Bonum Certa Men Certa

At EPO “I Have the Feeling That Lowering Quality is Part of a Concerted Plan.”

Good for top-level management, bad for staff. Profitable to the Office in the short term, but the public (or industry) will pay the price.

Externality
Reference: Wikipedia



Summary: Growing concern about patent quality at the EPO -- a subject which causes managers to get rather nervous -- is now an issue at the forefront

THE EPO can't help repeating the same mistakes that had made the US patent office a trolls factory until not too long ago (patent scope was belatedly limited -- a subject to be explored again separately, maybe later today).



"Sloppy patent examination may be profitable to the Office (in the short term at least), but it externalises -- in the externality sense -- all the damages."The latest cartoon from inside the EPO serves to show that even patent examiners recognise the effect of low-quality patents on small businesses and trolls. The patents can be invalidated by the courts, but at what cost and whose expense? Sloppy patent examination may be profitable to the Office (in the short term at least), but it externalises -- in the externality sense -- all the damages.

A relatively long new comment, posted some time last night, speaks of the reduction in patent quality at the Office. It's worth reproducing in full because it's buried several pages deep in some old Merpel article (from last year, before the self-censorship became more official):

The comments above give the impression that the plan was to improve production and that quality was just an unfortunate casualty of production pressure. But I think that lowering quality may actually have been a goal of its own, even if I don't exactly understand what is achieved by a lower quality. Consider what happened in the past years: -first, about 4 years ago, search and examination were reorganized, officially so that technical domains were not split between The Hague and Munich. In practice, however, in many cases it seems that domains were chosen to insure that a maximum of examiners had to change and therefore search and examine something which did not correspond to what they had learned to do. The training which was offered was often minimal. -this completely unnecessary destruction of competence is not a huge problem in examination (people can adapt much more easily in examination) but is a much bigger problem in search (it takes one to two years for an engineer to be familiar with the collection of documents), but... -second, about 3 years ago, search became a top priority and examiners had to do search files under time pressure (as an arbitrary short delay was set on them). Many had no time for examination any more -because of the strange way production is internally measured, this also meant that examiners had artificial higher production figures (search is counted with 50% more points than examination) -third, about a year ago, searches dried up and reducing examination backlog became a top priority. The examiners had to do more examination, but only final actions count towards our internal production figures (only grants or refusal, no intermediate communications). Examiners are not supposed to have their production figure decrease ever or your director will come to you and start to discuss retirement or dismissal for professional incompetence. That means that an examiner who had done, say, 80 "urgent" searches in 2015, not finding much prior art in a domain he or she was not familiar with, suddenly had to do 120 final actions in 2016 (they count 50% less). Many of them worked longer hours or brought files home.

Add a few items to fine-tune the process: -we hire as much as we can, the new people must be trained by existing examiners, only do searches in the beginning (while common sense would have them start by examination) and are under an enormous production pressure. -some examiners, particularly less scrupulous ones with very high production figures, are moved around, become team leaders (so that they can explain their colleagues how to increase production) and generally are spread around so that each directorate has a few high producers (and the note at the end of the year is dependent on the ranking within a directorate). -there are still regular transfers of people to technical domains they do not really know -I know at least two examiners who were pushed toward retirement because they rejected too many patents.

So, I may of course be wrong, but I have the feeling that lowering quality is part of a concerted plan. It does not happen by chance, just as it did not happen "by chance" that of 3 people dismissed, all 3 of them were prominent union officials.


What Battistelli has been doing is going to cost literally billions (if not more than a trillion Euros) to Europeans. He is a parasite that enriches himself and his friends while at the same time planting the seeds of patent war and ruin. Then there's the UPC -- a combination of low-quality patents and long reach of prosecution (gold mine to abusers, aggressors, and facilitators such as lawyers, who keep promoting it all the time, even days ago in a so-called 'workshop').

"What Battistelli has been doing is going to cost literally billions (if not more than a trillion Euros) to Europeans.""Don't forget that the President and his friends earn considerably more for a work which, at best, can be described as mediocre," one person just wrote, adding a reference to Merkel by saying: "Thank you for all these years. Is there any way we can convince you to come by from time to time?"

A letter to Merkel in German and in English was reproduced here very recently. It's sad that by silence (as in "conspiracy of silence" one might argue) she facilitates a destructive force at the very heart of Europe -- one which without a doubt is going to ruin a lot of Europe's industry and the taken-for-granted leadership.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Windows Fell to All-Time Lows in Egypt This Summer, Vista 11 Adoption Decreases While GNU/Linux Increases
Vista 11 is going down rather than up
12 Hours Ago The Register MS Published a Fake (Paid-for) Article, But This One for a Change Did Not Promote a Ponzi Scheme
There are also Free software alternatives, but they don't pay The Register MS for "synthetic" so-called 'journalism'
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, August 27, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, August 27, 2025
Slopwatch: linuxsecurity.com, Slopfarms in Google News, and More
Some readers of ours end up sending us links that are from slopfarms, not realising those are slopfarms
Gemini Links 27/08/2025: Katrina Memories and Google Versus Software Freedom
Links for the day
Links 27/08/2025: Police Against Media Freedom in the UK, Energy-Hungry Countries Targeted by China
Links for the day
Links 27/08/2025: Microsoft Demoralises Staff With Slop Demands, Leaving Mastodon Explained
Links for the day
More People Need to Call Out and Put a Stop to Serial Sloppers
Unless slopfarms are stopped, people will read and share Microsoft propaganda made by chatbots
Gemini Links 27/08/2025: Headphones and Tartarus
Links for the day
Morale at Microsoft is Terrible (Proprietary Plagiarism Machines Have No Future, LLM Slop is a Bubble)
The slop sceptics/critics are going to have lots of "told you so" moments
GNOME "governance issues, staff reduction, etc." amidst Albanian whistleblowing and women trafficking
Notice the connection to Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) and GNOME
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, August 26, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, August 26, 2025
Richard Stallman (RMS) Was Right About "Sideloading" in 1996
We now have computers that treat booting GNU/Linux like an act of "Sideloading"
Panama: Windows Down From 97% "Market Share" to Less Than 30%
In 2009, Windows was measured at 97.24% (compared to 62.32% right now or less than 30% if one also counts Android)
The UEFI 9/11 - Part I - Introduction to Impending Catastrophe (Microsoft Preventing People From Booting Non-Windows Systems)
eight-part series
Why Techrights is Slow Today (Bot Floods)
We don't know if those bots are connected to LLMs (we have not checked), but that is a possibility
Slopwatch: DDoS Slop, LinuxBSDos.com Spam, and Slopfarms in Google News, Including webpronews.com
Among the news we also found fakes, albeit not so much today
Links 26/08/2025: "Ballooning Debt" in France and "Transnational Repression in the UK"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 26/08/2025: Listening to Alcest and Google Doing Evil (Users Installing Software is "Sideloading" and Prohibited)
Links for the day
Links 26/08/2025: DNS Tampering and TikTok Layoffs
Links for the day
Microsoft's Windows "Market Share" Overestimated
Microsoft's income sources are shrinking
We Shall See...
My wife and I are hardly the first victims of Brett Wilson LLP
This New Determination on a Case Echoes the Modus Operandi of Microsoft's Serial Strangler vs Techrights (Its Online Decision/Judgment Says Truth and Public Interest Defend the Publisher)
Noel Anthony Clarke hopefully has enough money left to pay his victims, which include the publishers
Going Offline
There was life before the Net
The Register MS Has Apparently Shut Down Its Office
It is basically a fake address on the face of it
There Are Also Expectations of IBM Layoffs Very Soon With "Narrative Control."
Some of them mention Red Hat and how IBM failed to achieve anything substantial with that acquisition
After at Least Two Rounds of Mass Layoffs in August Microsoft Said to Have "September Layoff Confirmed - Performance Based"
Those "M5 level meetings" sound plausible
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, August 25, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, August 25, 2025