06.28.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

EPO Treats Staff as Disposable, Hence More Reluctant to Defy Unlawful Guidelines and Policies

Posted in Europe, Patents at 11:08 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Fear makes people more supine and passive; insecurity leads to obedience

On fixed-term contracts: New draft Circular 405 provides neither further clarity nor more work stability
New publication

Summary: Team Campinos continues to attack staff of Europe’s second-largest institution; amid pandemic they’re just totally misusing the crisis for PR purposes (warning: epo.org link) and also to take away rights of their very own staff

The Central Staff Committee (CSC) of the EPO has a new paper (shown above). In it, as one might expect, further erosions of staff’s protections are described.

This is bad news for everyone in Europe, not just EPO staff.

“This is bad news for everyone in Europe, not just EPO staff.”“Management has now tabled a draft Circular 405 (C405) on the conditions of conversion/extension of fixed-term contracts with the alleged intent to “give staff on fixed-term contracts greater clarity about their future prospect at the Office” (see Communiqué of 17-06-2021),” the CSC explains. “However, to us it is not apparent what in C405 could somehow help colleagues on fixed-term contracts to plan their future or could contribute to enhancing work stability.”

For those who have read this site long enough, maybe 3+ years, this ought to be familiar. Benoît Battistelli started this assault on the work security of staff and their families. António Campinos proves that he’s no better. It’s continuation of the very same agenda, including the attack on staff representatives.

The CSC adds: “Every decision appears to be at the discretion of the Office and the Office does not commit to anything regarding its employees. In addition, some points in draft C405 are unclear (e.g. on notice periods) and are likely to result in legal uncertainty. Read more in this paper.”

The letter was published and circulated yesterday, though it is dated 4 days ago. We reproduce it in full, below, as HTML:

Munich, 25.06.2021
sc21083mp

On fixed-term Contracts

New draft Circular 405 provides neither further clarity nor more work stability

Management has now tabled a draft Circular 405 (C405) on the conditions of conversion/extension of fixed-term contracts with the alleged intent to “give staff on fixed-term contracts greater clarity about their future prospect at the Office”.

However, to us it is not apparent what in C405 could somehow help colleagues on fixed-term contracts to plan their future or could contribute to enhancing work stability. Every decision appears to be at the discretion of the Office and the Office does not commit to anything regarding its employees. In addition, some points in draft C405 are unclear and are likely to result in legal uncertainty.

The future C405, once finalised, will have a tremendous impact on the life and families of the future generation of EPO staff. We will continue to bring forward our proposal and try to improve draft C405. We recognise the responsibility that lies with the working group members to ensure C405 is clear, comprehensive, and complete, and meets both the needs of the staff and of the Office.

A meeting of the working group on extensions/conversions of fixed-term contracts took place on Monday, June 14

The main topic of this working group meeting was a draft of the new Circular 405 (C405), which defines the procedures for the extension or conversion of fixed-term appointments. We expressed our disappointment with the draft. Indeed, none of our input seemed to have been considered. The meeting was closed after only 1.5hrs, and this was much too short for us to put forward all our concerns regarding the draft.

Arbitrary length of contracts, renewable an arbitrary number of times

The draft C405 confirms the model as initially presented based on 5 years + 5 years + conversion. However, it explicitly also permits the assignment of contracts which are shorter than 5 years. Furthermore, the initial idea of limiting the number of subsequent contracts to two contracts – one of the few aspects that was put forward by the administration which we had


welcomed – is now missing from the draft. This would allow the administration full discretion to re-new arbitrary-length contracts for an arbitrary number of times for a total duration of up to 10 years.

Notice period for conversion/extension of 6 or 12 months

The administration acknowledges that draft C405 needs to be clarified on this point, but the current draft provides for the following:

• A notice period of 6 months in case of extension
• A notice period of 12 months after 5 years of continuous service

We made a counter proposal which would provide a 12-month notice period for extension/conversion for all colleagues who would have served 5 years or more at the end date of the contract and 6 months for shorter periods of continuous service.

Conversion only after 10 years

Draft C405 states that conversion to a permanent contract should “as a matter of principle” only occur after 10 years. Although C405 does not exclude an earlier conversion in exceptional cases, it was made clear by the administration that there would be no mechanism for automatic conversion.

Possibility of internal competition for conversion

Draft C405 introduces the possibility to hold internal competitions for conversion of a contract based on qualifications, continuous years of service and/or tests. Final conversion would be subject to a set quota on conversion of fixed-term appointments to permanent employment. C405 lacks further information on how and when such a competition is organised – all seems to be at the discretion of the administration. We asked for further clarification on this point.

Conditions for extensions and conversion remain abstract

The Service Regulation states two conditions for extension/conversion: need of the service and individual performance. Draft C405 does not mention any commitment to offer alternative posts.

On needs of the service, draft C405 expands with the following:

• Continuation of the post: the post of a contract staff must continue to be relevant for the Office,
• Continued need for the specific set of knowledge, skills and competencies.

On individual performance of the employee, the draft C405 expands with the following:

• The employee’s ability, contribution and effectiveness, as well as the attitude to work and dealings with others,
• The employee’s development in knowledge, skills and competencies in respect to the
expectations as described in the performance goals.


Our preliminary view: Draft Circular 405 provides neither further clarity, nor more work stability

The intention of the administration on draft C405 was to “give staff on fixed-term contracts greater clarity about their future prospect at the Office”. However, it is not apparent to us what in C405 could somehow help colleagues on fixed-term contracts to plan their future or could contribute to enhancing work stability. Every decision appears to be at the discretion of the Office and the Office does not commit to anything regarding its employees, e.g. looking for alternative posts in case a job position is abolished. In addition, some points in draft C405 are unclear (e.g., on the notice periods), and are likely to result in legal uncertainty.

The future C405, once finalised, will have a tremendous impact on the life and families of the future generation of EPO staff. We recognise the responsibility that lies with the working group members to ensure the Circular is clear, comprehensive and complete and meets both, the needs of the staff and of the EPO.

C405 will also have an impact on the organisation as a whole. The EPO comes from a long tradition of facing future risks together as a community. In the past, a post at the EPO was a lifetime commitment, where new recruits gave up their careers to follow the mission of the Office. This created a strong feeling of belonging and pride for working at the EPO. This extraordinary “esprit de corps” was what differentiated the EPO from other patent offices, and which is the basis of its strengths that made the EPO the leading patent office in the world.

WIN-WIN counter-proposalWe will continue to bring forward our proposal and try to improve this draft C405 – for the better of our colleagues on fixed-term contracts and the Office.

Reminder: Past publications on fixed-term contracts

To raise awareness and to provide information on the issue of fixed-term contracts in the EPO, we have prepared a series of publications. We also produced a WIN-WIN counter-proposal which has been based on a principals paper.

[Redacted named and other stuff]

It’s important to fight for labour rights in general. The EPO is unaccountable and generally cash-rich; there’s no excuse for these relentless attacks on workers who not only relocated to another country for the job but also brought their family members with them (some are unable to speak the local language).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves



  2. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  3. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever



  4. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack



  5. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…



  6. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day



  7. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day



  8. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022



  9. Links 24/05/2022: nginx-1.22.0 and WordPress 6.0

    Links for the day



  10. [Meme] Divine Protection

    You won’t find Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) wearing a mask at the EPO because the rules of the Office do not apply to him



  11. António Campinos and the Alicante Clique (EPO Management, Appointed Based on Nepotism Despite Lack of Qualifications) Nowadays Exploiting Kids for PR Charades

    The sick old habit of exploiting kids for Public Relations (PR) and marketing purposes is all too common at the EPO (they’re constantly exploiting “the children” to associate criticism of the EPO with demeaning the young and innocent), but the management — which enjoys nepotism and immunity rather than relevant skills — carries on today and it’s being called “inaugural”



  12. [Meme] Snake on a Plane

    The EPO‘s President ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos), whom you never see wearing a mask (none of the photo ops; he does not even socially distance himself from peers, he wears sneakers instead of masks) during the height of a pandemic, is the "f***ing president"; don’t tell him to wear one…



  13. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XX — Entering Phase II

    We're about to resume the long-running series about the sick clique which ran GitHub until the assault on women became too much of a liability (among other wrongdoings and PR blunders)



  14. Links 24/05/2022: Fedora 37 Test Days and Tor Browser 11.0.13

    Links for the day



  15. Microsoft Vidal, as USPTO Director, Already Plays 'Political Cards' to Disguise and Deflect Away From the Corporate Agenda

    Microsoft Vidal, another corporate pawn in charge of the world’s most dangerous patent system, is using soft-spoken defle



  16. Links 24/05/2022: WAL-G 2.0

    Links for the day



  17. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 23, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 23, 2022



  18. Unethical Advertising, Published as So-called 'Articles', in CNX Software

    As we noted earlier this year, the CNX team is looking for money in the wrong places



  19. Links 23/05/2022: Broadcom to Buy VMware?

    Links for the day



  20. LibreOffice Conference 2022, As Before, Puts the Keynotes on Sale (the Rich Buy Influence, the Price Doubles)

    Discrimination against the community; talks and mentions are based on money, not merit ($2000 has become $4000 in just one year)



  21. Links 23/05/2022: Kdenlive 22.04.1 and New Alpine Linux Released

    Links for the day



  22. António Campinos Promotes Software Patents Using Buzzwords and Sketchy Loopholes With Dubious Legal Basis

    ‘Monopoly Tony’ (António Campinos) is shamelessly manipulating EPO processes at both ends (sender and receiver) to facilitate the illegal granting of invalid European software patents; we’re meant to think this former EU official and imposter (banker) is some guru in the sciences because he reads a lousy speech crafted for him with lots of meaningless buzzwords peppered all over it (he’s not good at reading it, either)



  23. [Meme] Jorgotta Be Kidding Us, Campinos!

    Monopoly Tony (António Campinos) runs the EPO by attacking the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence



  24. Unified Patent Court (UPC) Relies Too Much on Lies and Mischief Without Any Basis in Law

    Today’s video runs through the typical (weekly) lies from Team UPC — lies that are very easy to debunk; Team UPC not only drafted the thing but also looks to profit from it while misleading politicians and bribing publishers to spread intentionally misleading statements (lies)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 22, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 22, 2022



  26. Links 23/05/2022: Fedora 36 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  27. [Meme] It's My Working Party... And I'll Cry If I Want to!

    EPO President António Campinos is still not being held accountable for his Code of Conduct violations



  28. Links 22/05/2022: The 5.18 Kernel is Out

    Links for the day



  29. Gemini is Bigger Than Most People Care to Realise

    Geminispace has gotten to the point where it's too computationally expensive (or outright pricey) to study, let alone keep abreast of, Gemini capsules or the domain space as a whole



  30. Links 22/05/2022: Rock64 and Peppermint OS Release

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts