Bonum Certa Men Certa

UPC Hopefuls (Litigation Firms) Come to Life Amid Unitary Patent EPO Text, But Nothing New to See Here

I want to believeSummary: The UPC lobby (patent law firms) wakes up and the media props up the illusion of UPC progress, owing to nothing more than an EPO report/guidance that is oddly-timed and totally inadequate (makes false assumptions)

THE EPO's release/announcement of the PDF yesterday morning, combined with various other factors, would have us believe there's some kind of progress. But there's none. It's merely an illusion. Benoît Battistelli is leaving in 9 months, his protector leaves in one month, and Germany might not be able to do anything until next year (if ever). As for the UK, there's this new publication about the "UK patent system", published yesterday by the UK-IPO. Managing IP's pro-UPC front has already spun this as some kind of thing about the UPC. But it's not. "Timely report by @The_IPO," it wrote, "3 main UPC states compared. Majority UK patents via @EPOorg. UK legal costs higher but ok..."



"They're just blowing wind into the sails using their bare mouths."When they say "UPC states" they just mean EU states. Putting aside all that propaganda, there's nothing to see here. They're just blowing wind into the sails using their bare mouths. Also yesterday there was this tweet from Dr. Luke McDonagh, linking to this report from yesterday and adding: "UK retreat from CJEU pledge leaves possibility that UK Unified Patent Court division could stay (if UPC goes ahead)..."

As I've told him (publicly), "the article says nothing about the UPC (which is dead for reasons other than the UK)."

Why this obsession with the UPC and why are particular Brits trying to interject the UPC into things that have nothing to do with it? CJEU's post-Brexit status is still an unknown, as it always was.

It did not take long for UPC booster Darren Smyth‏ to engage McDonagh with tweets like: "Some of us (controversially) considered that the political pledge re CJEU never extended to the UPC as not a UK court but international [...] Just remembered, I even wrote a blogpost about it" (that was before UPC was in a limbo again).

"Why this obsession with the UPC and why are particular Brits trying to interject the UPC into things that have nothing to do with it?"So basically, nothing has changed except a bunch of UPC proponents (for their own selfish interests) harping/raving about it. Regarding the UPC's status in Germany and the EPO's report, there were lots of puff pieces about it yesterday. These sometimes reused photos from an event that EPO had wasted 3 millions euros on (for one afternoon!), paying so-called 'reporters' (PR generators) in the process. This new puff piece (propotional headline, too), which helps glorify Battistelli, makes one wonder about the motivations. "Even as Europe’s ambitious plan to introduce a single patent system still hangs in the balance," it says, "the European Patent Office (EPO) released on August 18, 2017 a Unitary Patent Guide, which outlines procedures for inventors and proprietors interested in registering a patent under the new system."

Here is the part about the UK and Germany: "Mired in the Brexit conundrum, the UK said in November 2016 that it is “proceeding with preparations to ratify the UPCA” (although once Brexit is fully implemented, the UK will also exit its membership in the EU, which will introduce a new layer of complication). Meanwhile, Germany put on hold its vote on the UPCA in June 2017 on questions raised about its constitutionality."

WIPR wrote about that too yesterday. It said that "Germany and the UK both need to ratify the UPC Agreement before the project can become a reality."

"Suffice to say, Team UPC and Team Battistelli pretend that the UPC is inevitable even though it's likely quite stuck/already dead due to various issues, including corruption."It's very likely that neither will happen, for reasons we explained here before.

Suffice to say, Team UPC and Team Battistelli pretend that the UPC is inevitable even though it's likely quite stuck/already dead due to various issues, including corruption.

One decent article that we saw about the UPC yesterday came from a British site for lawyers. It cites/quoted a Munich-based patent law expert Dr. Michael Schneider of Pinsent Masons. Here are some portions:

Schneider said: "There are apparently four grounds to the complaint, which each raise a question over whether the proposed reforms align with Germany's constitution. The constitution regulates the basis for Germany's participation in, and the internal workings concerned with, the transfer of powers to the EU. It also sets out the fundamental elements of the constitution, such as the democratic legitimacy and judicial rights, for example, which have to be safeguarded in such transfer."

"If viewed from this angle, as the complainant apparently advocates, in essence it requires that any transfer of sovereign rights from Germany's judiciary to another organisation – in this case the transfer of patent litigation powers to the UPC – has to approved by a certain quorum and majority of votes in parliament. The late night vote in the Bundestag which passed the UPC laws would call into question whether there was the required quorum to pass the legislation," he said.

"If this was the only basis of the legal challenge then it would be possible to foresee a straightforward solution whereby the legislation could be reintroduced before the Bundestag and Bundesrat after the September elections to achieve the two-thirds majority of votes needed to pass the thresholds for compliance with the constitution, but there are two further grounds of complaint that have been raised," Schneider said.


It can take another 4 months for a decision to come, i.e. it can come no sooner than 2018. By that point, Brexit negotiations will have likely progressed to the point where, even if the court deems UPC to be constitutional, Germany won't ratify because Britain has no intention to do so. They'd need to rewrite the whole thing with the UK removed from the text, then ratify in dozens of countries all over again. By then? No more Battistelli, probably no more work for the EPO either (mass redundancies/layoffs).

Recent Techrights' Posts

StatCounter Shows the Market Share of Vista 11 is Decreasing in Ukraine This Year
Microsoft abandoning Vista 10 users would be a victory for Vladimir Putin
The "Gold" Rule: Taking Money for Reputation Laundering and Openwashing Under the "Linux" Banner
Seller of expensive toilet paper, Jim Zemlin
LLM Slop Says Slop is "coming for white-collar jobs. Microsoft’s layoffs are just the start"
Look what the Web has become
Reporting Facts About Violence Against Women Deserves Awards, Not Frivolous Lawsuits and Threats
What is Microsoft's stance on women's safety?
Linux.com as Spamfarm of the Linux Foundation, Partner of the Gates Foundation
They no longer publish articles
Slopwatch: The Typical Slopfarms and the 'Brian Fagioli Dilemma'
To the Web and to society (exposed to the Web) LLMs are a net negative
 
Links 16/04/2025: Cliff Lynch RIP, More Attacks on Science (NASA)
Links for the day
Google Promotes Fake Articles (LLM Slop) Instead of Originals, Relaying Microsoft's Linux FUD Emanating From Microsoft LLMs
Shame on Google for participating in the slopfest
In Some Countries the Largest OEMs Already Dump Microsoft Windows
Windows at 18.9%, Android 60.2%
Microsoft Down From 100% to 10% in Myanmar/Burma
only about 4% of Web requests in Myanmar/Burma come from Vista 11, soon to be the only "supported" version of Windows
When Fedora Said It Was Looking to Integrate "AI" It Meant Promoting Microsoft's Proprietary Spyware and GPL-Violating Slop
When they say "AI" they mean Microsoft
It Used to be IBM, Now It's Microsoft (Why You Need to Fire Microsofters or CIOs Working for Microsoft)
Typically the only effective solution is to identity and remove Microsofters from one's project/organisation (before they can bring more Microsofters in)
IBM Closes Offices and Labs in the United States to Open New Ones in India
It's not layoffs per se; they're substituting/swapping veteran employees for lesser-paid ones
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 15, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Gemini Links 16/04/2025: IndieWeb Carnival, Tinylog RFC, "Focus, the Web and Gemini"
Links for the day
Links 15/04/2025: Touchable Volumetric Display and Resistance to American Spying Firms
Links for the day
Links 15/04/2025: Some People Cannot Read and Re-discovering of 'Web 1.0'
Links for the day
Links 15/04/2025: China Admits Targetting Critical Infrastructure Using CALEA Back Doors, NASCAR Cracked by Windows Usage
Links for the day
Why We Support Carole Cadwalladr (Even If We Don't Agree With Everything She Said)
I first became aware of Cadwalladr's work a long time ago
Microsoft's Serial Strangler Chose to Attack Techrights With SLAPP When Over 400 Victims of Mohamed Al Fayed Complained About Media's Role in Enabling Him
There is a strong element of "free press" here
A Coalition or a Coup of Sexism
In the Free software community it's hard to avoid this issue
statCounter Sees GNU/Linux at New High of 6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina
GNU/Linux is measured at all-time high
To Celebrate Git Turning 20 Linus Torvalds is 'Selling Out' to Microsoft and Proprietary Software Which Attacks Git (E.E.E.)
He makes it seem like he's endorsing his attackers
Gemini Protocol Milestone (3,000 Active Capsules)
and a total of nearly 4,500
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 14, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, April 14, 2025
Gemini Links 14/04/2025: Silver Pigs and more Foundation, Disliking Computers
Links for the day
Hundreds of Microsoft Layoffs (Net Headcount Decrease) in the United Kingdom
headcount decreased
Links 14/04/2025: Russian Attack on Sumy Shows No Intention of Peace, Virgin Australia Admits Overcharging People
Links for the day
The Dilemma of Web Browsers Lying About What They Are (in Order to Bypass Discriminatory Gateways Like Clownflare) Worsens Due to LLM Slop
LLM crawlers/scrapers have made sites more restrictive and hostile towards browsers that are potent but not "famous"
What Really Matters to Companies is Net Income or Profit (Bankruptcy is Possible Even With High Revenue)
We ought to stop talking about revenue without focusing on actual profit
Carole Cadwalladr Talks About How Big Business Tried to Silence Her (and Why You Might be Next)
Our story is very different from Cadwalladr's for many reasons
Companies Conspiring to Keep Salaries Down and Undermine Competition
People who do all the practical work are being paid less and made to work for much longer
Links 14/04/2025: Disinformation, Public Disdain for LLMs, and "Lessons on Tyranny"
Links for the day
LLM Slop and SEO SPAM Take Us Further Away From Facts (the Case of IBM Layoffs)
Some of these can impact Red Hat as well
Gemini Links 14/04/2025: Ween and Historic Ada Project Management
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 13, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, April 13, 2025
Influencers: Red Hat, Inc's IPO, 1999, post-mortem on the directed share offer to open source developer community
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock