08.29.19
Gemini version available ♊︎Updates on Koch v EPO, Anette Koch’s Case Which the EPO Would Rather Nobody Heard About
Summary: An interesting appeal at ILO unearthed to expose a profoundly dysfunctional ILO ‘tribunal’ and an unbelievably cruel EPO that ‘burns’ its own staff and then disclaims liability
Dr. Anette Koch, a former staff representative at the European Patent Office (EPO), was mentioned here a few times over the years. She was ruthlessly and mercilessly fired for her disability, which had likely been caused by her job at the EPO. So much for caring about one’s employees, eh? Battistelli and António Campinos probably prefer for her to just disappear because her case opens all sorts of jars full of worms, implicating many top officials of the EPO.
Two days ago her Twitter account became active again. Here’s what she has said since the last time we mentioned her case, in chronological order (oldest first):
The only difference with the original internal appeals procedure would be that in the meantime the #EPO has "legalized" the composition of the #internal #appeals #committee which the #ILO #Tribunal did not consider balanced in Judgment 3785 – is this #procedural #abuse, or not? https://t.co/aR2iQIO9BF
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) August 29, 2018
As the #EPO takes the final decision on internal appeals, there is no access for me to an #independent #judge contr.t. #Article6 #ECHR. Besides I would most likely have to file and plead the same cases with the #ILO #Tribunal again afterwards, as the #EPO does not seem to change.
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) August 29, 2018
No temporary stay of proceedings, despite chronic gastritis, chronic osteochondrosis/HNPs from C4/C5 to C7/Th1/RSI and aggravating arthrosis in my right hand of which the #Admin. #Tribunal of the #ILO is well aware. My reply in re AT 5-4532 could only be incomplete. #Inhumane… pic.twitter.com/zv80ma41ZH
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 11, 2018
Just for the records: I had no extension of my 30-days term in AT 5-4532 (incomplete reply!). #violation #Article6ECHR
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) September 12, 2018
FYI pic.twitter.com/Q8A4VLk1cN
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) October 3, 2018
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) June 5, 2019
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) June 5, 2019
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) June 5, 2019
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) June 5, 2019
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) June 5, 2019
— Anette Koch (@AnetteKoch) August 27, 2019
We might sooner or later have more to say about the subject, as we study this case closely. █