05.25.21

The EPO’s War on Justice and Assault on the Law — Part 19: Ladies and Gentlemen, Place Your Bets…

Posted in Courtroom, Europe, Law, Patents at 1:34 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Previously in this series:

Games begin
What happens next is anybody’s guess, but don’t hold your breath…

Summary: The EPO‘s BoA decision on G 1/21 seems to have already been made by virtue of stacking; but it’s not entirely impossible that following the removal of Beckedorf and Josefsson (it happened after writing this series) something surprising will happen

At the time of writing, there has been no identifiable public reaction from the Enlarged Board of Appeal, except this, to the myriad allegations of partiality which have been articulated in the IP blogosphere in connection with case no. G 1/21.

Even the normally sanguine Thorsten Bausch, writing in the Kluwer Patent Blog, has been unable to hide his exasperation at Josefsson’s apparent contempt for a fundamental and time-honoured principle of natural justice – nemo iudex in causa sua – according to which no person should be entrusted with the task of judging a case in which they have an interest.

“Taking a pragmatic view, the only realistic strategy open to the Enlarged Board at this juncture seems to be the option that the Germans call “Flucht nach vorn” – a headlong rush forwards into the legal minefield in the hope of coming out on the other side in one piece.”Unfortunately, it seems that Josefsson is suffering from the widespread EPOnian ailment of “conflict-of-interest blindness” when it comes to this rather delicate issue.

To paraphrase Oscar Wilde, having a Chairman who is under suspicion of partiality might be regarded as a misfortune; to have a panel with a majority of members tainted by such suspicion looks like downright carelessness.

However, the fact of the matter is that, as the scheduled date for the hearing approaches, it becomes increasingly difficult for Josefsson and his panel to come up with a graceful exit strategy which would allow them to extricate themselves in a credible manner from the appalling legal mess of their own making.

Taking a pragmatic view, the only realistic strategy open to the Enlarged Board at this juncture seems to be the option that the Germans call “Flucht nach vorn” – a headlong rush forwards into the legal minefield in the hope of coming out on the other side in one piece.

“As things stand, it’s looking pretty much like a “slam dunk” for Josefsson.”Of course the Enlarged Board’s predicament is significantly eased by the fact that whatever course of action it decides to take, there is no higher review instance to point an admonishing finger at its errors.

So even if the Enlarged Board decides to ride roughshod over fundamental legal principles and disregard its own internal rules for reasons of “political expediency”, nobody risks getting hauled over the coals for what – under “normal” non-EPOnian circumstances – might be considered to amount to serious judicial misconduct.

As things stand, it’s looking pretty much like a “slam dunk” for Josefsson.

Three of his internal members – van der Eijk, Eliasson and Ritza – are generally reputed to be managerially compliant “minions” who know their place and can be depended on to dance to the Chairman’s tune.

The only internal member with a credible track-record of independence is Beckedorf whose role in the procedures G2301/15 (warning: epo.org link, hence surveillance risk) and G2301/16 (warning: epo.org link) demonstrated that he wasn’t always prepared to dance to the tune of his political masters when their wishes conflicted with his sense of professional ethics.

“Three of his internal members – van der Eijk, Eliasson and Ritza – are generally reputed to be managerially compliant “minions” who know their place and can be depended on to dance to the Chairman’s tune.”But a lot of water has flowed under the Ludwigsbrücke near the EPO headquarters in Munich since those days.

It remains to be seen whether or not Beckedorf proves himself able and willing to swim against the tide in the present case.

To begin with he may have been chastened by his experiences during the proceedings in cases G2301/15 and G 2301/16 when he was reportedly faced with the threat of non‑reappointment by Benoît Battistelli‘s protector, Jesper Kongstad.

Beckedorf’s next reappointment (to take effect as of 2022) does not appear to have been decided yet. It is probably due to be decided later this year, most likely in June. That is likely to make him wary about trying to rock the boat too much between now and then.

Apart from this, it has been rumoured that Beckedorf may harbour personal ambitions for a more senior position in the Boards of Appeal, for example as head of the Legal Board. Those are precisely the kind of considerations that tend to make a nominally independent judicial official more inclined to show deference to the whims of his political masters.

EPO and USPTO
Josefsson and Beckedorf attending a Judicial Symposium in Tokyo in 2018

Last but not least, the significance of Rule 12d(3) of the EPC (warning: epo.org link) cannot be ignored.

The consequence of this Rule – which was introduced by Battistelli’s 2016 “reform” – is that Beckedorf, like all other internal members of the Enlarged Board, is dependent upon the goodwill of Josefsson to obtain a “positive opinion” on his reappointment.

“Let’s not forget that Josefsson was re-appointed by the Administrative Council in December 2020 and he clearly plans to remain in charge at Haar until 2027 at least.”Under the given circumstances, we can conclude that Beckedorf is likely to be extremely reluctant to dirty his copybook with his Swedish overlord.

Let’s not forget that Josefsson was re-appointed by the Administrative Council (warning: epo.org link) in December 2020 and he clearly plans to remain in charge at Haar until 2027 at least.

Arnold in costume
Now that’s what Battistelli would call “a real judge”!

The main potential for an upset in Josefsson’s “roadmap” for the referral case no. G 1/21 would appear to lie with the external members – the “real judges” as Battistelli would have called them.

One commentator on IPKat put it like this back in March:

“It would be interesting if Mr. Arnold and/or Mr. Chatzikos were to refuse to take part in what, on the face of it, is a kangaroo court.”

It would indeed be interesting if such a thing came to pass, but how likely is it?

We know next to nothing about the Greek judge, Evangelos Chatzikos, or his attitude to “kangaroo courts”. Cynics will probably reply that coming from the Greek legal system he is unlikely to have much difficulty in accommodating himself to the legal “no-man’s land” [PDF] of EPOnia.

“It’s equally possible that Arnold might decide to take the easy option to “go with the flow” and trouser his € 1000 “petty cash” without asking too many questions.”On the face of things, it is the “external member” from the UK – Lord Justice Richard Arnold – who would appear to be the person most likely to object to the procedural shenanigans which have tainted the case so far.

However, it is by no means certain that Arnold will object.

Even if he felt motivated to do so, the fact of the matter is that, as long as he remains on his own in this regard, he is in the unenviable position of being outnumbered by six to one.

It’s equally possible that Arnold might decide to take the easy option to “go with the flow” and trouser his € 1000 “petty cash” without asking too many questions.

Josefsson and Arnold
Josefsson and Arnold at the 17th European Judges’ Symposium (Tallinn, September 2014).

It also deserves to be noted that Josefsson and Arnold appear to be well-acquainted with each other on a professional level – as evidenced by the photographic record of the 17th European Judges’ Symposium which was held in Tallinn in September 2014.

In the group photo of the event, the pair can be seen standing in close proximity to each other, with “Calle” grinning smugly like the proverbial “Cheshire cat”.

“What happens next seems to be anybody’s guess so – if you want to avoid a disappointment – don’t hold your breath!”So it’s quite possible that, for old time’s sake, Arnold might prefer to avoid any kind of professional showdown with his “learned friend” Josefsson.

What happens next seems to be anybody’s guess so – if you want to avoid a disappointment – don’t hold your breath!

That concludes our review of the current state of play in referral case G 1/21.

A final summing-up will follow shortly.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2021/05/25/bets-g121/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 2/8/2021: Linux 5.14 RC4 and 20% Growth in Steam

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, August 01, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, August 01, 2021



  3. Links 1/8/2021: LibreOffice 7.2 RC2 and Lakka 3.3

    Links for the day



  4. Was Microsoft Ever First in the Market?

    Confronting the false belief that Microsoft ever innovates anything of significance or is "first" in some market/s



  5. Links 1/8/2021: 4MLinux 37.0, IBM Fluff, and USMCA Update

    Links for the day



  6. Microsoft Knows That When Shareholders Realise Azure Has Failed the Whole Boat Will Sink

    The paranoia at Microsoft is well justified; they've been lying to shareholders to inflate share prices and they don't really deliver the goods, just false hopes and unfulfilled promises



  7. [Meme] Nobody and Nothing Harms Europe's Reputation Like the EPO Does

    Europe’s second-largest institution, the EPO, has caused severe harm/damage to Europe’s economy and reputation; its attacks on the courts and on justice itself (even on constitutions in the case of UPC — another attempt to override the law and introduce European software patents) won’t be easily forgotten; SUEPO has meanwhile (on Saturday, link at the bottom in German) reminded people that Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos have driven away the EPO’s most valuable workers or moral compass



  8. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 31, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, July 31, 2021



  9. [Meme] When it Comes to Server Share, Microsoft Azure is Minuscule (But Faking It)

    Don't believe the lies told by Microsoft's charlatans and frauds; Azure has been a total failure and that's why there are layoffs as well



  10. [Meme] Mozilla Has Turned From Technical to Marketing

    Way back, long before Mozilla and Firefox got hijacked by politics (turning Mozilla into a VPN reseller that lies about its stance on privacy), geeks were driving the company, not corporate lawyers and spying/marketing people



  11. Over 1,500 (Known/Unorphaned) Gemini Capsules and Over 160,000 Page Requests in gemini.techrights.org During July

    Techrights is expanding at gemini:// (Gemini space) and over 1,500 capsules are reported to have been found (less than 4 months ago it was about 1,000)



  12. Links 31/7/2021: Kernel Additions and Linux Mint 20.3 Release Date

    Links for the day



  13. Microsoft Azure Stagnating

    Reprinted with permission from Mitchel Lewis, former Microsoft employee



  14. For 17 Days (and Counting) António Campinos Has Failed to Respond to Call for Compliance With the Law

    Team Campinos has been so arrogant and so evasive that there’s no indication (yet) that it will follow court orders (Willy ‘Guillaume’ Minnoye openly bragged about ignoring court orders and he's still cheering for the EPO's abuses); therefore, staff of the EPO takes collective action



  15. Raw: Elodie Bergot Breaking the Law by Threatening Against the Exercise of Fundamental Rights

    Over the years we saw a number of rude letters from Elodie Bergot, the grossly under-qualified spouse of a friend of Vichyite Benoît Battistelli; most of these we never published (we already have these and can always publish if the need arises), but those paranoid and insecure “Mafia”-like ‘cabal’ need to be exposed for the mobsters they are; for nearly a decade they’ve illegally bullied EPO staff in clear violation of the law (and for over 3 years António Campinos has kept those bullies on board); why does Europe do nothing and why is it never holding high-profile abusers accountable (only low-level facilitators)? Is it because the EU too is being infiltrated by them?



  16. Linspire Should Be Avoided in 2021 Just Like It Was Avoided 14 Years Ago

    The brand "Linspire" was brought back, but the agenda seems to be more or less the same, namely pushing proprietary software and serving Microsoft's commercial agenda (in 'Linux' clothing)



  17. The Death of Freenode Would Be Freenode's Own Fault

    Freenode is going dark and now it’s asking people to create accounts at IRC.com (just to get back into the network that they may have already occupied for decades) as if Freenode owns “IRC” as a whole



  18. Links 31/7/2021: KDE Progress and Activision Catastrophe

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 30, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, July 30, 2021



  20. The Smartest Meter of All

    Yesterday a lady came over to take our power readings (electric/gas meter); secure these people's jobs as they help protect people's privacy (dignity) at home



  21. [Meme] A Web of False Dichotomies

    A reminder that Techrights is fully available (all blog posts and wiki pages) in gemini://



  22. Freenode Shrinks by Another Quarter and Gemini Continues to Grow (For Techrights at Least)

    Freenode continues to perish faster than we've imagined; it's a good thing that we've had contingencies set up; regarding the monopolised and increasingly centralised Web, we're still making baby steps towards weaning ourselves off it



  23. Links 31/7/2021: Wine 6.14 and Chrome 93 Beta

    Links for the day



  24. European Media Does Not Care About Europe's Second-Largest Institution Crushing Basic Laws and Fundamental Rights

    New video about the latest publication from SUEPO (the EPO’s staff union); it was published yesterday, seeing that the “Mafia” (what EPO staff actually calls the management!) hasn’t done anything to comply with a wide-ranging set of court rulings from ILO-AT; why has the media said nothing about this and what does that say about today’s media? The material is all in the public domain, in widely understood languages, and SUEPO spoke about it more than 3 weeks ago.



  25. Links 30/7/2021: Distro Comparisons and Tootle Introduced

    Links for the day



  26. [Meme] Enforcing ILO-AT Rulings...

    We’re still waiting for a statement — any statement (direct or indirect) — from EPO management, seeing that almost a month has passed



  27. 'Open Source' as a Failed Initiative

    A closer look at the dire state of the Open Source Initiative, or OSI, which no longer protects Open Source (let alone software freedom) but instead helps openwashing, Microsoft entrapment, and a coup against the FSF



  28. [Meme] Rowan and António Sittin' on a Tree...

    How much longer can Team Campinos keep issuing tons of noisy and self-congratulatory puff pieces to (perhaps) distract from the elephant in the 10th floor of the Isar building (EPO HQ)? Staff won't wait for eternity.



  29. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 29, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, July 29, 2021



  30. Half the People in This Letter Are IBM Employees

    IBM seems to be continuing its war on the FSF because IBM wants to own everything (CentOS being ‘canned’ was just part of the plan)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts