EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.30.19

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Dead and Alexander Ramsay is Only Making a Total Fool of Himself

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 6:27 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Sadly, Ralph Jimmy Schulz has also just died (5 days ago of pancreatic cancer at the age of 51), according to Benjamin Henrion, but he fought a good fight against evil agenda

UPC meme
Zoobab’s (Benjamin Henrion) new UPC meme

Summary: The Unified Patent Court (UPC), or “Unitary Patent” as some like to call that vision (it was known as many other fantasies), is doomed; any attempts to claim otherwise are met with scorn and ridicule — to the point where even Team UPC is mostly keeping quiet these days

THE patent system in Europe languishes. Litigation? Not the same thing. After the European Patent Office (EPO) had granted loads of Invalid Patents (IPs), which were wrongly enshrined as European Patents (EPs) because Campinos and Battistelli break the rules (software patents are illegal in Europe for a number of reasons, not just the EPC*; the same goes for patents on life and nature), litigation that’s frivolous saw a sharp rise. Pertinent figures from Germany have been published in annual studies and we wrote several stories about these. So, in short, patent quality down, litigation up. As expected. And that’s not even counting the number of assertions/shakedowns happening outside courts…

“So, in short, patent quality down, litigation up. As expected. And that’s not even counting the number of assertions/shakedowns happening outside courts…”The courts, which are national, are currently an important obstruction to fake patents. As we keep showing, many EPs are nowadays rejected and invalidated by such courts. Law firms, joined by EPO thugs who shamelessly violate the EPC, tried hard to replace these courts. They lied, they broke laws, they sought to subvert a lot of constitutions in a great hurry/rush (before the public finds out), but thankfully they failed. They failed for a number of different reasons. And the longer these things drag on, the harder it becomes for them (more constitutional challenges arise, along with independent studies that demonstrate how awful, illegal and undesirable the UPC/A really is).

On Thursday the JUVE propagandist in chief (on UPC it's a megaphone of Team UPC) tweeted: “Here’s the exclusive JUVE Patent interview with #UPC Prepatory Committee chair, Alexander Ramsay. Ramsay explains how the constitutional delay has worked to the committee’s advantage, and why the UK should remain part of the European #patent project.”

So they have “exclusive” (yes, EXCLUSIVE) “JUVE Patent interview” with a known liar. Only months ago they admitted to the Financial Times that they had been faking progress to maintain their self-made illusion that UPC had a chance. At the same time they used psychological warfare (like spreading deliberate lies) against German Justices in the FCC — to the point where one of them gave an “exclusive” (totally inappropriate [1, 2, 3]) interview to a Team UPC front group/pressure group. These people play dirty. I responded to JUVE yesterday (Friday), joking about that part that says “the constitutional delay has worked to the committee’s advantage…”

“These people play dirty.”What an utter lie!

“Oh, I see,” I responded. “We got caught violating constitutions across Europe and that… and that, well… “worked to the committee’s advantage”

“Smoking is good for you,” was my analogy, “makes your lungs stronger!”

Thank you for smoking!

This is the sort of laughable argument style we’ve become accustomed to. Watch Team UPC getting burned in the comments (that even Team UPC allows past strict moderation; yes, they censor comments). It’s very revealing everywhere one turns. Team UPC isn’t believed by anyone except Team UPC and we’ve even seen some longtime UPC proponents changing their mind/tune. Even IAM a year ago.

Taking note of something we covered some days ago (US stance on UPC), AstraZenecaKat wrote about such patent fanaticism (extremism?) and how Donald Trump’s government uses the EPC as a vehicle of patent maximalism in the UK. It goes beyond what we covered a day after the leak:

This Kat was probably not alone in being slightly bemused by the recent media reporting on the leaked “451-page dossier” describing US/UK talks on future trade arrangements. The BBC reportsthe dossier as showing that the US is interested in “extending patents” in the UK. How strange. Is the US government proposing some novel form of patent term extension currently unavailable to patentees in the UK? Fear not, IPKat is here to provide some clarity!

It turns out that, contrary to media reporting, the dossier does not mention anything radical with respect to patent term extension. However, there are some interesting insights to be gained from the dossier on the potential battleground for IP rights in future US/UK trade negotiations. Most notable is the US government’s position on grace periods for disclosure before patent filings, which are not permitted under the European Patent Convention (EPC).

[...]

The US delegation was also interested to hear the UK government plans with respect to the UPC. [Merpel: wouldn’t we all?] The US expressed surprise that the UK government had ratified the UPC agreement before the UK’s exit. The US mentioned that US stakeholders were strongly in favour of the UK participating in the UPC. The UK replied that “we intend to stay part of the agreement through the implementation period…Beyond this is subject to negotiation”. This position was described in the subsequently published FEB white paper. The dossier thus does not make us any the wiser with regards to the UK’s intended negotiating position in post-Brexit negotiations with the US. Whether the UK will be able to be a member of the UPC after Brexit was discussed in a recent report from the European Parliament think-tank (IPKat: Can the UK become and stay a member of the UPC?)

[...]

The dossier therefore does provide some tip-bits of interesting information regarding US/UK thinking on IP protection and its relation to drug pricing. Reassuringly, despite the media reporting, there does not appear to be anything radical “on the table” with respect to patent term or data exclusivity. The US position on grace periods is the most concerning of all the issues under discussion. It would be an extraordinary act of self-harm for the UK to withdraw from the EPC, and this would have significant disadvantages not only the UK but also the US and third parties such as China and Japan. However, the dossier highlights throughout many areas that still need clarification. Final negotiating positions between the US and UK will also be highly dependent on the UK’s negotiating position with the EU following Brexit.

As usual, especially with AstraZenecaKat, the better and more informative tidbits are in the comments (those that are allowed anyway; they still censor comments).

“Let’s be honest,” a certain “Anonymous” wrote in the responses. “The reason the US think the UK might be able to introduce a grace period is because they don’t, and will never, understand that the EPC isn’t related to the EU. Further the US is strongly in favour of the UK participating in the UPC which would, of course, be impossible if the UK isn’t part of the EPC. The big issue is the possible extension of UK data exclusivity for biologics from 8+2 to 12. The public would undoubtedly see this as extending “patents” for pharmaceuticals.”

Oh, pharmaceuticals like AstraZeneca. We’ve been rather disturbed but not surprised to see this blog relaying pro-UPC lies.

Another comment said: “We in the UK need to be honest about our future position in the world. We need to belong in some way to a big powerful trading block. The US would be a natural ‘home’ once we leave the EU. Risking that over a grace period disagreement does not seem sensible. The sooner we see that bringing ourselves into alignment with the US brings a lot of benefits, the more clearly we can develop our post-Brexit relationships and alliances. We can be the ‘gateway’ to Europe for the US if we compromise a little on our laws. It will be a delicate balancing act to please both the US and the EU, but surely we have little choice now?”

Well, if anything, the above shows that “brexit” is about selling the UK to Donald Trump and equally dubious corporations (as his). The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is limited in reach and scope (more so due to 35 U.S.C. § 101), so they want a corrupt EPO, where the quarter of all patents are granted to the US (almost the same as the number of patents granted to Europe!).

As an elderly (and apparently very experienced) attorney, MaxDrei, then put it: “If the UK leaves the EU it will have little or nothing of that ongoing business.”

It’s a good comment and it’s one among several that condemn the UPC. To quote in full:

The comment from “Honesty” is hard to swallow. The EU is indeed a big Bloc, with 600 million consumers and, within it, the UK is one of the “Big 3″ Member States. So, a Big Fish in a Big Pool.

As the 51st State of the USA though, with zero representation in the US Congress, it is not even a Fish, and in a pool only half as big. And what’s all this nonsense about a “bridgehead” into Europe. The EU is already fully cognisant of the threat of a deregulated UK free-riding the European market. Use of force to effect a landing on the European Mainland is not an option except in times of war.

As we are now, given our language and professional skills, we in the UK should be filing at the EPO the Lion’s Share of everything sent to the EPO by both Asia and The Americas. If the UK leaves the EU it will have little or nothing of that ongoing business.

Is there no limit to the skill with which Westminster politicians squander in a few decades the huge reserves of soft power built up by the UK over centuries?

Well said. UPC is, as we’ve been saying for years, part of a trend, part of which is neo-liberal policies that are ruinous to all except very few, usually foreign few (foreign to the country where these policies are implemented). As we put it earlier this month, "Europe is Under Attack" (except the Bretons, Battistellis and Lagardes of Europe). Their ‘handlers’ know what they want and how to get it. We still have one final part to publish in the Thierry Breton series; then we’ll prepare the epilogue.
________
* It’s saddening to learn that Jimmy Schulz, who fought software patents in the political arena, has perished. “RIP Jimmy Schulz,” Henrion wrote last night, “one of the initiators of the motion, warned that trivial patents or patents harm small and medium-sized software developers https://www.ip-watch.org/2013/04/22/german-parliament-sends-message-stop-granting-software-patents/ [] RIP Jimmy Schulz, German MP software developer and opposed software patents…”

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Media Reactions to the EPO Coming to Grips With Fake Patents That It Granted (Spoiler: the Media is Controlled by Lawyers of Monopolists and EPO Partners)

    Appalling quality of reporting and truly awful bias in the media, primarily owing to the fact that it is dominated/manned not by actual reporters but the firms looking to patent life itself; they use their lawyers and operatives who are literally funded by these lawyers (wearing "journalist" badges to mislead)



  2. Links 21/1/2020: EarlyOOM Fedora Decision and AMD Zen 3 Microcode

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, January 20, 2020



  4. Links 20/1/2020: MNT Reform, Linux 5.5 RC7, KMyMoney 5.0.8

    Links for the day



  5. Mansion of Pedophilia – Addendum: Accessing and Assessing Court Documents

    How anyone out there can do the job the media failed to do (after an apparently unprecedented arrest at the home of Bill Gates)



  6. Mansion of Pedophilia – Addendum: Progress on Police Request

    9 updates from the police department of Seattle but still nothing material/concrete, only promises and major delays



  7. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 19, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 19, 2020



  8. Mansion of Pedophilia – Part VIII: More Than 4 Months of Waiting for Police Department to Send Over the Files They Claim to Have an Issue Opening

    The police department (PD) of Seattle is unable to open its own files about arrest for pedophilia at Bill Gates' home; it has been unable to open these files for several months, it claims...



  9. Starting a GNU Replacement for GitHub, Possibly Based on GitLab

    "It might be easier if we start from the GitLab software," Stallman said



  10. European Commission Pushes for Even Greater Patent Maximalism Instead of Rationality, Patent Zealots' Site Cherry-Picks China as Whipping Boy

    Fear of China is being leveraged to promote an agenda of patent maximalists; the general idea they promote is that granting millions of low-quality patents is the only way to compete, even if in reality that merely handicaps the whole market



  11. CRISPR Patents Disallowed, But Where Are the Journalists?

    The narrative surrounding last week's decision against CRISPR patents may have been virtually monopolised by the litigation think tanks and law firms; it certainly feels like no journalism is left to rebut them, fact-check, and introspect



  12. Links 19/1/2020: Wine 5.0 RC6, Alpine 3.11.3

    Links for the day



  13. Judges Reject EPO Patents on Life as Constitutional Complaints Against the EPO Pile Up in Germany

    EPO judges throw out patents on life (CRISPR at least); there's now growing hope that they'll have the courage to do the same to patents on software



  14. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 18, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 18, 2020



  15. StartPage (System1) Found New Spin Allies. Some Have Been Offered StartPage Jobs. Some Might Already be Working for StartPage in Secret.

    Pro-StartPage voices appear to be paid (or have been promised pay) by StartPage; the key strategy of StartPage seems to be, attack and betray people's privacy while paying people in particular positions to pretend otherwise



  16. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 17, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, January 17, 2020



  17. Links 18/1/2020: Mir 1.7 and GNU Guile 3.0.0

    Links for the day



  18. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 16, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 16, 2020



  19. Links 16/1/2020: Mozilla Layoffs, PinePhone Braveheart Shipping, KDE Plasma 5.18 LTS Reaches Beta

    Links for the day



  20. Microsoft is a Market Leader in Lying and Corruption

    Microsoft is working hard to describe itself as the exact opposite of what it is and what it has been; ‘Internet rot’ helps a lot with this agenda, not to mention control of the media (the narrative)



  21. The European Patent Organisation Continues to 'Piss All Over' Separation of Powers

    The EPO continues to scatter invalid patents (IPs) that are European Patents (EPs) all over Europe and nobody can stop this, not even the judges of the EPO because they lack independence (by their very own admission)



  22. Zealots of Team UPC (Patent Litigation) Now Attacking the Courts and the Judges, Removing Their Mask on the Face of Things...

    The tactics of Team UPC aren't changing, only the shamelessness associated with these tactics is changing (because it looks like the end of days to them)



  23. Microsoft Now Uses or Leverages Software Freedom Against Free Software

    A reader's explanation of what Microsoft is trying to accomplish with its so-called 'embrace' and what steps will come next (how they manifest themselves)



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 15, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 15, 2020



  25. Links 15/1/2020: CentOS Linux 8.1, Oracle VirtualBox 6.1.2 and GNU Sed 4.8

    Links for the day



  26. OSI Board at Microsoft: This is How Institutions Die or Completely Lose Their Purpose/Direction

    The photo (or meeting) may mark the turning point of the Openwashing as-a-Standard Initiative (OSI), which less than a year earlier took a bucket of money from Microsoft



  27. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 14, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 14, 2020



  28. When Microsoft's Actions Speak for Themselves (About Back Door Access)

    Unwittingly, people are being reminded of the 'special relationship' between Microsoft and the US Army (or government); The back doors or bug doors are still there, even 7 years after Edward Snowden's NSA leaks



  29. Why You -- Yes, You Too -- Should Consider Migrating to GNU/Linux

    The window is closing (and Windows/Vista 7 closing down); the chance to use machines that the users actually control is still there



  30. Can We Please Stop Lying for Microsoft in the Mainstream Media?

    Dishonesty for short-term financial gain (e.g. advertising money) will be a big loss in the long run. There’s a reason why so many news sites perish and Datamation (where I wrote more than a decade ago) now throws away remnants of reputation by spreading a big lie from Microsoft.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts