Bonum Certa Men Certa

Mozilla Has Turned Firefox Into OSPS Consistent With "Attestation" Objectives

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Apr 14, 2024

OSPS is Open Source Proprietary Software (Proprietary in 'Open' Clothing)

Halloween image of witch silhouetted flying in front of full moon with evil pumpkins at base

PART of running this Web site and Gemini capsule involves development and rapid improvement of custom-made software that suits our needs and meets some basic standards. A lot of it is coded in Perl, Python, and Bash. Recently, however, JavaScript too (tr-copy-title-url.xpi).

In the process of doing that we discovered just how locked down Firefox (and its derivatives too) had become. If one develops an extension to Firefox it "has to be installed as a 'temporary extension' because it is not signed at all," as an insider explains. "In Firefox," one must go to "about:debugging#/runtime/this-firefox" and then "Load Temporary Add-on..."

This needs to be done again and again every time Firefox gets (re)started. "The downside to it being unsigned," the insider emphasises, "is that it needs to be reloaded each time the browser is restarted."

This wasn't like that when I developed Firefox extensions nearly 20 years ago. Something has changed, we're not sure when it changed, and this change was likely gradual.

I installed the extension using the steps above and it required the same to be done in LibreWolf, so the artificial restrictions got inherited by the "Libre" 'version'. Great, eh?

So people need to 'sideload' ("sideloading" is a misnomer) their own work, even repeatedly. It cannot be done without so many steps. The insider explains that "restarting Firefox clears the plug-in out of memory, so figuring out how to sign it properly would help with that."

There's an issue with that though. As the insider soon realised, based on the official pages [1, 2], self-signing is forbidden. "As usual for nowadays," the insider says, "self-signing is not allowed. The tedious manual process given initially is the only real option" (for those who update the code frequently and want it to still work).

If one signs or self-signs one's own work, what is the problem? That it might crash everything? There are various ways to undo or remove extensions and "signing" does not in any way assure quality; it makes sense to allow self-signing in many circumstances.

We've attempted to find a workaround, we tried to think more of ways to install the extension fast (without all those laborious steps). We still wonder when these tight restrictions were added and why it happened (or how Mozilla tried to justify/rationalise it).

Mozilla just wants to be in control of everything, even whatever extension the user adds, even if the user himself or herself developed the extension for personal use. This can facilitate censorship of software by Mozilla, as in, you can only do in Firefox what we've approved.

Attestation much? Is this where Mozilla is going? It's a stepping stone towards DRM or at least Tivoisation.

Where was this decision debated? "Gradual steps [were taken] so that the public goes along without complaining," our insider says. As LibreWolf is the same, we can really see how the restrictions get inherited by freer alternatives. Apparently LibreWolf is so secure that the user is wrong to add the user's own code. Or, as the insider puts it: "It's not your computer any more. It's Microsoft via Mozilla via Google. The three collude and conspire to ensure that they have control of the system and not the ostensible owner. Don't look at the DRM hard- coded into Apple's M2, M3, and M4 chips."

I've estimated that it would take ~60 minutes/month (or 12 hours a year) if we need to re-load our extension every time Firefox (or LibreWolf) is restarted. The insider thinks "reloading is an intentional PITA by Mozilla."

"About the only other option would be to make it an official plug-in and downloadable via Mozilla's site. Updating it would be a horrible experience and require lots of time, each update."

Imagine trying to update one's own software and resubmit to Mozilla every small changes for re-signing. Where's the logic in that? What if the code (or extension) isn't of much use to the general public? Or Mozilla turns the coder down? This isn't being done for "security", it's all about control by Mozilla and its masters (GAFAM). One can bet that, like in Windows XP (and later), Mozilla also keeps lists of everything you put in Firefox every time you use it (under the guise of "telemetry" to 'improve' your experience or something).

We've seen similar issues in UEFI 'secure' boot and Certificate Authorities. These facilitate censorship of code or restrictions on site access (i.e. attacks on Freedom of Expression).

The way things work at the moment "is a waste of time," the insider opines. "It is not about "security" as you or I or anyone else thinks of it. It is about control of the machine and wresting that away from the public, without their complaints."

So just remember that Mozilla has turned Firefox into OSPS that refuses to trust you, the user, or obey your will. The word "Firefox" has two Fs, but Mozilla doesn't give a F about your Freedom.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

"Bad Shim Signature"; So 'Secure' That It Overrides Users' Preferences and Turns Itself Back on (Coercive Measure)
This was a few hours ago
We Covered UEFI 'Secure Boot' Scandals. The World Listened.
To hell with UEFI 'secure boot'
Fake News With Fake Numbers About Microsoft
"This is what happens when the world's economy is governed by sick old men"
Slopwatch: "Google News" is Fast Becoming a Mashup of Slopfarms, Linux Journal ("LJ") is a Dump of LLM Slop
Well done, Google News. Google itself can flourish as a slopfarm mashup.
Torturing Users Who Just Want to Run GNU/Linux on Their Own PC
"Linux does not want to install"
European Authorities, Already Bribed and Infiltrated by Microsoft, Won't Help You Find BigBlueButton, Jami, Ring, and Jitsi
Because they're paid by Microsoft and are Microsoft 'addicts' themselves
Moving From Content Management Systems (CMSs) to Static Site Generators (SSGs) Saves You Time, Makes You a Lot More Productive
try to reduce the cost (financial and computational) of running your site
Leak: European Patent Office (EPO) is Now Attacking Amicale Clubs
corruption has become the norm and scientists are robbed of any dignity
Oracle Fraud (or Defrauding Shareholders)
"the obvious [lie] is that watts are (wasted) electricity [and] and FLOPS are computing capacity"
 
20 Years Later and Academia Isn't the Same
"I never dreamed of being a professor"
'Cancel Culture' by the Right: Microsoft Lunduke Contacts People's Employers Trying to Get Them Fired
Microsoft Lunduke panders to extremists online
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 13, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, September 13, 2025
Microsoft is Rapidly Dropped From Web Servers, Shows Survey
Microsoft lost about 8% "market share" in just 3 months
Many GNU/Linux Users Report MOK (Machine Owner Key) Issues in Recent Days
many people don't report this online and never post in Reddit
Links 13/09/2025: Escalations in East Europe and POTUS’ Health Cover-Up
Links for the day
Gemini Links 13/09/2025: Lagrange Turns 5 and Lagrange 1.19.2 Released
Links for the day
Microsoft Inside Your Linux: "Security vulnerability that allowed an attacker to bypass UEFI Secure Boot."
2 hours ago
A New Low for "Linux Journal": Promoting MICROSOFT WINDOWS Using LLM Slop
They've just jumped the shark entirely
The Register MS Still Takes Money to Hype Up "AI" in Articles by Microsoft Resellers With the Term "AI" 30+ Times in Them
Notice how many times they mention "AI"
The Apache Logo News is VERY Old, Racists and 'Anti-Woke' Bigots Look for Something to Incite Other Bigots With
Nothing to see here, move along
Linux Mint 9/11: "4th One Today..." (in Reddit)
Remember that not everyone having an issue reports it to social control media like Reddit
Nepal Will Fall Without a Single Shot Fired, Thanks to Social Control Media
Or very few shots (by the authorities)
European Corruption in the European Patent Office (EPO) Targets Culture
"In reality, the project includes a new “legal instrument” shifting administrative burden and liability on EPO staff while creating new uncertainty and externalising Amicale activities."
UEFI Secure Boot Failing, as Expected for Nearly 15 Years Already (Techrights Said This Since 2012)
in the media
Debian 9/11
people report this issue
Gemini and Web Links 13/09/2025: MElon's Slop Grift and "Autonomous Trains"
Links for the day
Pursuing Peace Through Violence
You cannot "see" a person's mind, until the mouth opens
Can We Please Stop Celebrating Shooters?
"An important point to hammer on is that CoCs were never intended for uniform or symmetric application"
Geminispace is Growing Faster in 2025 Than It Did in 2024
What matters is that corporations haven't ruined it and LLM slop is extremely rare
Links 13/09/2025: China Punishes for 'Negative' Posts, US Police Unable to Find Shooter
Links for the day
Who's the Mystery Financier of SLAPP Against Techrights and Is That a Millionaire/Billionaire?
Whose idea was it to fund meritless lawsuits against my wife and I?
Slopwatch: Slow Slop Day
This distracts from or may take traffic away from the original articles, actually written by actual people
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 12, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 12, 2025
CoC Gone Wrong: Celebrating Murder OK, Complaining About the Celebration Gets You Banned
Hopefully the NixOS Foundation will have a word with (maybe replace) the moderator/s
Gemini Links 12/09/2025: Familiarity and Secondary Dominants
Links for the day
Explaining (in Length and Depth) the Damage Matthew Garrett Did to Linux and to GNU/Linux Users
no matter how many threats we receive
Links 12/09/2025: "Bad Reviews" as Extortion Weapon, "Free Speech At Risk in America’s Schools" According to ACLU
Links for the day
Only One Speaker Does Not Do Sharecropping for MElon (in X.com)
The man who puts principles before PR/optics
The Mind of the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI'
in a nutshell
A Day After "UEFI 9/11": UEFI Secure Boot Bypass
In the news today (right now), as published in the past few hours
Links 12/09/2025: Slop Code as Liability, Microsoft Outlook Down for Many
Links for the day
It's Still Not to Late to Turn Off "Secure Boot"
If people reboot their PC or server today, and it relies on "Secure Boot" on Sept. 12 or later, then depending on the firmware there may be trouble ahead
Links 12/09/2025: Shira Perlmutter is Back, “Software Per Se” Patent Rejections in In re McFadden
Links for the day
Slopwatch: Linux Plagiarism, Slopfarms Still Infesting Google News, Many Images Are Fake
Google is promoting plagiarism
"This Morning Might Turn Out to be an Interesting One for System Admins Who Haven't Updated Their Devices' Secure Boot Certificate" (If They Reboot)
Who asked for this anyway?
Gemini Links 12/09/2025: Metric System, Dumping Windows, and Software Architecture is Dead
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 11, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 11, 2025