Bonum Certa Men Certa

Supreme Court Saves the Day as Latest Statistics Reveal Slump in Patent Litigation (Mostly Trolls) in the Eastern District of Texas

Delaware now receives more new paperwork than the Eastern District of Texas and the Supreme Court is poised to reaffirm PTAB's role some time very soon

PTAB



Summary: The Supreme Court of the United States relentlessly rules against patent maximalism and is expected to tackle patent quality -- not just litigation scope -- some time later this year (or next year)

THE Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and the patent office of the United States both show signs of improvement and give us hope. Software patents, for example, are already severely hurt, which is good news for software developers.

Over the past couple of months we patiently watched and took note of various bits of news, including data that served to reaffirm the above-mentioned improvement. People out there may disagree with our tone; they may also not like our views. But numbers tend to speak for themselves.

"People out there may disagree with our tone; they may also not like our views. But numbers tend to speak for themselves."SCOTUS is taking under its wing a growing number of patent cases. It almost always rules against patent maximalism (5 out of 5 recently). As we recently noted, there is SAS Institute Inc. v Lee and a similar case that's heading towards SCOTUS. We wrote about it also at the end of last month, long after patent blogs had covered it. "The inter partes review appeal focuses on the procedural question of whether the America Invents Act permits the USPTO to partially institute IPR proceedings – as it has been doing," Dennis Crouch explained.

The America Invents Act (AIA) and IPRs pertain to PTAB, whose purpose is summarised above. We really need to protect PTAB and if SCOTUS rules in defense of IPRs, then that will be another nail in the coffin of software patents.

SCOTUS has meanwhile worked to weaken software patents from several other angles (other than PTAB). Apart from Alice there is also TC Heartland and some people still obsess over Impression v Lexmark -- a very important decision with no direct impact on software patents. Patently-O chose to write about how this decision from May impacts drug imports (probably good for the ordinary ill person) and remarked on TC Heartland in quite a professional way. It was covered here several times before, though we overlooked Dennis Crouch's initial response to it. In a nutshell, TC Heartland appears to have 'killed' the trolls' rocket docket, the Eastern District of Texas (and thus 'killed' quite a few patent trolls which relied on it). According to IAM, which is very extrovert about being pro-trolls, "Unified Patents released its US patent dispute data covering the first half of this year yesterday and it showed that the number of new district court cases came in at 1,914, down 12% on the first half of 2016. RPX also released its own analysis late last week, showing that litigation is at its lowest level since 2008 when the firm started collating data."

"In a nutshell, TC Heartland appears to have 'killed' the trolls' rocket docket, the Eastern District of Texas..."Very good.

"In other words," said Patent Progress, "the TC Heartland decision was neither a firework nor a sparkler," but it did lower the rates of abusive litigation.

At Managing IP, Natalie Rahhal, covered the numbers as follows:

Patent lawsuit filing in US district courts held up in June but plaintiffs have deserted the Eastern District of Texas, with Delaware the top venue. Natalie Rahhal analyses how US patent litigation has changed since TC Heartland, including how NPEs have responded


This is all news from the past few days. It confirms as a reality what we hoped for all along! It's working! TC Heartland will be mentioned a lot for years to come.

Baker Donelson, which IAM likes to boost, is trying to come up with new tricks.

Another recent article from Patent Progress had said that "After TC Heartland [...] Texas [is] less attractive for patent trolls," even before the data about it was made available. To quote within broader context:

You hear a lot about patent litigation in district courts. And, over the past several years, the new inter partes review procedure has seen a lot of attention (including last week’s renewed effort to try to kill off the single most effective tool we have for invalidating bad patents.)

You don’t hear that much about the International Trade Commission (ITC). But that might need to change. After TC Heartland made the Eastern District of Texas less attractive for patent trolls, they’re looking for a new place to go, and the ITC might be just the thing they’re looking for.



Also see "And… a court says “You could’ve done what TC Heartland’s Defendant did” -- a recent article from Patently-O.

This is all very, very encouraging news.

After TC Heartland we can certainly expect disputes over legitimacy of patent lawsuits that happened in the Eastern District of Texas. "There’s going to be a lot of litigation over whether a defendant who failed to object to venue pre-TC Heartland can raise it now," Patently-O wrote. "In fact, why not a plaintiff?"

"After TC Heartland we can certainly expect disputes over legitimacy of patent lawsuits that happened in the Eastern District of Texas."The decision and its impact is truly profound, but a lot of the mainstream media -- not to mention its readers -- does not find it interesting enough to cover. Maybe it's assumed that readers would not be interested and would not "click" much (to "consume" ads). When the mainstream media does cover it it tends to get the facts wrong. In fact, it gets some of its 'facts' from Association for Competitive Technology (ACT), which is "a well-known Microsoft proxy association" that "lobbied for software patents in Europe in the name of small companies." Benjamin Henrion noticed and said that.

Shame on the corporate media for quoting Microsoft AstroTurfing groups in relation to a case where Microsoft has high stakes (Microsoft uses trolls for competitive leverage). Some other corporate media, AOL for example, published "Supreme Court Clarifies Venue Rules for Patent Infringement Suits" and did not resort to spin such as "The Supreme Court’s big ruling on ‘patent trolls’ will rock businesses everywhere" (as if it's bad for everyone, everywhere). Sadly, no matter how often we berate the press, some of the press still quotes Microsoft AstroTurfing groups in relation to a decision that businesses actually celebrate, don't get "rocked" by. How about the paragraph in which the Microsoft front pretends to represent small developers, quoting "Morgan Reed, president of ACT | The App Association"?

Should they not just quote actual app developers rather than a group pretending to represent them?

Anyway, Natalie Rahhal, writing from New York, framed the above as a "Heartland attack" (like heart attack). Funny twist on the case, eh? It's no attack but a much-needed blessing. Unless you love blood. Or patent trolls...

Suffice to say, patent trolls in the US are panicking (as does Watchtroll, a site which supports the trolls, not to mention IAM; In "IAM speak" -- being a megaphone of patent trolls -- suing with patents in the Eastern District of Texas is "extract[ing] value"). No doubt they'll lobby against this decision, just as they did against Alice (a subject to be covered separately some other day). It's already dealt with by political means, even though SCOTUS is supposed to be apolitical. To quote Patent Progress:

Tomorrow morning, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet is holding a hearing titled “Examining the Supreme Court’s TC Heartland Decision.” In advance of the hearing, I wanted to take a look at why there’s a special patent venue statute at all, and why the decision in TC Heartland makes sense in light of that history.



As someone put it last month, the decision makes patent lawsuits in Texas acceptable if, for example, the "user’s smartphone is in the Eastern District of Texas," but not otherwise.

Back in May the decision made it into television. Two months ago (when I was away) PBS covered everything in this programme that the patent microcosm recommended. HBR covered it too and there was this article titled "Why it matters that patent trolls won’t be able to force their cases in Texas" from around the time of the decision. Later on HBO did a programme related to this; See "HBO’s ‘Silicon Valley’ tackled an issue that’s all too familiar to startups: The threat of frivolous patent litigation" (early June) -- an article that's quoted as saying that “Hollywood is doing its part to bring light to this shady practice, but Washington needs to do more...”

From the article:

The latest episode of HBO’s “Silicon Valley” took on an issue that is all too familiar to startups across the country — the threat of frivolous patent litigation.

In the show, the startup, Pied Piper, breaks into the Top 500 on the App Store, and almost immediately, the company receives a demand letter stating that it is violating an existing patent. Pied Piper soon discovers that it is being sued not by another well-intentioned startup, but an unscrupulous attorney, or a patent troll. The troll in the show explains that he buys up vague patents at auction and “prints money” suing startups for settlements. Despite the fact that Pied Piper eventually outsmarts the patent troll, the startup ends up paying more in attorney fees than it would have cost to just settle.



This does not directly relate to TC Heartland, but the timing seemed right. "Troll The Tech Patent Trolls", said one article around the same time, noting that "[s]oftware patents in the last decade have skyrocketed." (but are no longer potent in the US). This one was definitely about TC Heartland and it alluded to it directly: "A recent court ruling stands to shake up the entire patent-troll sector. Although some declines have been witnessed already, the true nature of this situation has yet to be realized, offering short sellers a rare opportunity to ride stocks to the ground. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that patent suits should be filed in the state where the defendant is incorporated, and not in the location of the plaintiff's choosing, as was the previous practice. The ruling will bar many patent owners from bringing forth cases in the Eastern District of Texas, a patent-friendly jurisdiction where more than one-third of all infringement lawsuits are now filed. This puts an end to a majority of cases that sought refuge there in order to gain an advantage and claim victory. It's about time the patent trolls got trolled on."

“Let this be a lesson to other patent trolls attempting to extort funds from printing industry service providers and OEMs using equipment and software generic to the industry,” Harvey Levenson, Cal Poly Professor Emeritus said in relation to another SCOTUS decision. "The Supreme Court Continues To Take Aim At Patent Trolls," said the headline in a patent law firms' platform.

"SCOTUS Slaps Patent Trolls," said this article which was published almost immediately after the decision had been published. To quote:

In a unanimous decision (TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC), the U.S. Supreme Court gave a kick in the rear to patent trolls. The Verge has this article on the case.

Patent trolls obtain patents not for the purpose of producing an invention or a technology but to license and enforce the patents. In other words, trolls have no plans to actually make the patented product or process; instead, they prefer to lie in wait, letting someone else do the heavy lifting and then suing just as the new creation is about to take off commercially. It is a shakedown process that threatens innovation.


Another piece, "SC [Supreme Court] Ruling Signals New Era for Software Patent Enforcement," correctly connected software patents to patent trolls.

Going back to Natalie Rahhal and Managing IP, they're obviously not happy. They front for patent law firms and Managing IP published its third article about the case in a matter of a few days [1, 2, 3]; being a death blow to many patent trolls, it certainly worries them. It also worried Annsley Merelle Ward from Bristows, the friends of patent trolls, as the decision potentially ends/shreds their business with trolls. They were dominating the blog IP Kat around the month of May (as though Bristows almost took over), back when they were writing the majority of 'articles', e.g. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. To quote Bristows: "So will this be the blow to the much loved (by patentees, anyway) Eastern District of Texas that so many defendants have been dreaming of? Is this a further blow to patent trolls in the US? Will patentees look to other global venues where forum shopping presents more opportunities, for example in Europe and under Article 33 of the UPCA? Or is this just balance returning to forum shopping in the US and it will be business as normal? What do readers think?"

See how they allude to the UPC? They want to make Europe the next Eastern District of Texas. Their friends at IAM, others whose ambition is to have lots and lots of lawsuits, express concern about the case. It would certainly take away a lot of their 'business' (litigation). "Historically," as one person put it, "EDTX often doesn't consider petitions for change of venue until after discovery is done & defendants have usually spend >$1MM." That's money that's channeled into law firms' pockets.

Dubbing it the “most significant patent law decision since Alice”, Managing IP also noted: "Filing in the Eastern District of Texas has ground to a halt, one judge has already factored it into an order and IP observers have been busy on social media debating its "seismic" impact – Managing IP collates the best reaction to the Supreme Court’s TC Heartland v Kraft ruling on patent venue" (the figures above serve to confirm this).

The anti-Alice bloggers over at Bilski Blog tried to assess the impact. "That's against the interests of their own profession," Henrion remarked. "As it is with software patents and Alice."

"Patent filings could fall 69% in East Texas after TC Heartland ruling," WIPR wrote. The headline from WIPR actually makes no sense (suggestive of the writer's misunderstanding). Filings (not of lawsuits) are done in the US, not in Texas. Either way, these predictions from over a month ago are now better supported by data because, as IAM put it the other day, "post-TC Heartland Delaware overtakes EDTX as top venue for new suits," based on Unified Patents.

The more SCOTUS intervenes in patent cases, the more the patent microcosm has to worry about. So let's hope for more.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Dalai Lama Succession as Evidence That Determined, Motivated People Can Reach Their Nineties
And we need to quit talking about their death all the time
Many Lawyers (for Microsoft) and 1,316 Pages to Pick on a Litigant in Person Who Exposed Serious Microsoft Abuses
Answers must be given
Layoffs and Shutdowns at IBM, Not Just Microsoft
Same as Microsoft
With Workers Back From a Holiday Weekend, Microsoft Layoffs Carry on, More Waves to Come
Now it's Monday and people are bad to work, even some journalists
You Need Not Wave a Rainbow Flag This Month to Basically Oppose Arseholes Looking to Disrupt and Divide the Community
Don't fall for it
What Miguel de Icaza and Microsoft Lunduke Have in Common
Similar aims, different methods
The 'Corporate Neckbeard' is Not the "Good Guy"
Works for IBM
 
More on "Lunduke is Actually Sending His Audience to Attack People"
"pepe the frogs"
Links 08/07/2025: Sabotage of Networking Infrastructure, Microsoft XBox Game Pass Deemed “Unsustainable”
Links for the day
Gemini Links 08/07/2025: Ancillary Justice and Small Web July
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, July 07, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, July 07, 2025
The FSF's (Free Software Foundation, Inc.) 2025 Summer Fundraiser Already Past Halfway Line
This is where GNU/Linux actually started
Mozilla Had No Good Reason to Outsource Firefox Development to Microsoft
What does Mozilla plan to do when GitHub shuts down?
Mozilla Firefox Did Not Die, It Got Killed
To me it'll always look like Mozilla got killed by its sponsors, especially Google, which had a conflict of interest as a sponsor
Dan Neidle, Whom Brett Wilson LLP SLAPPed (on Behalf of Corrupt Rich Tax Evaders), Still Fighting the Good Fight
Neidle fights for the poor people
Wayland Should Start by Dumping Its Very Ugly Logo
Wayland wins the "ugliest logo" award every year
Stop Focusing on Hair Colours, Focus on Corporate Agenda
If someone commits a crime, it does not matter if his or her hair was mostly white or there was no hair or a wig or whatever
Links 07/07/2025: Science, Conflicts, and a Fictional K-pop Group
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/07/2025: Being a Luddite and Announcement of Gotify
Links for the day
Links 07/07/2025: XBox Effectively 'Dead', DMCA Subpoena Versus Registrar
Links for the day
The Nasty Smear (and Stereotype) of "Neckbeard" or "Greybeard" is Ageism
This is the sort of stuff they might try to volley at critics of Wayland
Why Many of Us Use X Server and Will Continue to Use It For Many Years to Come
Don't make this about politics
Microsoft's Nat Friedman Became Unemployed the Same Time the SLAPPs Against Techrights Started Coming From His Friends (Weeks After We Had Exposed Scandals About Him and the Serial Strangler, His Best Friend, Who Got Arrested a Few Days Later)
Nat Friedman is not "Investor, entrepreneur"
Brett Wilson LLP Uses Threats to Demand Changes to Pages or Removal of Pages Without Even Revealing Which Staff Member Does That (Sometimes People From Another Firm!)
This has been in the public for years
Dan Neidle Said "It Really Then Became a Job of Tormenting" Lawyers Like Brett Wilson LLP (Who Threatened Him for Exposing Crimes, Just Like They Threatened My Wife a Few Months Later)
he and his wife decided to take on the evil people and their evil lawyers
Large Language Models (LLMs) Externalise Their Cost to the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
"The forty-sixth Free Software Bulletin is now available online!"
Weeding Out Extremism in Our Community
To me it seems like Microsoft Lunduke is rapidly becoming like a "hate preacher" who operates online, breeding an extremist ideology or trying to soften its image
Censorship Versus Fact-Checking and Quality Control
It's not censorship but a matter of quality control
Reinforcing the Allegations Some More, Bryan Lunduke Digs His Own Grave
In his latest episodes he merely repeats his own lies, which I debunked using evidence right from his own mouth
Global Warming and Free Software as a Force of Mitigation
we'll need to think about Software Freedom, not just brands like "Linux"
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, July 06, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, July 06, 2025
Gemini Links 07/07/2025: BaseLibre Numerical System and TUI Rant
Links for the day
[Video] "Copyleft Isn't a Bug."
"Copyleft isn’t a bug. It’s a feature. GNU GPL forced the world to treat code like a public good."
Being in Social Control Media Means Exposing Oneself to Heckling
Richard Stallman does not (either himself or directly) post to any social control media
Links 06/07/2025: Airlines Perils, Scams, and Breaches
Links for the day
Two Risks to Companies: The Microsoft Culture and the Microsoft Tools
Novell was killed by a form of "social engineering" by Microsoft
It's Hard to Trust People Who Worked - Not Only Those Who Still Work - at Microsoft
Bryan Lunduke is just what people would call an "arsehole of a person"
For the Second Time, Bryan Lunduke From Microsoft is Siccing Racist Trolls and Vandals at Me
You're only reinforcing the point we made yesterday
Links 06/07/2025: End to End Encryption at Risk, Reuters Twitter ("X") Account Withheld in India
Links for the day
Gemini Links 06/07/2025: Tinylog and Certification Rotation
Links for the day
Links 06/07/2025: Climate Change and "The Right to Criticise"
Links for the day
PCLinuxOS Sites Coming Back, Gradually
let's just be patient
Social Control Media, Even If Based on Free Software, Still Has Many Problems
a distraction from what actually mattered and still matters
IBM is Not Your Master
IBM makes friends with people who exclude the majority of the population: women
Help Fund the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
If you have some dollars to spare, go support the FSF
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 05, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, July 05, 2025
A Short History of Attacks on Techrights (and Boycott Novell Before That)
good opportunity to tell again the story of several (not all) attempts to silence us
The Mainstream Media Took 4 Days to Realise Microsoft Shut Down Its Operations in Pakistan and Fired Everybody
We estimate that Microsoft has had about 29,000 layoffs since January
Leadership in Free Software
Don't let IBM lead. It's a terrible flag bearer.