Bonum Certa Men Certa

McAfee Receives Warning After Spreading GPL FUD

As you may recall, McAfee recently contributed to Linux and GPL FUD and later tried to mitigate the damage (without retraction of its claims). Someone whom I know has independently decided to challenge McAfee for its alleged GPL violations. I helped in drafting a response, which is appended below.

Contact was first made, but the issue at hand was escaped.




Dear Jerry,

Thank you for contacting McAfee Customer Service.

I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience but I am unable to understand your message. Please rephrase and resend your issue in detail so that I can assist you more efficiently.

I would like to inform you that McAfee Customer Service can only answer issues related to McAfee.

Please include your previous correspondence when you reply to this e-mail. Your reference number for this contact is 81456567.

Sincerely,

Venj V. McAfee CS-Tier 1




Here is the second message, with responses yet to come.




Dear Sir,

The company that you work for, McAfee, develops and sells software. Apparently, included in your software are third party contributions protected under the General Public License, otherwise known as the GPL. The GPL license stipulates that your company can indeed use GPL-licensed software to develop the products which McAfee sells, provided that you make modification to the GPL-licensed source code available and freely accessible for public use. If GPL code that you added to software was changed by you, then under those provisions of the GPL I request access to the source code of parts of your products that make use of the GPL-licensed source code.

To help you understand what is being requested, here are some relevant URLs that support my request for relevant McAfee source code. A copy of the licence is typically accompanied with to source code that you download for use and the language is clear enough to ensure understanding of use (there are no 'hidden' expectations and surprising obligations).

The General Public License 2.0 can be found at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt

There is an excellent FAQ that explains the terms of the GPL at: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html

One of the relevant points leading to my request for your source code being: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LinkingWithGPL

The URL's where your company, McAfee, admits to using GPL'd source code in your products may be found at: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/05/mcafee-throws-fud-gpl

Additionally see:

http://www.crn.com/security/205600714

I await your next message containing the location on the McAfee website where I can freely access the sources. If GPL-licensed code was never modified and the articles above are incorrect, then I apologize in advance.

Thank you very much for accepting my query.




Perhaps Jerry will get to the bottom of this. This hasn't anything to do with BoycottNovell, but permission was given to post this as an open letter for greater exposure and increased public scrutiny.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Ongoing Media Campaign, Sponsored by Bill Gates, to Portray Critics of Gates Crimes as "Conspiracy" Cranks
In prior years we wrote about this PR tactic of Gates
 
Gemini Links 26/02/2024: Mastodon Trouble, RSS, and Zombie-scrolling
Links for the day
Links 26/02/2024: Suicide Crisis and Doctor Walkouts in South Korea
Links for the day
Why Do People Who Attack GNU/Linux Hate Women So Much?
My wife is being viciously targeted again
[Meme] Follow the Law, Not Corrupt Bosses
pressuring staff to break the rules to make more money
The EPO Uses Appraisals to Force Staff to Illegally Grant European Patents or Lose the Job. The Matter is Being Escalated en Masse to ILO-AT, Requesting a Review of Appraisal Reports.
it is only getting worse over time
Debian History Harassment & Abuse culture evolution
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 25, 2024
IRC logs for Sunday, February 25, 2024IRC logs for Sunday, February 25, 2024
Gemini Links 25/02/2024: Chronic Pain and a Hall of the Broken Things
Links for the day
Links 25/02/2024: New Rants About 'Hey Hi' Hype and JavaScript Bloat
Links for the day
Going Static Helped the Planet, Too
As we've been saying since last year
Chris Rutter, Winchester College, Clare College choir, Arm Ltd, underage workers & Debian accidental deaths
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Gemini Links 25/02/2024: Blocking Crawlers and Moving to gemserv
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 24, 2024
IRC logs for Saturday, February 24, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
[Meme] Objective Objection at the EPO
No more quality control
EPO Staff Explains Why It Cannot Issue EPC-Compliant European Patents (in Other Words, Why Many Fake Patents Get Issued)
chaos inside
Links 24/02/2024: More Sanctions Against BRICS, Software Patents Squashed
Links for the day
Microsoft's Demise on the Server Side Continues Unabated This Month
Netcraft says so
Bonnie B. Dalzell Explains Her Experience With Richard Stallman
new essay
Gemini Links 24/02/2024: OpenBSD Advocacy and Nonfree Firmware Debated
Links for the day
Mark Shuttleworth & Debian Day Volunteer Suicide cover-up
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 23, 2024
IRC logs for Friday, February 23, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
Links 24/02/2024: EA Planning Layoffs and 'Liquor Regulators Are Seeking Revenge on Bars That Broke Pandemic Rules'
Links for the day
Gemini Links 24/02/2024: In Defense of Boilerplate and TinyWM Broke
Links for the day