03.22.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO and Microsoft Collude to Break the Law — The ‘Smoking Gun’: Hard Evidence That the EPO Has Been Lying About GDPR Compliance

Posted in Deception, Europe, Law, Microsoft, Patents at 6:56 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

What the EPO says:

EPO CA-20-19 page 49 of 88

Summary: The EPO’s Annual Reports of the Board of Auditors help show that the cronies of Benoît Battistelli have been lying all along about GDPR compliance; António Campinos is, as expected, just another one of those Battistelli cronies, in effect passing EPO funds into a gambling black hole and overseas violators of everybody’s privacy

We have managed to track down copies of the “audit reports” which allegedly confirm a close alignment between the EPO’s data protection framework and the GDPR.

As far as we have been able to work out, the “audit reports” that the EPO refers to in its data protection “puff pieces” are the annual reports of the supposedly independent Board of Auditors (warning: epo.org link). One of these “independent” auditors is Battistelli’s old crony from the INPI, Frederic Angermann.

” One of these “independent” auditors is Battistelli’s old crony from the INPI, Frederic Angermann.”Anyway, the annual audit report is usually issued as Administrative Council document no. 20 at the end of April or beginning of May each year.

So for 2020, the document is numbered CA/20/20 [PDF].

For 2019 it is CA/20/19 [PDF] and for 2018, the reference number is CA/20/18 [PDF].

“From this it can be seen that the the annual reports of the Board of Auditors just parrot the party line of EPO management…”We’ve made local copies as we want this to last and remain unchanged, just in case something mischievous was to happen at the EPO’s end. As happened in the past…

The documents are publicly available via the official webpage of the Council (warning: epo.org link) and can be found using the search keyword “auditors”.

The first mention of GDPR is in the 2018 audit report, CA/20/18, on page 6 of 81:

42) As of 25 May 2018, a new, uniform General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on data privacy will apply across the European Union (EU) to all organisations collecting and/or processing data from EU residents.
43) On July 2017, the President issued a task force with a mandate to assess the potential impact of this new EU GDPR on the EPO’s current data protection guidelines.
44) It is noted that the EPO’s current data protection guidelines are relatively closely in line with the new GDPR.
However, an action plan is in place to address the potential impact of the GDPR on the EPO.

EPO CA-20-18 page 6 of 81

The 2019 audit report, CA/20/19, contains the following statement:

259) The new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been in force since 25 May 2018. Even though the EU regulations do not directly apply to the EPO as an international organisation, basic principles have been implemented, as European citizens’ data is processed at the EPO.

It then goes on to talk about a the implementation of a “data protection register to record all the processing operations carried out on personal data” which can be accessed by EPO employees on the EPO intranet. It is not accessible to external data subjects but external parties can make a data subject access request “thus ensuring the right to information”. This is followed by a recommendation that data protection register needs to be updated and to be completed in order to ensure that all relevant information is available.

The report then states that the EPO’s IT department, referred to as IM (= Information Management) is “only involved in the GDPR analysis on a high-level basis” and that IM does not prepare the necessary implementation, such as deletion concepts.

This section of the report concludes with a recommendation to include IM much more in the GDPR evaluation “to ensure that technical and organisational measures are addressed adequately. Additionally technical solutions need to be evaluated.”

The 2020 audit report, CA/20/20, contains a section entitled “Analysis of implementation of GDPR requirements in the HR area” on page 7 of 89.
According to this:

41. Since the Office, as an international organisation that does not fall under the EU regulations, is not subject to the General Data Privacy Regulation (hereinafter: “GDPR”), the internal “Guidelines for the protection of personal data” were developed and introduced by the Office with the latest revision in 2014. The abovementioned guidelines are very close to the requirements of the GDPR and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and as such are to be implemented and followed by the Office.

EPO CA-20-20 page 7 of 89

There are two short paragraphs explaining that “audit procedures were carried out in respect of the adherence of the Office to the requirements of the above-mentioned guidelines within the HR area” and that the audit “resulted in a number of recommendations”, such as the need to update the Data Protection Registry and to define retention and deletion periods and actions for events such as retirement and leaving the Office.

“There hasn’t actually been any independent audit of the EPO’s data protection framework to determine the level of GDPR compliance.”Additionally, it recommends that “the awareness of the responsibilities of controllers in terms of data protection topics should be raised, and regular training sessions should be held for the HR department, as well as for other departments working with the personal data, to inform them about critical areas in the data protection process.”

From this it can be seen that the the annual reports of the Board of Auditors just parrot the party line of EPO management according to which “the EPO’s current data protection guidelines are relatively closely in line with the new GDPR” (CA/20/18) and “the internal ‘Guidelines for the protection of personal data’ [which] were developed and introduced by the Office with the latest revision in 2014 … are very close to the requirements of the GDPR and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725″ (CA/20/20).

There hasn’t actually been any independent audit of the EPO’s data protection framework to determine the level of GDPR compliance.

All that we have are bald assertions of GDPR compliance by EPO management which have been rubber-stamped by the auditors without further ado.

“All that we have are bald assertions of GDPR compliance by EPO management which have been rubber-stamped by the auditors without further ado.”Given that EPO management claimed at the time of adoption of the EPO’s internal “Guidelines for the protection of personal data” in 2014 that they were closed aligned to the earlier EU Regulation (EC) 45/2001, it remains to be explained how these same Guidelines could now manage to be compliant with the GDPR which was not adopted by the EU until 2016 and entered into force in 2018.

Of course it’s complete nonsense but as long as nobody actually goes to the trouble of carrying out an independent audit who’s going to notice anything?

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] EPO Budget Tanking?

    While the EPO‘s António Campinos incites people (and politicians) to break the law he’s also attacking, robbing, and lying to his own staff; thankfully, his staff isn’t gullible enough and some MEPs are sympathetic; soon to follow is a video and publication about the EPO’s systematic plunder (ETA midnight GMT)



  2. EPO.org (Official EPO Site) Continues to Promote Illegal Agenda and Exploit Ukraine for PR Stunts That Help Unaccountable Crooks

    epo.org has been turned into a non-stop propaganda machine of Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos because the EPO routinely breaks the law; it’s rather tasteless that while Ukrainians are dying the EPO’s mob exploits Ukraine for PR purposes



  3. [Meme] EPO Applicants Unwittingly Fund the War on Ukraine

    As we’ve just shown, António Campinos is desperately trying to hide a massive EPO scandal



  4. EPO Virtue-Signalling on the Ukrainian Front

    António Campinos persists in attention-shifting dross and photo ops; none of that can change the verifiable facts about the EPO’s connections to Lukashenko’s 'science park' in Minsk



  5. Links 19/05/2022: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 1 and Plasma 5.25 Beta

    Links for the day



  6. A Libera.Chat Anniversary and Happy Birthday (Maybe the Last) to 'Leenode'

    What became known as the so-called ‘Leenode’ is a cautionary tale, but maybe it is also a blessing in disguise because IRC as a whole seem to have become a lot more decentralised (as everything should be)



  7. Links 19/05/2022: The Gradual Fall of Netflix/DRM

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 18, 2022



  9. Links 18/05/2022: Qt Company Loses Chief; OpenSUSE Leap Micro 5.2 and RHEL 9 Final

    Links for the day



  10. Jim Zemlin's Wife is Funded by Puppies (Microsoft)

    Jim Zemlin — like his wife — is bagging millions from Microsoft, but that’s clearly a conflict of interest for the Linux Foundation



  11. Links 18/05/2022: More Defections From WordPress to Gemini

    Links for the day



  12. Links 18/05/2022: PikaScript and cURL's Annual User Survey

    Links for the day



  13. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 17, 2022



  14. Phoronix: Microsoft and Phoronix Sponsor (and Close Microsoft Partner) AMD All Over the Place

    When you’re taking massive 'gifts' from AMD (and also some from Microsoft) maybe it’s not surprising that editorial decisions change somewhat…



  15. EPO Has No F-ing Oversight

    Earlier today SUEPO mentioned this new article demonstrating that EPO President António Campinos can very obviously and blatantly violate the Code of Conduct of the Office without facing any consequences; there are translations too, so the report is now available in four languages



  16. [Meme] Linux-Rejecting Foundation

    The Linux Foundation never really leads by example; by default, it uses proprietary software



  17. Linux Foundation Almost Never uses Open Source

    The Linux Foundation uses proprietary software (look where they hire and take money from) and be sure they're probably not even aware of it



  18. Links 17/05/2022: Many More Games on GNU/Linux, YaST Development Report

    Links for the day



  19. Links 17/05/2022: Rocky Linux 8.6 and Budgie Desktop in Fedora

    Links for the day



  20. Patent Examiners Rising Up Against EPO Abuse

    Unhappy with the law-breaking autocracy (the EPO‘s management breaks the law as a matter of routine), fast-deteriorating working conditions and rapidly-decreasing quality of work (or lack of compliance with the law), workers have escalated further, topping off strikes and industrial actions with a large-scale petition



  21. [Meme] What Managers (Really) Mean by Acting Professionally

    The myth of 'professionalism' needs to die along with the façade of conformity as prerequisite for employment (Linus Torvalds can work just fine in a bathrobe in his own home)



  22. Internal Poll: 93% of European Patent Office (EPO) Workers Are Unhappy With the EPO

    On top of strike/s and industrial action/s there are now also petitions; at the EPO, almost all staff is "disgruntled" because of utterly corrupt and defunct leadership



  23. Links 17/05/2022: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Release Candidate

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 16, 2022



  25. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day



  26. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone



  27. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.



  28. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  29. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents



  30. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts