My Husband's Reply to Our Webhost After False Accusations, Perjury, and Crimes Committed Against Me and My Family (Including Parents and Siblings)
Editorial note: A high-level authority said that writing about this is lawful; it's definitely OK to publish and there is "no law against it".
THE FOLLOWING is a 100% complete reproduction of what my husband told the webhost a few months ago after failed attempts at censorship. It did not mention any names to the webhost, nor are any names mentioned in this post.
As the record shows, the webhost could see very clearly what was going on and took our side, keeping the sites in tact and not trying to apply any pressure (or asking for anything to be removed):
Hi,I've received professional advice on this today (I only saw the three messages last night; 24 hours isn't enough time to reply). I shall deal with each complaint in turn.
What we have here isn't a mentally healthy person (autistic by own admission); the person (openly admits being arrested) not only abuses my wife and my mom (totally unprovoked, just attacking women like it's a hobby) starts lying to you about everything because they don't like the women speaking out about the abuse they've received. Do not take instructions/takedown requests from a person who comes to the site to post messages like "gas the Jews" with other threatening language (borderline death threats); it would not look good.
What we have here is not a British person... harassing British people.
The images in question are screenshots; they're not just fair use, but the LinkedIn stuff is public under license (check the LinkedIn licensing and ToS). These screenshots fall 100% under Fair use Doctrine. It's very trivial, as any reputable lawyer would likely tell you the same. They're publicly available, just search the name and it's #1 result in Google. The person is clearly perjuring herself/themselves, and that is yet another crime. Laws apply to trans people as much as anyone else. Posting illegal stuff online, impersonating people, abusing women, and even abusing gays (yes, that too) while shouting "gas the Jews" may merit responses. Do not censor the people who explain the abuse they suffered. Censorship by deliberate misrepresentation of copyright law is in its own right misuse of copyright law. It's easy to challenge in court and even holding the frivolous reporter accountable is feasible (for the reporter to pay our legal fees).
That is the message my husband sent. Legally proficient people, not people who merely pretend (lying about their own credential), sided with us. There is hard proof for all of the words above. Of course we would have taken legal action (a year ago already) if the perpetrator was not financially broke.
Next week, on Monday as usual, we will show another invalid attempt to censor the sites in vain. It's part of a pattern. █