EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.22.19

EPO Directors Would be Wise to Rebel Against Team Campinos While They Still Have the Job

Posted in Europe, Patents at 8:03 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Everybody demoted and disempowered except Team Campinos (below)

Team Campinos

Summary: As the EPO continues its bold journey towards dictatorship (where presidencies are passed between friends and ‘circles’ are former colleagues or close confidants) Techrights urges those who have power to speak out — e.g. EPO judges and Directors — to do something before it’s too late

THE European Patent Office’s (EPO) Presidency, Team Campinos/Battistelli (more or less the same people, same views, similar policies and identical nationality) is expanding with friends and family (some of the above are spouses and grossly under-qualified). Meanwhile, as a direct result of this institutional corruption, everybody else suffers.

A decade and a half ago I merely protested against software patents in Europe; I was a Computer Science graduate at the time and was working on software (computer vision) towards a doctorate degree. Even back then I argued with some professors about software patents, which they insisted were possible to obtain in the UK (contrary to the EPC). The EPO no longer cares what the EPC says; it grants patents on algorithms based on semantic nonsense like “technical effect” and buzzwords like “AI” (hey hi). It’s also granting patents on life/nature in defiance of Parliament (as if the EPO is positioned above the EU itself and decides European policies behind closed doors, based on autocrats and their friends, recruited based on connections/nepotism). This utterly sick situation severely harms Europe’s competitiveness. Even the US is already leaving software patents behind (USPTO grapples with 35 U.S.C. § 101).

As recently as yesterday Kluwer Patent Blog, a major patent maximalist, published yet another article about European Patents that perish. Litigation by American giants, using European Patents, turns out to be abusive, thuggish, frivolous. What do their lawsuits target? Generics, i.e. life savers. And “the District Court decided there was no infringement, not even by equivalence.” Here’s more:

Pemetrexed, yet again: last Wednesday the District Court of The Hague decided on Eli Lilly’s claim that Fresenius infringed its ‘pemetrexed disodium’ patent with a generic product that does not contain pemetrexed disodium. Going against the current, and after a deep diver in the prosecution file, the District Court decided there was no infringement, not even by equivalence.

The basic facts of the widespread Pemetrexed litigation will be well-known to most readers by now. Eli Lilly’s patent (EP 1 313 508) has a Swiss form claim relating to the “use of pemetrexed disodium” in combination with vitamin B12 for inhibiting tumor growth. Different generic companies do not use pemetrexed disodium in their product, but another form of pemetrexed (e.g. pemetrexed diacid, as in Fresenius’ product). Do these generic products fall within the scope of Lilly’s ‘pemetrexed disodium’ claim?

That question was put before numerous European patent judges over the past years.

This attack on a generic product is one of many; the UPC would only exacerbate things (if anything like it ever became a reality, which we doubt). There are lives at stake here. Yes, people would die if these generics were removed from the market and producers of such generic medicine already lose a lot of money in these failed court battles; intimidating and weakening them with weak ‘cases’ is perhaps the goal as Eli Lilly has very deep pockets, unlike theirs. This isn’t about justice; it’s bullying.

EPO managers with consciousness ought to do something about it. Attending protests, which will probably come soon, is one option. Leaking material to us is another. Following our latest EPO leak one reader noted, “what a coincidence BIT also means Bureau International du Travail, in other words ILO. You may want to see the scrubbed names [and] therefore here [is] a complete version…”

ILO might receive some appeals from them one day (e.g. if they get laid off* without actually committing any offense).

“I need to carefully think if (or when) these names become relevant,” I responded to this reader. “Their subordinates might not like them, but they can form an alliance of convenience against the bad direction the Office has taken. Many would be former examiners.”

I’ve compared the names listed at the top (Team Campinos) to the ones below; spectacularly there’s no overlap, so in other words the people who are in effect being cautioned (or pushed one foot out the door) are those not in the ‘circle’ of Campinos. Coincidence? It’s hard not to compare this to Donald Trump’s self-assimilation tactics in the White House. Here’s the full letter:

New BIT organisation and staff changes

02.05.2019

Implementation of new BIT organisation – several changes of PDs and Directors

Dear colleagues,

The new Business IT organisation came into life on 1 May 2019. BIT comes with a very different structure, a new leadership team and a very ambitious plan, as reflected in the draft SP2023 that you may have had the opportunity to browse. A leadership team, however, is only the tip of the iceberg: a fully functional BIT requires everyone’s contribution and engagement. As we said at the beginning of the year, we will leave nobody behind on this journey.

With the implementation of the new BIT organisation as of 1 May, we would like to inform you about the following staff changes:

Under the direct responsibility of PD 4.6 Diego Eguidazu Alonso (CIO):

Mr Alain Lambert as Principal Advisor;
Mr John Selkirk as Director IT Operations;
Ms Catherine Eder as Director ad personam in charge of Change Management.

Under the direct responsibility of PD 4.5 Angel Aledo Lopez (CTO):

Mr John Bambridge as Principal Advisor;
Mr Jean-Marc Janyszek as Director IT Architecture;
Mr Yvan de la Fuente as Director IT Patent Granting Process;
Mr Domenico Golzio as Director ad personam.

In the Directorate IT Operations (D 4.6.3):

Mr Michel Fombellida Lopez as Director ad personam in the Dept End User Computing (Dept 4.6.3.4);
Mr Ian Wood as Director ad personam in the Dept Change and Release Management (Dept 4.6.3.2).

In the Directorate IT Search and Patent Granting Process (D 4.5.3):

Mr Miguel Albrecht as Director in charge of his current directorate (Dept 4.5.3.8);
Mr Aloïse Fuchs as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners (Dept 4 .5.3.1);
Mr Sytse De Jonge as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners;
Mr Salvatore Chiarizia as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Partners;
Mr Auke Hoekstra as Director ad personam in the Dept Patent Grant Products (Dept 4 .5.3.6);
Mr Graham Day as Director ad personam in the Dept Patent Grant Products.

In the Directorate IT Architecture (D 4.5.1):

Mr Marc Guilleaume as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Analysis (Dept 4.5.1.1);
Mr Giovanni Calamida as Director ad personam in the Dept Business Analysis.

In the Directorate IT Cooperation (D 4.5.2):

Mr Robert Gemmell as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners (Dept 4.5.2.1);
Mr Yves Grandjean as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners;
Mr Paul Schwander as Director ad personam in the Dept National Patent Offices Business Partners.

In the Directorate Corporate IT (D 4.6.1):

Mr Christian Baetzner as Director ad personam in the Dept Document and Content Management (Dept 4.6.1.3);
Mr Giuseppe Falco as Director ad personam in the Dept SAP Centre of Excellence (Dept 4.6.1.1).

In the Directorate IT Planning (D 4.6.2):

Mr Lodewijk De Kock as Director ad personam in the Dept Risk Management (Dept 4.6.2.2);
Mr Christophe Lintz as Director ad personam in the Dept IT Budgeting and Controlling (Dept 4.6.2.5).

The ad interim for the Director IT Cooperation (D 4.5.2) will be covered by the Chief Technology Officer until further notice.

The Chief Information Officer will ensure the ad interim function for the Director IT Planning (D 4.6.2) and the Director Corporate IT (D 4.6.1) until further notice.

We would like to thank all of our colleagues mentioned above for having accepted these new challenges and wish them all the best in their new functions.

Nellie Simon
Vice-President DG 4

Steve Rowan
Vice-President DG 1

Back

02.05.19 | Author: Nellie Simon – Vice-President DG 4, Steve Rowan – Vice-President DG 1

The above people are in effect being demoted; in Zagreb we saw Battistelli’s ‘bulldog’ using similar tactics. He had assigned/relocated people whom he did not like to imaginary/temporary/volatile positions with questionable job titles before rendering them obsolete (making the redundancy seem impersonal). Battistelli later used the same tactics to drive out people inside the EPO (people who opposed him). Recall Lionel Baranes and others. Remember how Battistelli rigged the presidency's succession process against Cuno Tarfusser. The EPO of the past decade or so makes Europe look just about as corrupt as China or Russia (which are notorious for similar things).
____
* The "hoax" financial study (the CSC called it that) suggests they plan major cuts — and ones that aren’t needed. They even hire lawyers in preparation for something to that effect. It certainly looks like the EPO is nowadays preparing to lay off staff, maybe even sympathetic (to examiners’ gripes) Directors.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 15/7/2019: Vulkan 1.1.115 and Facebook Openwashing

    Links for the day



  2. Microsoft Office 360 Banned

    OpenDocument Format (ODF, a real standard everyone can implement) and Free/libre software should be taught in schools; it's not supposed to be just a matter of privacy



  3. Microsoft, in Its Own Words...

    Sociopathy, incompetence and intolerance of the rule of law, as demonstrated by Microsoft's top managers



  4. Microsoft's WSL is Designed to Weaken GNU/Linux (on the Desktop/Laptop) and Strengthen Vista 10

    What Microsoft does to GNU/Linux on the desktop (and/or laptop) bears much resemblance to what Microsoft did to Java a couple of decades ago



  5. Links 14/7/2019: Linux 5.2.1, Unreal Engine 4.23 Preview, Linux Mint 19.2 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. 25,500 Blog Posts and Pages

    With our thirteenth anniversary just a few months away we're at a pace of about 2,000 posts per year



  7. With WSL Microsoft is Doing to GNU/Linux What It Did to Netscape

    Embrace, extend, extinguish. Some things never really change even if they become an old and repetitive accusation.



