Daniel Pocock Explains Social Engineering in Debian and Other Communities Increasingly Controlled by "Barons"
Communities are not corporations
Today is the second day of our twentieth year and both sites have been very busy (the sister site had over 40 pages yesterday). Today will be another busy day and it began with IBM and EPO, as usual. We then reprinted 3 articles with permission from Daniel Pocock. On Debian and justice he then wrote:
The vast empires of social media barons are built and controlled almost entirely by men. Their number one tactic for tricking women to submit all their data and communications to male surveillance is by giving women a false sense of empowerment. The pro-choice lobby endears themselves to women with the same narratives.
In the end, there are women who regretted having an abortion and there are women who came to regret giving all their data to social control media.
In my JuristGate reports, I look at how customers were tricked by our own lawyers. It is not hard to imagine that some people take their own life after being tricked like that.
In the most compelling case of trickery, I've examined how Adrian von Bidder-Senn died, age 32, on the same day as our wedding. It was Palm Sunday. By going over all the Debianism-related deaths, we find the whole Debian suicide cluster. Based on the things written by Frans Pop, I can't ignore the feeling that he felt tricked when he died. When we traced the Debian suicide cluster right back to its origins, we find the first death Joel "Espy" Klecker occurred in the US State of Oregon immediately after the high-profile legalisation of euthanasia. Moreover, the writings of Klecker show us that he was also tricked by the promise of a philosophy that our peers used to deceive us.
We can relate to a lot of the "trickery" (his word) that the refers to, as many of the same methods and very same actors (people) tried the same on us, to no avail. They spent a fortune trying to silence us. Mr. Pocock gave a talk about this last year in the US. █