If Ardour Chooses Not to Support Windows, Microsoft Might Do It
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2010-06-25 16:00:14 UTC
- Modified: 2010-06-25 16:00:14 UTC
Summary: Illustration of Microsoft as stern advocate of Windows, porting to it Free/libre applications that wish to run on a Free platform
WE HAVE JUST been informed that a Microsoft employee called Bruno Barba Venturi wants to port Ardour to Windows. For reasons that Ardour explained some months ago, it wishes not to support Microsoft Windows, just GNU/Linux and Mac OS X (maybe because of its UNIX slant).
Microsoft is a Windows company. It only supports Free software when it serves its proprietary stack. That, for example, is what CodePlex is all about. Sam Dean
wrote about CodePlex in response to Moody's report which we
mentioned yesterday. People ought to realise that CodePlex advocates proprietary software such as Windows, SQL Server, SharePoint, Office, and so on. It does not deserve coverage from Open Source-oriented Web sites (at least those which are true to their focus).
⬆
"I would love to see all open source innovation happen on top of Windows."
--Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO
Comments
Needs Sunlight
2010-06-26 12:53:05
A more appropriate path would be to get Windows users to upgrade to Fedora or OS X. That also helps clean up the net for the rest of us, with fewer Windows Chernobyls out there making botnets.
dyfet
2010-06-25 23:01:51
In any case, I never worried about popularity as a goal with my own packages; I am concerned with freedom. Popularity can be a consequence of offering freedom, but it is never the purpose in doing so.
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-06-25 23:18:43
dyfet
2010-06-25 16:50:11
http://ardour.org/node/517
"...well, there is a windows version. but its not ready for general use yet.
second, you seem to assume that the crowd we would get from there being a windows version is a desirable thing. many other *nix open source projects have been overwhelmed when they have ported to windows - a huge, sudden influx of users with zero background in software development, and no infrastructure to offer them support. we don't want to end up in that situation.
when the windows version is ready, and when we can feasibly support windows users, we will announce it..."
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-06-25 17:05:38
dyfet
2010-06-25 17:20:58
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2010-06-25 17:51:53
saulgoode
2010-06-25 22:42:50
For the most part Paul Davis echoes the sentiments presented by Bryce Harrington, which were summarized by Carla Schroeder in the following Linux Today editorial:
http://blog.linuxtoday.com/blog/2008/08/httpbryceharrin.html