Bonum Certa Men Certa

Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

Patent maximalists are among the biggest culprits

Buzz me up!
Buzz me up!



Summary: In an age of substitution -- where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts -- it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents

OVER THE past year the European Patent Office (EPO) often promoted software patents disguised not only as "hey hi" (AI) but also "blockchains" (in both cases there are two aspects to it; one pertains to patent searching and another to patent applications). Hours ago we found this report which talks about blockchains (the real thing) and bemoans the gold rush to patents on algorithms. To quote:



Over the last few years, the number of patent applications filed for blockchain technology has been on the rise globally, with the U.S dominating the charts. According to reports, the notable patent filers in the blockchain technology space have been banks. But, don’t patents question the very existence of blockchain? A technology that is supposed to be open, permissionless and transparent?

Along the same lines, James Gong, the Co-founder of LongHash, has said that “patents go against the spirit of blockchain technology.” In the latest LongHash post, Gong stated,


Not only that; in the US that goes against 35 U.S.C. ۤ 101 (which USPTO administrators like to sweep aside and ignore). In Europe we have Team Campinos/Battistelli misusing the term -- a concept they clearly don't even understand (see this talk from Campinos, complete with nonsense such as "CII", "4IR", "IoT", "AI" and "Blockchain").

"Off-the-shelf implementations of algorithms such as these have long been available, even before Microsoft's GitHub existed (the article perpetuates the idea that GitHub is the only thing which counts)."We've entered a dangerous era in the patent world. WIPO (UN) issues reports that glorify patents on buzzwords ("hey hi"), they're always calling everything "IP" (patents are not property) and they deliberately conflate things, such as blockchains for storage and search and blockchains as precondition for patent grants (pseudo-novelty to bypass strict limits on patenting).

Hours ago we also saw that Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP's Theodore Claypoole had published this nonsense in Lexology and other patent maximalists' journals. It uses the term "Open Source" along with "IP" and "Machine Learning" (what many in this profession call "hey hi"). To quote:

Businesses know that machine learning systems and artificial intelligence programs can be customized to meet a company’s specific needs. Most are at a loss to know how to begin developing them. Many are worried about teaching a machine learning system their pivotal secrets and losing rights to the system itself.

We have talked and written extensively on the risks of artificial intelligence that many business executives may be too intimidated to seek its rewards. This hesitation is unwise and unnecessary.

Probably the best way to resolve these concerns is for companies to start building their own AI for improving internal processes. While the prospect may seem foreign and scary, a universe of open source tools exists to make it easier.


Off-the-shelf implementations of algorithms such as these have long been available, even before Microsoft's GitHub existed (the article perpetuates the idea that GitHub is the only thing which counts). I know this as someone who worked in that area for over a decade and a half. The above perpetuates several other falsehoods, which basically glorify statistical analysis, training and pattern matching as something new and innovative when it face it goes many decades back. The main difference is the availability or cost of computational resources available to us at scale.

"Our society is quickly devolving into a pool of marketing terms ("apps", "cloud" and so on), so having meaningful technical discussions -- e.g. in the patenting domain -- is too difficult. The lawyers prefer it that way (BlahLaw)."It seems reasonable to conclude that patent offices and law firms could really use some training or education about those buzzwords they keep dropping. Public officials too could use some lessons to avoid being bamboozled. Our society is quickly devolving into a pool of marketing terms ("apps", "cloud" and so on), so having meaningful technical discussions -- e.g. in the patenting domain -- is too difficult. The lawyers prefer it that way (BlahLaw).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Recent Site Changes and Looking Towards 2026
In November 2026 we turn 20
Mozilla Firefox is Probably Already Below 2% in the UK (United Kingdom)
LibreWolf identifies as "Firefox" by default
When You Don't Want to Tinker Much You Just Use GNU/Linux, Not Windows
With GNU/Linux upgrades are possible and, failing that, one can just back up the home directory and copy it "back into" the new OS
Coming Soon, the Next Chapter About the Crisis of the Open Source Initiative (OSI)
We're far from done
Expect GNU/Linux to Rise Sharply in China
But Red China won't trust Red Hat (IBM), which works for the Pentagon and keeps the "secret sauce" for its OS secret (just what Americans accused China of doing with its distros)
Gemini Links 16/03/2025: Threats to Canada and How to Process News Online
Links for the day
 
Gemini Links 17/03/2025: "Hack the Planet", Klingnauer Stausee, and Enshittification
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, March 16, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, March 16, 2025
Slow News Cycles Are Part of a Trend, Technology Gravitating Towards Rich People's Interests
This issue isn't limited to the Web
Facebook REALLY, REALLY, R E A L L Y Does Not Want You to Read This Book
It would be a CRIME to read it
Illuminating Microsoft's Code of Conduct (CoC) Hypocrisy
Oppressor victimhood? Leadership claimed by the worst offenders?
Planet Ubuntu - or Ubuntu Planet - Has an LLM Slop Problem (Called Faizul "Piju" 9M2PJU)
Does investigative reporting have any future at all?
Links 16/03/2025: Handwriting Comeback and "MElon’s Attack on U.S.A.I.D."
Links for the day
Gemini Links 16/03/2025: "Differences Distance" and "Dopamine-addicted Pigeon"
Links for the day
Links 16/03/2025: American Press Under Attack, "France Offers to Take in US Scientists"
Links for the day
Links 16/03/2025: Growing Tariff Hostilities and Social Media Surveillance
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, March 15, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, March 15, 2025
Gemini Links 15/03/2025: Sleeping in March, Headless Raspberry Pi 4
Links for the day
Links 15/03/2025: Hey Hi (AI) Hype Waning, Microsoft and Apple Ridiculed for Vapourware
Links for the day
Many Reports About Microsoft Layoffs Are LLM Slop Based on Other LLM Slop (From Microsoft-controlled LLMs That Downplay the Layoffs or Give Badly Outdated Data)
The LLM slopfarms also dilute/derank actual news about Linux by pushing Microsoft Azure instead; it's a spamfest!
When You Expose Corporate Crimes, Misconduct and Lies They Harasses and Troll You. Then You Write About the Harassment and Trolling and They Allege It's "All Personal".
protect women's safety
Gemini Links 15/03/2025: Bandcamp and DST
Links for the day
Links 15/03/2025: Albania TikTok Ban, No Skinnerboxes in Danish Schools
Links for the day
Sierra Leone: Android Up to Record Highs, Windows Falls to Record Lows of Almost 5% (15 Years Ago It Was 100%)
This is what happens when about 83% of Web requests come from mobile
Margarita Manterola (marga, Google) & Debian DebConf13 Swiss venue intrigue
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, March 14, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, March 14, 2025