Bonum Certa Men Certa

Frankfurter Rundschau on the European Patent Office (EPO)

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Feb 16, 2024,
updated Feb 16, 2024

Frankfurt

THE German publication Frankfurter Rundschau has released this article by Thomas Magenheim-Hormann, who has a long history writing about EPO issues. The EPO's staff union saw the article and shared translations of it with staff (in English, French, and Dutch), even if automated and thus imprecise.

In order to make the publication more accessible today we're reproducing the English version as HTML, plain text, and GemText:

Frankfurter Rundschau

European Patent Office refuses

12.02.2024, 15:46

From: Thomas Magenheim-Hormann

An engineer at Siemens Energy

An engineer at Siemens Energy: "Large industrial groups thrive on innovation. But research is only worthwhile if the results can also be protected under patent law. © picture alliance / Rupert Oberh

The industry and its own works council criticise the EPO's auditing practices. However, the authority has so far refused to engage in dialogue.

You can call the letter from the staff representatives at the European Patent Office (EPO) a resolution or a fire letter. What it lists sounds like years of ignorance on the part of management, which does not exempt the head of the Patent Office, Antonio Campinos. "Quality is the appreciation of many and not the dissatisfaction of a few," the works council quotes him as saying about strongly articulated quality problems. As Campinos suggests, it is not the few who are criticising. For a good year now, an industry initiative called IPQC has been denouncing poor patent quality. Patent attorneys have been doing this for a long time. Patent professionals have also voiced their criticism. Now the internal works council has also joined in.

The EPO trade union Suepo criticises the demand to process more and more patent applications in less and less time, which is at the expense of quality. At the same time, the union writes, the number of patent staff is being thinned out, resulting in "increased pressure on remaining patent applicants and less available patenting time per application".

According to the letter, the office is increasingly acting like a profit-orientated corporation. Applications that were never recognised in the past are now being given positive stamps of approval. Promises to pay attention to quality remained empty words. "Despite publicly voiced concerns about patent quality, the pressure to produce priifers remains undiminished," criticises the staff. In some cases, it is even being exacerbated. Meanwhile, the office management remains silent. They do not comment on internal documents such as that of the works council.

A former top manager at the office also criticises current patent practice. "Today, quality is falling by the wayside, a lax approach is everywhere," writes Jacques Michel, current head of the patent consultancy Europatis, in a blog. "Quality is falling by the wayside," blogs renowned patent attorney Martin Wilming, speaking of a fatal undesirable development.

Beat Weibel feels vindicated. "We are open to constructive dialogue," says the head of patents at Siemens. He and his company have joined IPQC together with other well-known companies from Europe and the USA to work with the patent office to discuss quality improvements. This was last the case last November, when IPQC brought together representatives from national patent offices for talks. "The European Patent Office was also invited, but stayed away," regrets Weibel. It had announced that it no longer wished to make direct contact with the IPQC, but only to discuss content via organisations such as the Federation of German Industries (BDI). Weibel believes that this is no longer constructively possible in such a forum. "IPQC members are directly affected, so they speak plainly and don't have to take a political view like an association," he says.

In contrast, IPQC's concerns have met with an open ear at the national patent offices. "The German Patent Office shows great willingness to engage in dialogue," praises the Siemens patent chief. Like the EPO, it is based in Munich. The Siemens man is also annoyed by the EPO's refusal to engage in dialogue because the criticism is well documented, as a study by the analysis company ipQuants shows. According to the study, the number of patent applications at the EPO rose by a good 7.5 per cent between 2018 and 2022, while the number of patents fell by seven per cent. The time available to file an application has shrunk by around a tenth. Important priiping steps were being omitted more and more often. "The depth of validation has decreased, more and more applications are being waved through," says Weibel, summarising the results of the study. This has consequences when patents are contested. According to ipQuants, this is now successful in almost three quarters of such cases. "That is a very high figure," emphasises Weibel. The office replies that the study is not based on correct data, but does not mention this and does not answer any questions.

The IPQC criticises that it is becoming increasingly difficult to be certain of a patent and to build investments on it. Inflationary patent authorisations also have other consequences. "Badly priced patents can block innovation," warns Weibel. Even a start-up could be rejected as a result.

In June, the IPQC will again attempt to enter into dialogue with the EPO. A congress is planned. The question of whether the EPO will come this time, however, remains unanswered.

From Thomas Magenheim

We may never see Benoît Battistelli behind bars (he's too old), but there's still some prospect of justice for António Campinos and his corrupt friends in the EU. The damage they've done is truly enormous.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Links 01/06/2025: "Vibe Coding" Turns Out to be a Fraud and Amazon Merits Boycott, Argue Bloggers
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: "Stardust" and Ideal PC Setup
Links for the day
Links 01/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, "It's FOSS" Still Promoting Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 01/06/2025: Simplification and Networks Everywhere
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 31, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 31, 2025
Google Bribes EFF. EFF Promotes LLM Slop as 'Fair Use'. To GAFAM It's a Low-Cost Lobby Hedge.
So the bribes pay off ("slush fund") and the word spreads
Slopwatch: Fake Text and Images, Financial Bubbles, and Scams in "Intelligent" Clothing
Sometimes what they mean by "AI" is just cheap labour somewhere else, as we discussed in IRC a few hours ago
Why Microsoft is Collapsing (Similar to What's Happening at IBM), As Insiders See It
IBM seems like one heck of a mess
Reliable Computing Means Free (Libre) Computing
Sites that want to promote security ought to deal with the biggest issues
Links 31/05/2025: US Court Orders Sides With RFE/RL, War Updates From Ukraine
Links for the day
Gemini Links 31/05/2025: ARM Server and power_supply Subsystem
Links for the day
Links 31/05/2025: Slop Stigmatised as Disinformation, Catalyst/Driver of "Death of Communication"
Links for the day
Common Sense 101: Do Not Write Blog Posts Saying You Want to Murder Colleagues (or Yourself)
Only crazy people would think stabbings are a joke
Microsoft Bankruptcy
"Microsoft unit in Russia to file for bankruptcy, database shows"
Techrights Does Not Compete With LLM Slop, It Exposes the Bastards, Plagiarists and Scammers Who Do That
People like Scam Altman, still facing a lawsuit from his own sister for sexual abuse against her
Links 31/05/2025: Microsoft-Connected Builder.ai is a Fraud and US is Purging Students Based on Race/Nationality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Limmat, Doomscrollers, and Arguments Parsing
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 30, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 30, 2025
The "AI" (Slop) Bubble Already Popped, But It's Not an Overnight Collapse
where Microsoft put its money
No More Steven Astorino at IBM, Chatter About Weekly/Nonstop Layoffs at IBM
What happened? Good luck guessing.
Looking at Corruption in Europe, Going Beyond the EPO
Expect a new series to kick off very soon
Slopwatch: Security SPAM and LLM Slop for SEO and FUD Purposes, Perpetually Tarnishing the Perception of Linux and (Open)SSH Security
A lot of this Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD) comes from Microsoft and its LLMs
Links 30/05/2025: Google's LLM Slop Pushers Are Killing Journalism and Shira Perlmutter Fails to Stop Bribed Regime From Legalising Plagiarism (in "AI" Clothing)
Links for the day
Links 30/05/2025: Offline Arts and "Threshold of Patience"
Links for the day
Signing Off Serious Lies With a Statement of Truth is No Joking Matter
It's not hard to see what's happening here
Links 30/05/2025: LLM Slop Already Ingests and Vomits Its Own Garbage, Facebook Exec Admits Copyrights a Concern Too
Links for the day
Mass Layoffs at Microsoft Result in More Whistleblowers From Microsoft
Microsoft's predatory pricing is further
Slopwatch: Planet Ubuntu Became LLM Slop and Some People Fail to See the Immorality of Plagiarism
it lessens the incentive for people to publish real articles
EPO Poll: 68% Dissatisfied With Quality of Slop (Wrongly Framed as "AI") for Patent Classification
Slop does not work, it's just falsely advertised with extra hype (funded by slop pushers that sponsor the major media)
Big Crowds Gather to Learn About Software Freedom From the Man Who Started GNU/Linux in 1983
"It was a great success"
Microsoft Layoffs Again in Bay Area
Microsoft relies on people's false belief that being "in LinkedIn" will get you a job; well, seems like even working inside LinkedIn really sucks and you lose the job
Gemini Links 30/05/2025: Fighting Against the Bad News, and Slop is Dehumanisation Disguised as "Intelligence"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 29, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 29, 2025