ReverseGTR | schestowitz: is the new news posted yet? | Sep 01 00:14 |
schestowitz | No, not yet. Urgent? I could do it tonight or tomorrow. Your choice. | Sep 01 00:15 |
ReverseGTR | schestowitz: not really urgent, I was just wondering about the progress | Sep 01 00:15 |
schestowitz | No progress on it yet. It needs tidying up a bit. I then need to connect it to previous posts so that I needn't repeat old citations and arguments. | Sep 01 00:16 |
twitter | Checked out that attack link of yours and found this http://blogbeebe.blogspot.co... | Sep 01 00:49 |
schestowitz | Yes. He did these before... | Sep 01 00:49 |
schestowitz | Groklaw gives him the kick. | Sep 01 00:49 |
schestowitz | He backed O'Gara and the spaying on PJ. | Sep 01 00:50 |
twitter | Quotes "Fucker T. Washington", obvious troll. | Sep 01 00:50 |
schestowitz | I'm off to bed now. | Sep 01 00:50 |
twitter | night night | Sep 01 00:50 |
ReverseGTR | cya | Sep 01 00:50 |
schestowitz | Yes, a recist racist troll | Sep 01 00:50 |
schestowitz | *racist | Sep 01 00:50 |
ReverseGTR | and keep'em coming | Sep 01 00:50 |
ReverseGTR | lol yea, hence why less folks will take that rant seriously | Sep 01 00:51 |
ReverseGTR | and what does he or she know about exposing misdeeds? | Sep 01 00:51 |
*dsmith_ has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) | Sep 01 02:10 |
*libervisco has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)) | Sep 01 02:14 |
*dsmith_ (n=dsmith@c-76-114-142-224.hsd1.md.comcast.net) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 02:14 |
*mib_dgw0ao (i=3e752fb7@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-8797ff566af46cf5) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 02:15 |
*Egyptian[Home] (n=Egyptian@62.117.47.183) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 02:16 |
*Egyptian[Home] (n=Egyptian@62.117.47.183) has left #boycottnovell | Sep 01 02:16 |
*mib_dgw0ao has quit (Client Quit) | Sep 01 02:16 |
*dsmith_ has quit (Client Quit) | Sep 01 02:17 |
*libervisco (n=daniel@tuxhacker/libervisco) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 02:29 |
*dsmith_ (n=dsmith@c-76-114-142-224.hsd1.md.comcast.net) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 04:08 |
*dsmith_ has quit (Remote closed the connection) | Sep 01 04:52 |
*ReverseGTR has quit ("Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com") | Sep 01 09:39 |
*moparx has quit ("leaving") | Sep 01 09:53 |
*trmanco (n=trmanco@bl7-11-108.dsl.telepac.pt) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 10:18 |
*tessier__ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) | Sep 01 11:17 |
*tessier__ (n=treed@wsip-70-164-113-3.sd.sd.cox.net) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 11:17 |
*kentma (n=user@host86-156-216-1.range86-156.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 12:04 |
*kentma has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) | Sep 01 12:19 |
*kentma (n=user@host86-156-216-1.range86-156.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 12:34 |
*PetoKraus (n=Peter@host-77-247-224-25.isper.sk) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 13:14 |
*kentma1 (n=user@ellandroad.demon.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 13:29 |
*kentma has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) | Sep 01 13:30 |
*ima_nightmare (i=3e31dba5@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-2a06d8f0059b401e) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 13:33 |
*kentma1 has quit ("Leaving.") | Sep 01 14:04 |
*kentma (n=user@ellandroad.demon.co.uk) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 14:05 |
*ima_nightmare has quit ("http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client") | Sep 01 14:10 |
twitter | :) Nice round up of astroturf groups. | Sep 01 14:38 |
schestowitz | Old news though; good for future referencing, e.g. when ACT comes up. | Sep 01 14:40 |
*kentma has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) | Sep 01 15:00 |
*kentma (n=user@host86-156-216-1.range86-156.btcentralplus.com) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 15:02 |
schestowitz | FAA runs Windows. Check the latest: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir... | Sep 01 15:10 |
schestowitz | The Snyder article has made Slashdot < http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08... >. Since the guy like to sling mud at Linux, I believe his hidden message in this case is that there's no money in GNU/Linux. It's a form of FUD, which he backs using studies from The 451 Group. The first comment is interesting too. | Sep 01 15:28 |
schestowitz | Reader says "Microsoft Jack trashing Apple again": http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/tech... | Sep 01 15:32 |
twitter | Windows is no longer mentioned in that FAA article. Did you save the text? | Sep 01 16:02 |
schestowitz | Which article? | Sep 01 16:03 |
twitter | http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news... | Sep 01 16:03 |
schestowitz | http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.li... | Sep 01 16:04 |
twitter | Nice work. | Sep 01 16:06 |
schestowitz | I did mine too: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.li... | Sep 01 16:06 |
schestowitz | BTW, I'm separating these from large threads because Microsoft Munchkins hijack them and spread libel. | Sep 01 16:06 |
trmanco | http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news... | Sep 01 16:06 |
trmanco | this one almost got me | Sep 01 16:06 |
schestowitz | Yeah, I gave up after the opening when I saw it hours ago. | Sep 01 16:07 |
twitter | Power just failed, battery won't last long, have to see you later .... | Sep 01 16:10 |
*twitter (n=willhill@68.225.99.100) has left #boycottnovell | Sep 01 16:11 |
schestowitz | Banter at the Inquirer. You can tell what to skip based on writers. | Sep 01 16:11 |
*mib_g7349c has quit ("http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client") | Sep 01 17:02 |
*mib_rd720l (i=43f0d869@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-f86875df44be9373) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 17:05 |
MinceR | apparently Monkey Boy managed to buy the hungarian court system after all | Sep 01 17:08 |
MinceR | (hu) http://index.hu/politika/belfold/microgvhper0/ | Sep 01 17:08 |
schestowitz | :-( http://translate.google.com/transl... | Sep 01 17:09 |
schestowitz | http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/24/mic... | Sep 01 17:09 |
schestowitz | Can you translate a paragraph or two for me, please? I'll attribute. | Sep 01 17:10 |
MinceR | i don't know how to translates the names of the authorities involved | Sep 01 17:10 |
MinceR | s/tes/te/ | Sep 01 17:11 |
schestowitz | It can be a rough translation. | Sep 01 17:11 |
schestowitz | I just don't know what's happening here. | Sep 01 17:11 |
schestowitz | Nothing in English, I think: http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=u... | Sep 01 17:12 |
MinceR | the court of budapest decided it was legal to use the name of microsoft in the public procurement procedure in which they wanted to buy software for 25 million HUF even though a few days earlier the Economic Competition Office decided it was a violation of neutrality of competition | Sep 01 17:15 |
MinceR | though this is apparently only a first instance decision | Sep 01 17:16 |
schestowitz | Thanks. | Sep 01 17:18 |
schestowitz | I'll post about it. | Sep 01 17:18 |
MinceR | np | Sep 01 17:23 |
schestowitz | Bear this in mind: ... | Sep 01 17:25 |
schestowitz | http://boycottnovell.com/2008... | Sep 01 17:26 |
schestowitz | [Oh, scroll down to the bit abotu Hungary. PJ saw this too.] | Sep 01 17:26 |
MinceR | bbl | Sep 01 17:32 |
PetoKraus | haha, great! | Sep 01 17:33 |
schestowitz | http://www.computerweekly.com/Artic... Microsoft is using AstroTurfers that it hires via LawMedia Group (and possibly others) to attack this deal. Microsoft complains about "anti-competitive" (pot, kettle, black), privacy intrusion (pot, kettle, black) and it hires shills for a fact. | Sep 01 17:55 |
MinceR | re | Sep 01 17:57 |
schestowitz | What does Microsoft call "fighting Linux"? "Fighting piracy". Watch this from the news: http://www.networkworld.com/news/200... "But Ndung'u said that the corporation has developed a pricing structure for cyber cafés that requires them to pay US$10 per desktop annually. " The cafés have moved to GNU/Linux! There were many reports about it. | Sep 01 18:01 |
*moparx (n=moparx@pdpc/supporter/base/moparx) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 18:16 |
*zoobab (i=zoobab@vic.ffii.org) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 18:33 |
zoobab | pong | Sep 01 18:33 |
schestowitz | Brazil statement: http://www.convergenciadigital.com.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/s... | Sep 01 18:34 |
schestowitz | China patents (via Andy): v | Sep 01 18:35 |
schestowitz | http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2008-... | Sep 01 18:35 |
*kentma has quit ("Leaving.") | Sep 01 18:44 |
*trmanco has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)) | Sep 01 20:04 |
schestowitz | http://www.convergenciadigital.com.br/cgi/cgilua.ex... "albeit reluctantly, re-evaluate our assessment of ISO/IEC, particularly in its relevance to our various national government interoperability frameworks." | Sep 01 20:18 |
*trmanco (n=trmanco@bl5-132-239.dsl.telepac.pt) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 20:21 |
*seller_liar (n=seller@201-42-211-109.dsl.telesp.net.br) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 20:29 |
seller_liar | hello | Sep 01 20:29 |
seller_liar | someone please can help in this situation: | Sep 01 20:30 |
schestowitz | Hey, seller_liar. I have news from Brazil | Sep 01 20:30 |
seller_liar | http://forum.paldo.org/index.php?a... | Sep 01 20:30 |
*schestowitz looks | Sep 01 20:30 |
seller_liar | I see, thanks roy | Sep 01 20:30 |
schestowitz | Isn't the D language a Microsoft one? | Sep 01 20:31 |
schestowitz | Vapourware... | Sep 01 20:31 |
seller_liar | really | Sep 01 20:31 |
MinceR | iirc it isn't | Sep 01 20:31 |
schestowitz | Wait. I'll check to be sure. | Sep 01 20:31 |
MinceR | it's from Digital Mars | Sep 01 20:32 |
seller_liar | yes | Sep 01 20:32 |
schestowitz | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_language | Sep 01 20:32 |
seller_liar | exist a free gcc compiler,called gdc | Sep 01 20:32 |
schestowitz | http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1159 | Sep 01 20:32 |
schestowitz | That's what had me believe so. Let me reread it now. | Sep 01 20:33 |
schestowitz | "D will be a declarative language aimed at non-developers, and will be based on eXtensible Application Markup Language (XAML), sources, who asked not to be named, said." | Sep 01 20:33 |
schestowitz | Blech. Silverblightfish. | Sep 01 20:33 |
seller_liar | it's another d | Sep 01 20:33 |
seller_liar | or not | Sep 01 20:33 |
schestowitz | I'm not sure yet. | Sep 01 20:34 |
seller_liar | because D is a normal language , imperative | Sep 01 20:35 |
schestowitz | http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ | Sep 01 20:35 |
schestowitz | That's what I thought. Is Microsoft, brandname-jacking? Well, with a single-letter names, that's likely. | Sep 01 20:35 |
seller_liar | digital mars = ms proxy | Sep 01 20:36 |
schestowitz | http://news.cnet.com/Microsoft-sued... | Sep 01 20:36 |
seller_liar | The D language is statically typed and compiles directly to machine code. It's multiparadigm, supporting many programming styles: imperative, object oriented, and metaprogramming | Sep 01 20:36 |
seller_liar | intro in digital mars iste | Sep 01 20:36 |
schestowitz | It looks like W32. | Sep 01 20:36 |
seller_liar | *site | Sep 01 20:36 |
schestowitz | Look at their Web site | Sep 01 20:36 |
schestowitz | .http://www.digitalmars.com/d/download.html | Sep 01 20:37 |
schestowitz | Hmmm... | Sep 01 20:37 |
schestowitz | Maybe Microsoft just 'extends' it like it did with Java. | Sep 01 20:37 |
seller_liar | but I do not know.... | Sep 01 20:38 |
schestowitz | Ben Slivka, Microsoft: "Don’t encourage new, cross-platform Java classes, especially don’t help get great Win 32 implementations written/deployed. [...] Do encourage fragmentation of the Java classlib space." | Sep 01 20:38 |
seller_liar | so digital mars can be a ms proxy | Sep 01 20:39 |
seller_liar | java competitor | Sep 01 20:39 |
seller_liar | and about news in Brazil | Sep 01 20:40 |
schestowitz | Why use a proxy though? | Sep 01 20:40 |
seller_liar | what | Sep 01 20:40 |
schestowitz | Brazil has some seniors wanting to give ISO (and Microsoft) the boot. | Sep 01 20:40 |
schestowitz | http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?... | Sep 01 20:41 |
schestowitz | Smartsoft, LLC 88 Petersburg Road Petersburg NJ US 0827065.204.18.192FreeBSDApache/2.2.4 FreeBSD mod_ssl/2.2.4 OpenSSL/0.9.7e-p1 DAV/2 PHP/4.4.4 with Suhosin-Patch 1-Aug-2008 | Sep 01 20:41 |
seller_liar | smartsoft | Sep 01 20:42 |
MinceR | i thought D was not interpreted and as such it was intended to be a competitor to C++, not Java | Sep 01 20:43 |
seller_liar | whay mince | Sep 01 20:43 |
seller_liar | *why | Sep 01 20:43 |
*_Doug_ (i=c17a2faa@gateway/web/ajax/mibbit.com/x-fd232a12990af1f0) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 20:44 |
_Doug_ | hi there ... computer nerds with no girlfriend .. :) | Sep 01 20:44 |
MinceR | because none of its descriptions have ever mentioned any interpreters | Sep 01 20:44 |
seller_liar | yes,but c have a lot of object-oriented tech | Sep 01 20:45 |
seller_liar | *d hav a lot , | Sep 01 20:45 |
MinceR | benJIman: you said you'd refer me to some info on some currently implemented JIT optimizations | Sep 01 20:46 |
benJIman | Ah yes. | Sep 01 20:46 |
MinceR | oh, one more reason: the D website keeps comparing it to C++ | Sep 01 20:49 |
seller_liar | ok | Sep 01 20:50 |
seller_liar | but, why d attacks c++, is just technical comparisions | Sep 01 20:51 |
seller_liar | or digital mars have more reasons | Sep 01 20:51 |
seller_liar | hey roy ,do you have some link about senior in brazil | Sep 01 20:54 |
schestowitz | Hey, _Doug_ | Sep 01 20:55 |
schestowitz | http://www.convergenciadigital.com.br/cgi/cg... | Sep 01 20:56 |
benJIman | MinceR: http://www.dcs.warwick.ac.uk/~rlmw/talks/vms.pdf has some good overview of reasons for using JIT for performance. http://java.sun.com/performance/reference/whitep... has some specific new and interesting optimisations added in java 6, obviously those are only the new ones. There's a shedload of academic papers on JVM optimisations http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q... I'm trying to find where I boo | Sep 01 21:01 |
*MinceR didn't know java 6 was out already :) | Sep 01 21:01 |
_Doug_ | Roy .. what ? | Sep 01 21:02 |
seller_liar | cacao does jit compilation | Sep 01 21:02 |
benJIman | MinceR: 7 out in a few months. | Sep 01 21:02 |
_Doug_ | Is jit compilation safe over the Internet ? | Sep 01 21:05 |
seller_liar | schestowitz: there are a company here called "rede Globo" , the most destructive company in Brazil | Sep 01 21:05 |
seller_liar | _Doug_:I do not know doug,but is more fast | Sep 01 21:06 |
MinceR | are there any benchmarks how JIT compares to native code with these optimizations? | Sep 01 21:06 |
seller_liar | schestowitz, globo has a lot of contracts with ms some time ago | Sep 01 21:06 |
schestowitz | benJIman: your mesage got truncated at "I'm trying to find where I boo" | Sep 01 21:06 |
MinceR | i see it as "...where I book" | Sep 01 21:07 |
seller_liar | MinceR:gcj does fast compilation in native, is very fast | Sep 01 21:07 |
benJIman | ... interesting explanation of optimistic optimisations in java. | Sep 01 21:07 |
_Doug_ | seee ya'll later .. | Sep 01 21:07 |
schestowitz | seller_liar: got articles about it? Even in Portuguese? | Sep 01 21:07 |
*_Doug_ has quit ("http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client") | Sep 01 21:07 |
MinceR | apparently i was right about truncation on irc being impossible to predict. | Sep 01 21:07 |
benJIman | seller_liar: Native != faster. | Sep 01 21:07 |
seller_liar | schestowitz:wait | Sep 01 21:07 |
MinceR | i'm still waiting to see proof of JIT having surpassed the performance of native code :> | Sep 01 21:08 |
benJIman | seller_liar: A JIT enables optimisations to be done later, while more information such as profiling is available, and to try optimisations and fall back to unoptimised version if assertions fial. | Sep 01 21:08 |
schestowitz | MinceR: it wasn't just me then. Pidgin was the cause at times (other people who use it) | Sep 01 21:08 |
seller_liar | benJIman: I know ,but native is more fast ,gcj takes a lot of resources to compile, but gentoo users always say that is fast | Sep 01 21:08 |
seller_liar | schestowitz:I know | Sep 01 21:09 |
benJIman | seller_liar: native is not faster. | Sep 01 21:09 |
MinceR | schestowitz: it's client-independent -- there's a limit on irc message length (512 bytes, iirc), and i suspected that includes at least a prefix the sending client can't really know | Sep 01 21:09 |
benJIman | seller_liar: When you compile ahead of time to native code you lose the possibility to do optimisations later. | Sep 01 21:09 |
MinceR | (plus iirc it varies depending on where the receiver is) | Sep 01 21:09 |
seller_liar | benJIman:yes | Sep 01 21:10 |
benJIman | seller_liar: So about the only thing you might gain on is startup time. | Sep 01 21:10 |
MinceR | so theoretically JIT can be faster than native code. we know that | Sep 01 21:10 |
benJIman | And in practice. | Sep 01 21:10 |
MinceR | where are the benchmarks to show that? | Sep 01 21:10 |
seller_liar | schestowitz: I will post globo articles after , I need to go , but see the movie " beyond citizen kane" | Sep 01 21:13 |
schestowitz | seller_liar: have fun. Thanls. | Sep 01 21:14 |
*seller_liar has quit ("Saindo") | Sep 01 21:14 |
benJIman | MinceR: If you google java benchmarks you will see hundreds, and as you can see you can show pretty much whatever you want with benchmarks depending on what you test. | Sep 01 21:17 |
*MinceR shows that C is still faster then Java. :> | Sep 01 21:17 |
benJIman | If you do microbenchmarks that test specific things that java's JIT optimises then it massively outperforms precompiled versions. If you do macrobenchmarks what are you actually testing? If you do complicated benchmarks have you implemented it the same way in both languages? | Sep 01 21:18 |
MinceR | it doesn't have to be implemented the same way -- it has to be implemented in the way that language works best | Sep 01 21:19 |
MinceR | and the benchmark should cover a wide spectrum of tasks | Sep 01 21:19 |
benJIman | Well one of the most important things about a JIT is that the code doesn't have to be implemented in the way that is most performant. | Sep 01 21:20 |
MinceR | i'd assume a competent programmer aiming for performance in such a comparison. | Sep 01 21:20 |
benJIman | Programmer writes idiomatic code, and let's the JIT worry about turning it into the fastest implementation. | Sep 01 21:20 |
MinceR | (since that's how we aim for performance and that's what we're testing) | Sep 01 21:21 |
benJIman | Writing for performance will just bite you in the arse when the next version comes along and someone else's idiomatic code outperforms your performance hacks thanks to JIT improvements. | Sep 01 21:21 |
schestowitz | Same in MATLAB ('on-line' optimisations). | Sep 01 21:21 |
MinceR | i'm still waiting for that next version. | Sep 01 21:21 |
MinceR | that's my whole point. | Sep 01 21:21 |
schestowitz | Ok, I'll do a post about swpats last. I have other posts. :-) | Sep 01 21:22 |
*PetoKraus has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)) | Sep 01 21:48 |
trmanco | http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenMalaysia/~3/... | Sep 01 22:39 |
trmanco | http://www.computerworld.com/action/a... | Sep 01 22:49 |
schestowitz | Thanks. | Sep 01 22:54 |
*trmanco has quit ("I just hit the close button :)") | Sep 01 22:58 |
*moparx has quit (Remote closed the connection) | Sep 01 23:27 |
*moparx (n=moparx@pdpc/supporter/base/moparx) has joined #boycottnovell | Sep 01 23:27 |