03.08.20

António Campinos is Just as Corrupt as Benoît Battistelli, Top Jobs Offered as ‘Endowments’

Posted in Europe, Patents at 8:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Immunity of the European Patent Office (EPO) won’t last much longer if this level of corruption persists

Campinos on running the EPO
Screenshot of Campinos on running the EPO (from the new interview with IAM)

Summary: Management indebted to the President shows a cult-like formation inside Europe’s sole (monopolised) patent office — a dangerous situation which also greatly discredits the EU (the EUIPO is an EU institution)

“Inclusion at the EPO?”

“Surely you jest,” I told the EPO’s V-P Stephen Rowan, “the EPO is not inclusive at all!”

“The opposite is true,” I continued. “People are hired based on nepotism. Now you just hijack and exploit popular causes.”

Even Rowan Atkinson wouldn’t resort to such sad comedy/satire. These people are cynical for many reasons, ranging from nationality to gender. EPO staff has not lost sight of these discriminatory patterns. And having voted for a strike at the end of last year, it’s clear that the unrest persists, even if quietly (out of fear mostly).

“EPO staff has not lost sight of these discriminatory patterns.”EPO’s V-P Rowan pushed this EPO “jobs” tweet a couple of days ago (basically retweeted it; he’s barely active there otherwise, except occasional sports fluff). It said: “This week and next are ‘Inclusion Weeks’ at the EPO. All staff, across all sites will be taking part in a wide range of events such as “lunch & learn” sessions or reflection groups to identify EPO-specific, inclusive behaviours that will further strengthen our working culture.”

This is the EPO riding today’s wave, which is centered around feminism. The cause of feminism is good, there’s nothing wrong with it, but surely the EPO and Rowan are aware of the guilt; he knows about this problem, of which he might be a part. People aren’t really hired for diversity, as the “flier team” explained following some ridiculous prose from António Campinos. It’s not a campaign of diversification but a cabal-building exercise no better than that of Benoît Battistelli. It used to be corrupt INPI and now it’s EUIPO; we covered this entryism last year and it has since then gotten more severe. It has gotten a lot worse since we last checked.

The Staff Union of the European Patent Office (SUEPO) put it like this:

EUIPO and EPO

To better fit our narrow layout we’ve rearranged this a bit as follows:

EUIPO and EPO - narrow

Remember that this is an EU institution, so the EP/EC/EU officials must get involved and express their concerns. This becomes a potential rationaliser for more ‘Brexits’.

Here’s the accompanying text, which is exceedingly polite for diplomatic reasons (the facts and the charts speak for themselves though):

02 March 2020

The talent pipeline from EUIPO

In 2018, the Administration Council allowed Mr Battistelli to exclude staff representatives from selection boards when “modernising” the employment framework. Since the beginning of his presidency, Mr Campinos has maintained this policy of his predecessor and laid a wide talent pipeline directly from the EUIPO in Alicante to the Office.

Before he took office in 2010, Mr Campinos’ predecessor, Mr Battistelli, indicated that he would bring with him three persons for whom he needed posts: François-Régis Hannart, Gilles Requena (his right-hand men) and Elodie Bergot, the wife of the latter. Mr Battistelli was told that there was no possibility to create or reserve posts for specific persons. Some half a year after Mr Battistelli started all three had nevertheless been recruited at the Office.

At the time, staff representatives challenged several of what seemed to be irregular appointments through internal appeals. Taking issue with the incorrect composition of the Internal Appeals Committee – ordered by Mr Battistelli – the ILO-AT sent more than two hundred cases back to the EPO. These include most, if not all, of the dubious appointments. As a consequence thus far none has resulted in a judgment, and no judgments on the substance are expected anytime soon. This is very convenient for Mr Battistelli and the favourites that he appointed.

Apparently annoyed nevertheless with the opposition, Mr Battistelli decided to change the rules. In 2018 he proposed to the Administrative Council a change in the Staff Regulations that de facto excluded the staff representation from recruitment procedures. The Administrative Council complied. In recent years the ILO-AT has become more and more staff unfriendly. The Tribunal is, in particular, rapidly becoming more and more restrictive on receivability1, 2. It is therefore to be expected that future complaints about recruitment will be summarily dismissed as irreceivable.

Our current President, Mr Campinos, did not come with a wish-list of appointees. Maybe that was not necessary since some of his close collaborators like Telmo Vilela already slipped into the Office during Mr Battistelli’s presidency. But since then we have seen a significant influx of EUIPO staff, starting with Ms Nellie Simon (VP4) and last but not least PD Cooperation. In particular in the IT area ex-EUIPO staff is well represented – see below. Also the nationality distribution – again – raises concern.

Being excluded from the recruitment procedures makes it impossible for the staff representation to form an opinion on the quality of the new recruits, on their grading and/or the fairness of the recruitment procedures. And we do not wish to condemn the new colleagues without giving them a chance to prove themselves. Maybe Mr Campinos has an excellent hand in choosing his experts. But if so: why not involve the staff representation in the recruitment procedure? If Mr Campinos’ choices are really the best, staff representation nominees would no doubt confirm this.

SUEPO Munich & The Hague

______
1 ILO-AT Judgments 3785
2 ILO-AT Judgments 3515, 3557, 3615 and 4194

Also cited by SUEPO yesterday or on Friday was the latest article from Dr. Bausch. Notice the first comment there. It says, under the name “Frequent flier, grounded” (game of words about the “flier”; at one point last year their site was almost literally 'grounded'):

The flier plays with buzzwords the president uses in his internal communiqués.
All the while while he drains EUIPO’s management, by hiring Alicante management staff.
It’s a referral to an internal trade union publication, listing newly created gigh level management posts, and the person filling the post.

With the amount of competence the EPO president has hired (if I were to believe his communiqués), EPO’s management is so competent, that external consultants were needed to tell them what to do as managers…

I wonder where the fault lies? With the external consultants who proposed the hiring of these highly competent people, or the hired managers who are unable to do what they’ve been hired for and consult consultants who have no idea about inner workings of international organisations and the rules they are bound to?

Either way, the office has more money than it knows what to do with it, but the consultants have ideas… Which would require expensive follow-up contracts of course…

PS: ask around in Alicante what the “brain drain” causes there, as EU-rules make it difficult for EUIPO to hire replacements (as the team of managers has the right to return for a few years).

we assume that’s American-style scare quotes in “brain drain” (British isn’t the same convention); we judged the professional background of several of these people; it’s a bit horrifying to see how little experience some of them have for the job at hand. Shocking even! But it’s not about what you know but who you know. Welcome to the age of “inclusion”; job applications may not be assessed based on underlying skills but intuition and sometimes corruption (the latter has been true for almost a decade at the EPO’s upper echelons). Immunity? Impunity? Sure. That’s EPO. Immunity breeds corruption. Inaction (or indifference) by European authorities merely harms the EU and its very credibility.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2020/03/08/about-euipo-epo-nepotism/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. GNU/Linux Turns 38 This Year, But the (Partly) Microsoft-Led Linux Foundation Wants You to Think It's Only 30 and a Good Friend of Microsoft

    What the Linux Foundation calls “Linux” (as its PR staff members refer to it in their new press release) is 38 years old, not 30. “Open Source” as a term did not formally exist yet, so this latest waffle makes no sense at all (the press release keeps mentioning a term that’s designed to attack and replace the original). But it’s part of a broader pattern of deception, attacking software freedom and pretending GNU never existed. Did money corrupt everything and is it too late to salvage truth, let alone freedom?



  2. Richard Stallman on Paid Smear Campaigns

    Dr. Richard Stallman on people who lie about him online (4 years after the older campaign of hate and distortion and half a decade before the current one, coordinated by groups funded by monopolies that dislike GPL)



  3. Links 22/4/2021: Grafana Goes for AGPLv3, Godot 3.3 Released, Mesa 21.0.3 Available

    Links for the day



  4. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 21, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 21, 2021



  5. Behind the Curtains of Cheap and Cheesy PR the EPO is a Machine of Oppression (Against Its Very Own Staff), Tribunal to Rule on Strike Busting

    The laughable regime of Campinos is a naked emperor with nothing but diplomatic immunity (almost not a single member of staff trusts the President) and the PR strategic front is becoming worse than pathetic; it's like the place is run by infantile career-climbing sociopaths with no qualifications, trying to weaponise a sea of money against staff, inquisitive media, and states (by bribing them or hiring lawyers to intimidate/bankrupt them); while the EPO still swims in money its reputation drowns too quickly to ever resurface, recover



  6. Links 21/4/2021: University of Minnesota Blacklisted Over Defects, Red Hat Satellite 6.9 is Out

    Links for the day



  7. Links 21/4/2021: VirtualBox 6.1.20, GCC 11.1 Release Candidate, Nginx 1.20.0

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 20, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 20, 2021



  9. Some People Who Asked to Be Removed From the Slanderous Hate Letter Against the FSF Are Still Being Denied Removal (But Not All)

    I am aware of some people (evidence is in the public domain for all to see) who asked to be removed from the hate list; their requests have not yet been processed, or simply denied. Maybe they should ask again. There are silent and selective changes.



  10. Overt Abuse and Mischaracterisations by Bully de Blanc

    The campaign to ruin the FSF and silence its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), goes months prior to the hate letter set up by Bully de Blanc, her boss, and the Microsoft-sponsored OSI; they just attack the licence (GPL/copyleft) and they try to redefine things for the corporations which fund them



  11. According to StatCounter, This Month GNU/Linux Market Share on Desktops/Laptops Exceeded 2% (Based on Sites They Monitor)

    StatCounter does not monitor everything and not every machine connects to the Web, but in relative terms, based on the chart above, no doubt GNU/Linux continues growing relative to other operating systems (chart plotted based on the latest raw data, rendered in LibreOffice Calc)



  12. At the EPO, Lawlessness Has Become “a New Normal”

    Without as much as a real consultation with those who are impacted (by the EPO's gross infringements) the management of the EPO rushes ahead again, enjoying zero oversight, no legal review, and no accountability or scrutiny of any kind



  13. Links 20/4/2021: Tails 4.18 and Mark Surman in Mozilla's Board of Directors

    Links for the day



  14. Microsoft as a Censorship Machine Working to Undermine Free Software and Code Sharing (Also Sharing in General)

    Microsoft is, as usual, a tool of destruction rather than creation; it seems to be better at ruining things and censoring things, notably things that compete against Microsoft or pose a threat to Microsoft's business model (and close partners, such as RIAA)



  15. Phoronix Needs to Exercise Caution and Stay Vigilant/Careful of Microsoft

    Taking note or lessons from the blunder of Raspberry Pi (back in February), Phoronix should be careful of Microsoft 'freebies' as they're never free and there are strings attached, destined to alienate longtime supporters



  16. IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 19, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, April 19, 2021



  17. Links 20/4/2021: EasyOS Dunfell 2.7.1, Phoronix Takes Microsoft 'Freebies', Microsoft Trying to Steal Credit for Linux on Mars

    Links for the day



  18. Richard Stallman on How UPC is a Trojan Horse for Software Patents in Europe

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, offers his analysis of the Unitary Patent (or UPC) and what it means for software patents in Europe now that the EPO increases its influence over continental law



  19. Technology Can Make Life Worse, Even in the Public Sector, Not Just the Private Sector

    There are growing concerns — increasingly justified concerns as a matter of fact — that customer service is universally going away and “COVID” has become the impenetrable shield or a cover in the face of facts, laws, and basic rights



  20. Links 19/4/2021: LibreSSL 3.3.2, OpenSSH 8.6, Firefox 88

    Links for the day



  21. Time to Move to Gemini, Wherever/Whenever Possible, as the World Wide Web is a Burden on Everybody

    A 30-minute rant about what the Web has become and the promise of gemini:// (designed to simplify everything, enable self-hosting, preserve privacy, and empower communities rather than military-connected monopolies)



  22. The Number of Signatures in the Anti-FSF Petition is Decreasing, Not Increasing

    A reader has notified Techrights that belatedly, perhaps where people’s job is at risk (we’ve heard of stories and situations wherein the employer’s view and a worker’s view diverge), the GNOME Foundation/OSI did in fact remove some people from the hate letter they had set up for their monopolistic sponsors. We do, however, still see some names in there of people who asked to be removed, so it must be a very selective process. They don’t want to lose face, so they must have made it very difficult to revoke one’s name. Exceptional circumstances? We have checked to confirm, based on the available archives, and indeed that number decreased since 10 days ago, whereas 6,415 people have thus far signed the support letter (it's still growing), so we’ve just re-plotted the chart.



  23. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 18, 2021



  24. How Many People Developed GNU (Maybe Hundreds) in the 1980s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains how code was managed and contributed in the early days of GNU



  25. Links 19/4/2021: Linux 5.12 RC8, GNU Poke 1.2, EndeavourOS 2021.04

    Links for the day



  26. Proprietary Software (BT Hub) Has Ruined My Whole Day

    While we did have some plans to publish long articles, those plans were curtailed or at least delayed due to the fact our sole device at home not to be controlled by us (a so-called 'Smart' Hub from BT) decided to break itself and by doing so bring productivity to a standstill (that firmware update, silently installed without notice or any form of consent, managed to screw with the local network)



  27. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 17, 2021



  28. Tolerating the Intolerant and Lacking Tolerance for Opposing Views

    The person who shouted...



  29. Letter of Support for Richard Stallman - Doing Better in Community

    "How do you support someone you’ve known for years who is unfairly attacked and publicly maligned?"



  30. Richard Stallman on Rejecting Workplace Bureaucracy in the 1970s

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains what inspired him to get involved in non-software matters


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts