Bonum Certa Men Certa

Peter Duffy Explains SystemD

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 18, 2024

Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer! (it is not optional)

We have elections and systemd

"Apropos the most recent [systemd] postlette from today," one reader told us, pointing to a cache of new criticisms. "Some of the longer e-mails there have material for a proper post. One of the key questions raised is why systemd is designed to be mutually exclusive to all other approaches."

See Version 256 of systemd boasts '42% less Unix philosophy'.

Lots more at dyne.org in recent days, but here's one that stands out:

Just to be clear . . .

The only thing which I said (at least I hope I said) was that for me, the elephant-in-the-room question is: why is systemd not optional? That's the question which in my view should be asked of anyone who evangelises about systemd or thinks it's a good idea. I have asked it a few times, and never got an intelligible or intelligent reply.

I dislike systemd for all the reasons usually given, and a few more besides. But I dislike it the most for not being optional. I see that as genuinely tragic. If ONLY it had been optional! Those who liked it could use it. Those who didn't could use something else. It would have been a win-win, because LP and co. would have got constructive criticism and maybe even praise, instead of endless hatemail, and as a result, systemd might have actually got better (yes, I know - it's difficult to contemplate that possibility). And the linux community wouldn't have been divided against itself.

I've never found the "faster boot time" argument as in any way convincing, and obviously I've not used systemd-based distros enough to know whether it's borne out in practice. I've always assumed that it was probably based on the obsession with parallelising the startup of processes - which to me always seemed a bad idea anyway. Say that for some reason, a disk or other device responds a few milliseconds more slowly than usual: that could cause a knock-on effect which at worst might stop a system from booting. If processes start in an orderly and predictable way as configured, something like that might have have less impact. (I did once have to deal with a box which would only boot intermittently: it was running ubuntu, and I eventually found that someone had decided to "upgrade" it to a systemd-based release. From what I could make of the logging information (not a lot), it appeared that something like the above was happening. Once the box was rolled back to a pre-systemd release, the problem went away.)

The thing which permanently set me against systemd was that when I first tried it (testing RH7), the box wouldn't shut down. It just gave a message about "asserting shutdown state" or some such pompous baloney, and then hung. I had to hold down the power button. When the system came back up, it complained about ungraceful shutdown and ran a full set of disk checks. Maybe not so bad if the box is on my desk. Rather more of a problem if it's a mission-critical server in an unmanned server farm, I'm trying to sort out a major problem on it, and it's 03:00 in the morning. (Strangely enough, I noticed on one of the FB linux groups only a few days ago that someone else had just had the shutdown hang problem.)

systemd is clearly not an init system. It's more like a comprehensive replacement for everything, developed in Microsoft's proprietary platform and led by a Microsoft employee.

dyne.org on SystemD

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Sponsored by Linux Foundation
All the pages are full of 'Linux' Foundation ads that are not about Linux
It's Hard to Dispose or Get Rid of Swasticars Now
'Memecars' only sell as long as people have a 'belief' in them
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, March 12, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, March 12, 2025
The Fall of the Open Source Initiative (OSI): Microsoft-Sponsored OSI is Probably Not Even the Real Steward of the Open Source Definition, It's More Like an Identity Thief at This Point (Like "FSFE", a Microsoft-Sponsored Imposter of FSF)
As we'll show later, many people (even inside OSI) are very angry at the OSI right now
Gemini Links 12/03/2025: Cataloging Books, Ramen, and MElon
Links for the day
Links 12/03/2025: Anti-Union Actions and New Efforts at Truce/Ceasefire in Ukraine
Links for the day
CodeWeavers Ads Weaved by LLM Slop at BetaNews
How much of this was even touched by a human being?
Springtime Plans
We currently have two long series underway
In Australia, iOS Estimated to be Bigger Than or Equal to Windows
Not even counting macOS
Brett Wilson LLP Does Not Deny Microsoft or Another "Third Party" Secretly Funds the SLAPPs Against Techrights, Bankrolling Despicable People Who Deserve Criticism
Writing about crime is not a crime
Gemini Links 12/03/2025: LLM Slop Lacks a Future, Wordle Clone Comes to Gemini Protocol
Links for the day
Using FUD That Blames "Linux" for Typos, Turning It Into LLM Slop That Blames "Linux" for Typos
It is probably the "leader" at LLM slop (fake 'articles') about "Linux"
Links 12/03/2025: Big Cuts to US Education and Science (e.g. NOAA)
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, March 11, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, March 11, 2025
Crossbow murders: prevention, missed opportunities
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
This yt-dlp Bug Report Shows Us That the Future of YouTube is DRM and It's Time to Leave (yt-dlp Should Also Leave Microsoft GitHub, Which Censors YouTube Downloaders)
GAFAM traps aren't "free hosting"; they herd us all into a world of tollbooths and locks, surveillance and planned obsolescence (you own nothing, you only rent)
Ukraine Didn't Take Twitter/X Down, Microsoft or Windows Likely Did
There are many debunkings (to likely false accusations), but won't that just be another example of Windows TCO, exacerbated externally in the form of Windows botnets?
The Fall of the Open Source Initiative (OSI): Worse Than What the Media Has Focused on, Losing Sight of Who Owns and Runs the OSI
Members' dues are less than 3% of the income; where does the 97+ percent come from other than Microsoft?
Apple Seems to Have Run Out of Things to Boast About After Apple Vision Pro Failed Spectacularly
With "Apple Intelligence", Apple has finally named a product after what target customers lack
Slopwatch: Reckless FUD and Machine-Generated Spam from LinuxSecurity.com, cybersecuritynews.com, and gbhackers.com (Google Boosts LLM Slop About "Linux")
Google and so-called 'Google News' continue to yield anti-Linux misinformation
Gemini Links 11/03/2025: 'Chainsaw Politicians' and Proprietary Software Hell
Links for the day
Links 11/03/2025: Covid-19 5 Years On and Violence in Syria
Links for the day
Links 11/03/2025: NASA Besieged and "DOGE Has Become What It Claimed To Destroy"
Links for the day
Fresh IBM Layoffs Reported in Europe and North America, Jobs Allegedly Moved to South Asia (Low Salaries)
As usual, IBM does not talk about this
Illuminating Injustice is Critical When Reckless Microsofters and Law Firms Try to Silence Reporters of Violence Against Women
I want to clarify that I'm well within my right (and not running afoul of any rules) by explaining what goes on here
EPO Central Staff Committee: "The Strategy of the Office Lacks Transparency and Cannot be Understood"
Microsoft and the EPO violate data protection laws
Microsoft Has Not Much Left to Show Investors, Shares Fall Almost 20%
It's not even clear how Microsoft makes money anymore
Links 11/03/2025: Spring and Misfin Server
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 10, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, March 10, 2025