  8. Allowing Bad Guests to Become the Hosts

    Why the so-called 'Linux Foundation', a nonprofit that acts more like a PAC controlled by proprietary software companies and people who don't even use Linux, is increasingly becoming a Linux-hostile front group



  9. Honesty and Collaboration Make Free Software Stronger, Microsoft is Inherently a Misfit

    In spite of all the lies Microsoft and its Web sites spew out on a daily basis, nothing has really changed and Microsoft is still attacking Software Freedom (mostly from the inside nowadays, helped by FUD proxies such as WhiteSource and Snyk)



  10. Patent Certainty Waning, But That's Still OK for Patent Trolls

    Patent maximalism remains a threat to everyone but patent lawyers (and patent office chiefs who measure their own performance only by the number of patents granted); best served are the patent trolls who extrajudicially attack already-impoverished parties behind closed doors



  11. GitHub is Microsoft's Proprietary Software and Centralised (Monopoly) Platform, But When Canonical's Account There Gets Compromised Suddenly It's Ubuntu's Fault?

    Typical media distortions and signs that Microsoft already uses GitHub for censorship of Free/Open Source software that does not fit Microsoft's interests



  12. Canonical is Turning Ubuntu Into a More Proprietary Deviant of GNU/Linux

    Ubuntu is becoming more 'Ubinary'; binaries without their source code available are packed up and cooked up for (or baked into) the ISO; this may be good for widespread adoption, but it's not an advancement of freedom, a capitulation rather



  13. Links 13/7/2019: Librem 5 July Update, Project Trident 19.07, KDE Frameworks 5.60.0

    Links for the day



  14. The Problem Isn't Women or Minorities in Free Software But Particular Corporations That Exploit or Steer or Hijack Their Agenda

    If technical issues are being disguised using colours and genders (among other things), then it's important to highlight who's behind it (what company/ies) rather than fling back insults at people because it makes things worse



  15. There's No Such Thing as Cloud Computing, Serverless and All That Other Nonsense

    Buzzwords. Confronted.



  16. Linux is Doing 'Well' Only for Those Who Dislike Software Freedom and Love Control Over Users

    Linux, the kernel, has become a corporate playground or a sandbox that's used to upsell proprietary software, including surveillance; freedom in Linux is gradually being diminished if not completely obliterated and it does not worry the foundations entrusted to guard against it



  17. Consultation About Direction and Future Focus for Techrights

    We invite ideas and recommendations for the future of the site, notably which topics and aspects are worth covering as a matter of higher priority



  18. European Media Continues to Ignore the EPO Crisis While Law Firms and EPO Management Cover Things Up

    The EPO crisis silently deepens because serious problems are lied about, not acknowledged, and the legitimacy of European Patents is greatly diminished, not to mention the EPO's ability to attract talent



  19. Links 12/7/2019: Alpine 3.10.1 is Out and Red Hat Loses Oliva

    Links for the day



  20. Links 11/7/2019: KDE Plasma 5.16.3 and Verifying Gentoo Election Results

    Links for the day



  21. Campinos is Already Widely Seen as Battistelli the Second, Even Among EPO Stakeholders

    The Frenchmen in charge of the EPO may have a taste (and waste) for wine, but they have no clue how to run a patent office (except into the ground); patent application numbers are meanwhile falling (a reduction in demand)



  22. The EFF Responds to IBM's Liars and Lobbyists for Software Patents Just a Day After Red Hat is Officially Absorbed

    IBM's unacceptable stance and abominable actions on the patent front continue to haunt it; IBM must quickly dissociate and reconsider its patent strategy so as to not alienate thousands of workers (the real asset of Red Hat) it has just spent a fortune on



  23. Microsoft Putting Patent Traps Inside Linux While Blackmailing Companies Using Patents Associated With These Traps

    In an effort to make exFAT (a patent trap) the 'industry standard', even inside Linux, Microsoft now wants exFAT inside the very heart of Linux and people are pushing back



  24. Links 11/7/2019: Cockpit 198, Librem Updates

    Links for the day



  25. More People Are Coming Out: Microsoft Tried to Get Them Fired for Standing in Microsoft's Way (the 'One Microsoft Way')

    Microsoft's bullying tactics aren't "old news"; the same tactics carry on to this date and they're the moral or corporate equivalent of doxing



  26. Links 10/7/2019: Sparky 4.11 and Sculpt OS 19.07

    Links for the day



  27. Links 10/7/2019: Septor 2019.4, Tails 3.15, FreeBSD 11.3 and Microsoft 'Morality Police' (Censorship of FOSS) in GitHub

    Links for the day



  28. EPO Further Harms Justice and Quality by Weakening Processes Associated With the EPO’s Boards of Appeal

    The priorities of EPO management reveal the sheer misunderstanding if not malice; either they do not know how to run a patent office or they intentionally try to make it fail (where it matters most)



  29. Links 9/7/2019: Goodbye Red Hat (IBM Takeover Finalised), Mesa 19.1.2, D9VK 0.13

    Links for the day



  30. IBM Has Just Wiped Clean Red Hat's Position on Software Patents

    Proprietary software giant buying Red Hat is not good news; but now it is confirmed and damage limitation may be in order


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts