack Credibility Because Examiners and Judges Lack Independence

    The lawless, merciless, Mafia-like culture left by Battistelli continues to haunt judges and examiners; how can one ever trust the Office (or the Organisation at large) to deliver true justice in adherence or compliance with the EPC?



  18. Team UPC Buries Its Credibility Deeper in the Grave

    The three Frenchmen at the top do not mention the UPC anymore; but those who promote it for a living (because they gambled on leveraging it for litigation galore) aren't giving up and in the process they perpetuate falsehoods



  19. The EPO Has Sadly Taken a Side and It's the Patent Trolls' Side

    Abandoning the whole rationale behind patents, the Office now led for almost a year by António Campinos prioritises neither science nor technology; it's all about granting as many patents (European monopolies) as possible for legal activity (applications, litigation and so on)



  20. Where the USPTO Stands on the Subject of Abstract Software Patents

    Not much is changing as we approach Easter and software patents are still fool's gold in the United States, no matter if they get granted or not



  21. Links 19/3/2019: Jetson/JetBot, Linux 5.0.3, Kodi Foundation Joins The Linux Foundation, and Firefox 66

    Links for the day



  22. Links 18/3/2019: Solus 4, Linux 5.1 RC1, Mesa 18.3.5, OSI Individual Member Election Won by Microsoft

    Links for the day



  23. Microsoft and Its Patent Trolls Continue Their Patent War, Including the War on Linux

    Microsoft is still preying on GNU/Linux using patents, notably software patents; it wants billions of dollars served on a silver platter in spite of claims that it reached a “truce” by joining the Open Invention Network and joining the LOT Network



  24. Director Iancu Generally Viewed as a Lapdog of Patent Trolls

    As Director of the Office, Mr. Iancu, a Trump appointee, not only fails to curb patent trolls; he actively defends them and he lowers barriers in order to better equip them with bogus patents that courts would reject (if the targets of extortion could afford a day in court)



  25. Links 17/3/2019: Google Console and IBM-Red Hat Merger Delay?

    Links for the day



  26. To Team UPC the Unified Patent Court (UPC) Has Become a Joke and the European Patent Office (EPO) Never Mentions It Anymore

    The EPO's frantic rally to the very bottom of patent quality may be celebrated by obedient media and patent law firms; to people who actually produce innovative things, however, this should be a worrisome trend and thankfully courts are getting in the way of this nefarious agenda; one of these courts is the FCC in Germany



  27. Links 16/3/2019: Knoppix Release and SUSE Independence

    Links for the day



  28. Stopping António Campinos and His Software Patents Agenda (Not Legal in Europe) Would Require Independent Courts

    Software patents continue to be granted (new tricks, loopholes and buzzwords) and judges who can put an end to that are being actively assaulted by those who aren't supposed to have any authority whatsoever over them (for decisions to be impartially delivered)



  29. The Linux Foundation Needs to Speak Out Against Microsoft's Ongoing (Continued) Patent Shakedown of OEMs That Ship Linux

    Zemlin actively thanks Microsoft while taking Microsoft money; he meanwhile ignores how Microsoft viciously attacks Linux using patents, revealing the degree to which his foundation, the “Linux Foundation” (not about Linux anymore, better described as Zemlin’s PAC), has been compromised



  30. Links 15/3/2019: Linux 5.0.2, Sublime Text 3.2

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts