01.29.20

Patent Scavenging or Racing to the Bottom of Patent Quality

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:33 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

As long as there’s a name of an individual on the application the EPO will look for excuses to grant, not reasons to reject

Vultures abound

Summary: The patent microcosm is pushing for software patents, and for litigation with such patents, but it all boils down to bottom feeding

THE patent maximalists pose a threat to the legitimacy of the patent system because they advocate a torrent if not an avalanche of low-quality patents, which the public in turn mocks and ridicules. It’s a bubble that will implode or structure which will collapse. See what happened in the US owing to 35 U.S.C. § 101 (which the USPTO cannot just ignore).

The European Patent Office’s (EPO) advocacy/promotion of software patents in Europe isn’t a new thing. Before António Campinos did it Battistelli had done that. They love using buzzwords.

Earlier this week the EPO tweeted: “Searching for patent applications related to disruptive technologies such as #AI and #3Dprinting can be challenging. We’ll be presenting some strategies at this event…”

There’s also this new tweet (about a day apart): “This year’s #SearchMatters will focus on disruptive technologies. Our experts will be sharing their insights with #patent search professionals from business, academia and IP firms…”

We’ve noticed that the corresponding Web page has been edited to add “CII (computer-implemented inventions).” Was the nonsensical “AI” not enough? It now says (warning: epo.org link): “This year’s Search Matters conference aims to deliver workshops and lectures with a special focus on disruptive technologies such as 3D printing/additive manufacturing, AI and CII (computer-implemented inventions).”

The “CII” part is definitely new. We also know what they typically mean by “AI”…

Sometimes they mean software patents; and sometimes they mean this thing they’ve rejected and explain as follows: (warning: epo.org link)

The EPO has published its decision setting out the reasons for its recent refusal of two European patent applications in which an AI system was designated as the inventor. Filed by an individual in autumn 2018, the applications EP 18 275 163 and EP 18 275 174 were refused by the EPO following oral proceedings with the applicant in November 2019, on the grounds that they do not meet the legal requirement of the European Patent Convention (EPC) that an inventor designated in the application has to be a human being, and not a machine.

In both applications a machine called “DABUS”, which is described as “a type of connectionist artificial intelligence”, is named as the inventor. The applicant stated that he had acquired the right to the European patent from the inventor by being its successor in title, arguing that as the machine’s owner, he was assigned any intellectual property rights created by this machine.

In its decisions, the EPO considered that the interpretation of the legal framework of the European patent system leads to the conclusion that the inventor designated in a European patent must be a natural person. The Office further noted that the understanding of the term inventor as referring to a natural person appears to be an internationally applicable standard, and that various national courts have issued decisions to this effect.

Watchtroll has already done a “me too” piece. To quote (what’s quoted): “The decisions to refuse the two patent applications can be appealed by the applicant within two months at the EPO’s independent judiciary, the Boards of Appeal, said the EPO release.”

Watchtroll’s “EPO Provides Reasoning for Rejecting Patent Applications Citing AI as Inventor” is more or less expected (“In the EPO press release today, the Office explained…”); it is hardly surprising that Watchtroll is an EPO megaphone because both nowadays work for patent zealots, litigators, and trolls. They even reuse the same words.

So, in short, EPO management continues to grant loads of invalid patents provided there’s a name of a human on the paper associated with the application. As some pundits have already pointed out, the above patents can be resubmitted with the name of a human and then be accepted. So the EPO isn’t actually solving the problem. Software patents will continue to be granted, with some exceptions, two of which have just been named [1, 2] and outlined as follows: “The EPO refused to grant a #software #patent on increased security when collecting and selling customer data. [] There’s a new entry in the EUROPEAN SOFTWARE PATENTS knowledge base: Animating a graphics icon by superimposing an image sequence on a static background: non-technical” (by “non-technical” they mean invalid).

We’ve meanwhile noticed the IBM-backed front groups pushing for software patents in the US, basing it on the EPO’s abusive interpretations of the EPC. Dennis Crouch says “Europe uses this approach found in Article 54 of the European Patent Convention” (it’s in our Daily Links already) and adds:

Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) Board has proposed a “clarifying” amendment to Section 101(a)(1) of the Patent Act:

[...]

EPC Art. 54. Note that 54(1) and 54(2) are parallel to 35 U.S.C. 102(a) while 54(3) is parallel to 102(a)(2) which the IPO does not propose to change. Regarding these secret prior patent application filings identified in 54(3) and 102(a)(2); the European approach is broader than the US in some ways because it creates prior art even when the prior filing is the same inventor / owner; at the same time, the European approach is narrower than the US because 54(3) prior art does not apply to the inventive step (obviousness) analysis.

As can be seen above, the EPO’s abusive approaches toward the matter (and violations of the EPC) are causing problems in other continents as well. Last year the EPO openly bragged that it would spread these practices — regarding software patents — to other countries.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2020/01/29/swpats-scavenging/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 16/4/2021: Mozilla Dumping FTP, Corporations Still Concern-Trolling FSF

    Links for the day



  2. The EFF Attacks Software Freedom and Promotes Fake Privacy Linked to Microsoft

    Only weeks after attacking Software Freedom (the ad hominem way, which is easier) the EFF endorses a Microsoft-linked privacy abuse, misframing it as some sort of privacy champion



  3. Richard Stallman on How Corporate Media Limits What People Are Allowed to Think and Say

    What the founder of the FSF told yours truly a number of years ago about the behaviour of corporate (funded and controlled by corporations) media



  4. Exposing Hard Truths is the First Step or the Path Towards Justice

    A reflection and a moment taken to set aside tribalism (shallow differences based on allegiances of personal comfort), for we need look back at actual facts — however inconvenient at times — and consider the reality of the situation



  5. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 15, 2021



  6. [Meme] Laundering Bribes as 'Cooperation Money'

    Germany has financial interest in ensuring that EPO abuses carry on and nobody holds the EPO accountable



  7. Articles in Support of Richard Stallman

    Reproduced with permission



  8. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 20: Taking Stock

    Benoît Battistelli's legacy at the EPO is a legacy of corruption and cover-up; we take stock of how illegality was defended and persists to this day



  9. Links 15/4/2021: Zorin OS 16 Beta and Pushing Linux to GitHub- and Microsoft-Connected Rust

    Links for the day



  10. [Meme] Enemies With Common Interests

    The Software Freedom Movement (or Free Software Movement) has many enemies; some of them just hide in the shadows or speak out through shadowy front groups/NGOs that they semi-officially sponsor



  11. [Meme] Germany's Red Cash Cow

    EPO brings a lot of money to the German state. But at what cost to citizens and Germany’s public image?



  12. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 19: The Deafening Silence of the Media

    "There has been speculation that Maas might have had his own political interest in protecting Battistelli and the Balkan Express because of certain allegations about financial irregularities involving the German Patents and Trademark Office (DPMA) which were doing the rounds at the time."



  13. The Indirection Game

    How to attack institutions and concepts by personifying them, then proceeding to character assassination based on lies and deliberate distortions



  14. Links 15/4/2021: LXQt 0.17, Proxmox Backup Server 1.1

    Links for the day



  15. The Patent Battles in Europe Are Connected to the War on GNU/Linux (as a Community-Led Effort)

    Monoplisers of GNU and Linux want us to think that OIN is the solution while they actively lobby for software patents in Europe and the people in charge of Europe’s second-largest institution and Europe’s largest patent office help them; this long video contains thoughts about news from the past couple of days



  16. Richard Stallman: Freedom is the Goal (Updated)

    What Richard Stallman (RMS) told me in person on his trip here



  17. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 14, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 14, 2021



  18. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 18: Zero Tolerance for “Lawless Zones”?

    "It comes as no surprise that Maas appeared as a guest of honour at the European Inventor of the Year Boondoggle in Berlin in 2014 where he was seen on stage clapping along with the EPO President."



  19. Richard Stallman's Honors and Awards (and Why He Resigned in 2019)

    Reproduced with permission



  20. Links 14/4/2021: Alpine Releases and X.Org Server 1.20.11 Release (Security)

    Links for the day



  21. Links 14/4/2021: EasyOS Dunfell 2.7, Tor Browser 10.5a14

    Links for the day



  22. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 17: Jawohl, Herr Minister!

    A French-German co-production of "Yes, Minister!" starring Raimund Lutz, Heiko Maas and Christoph Ernst. Directed by Benoît Battistell.



  23. Over 1,000 EPO Workers Initiate Legal Challenge Against the EPO's Attack on Salaries (in Defiance of Assurances Made to Workers Who Relocate to Another Country With Whole Families)

    The EPO’s attack on workers and pensioners isn’t going ahead without challenge; while the “Mafia” (what EPO workers call the management) loots the organisation it takes away money from the workers — i.e. from besieged folks who do all the work and face growing workloads during a pandemic



  24. Who is Richard Stallman?

    Reproduced with permission



  25. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 13, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 13, 2021



  26. Links 13/4/2021: FreeBSD 13.0 Final, Slackware 15.0 GNU/Linux Beta Release and OpenMandriva Lx 4.3 Plans

    Links for the day



  27. IBM Stroking the Masters

    IBM continues to diminish its weakly-supported thesis about the word “Master” being inadequate in all contexts and IBM’s front group, the Linux Foundation, has just promoted more of that same self-serving agenda in the corporate media (screenshot below from 5 minutes ago)



  28. The 'Stallman Support' Web Site and How You Can Support Truth, Not Just Software Freedom

    The Stallman Support Dot Org Web site (stallmansupport.org, "In Support of Richard Stallman“), endorsed by Stallman himself, sets the record straight while the corporate media keeps peddling lies and distortions



  29. An Examination of Correspondence Between the Tweedledum-Tweedledee Duo, Lutz and Ernst

    A quick look at the letters and E-mails sent back and forth from the current VP5 and former VP5 of the EPO, Europe’s second-largest institution that the German government has let exist outside the rule/reach of any law



  30. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 16: An Inimitable Duo

    How the efforts to reform the EPO's data protection framework were derailed by the actions of Lutz and Ernst


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts