Bonum Certa Men Certa

(Don't Let's) Throw Caution to the Wind

2020 figosdev

Index



Free-falling
Chapter 8: (Don't Let's) Throw Caution to the Wind



Summary: "As it will become crucial to explain, the effect of all this dancing around truth and reality was to transform a volunteer force primed to bring freedom to users into cheap labour for an industry that exploits everyone in it -- all the way to the very top of Open Source itself."

Before we muck up our not-quite-pristine software platform with more projects, it would be wise to talk about why this is done only with some trepidation.



The projects most relevant to the next chapter are desktop environments or DEs, window managers or WMs and toolkits or libraries. The choices we make there decide what kind of crappy developer politics we end up saddled with.

"The choices we make there decide what kind of crappy developer politics we end up saddled with."Of all the laughable farces in the world, one of the greatest is that you can separate a project from "politics". As someone recently said online (maybe it was Tom) politics enter the equation the moment you're talking about Free software. This idea of any project being "apolitical" is itself a political stance. It means that certain kinds of politics (not just the party/electoral variety either, I might add) are discouraged or forbidden in a project.

One of the most famous scams to avoid the subject of "politics" is Open Source. Open Source was created to talk about / sell / exploit Free software, without mentioning either freedom or organisations that work for it. Open Source is the pseudo-apolitical, "Don't mention the war" corporate-friendly sell-out version of the Free software movement -- so much so, that its flagship organisations own co-founder Bruce Perens resigned after just a year of Open Source selling out the movement it hijacked.

Pretending to be apolitical is an industry unto to itself, and industry loves to say that political discussions are forbidden, because if they weren't you could call them on their own political atrocities.

"Pretending to be apolitical is an industry unto to itself, and industry loves to say that political discussions are forbidden, because if they weren't you could call them on their own political atrocities."Once again, this is not just about politics tangential to Free software itself. Discuss Open Source for long enough, or discuss the ethical implications of software withing an open source project for long enough, and someone will mention that political discussions are either "divisive" or a "waste of time" -- basically to "Shut up and (don't say anything unless you) code".

You will reasonably expect the next chapter to be about graphics. But this book is about user freedom, and the next chapter is about graphics from the perspective of user freedom. Some people will say "just choose your graphics layers based on their technical aspects". If you do that, you could end up with lock-in as well as the exploitation of users and developers. Maybe that's great for you, but its exactly what this book exists to discourage as much as possible.

Because so many Free software projects are actually Open Source projects, and because these projects eschew "politics" and ultimately sell out their own users (along with developers who aren't on board with the changes), it is absolutely necessary to examine the Open Source Initiative as the archetypal example of this political bait-and-switch routine.

Let's start with Bruce Perens -- I like to start with Perens, because I believe he is (at the very least, was) the most sincere person in Open Source. Perens and Eric S. Raymond founded the Open Source Initiative in 1998 -- more than a decade after the Free Software Foundation was started.

It doesn't bother me that the FSF doesn't have a monopoly on promoting Free software, nor did it bother Perens. Perens is the author of the Debian Free Software Guidelines, or DFSG. I happen to like the DFSG, even though I've lost all allegiance to Debian. Of important note is that the DFSG was the basis for the Open Source Definition (OSD) itself. That's how integral Bruce Perens is to Open Source.

"ESR still hosts the Halloween documents on his own website. These are based on memos leaked from Microsoft (verified authentic) regarding their practices towards competitors."Eric S. Raymond, I believe -- made Open Source what it is today. I don't think its accurate or fair to say he alone was responsible for the state Open Source is in. He may have made the decisions that led us to where we are now. He absolutely did not act alone.

The paradox of ESR is that he was very vocally anti-Microsoft (Microsoft is not a company, it is a Cult and empire -- so for a moment, it may help to think of ESR as anti-empire. Though whether he really is would only be a guess) to the point of publishing the "Halloween documents" on the OSI website. From there, things get weird.

ESR still hosts the Halloween documents on his own website. These are based on memos leaked from Microsoft (verified authentic) regarding their practices towards competitors. They prove that Microsoft considers Free software a competitor, that they intend to fight, thwart and if possible exploit it, and some of the overall methodology they might use to accomplish this.

"The farce of Open Source is this elaborate footwork around the idea that you can actually fight corporate hegemony without ever really talking about corporate hegemony."Raymond's comments were hardly sympathetic to them, though today Microsoft has very arguably done to OSI exactly what the Halloween Documents said they would do to Free Software and Open Source.

For years I've tried to figure out the paradox of Raymond letting Microsoft do to his own organisation exactly what he condemned them for, and I have still only come up with two possible conclusions -- one is that he lied about his true feelings originally (I very much doubt this, it is also less charitable than my other guess) and the other is that he's too proud to appreciate and admit the irony -- I think this one is probably on the money.

The farce of Open Source is this elaborate footwork around the idea that you can actually fight corporate hegemony without ever really talking about corporate hegemony. Just wave your hands about "practical development methodology" and you'll hoodwink the empire into doing the bidding of the tech world peasantry! I don't picture Raymond rubbing his hands conspiratorially and cackling so much as I imagine him thinking he could pull this off.

"In the Open Source cult, mocking the empire they originally exposed (OSI no longer hosts the Halloween documents, instead their board of directors plays host to Microsoft themselves) is precisely the problem, and being "constructive" (pretending to not have any political qualms with Microsoft's actions against users, while pretending you can reform them with a "better design methodology") is the real answer."At any rate, Open Source acts like Free Software is a "Cathedral" full of sacred cows, while Open Source is (or pretends to be) very laid back, invisible-hand-like, replacing all "wasted time" concerns about freedom with de facto freedom itself.

As it will become crucial to explain, the effect of all this dancing around truth and reality was to transform a volunteer force primed to bring freedom to users into cheap labour for an industry that exploits everyone in it -- all the way to the very top of Open Source itself. Microsoft and OSI are both corporate cults, and OSI promotes an ideal that you can somehow beat the cult if you worship just the right way -- turning it against itself.

While Open Source points and laughs at the sentimentality of Free Software and treats it as pompous, naive and even hateful, its worship of industry monopolies is revealed by the complete lack of a sense of humour about people mocking the empire itself. For all of Free Software's alleged sacred cows, nothing is more sacred or hallowed to Open Source than the empire. Throw the smallest stone you can find at one of the corporations under their protection, and the "morals" and politics of OSI will be revealed not only to peons like you and me, but even to Linus Torvalds and Eric S. Raymond.

"Unfortunately, this systemic and philosophical failure is not limited to OSI, but is likely to play out in every project (as it has with too many) that caters to Open Source over Free Software."In the Open Source cult, mocking the empire they originally exposed (OSI no longer hosts the Halloween documents, instead their board of directors plays host to Microsoft themselves) is precisely the problem, and being "constructive" (pretending to not have any political qualms with Microsoft's actions against users, while pretending you can reform them with a "better design methodology") is the real answer.

Unfortunately, this systemic and philosophical failure is not limited to OSI, but is likely to play out in every project (as it has with too many) that caters to Open Source over Free Software. One of these is a movement; the other is a conceit.

Licence: Creative Commons CC0 1.0 (public domain)

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft Lacks a Solid Strategic Plan Other Than Buying Its Own Stock (and Paying Staff in Shares)
Beware and be cautious of bubbles
Microsoft's Chatbot Strategy Resulted in Massive Losses, So Now It's Trying to Reinvent Itself as 'Hardware Company' (Once Again, Years After XBox, KIN, Windows Phone and Surface Failed Miserably)
revenues associated with Windows has fallen sharply
 
Microsoft's Pearls of Wisdom: Layoffs Are Growth
Microsoft boss: layoffs are "long-term growth."
[Meme] Hide the Bodies
hiding EPO's role in funding Lukashenko
Josef Kratochvíl and All the European Patent Organisation's Chiefs (at the Administrative Council Too) Notified That Over 1,000 Members of Staff Demand Action on Patent Quality and Compliance (Industry Too is Alarmed That Many Invalid Patents Get Granted)
Huge corruption
Debian trademark canceled
Debian trademark canceled
Links 23/02/2024: Feed Aggregator and 2 Years of Invasion, Alexei Navalny’s Mother Blackmailed
Links for the day
Gemini Links 23/02/2024: Getting 'Sick' of Modern Tech and Deletion of One's Reddit Account
Links for the day
Links 23/02/2024: 227 Microsoft Layoffs Noted in Santa Clara and Disaster in Rivian
Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 22, 2024
IRC logs for Thursday, February 22, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
[Meme] It's NOT Your PC
losing control of hardware
Gemini Links 22/02/2024: Removing Radio Ads and Being Seen on the Internet
Links for the day
Mark Shuttleworth and the Question of Liability (Debian Volunteers He Pressured Before the Suicides)
Humanity for me
Mark Shuttleworth's (MS) Canonical Running Microsoft (MS) Ads, Mischaracterising Mass Surveillance as 'Confidential' (the Usual Lie)
The money talks, so the facts are absent
Ads as 'Articles'
Money buys perception manipulation (or reputation laundering) campaigns
Abraham Raji & Debian, DebConf kayak death: search abandoned, evading liability
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 22/02/2024: Chatbots Failing 'Big Time' and More Condemnations Appear of Bill Gates
Links for the day
There May be Close to 100,000,000 Laptops and Desktops Running GNU/Linux Around the World in 2024
hard to track the number
Search Engine Market Share Worldwide Shows How Badly Microsoft's Chatbot Strategy (Hopes) and Vapourware Have Failed
Bing, which was marketed as the forefront "product" for chatbots (Microsoft paid the media a lot of money for hype campaigns), gained nothing at Google's expense
[Meme] Demoralising and Putting Down Your Staff
unproductive and dangerous approach
This Week's Letter to António Campinos About Mean-Spirited Line Managers at the European Patent Office (EPO)
Seems like a way to get rid of staff. Some will resign in anger.
Software in the Public Interest (SPI) & Debian obfuscated structure fooled suicide victim's family: the ultimate example of bad faith
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 21, 2024
IRC logs for Wednesday, February 21, 2024
Gemini Links 22/02/2024: What We Pass On and HTTP Header Viewer
Links for the day
Manuel Estrada Sainz (ranty), Andres Garcia (ErConde) & Debian Deaths overworking
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
GNU/Linux Rising to 8% of Desktops/Laptops in Jordan?
what statCounter shows
[Meme] If Iraq Launches an Investigation Into How Microsoft Bought OpenAI Without Paying for It
fake "money" from Microsoft
Windows Has Fallen to 13% Market Share in Iraq (It was 100% Just 15 Years Ago), GNU/Linux Rose Sharply in Recent Years
In recent years Iraq was developing its own GNU/Linux distro
Springtime is Next, Here's What We Plan for March and April
This month and next month we expect to publish something unique about EPO abuses every day
Studying the Freedom of firefox-123.0.tar.bz2
The "F" in Firefox
Abraham Raji, Jens Schmalzing & debian-private cover-ups after deaths, accidents, suicides
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Microsoft Bribes, Keeping Regulators at Bay
crime and corruption
[Meme] The Quotas Came From Above
EPO targets
EPO Talent Planning & Architecture is Another Attack on EPO Staff and the Central Staff Committee (CSC) Explains Why
ignore the flowery words
[Meme] Just Following Orders From "The Fu**ing President" António Campinos
Salary? OBEY!
Links 21/02/2024: China Working on West-less Tech Future, More Bounties on Patent Troll Leigh M. Rothschild (Which IBM et al Failed to Dismantle at the Root)
Links for the day
Links 21/02/2024: Encryption Backdoors Deemed Not Legal, Decentralised Web Under Attack
Links for the day
Games:Steam Audio as Free Software, Hazard Pay, ChipWits, and More
7 stories for today
Julian Assange, Wikileaks & Debian-private
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 20, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, February 20, 2024
Links 21/02/2024: Microsoft Sued for Monopolistic Policies, More Layoffs Planned for Next Month
Links for the day