Bonum Certa Men Certa

Open Source Revisionism of GNU and Free Software History

Richard Stallman
Source: Conference by Richard Stallman, "Free Software: Human Rights in Your Computer" (2014)



Summary: Media mistreatment of the very roots of Free/Open Source software (FOSS), which is now approaching 35 years in age and increasingly thriving

IN recent weeks we have found several 'news' articles that gave us cause for concern. Some were shared with Richard Stallman, a regular reader of Techrights, for his views to be expressed and portions of the correspondence can be found here (cautiously redacted to reduce potential animosity/tensions).

It is not unusual, especially these days (age of openwashing), to see the label "Open Source" misused. Not too long ago we identified some very gross distortion of the term "open source" to essentially openwash Facebook's surveillance ambitions, focusing on poor people. Facebook traffic has sunk pretty badly over the past year (based on Alexa it's a massive drop), so Facebook is trying really hard to frame/paint itself as "ethical", even when it tries to expand its surveillance to people too poor to get connected to the Internet. This isn't altruism, it's opportunism and malice. It's definitely not "open source" and the dot org suffix (Internet.org) is clearly inappropriate, not just misleading. "Facebook mistreats its users," Stallman explained. "Facebook is not your friend, it is a surveillance engine."

There was also an effort to delete GNU from history -- an effort that has gone rather aggressive. Stallman was in the process of speaking to editors who jad allowed this to happen (dumb lawyers called GNU and Stallman's text "Open source Manifesto" in the article "Open source Manifesto turns 30"). Stallman asked me to show him the original publication site and tell him how to write to them. It wasn't too clear whether to write to the editor/site or the author/law firm. The former can issue some fixes/corrections, we tend to think, superseding what was contributed by lawyers. The article comes from a formal publication which often publishes patent lawyers' pro-software patents columns (we have seen over 100 of them over the years). The target audience is lawyers. The latest is no exception to the rule. It is an article by Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl LLC and the Web site is London-based, with Andrew Teague as the Associate Publisher, Mark Lamb as the Publishing Director, and Chris Riley handling subscriptions. When it was first published Stallman was eager to contact "Either one, or both! [editor and writer] But the sooner the better." No correction has yet been published. It's nowhere to be found.

GNU and Free software are 30+ years old. A lot of people contribute to the misconception that it all started when Torvalds released Linux or when the term "Open Source" (not open source intelligence) was coined by the likes of O'Reilly. Watch the "Open Source" O'Reilly nonsense starting the clock more than 10 years later than GNU: "Twenty years ago, open source was a cause. Ten years ago, it was the underdog. Today, it sits upon the Iron Throne ruling all it surveys. Software engineers now use open source frameworks, languages, and tools in almost all projects."

Rachel Roumeliotis is advertising OSCON 2015 (OS stands for "Open Source"), but she should know about GNU and its age. These people conveniently start the clock when O'Reilly and his henchmen got involved. They want all the credit and they want people not to speak about freedom. Eben Moglen already ranted about this, right on stage in an OSCON event nearly a decade ago.

"This shows how "open source" misses the point," Stallman wrote to us. "If the frameworks, languages and tools they use are free software, that is good for their freedom. But if what they develop with those is nonfree software, it doesn't respect our freedom.

"So open source "won" by ducking the important battle."

Well, the "we already won" attitude (or notion) helps a defeatist's approach; why fight for more freedom if "we won"? That's what those people (even developers) who open a MacBook or some 'i' device want to happen; some would further insist that Apple and Microsoft are now "open source" players, so "game over"...

We have noticed that Microsoft is now googlebombing with "Windows open source", promoting the ludicrous notion that it's now "open" (or gratis), or that it will be so one day. It started about a month ago, maybe two; dozens of articles have served this PR strategy. we wrote some rebuttals and will write another one this weekend. There is a gross distortion of what actually happened and what is happening.

"Stallman was unhappy about the increasing prevalence of proprietary software," said the aforementioned article From Lexology, "software protected by copyright law and usually licensed on a commercial basis by its owners."

Yes, but Free software too is protected by copyright law, it's just twisted into copyleft. "Source code is sometimes licensed under GNU GPL terms," says the article, "a form of “copyleft” rather than copyright."

OK, so surely they know what Free software is and where it comes from. Why proceed with statements like: "The “open source” movement emerged in GNU’s wake. As with GNU, users of open source code can look at the source code and modify it. However, unlike with GNU, they are not required to share their developments with the world at large."

"We have noticed many articles throughout this past year or so -- including some from Linux Foundation staff -- that basically start history in 1991 as if GNU/Linux came out of a vacuum or from Torvalds' bedroom."Actually, unless they are using something like the BSD licence, they usually must. Then there are issues like SaaS, which are addressed by the AGPLv3, among other licences. But either way, Free software remains Free software, there is no justification for renaming it "Open Source" and calling the GNU Manifesto "Open source Manifesto". It's insulting to those who started the whole thing and wish to receive fair coverage or attribution, at the very least.

The Lexology sites presents some other issues, mostly to do with access, not just paywalls. Stallman asked: "Can you email me the full text of that article? I tried to fetch the page and what I got did not include the text."

Stallman said he "wrote to them", but more than a month later the article remains uncorrected, not updated, etc.

Another big load of revisionism (changing history) uses the "Open Source" label to delete GNU from history. Published last month, the article titled "At Birth, Open Source Was About Saving Money, Not Sharing Code" focuses on Torvalds (see feature image) and frames the movement as one that is centered around money. Stallman asked: "Is that someone opinionated who won't listen to me?"

It is of course worthless asking for a correction when you know in advance none would be made. It later turned out to be part of a broader series of articles, some of which did cover GNU. I personally read several hundreds of items from the author and he's more into 'practical' benefits, so I don't think it would be worth arguing over. Some people just aren't fond of freedom in the context of computing.

We have noticed many articles throughout this past year or so -- including some from Linux Foundation staff -- that basically start history in 1991 as if GNU/Linux came out of a vacuum or from Torvalds' bedroom. Quite frankly, we think it's an insult to history. We deem it negligent at best. Of course it leads people to deducing that the success of the system in its entirety is owing to the great "Linux values", not GNU philosophy.

In summary, in our threads of communication with Stallman we were able to reaffirm that there were factual issues in the "Open Source Manifesto" article (it speaks about the GNU Manifesto) and despite Stallman's request for correction, nothing has been done by the publishers. It's like people just don't wish to speak favourably about freedom in computing. Mac Asay, a Mormon (i.e. more superstition a religion than most other religions), compares Free software people to dangerous religions -- a typical smear directed at a largely secular Free software community. Perhaps there are just those who are impossible to please because they are inherently opposed to control over one's machine and would rather buy digital prisons from Apple than work a little harder to gain control or acquire freedom-respecting tools.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Public Talk by Richard Stallman (RMS) Tomorrow
Still advertised
Soylent News Editor Stays, Trolls Leave Instead
Some of us asked him not to resign but pause and reconsider
Corporate Media Did Not Report on Mass Layoffs at IBM's Expert Labs
Not a single media outlet even mentioned those mass layoffs!
In BetaNoise, The "Latest Technology News" is Noise (Still!)
If you fail to get the slop under control, the site as a whole will perish
Defaming, Impersonating, Hijacking Accounts is Abusive If Not Illegal/Criminal Behaviour
There are actual victims here
If Your Bicycle Got Stolen, Then Open a Facebook Account and Send the US Lots of Personal Data to Get the Bicycle Back (or Try to)
"No Help Unless You Open an Account at Facebook"
Growing Recognition Out There That Courts Must Abandon Microsoft or Have No Perception of Authority, Autonomy, Independence, Fairness, and More
Imagine making a complaint about Microsoft to an agency that uses Microsoft
The Next Talk of Richard Stallman (Father of GNU/Linux and the GPL) Advertised in the Media 3 Days in Advance
He spoke in Italy earlier this year and also did some interviews
Free Software as a Culture of Resistance
Free software as a movement accomplished a lot in 40+ years
 
Richard Stallman Has Barely Changed
Collecting "estate" "assets"? That's not "success" in the eyes of Dr. Stallman
Gemini Links 25/05/2025: Konsole Layout Changes and Capitulation to Surveillance World
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 24, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 24, 2025
Links 24/05/2025: From War on Science to War on Academia, Chagos Islands Handed Over to Mauritius
Links for the day
Links 24/05/2025: Leasehold Myths and Analog Computer
Links for the day
Links 24/05/2025: Google Helps Slop Videos, Microsoft Resorts to Desperate Measures to Fake Demand for Slop
Links for the day
Gemini Links 24/05/2025: New Home and Force/Drag Simulation
Links for the day
Sometimes Legal Action is Imperative (Even if Recovering the Cost of the Litigation Itself is Infeasible)
Sirius got sued, but the company has no money (large piles of debt)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 23, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, May 23, 2025
Simpler is Better
Gemini Protocol turns 6 in exactly 4 weeks
Slopwatch: Brian Fagioli, Brittany Day, and Other Plagiarists Who Rip Off Real Writers and Target Themes Around "Linux"
Fagioli also prompted chatbots for some words diarrhoea
Links 23/05/2025: Microsoft Openwashing at ZDNet, Signal Does It Wrong (DRM, Back Doors Still Intact)
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/05/2025: Clutter in Modern Interfaces and Dealing With DRM-Free Music
Links for the day
Links 23/05/2025: Tax Audits of Hong Kong's Independent as ‘Intimidation Tactics,’ Why "Regulating X Isn’t Censorship"
Links for the day
TecAdmin Took a Break From Linux to Push SPAM
This happened hours ago, and it seems to have been posted directly by the site's "Admin" (Rahul)
The Microsofter Who Kept Sending Threatening Post and E-mail to My Wife Has Been Joking He'd Work on Code for "Sexual Favours"
For one thing, for software professionals (like for landlords), this is outright illegal and you'd get arrested for it, and moreover it's no joking matter because there are many real victims of such sexual exploitation
We Seem to Have Abandoned Science and Replaced Sound Policy With Private Patent Shareholders and College Dropouts Like Bill Epsteingate
Because of what they did there are now many people out there who reject all vaccines
Links 23/05/2025: Violent Attacks on the Press, VMware Price Hikes, Vista 11 Considered Unsuitable for Any Confidentiality
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/05/2025: Balkan Tourism, UK Polls, Reticulum and Meshtastic
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 22, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, May 22, 2025
Back to Basics, Folks, "AI" (Plagiarism) is Symptom of a Dying Industry Looking for Whatever Prey It Can Devour
lousy/sloppy imitations
Liam Proven's Thoughts on "AI" Being a Scam No Different From Religions, Alternative Medicine, and More
"Is there anywhere outside of retrocomputing that doesn't have AI in it?"
Many IBM Layoffs, Centred Around Expert Labs US in Atlanta (Offer of "Relocation" Where No Such Option Exists)
So Techrights was assessing comments/gossip online and it was right about the Thursday cull