Bonum Certa Men Certa

Technology: rights or responsibilities? - Part II

posted by Rianne Schestowitz on Oct 02, 2024

By Dr. Andy Farnell

Back to Part I

Outline

This thesis on technology and responsibility proceeds, albeit incoherently, through several stages. First from the very idea of "rights" and the fundamental duty of the State to protect citizens from arbitrary private power. Next to situate this in terms of "civic cybersecurity" and the growing realisation of security organisations that contemporary threats are not just cybercriminals and hostile foreign states but billionaire megalomaniacs and unruly corporate giants who have set digital technology on a dangerous trajectory. A marriage of convenience between these factions needs a swift divorce if the State is to stay on the "right side of history" in coming years.

Academia

I then move on to examine the debasement of science and (as Noam Chomsky predicted) the utter failure of Academia to rescue it (and itself) from moral dereliction. After mentioning my personal experience of academic decay in the field of computer science, and the wider cultural shift from valuing knowledge to valuing convenience which I've witnessed over 50 years, I'll conclude with a reprise of the unyielding bugle-call to "take back tech", but this time under the banner of personal and social responsibility for the future rather than our own parochial wish for gratification.

computer science

Who wants digital rights?

First let's talk about personalities and motives. We often begin computer security classes with a breakdown of the types of hacker, from the curious teenager DDOS-ing fellow gamers from their bedroom to international cybercriminals and state intelligence actors. Rarely do we extend that analysis to every corner of computer use and misuse, including developers, business founders, and the end-users themselves. That would seem an interesting exercise if we are to really understand cybersecurity and digital rights. Of all the people out there using devices for work, chatting, entertainment, where do they fit in their scheme of usage and attitudes around rights, ownership and boundaries with technology? From such a study I think we would quickly conclude that cybersecurity must concern itself with preventing the violation of rights as much as the violation of laws and technical protections.

motives

hacker

Rights?

But what are rights and how can they possibly extend to unreal electronic realms? What happens when your digital rights conflict with mine? Can there be natural rights around information? Surely well-meaning ideas like the "right to be forgotten" are impossible demands in practice, whereas the "right to repair" is almost a nonsense for the opposite reason; namely that it is a self evident natural right impeded only by the existence of egregious over-reaching "intellectual property" laws. Even if certain "technology rights" existed, what use are mere legal rights in a world where the rule of Law is continually being weakened, where arbitrary private authoritarianism is on the rise and de-facto law is determined by technical factors in far away lands or even out in space? Rights are a super complex can-o-worms, so it might be worth quickly tracing the history of rights.

violation

Modern ideas of rights really appeared in the late 1940s after the Holocaust in response to the realisation that laws alone could neither restrain nor define human conduct. That is of course something Sophocles' Antigone dug up the bones of in the Greek period. Pivotal in the 1940s was the testimony of Hermann Goering at Nuremberg, who shocked and deeply challenged established thought with his dogged insistence on the rational, legal and procedural basis of eugenics and genocide. Goering died unrepentant, satisfied that he had "served order" to the last. This resurfaced a contradiction at the heart of social contract theory that had been around since the 19th century. It upended our comfortable satisfaction with society based solely on the primacy of procedural, positivist logic.

genocide

To understand this is to grasp the oscillation between "legal" and "natural" concepts of rights which have existed in tension since humans could think. Greatly simplified, this comes from differing interpretations of social contract by Rousseau and Hobbes, differing accounts of human reason by Locke and Hume, and differing ideas about individual sovereignty arising from Mill and Bentham. One major turning point is the demise of 13th century Feudalism leading to documents like the Magna Carta that define legitimate government as having a duty to protect rights above private power interests. Again in the 18th century the United States yields and inflection in the time-line with its Declaration of Independence containing the famous words "self-evident and unalienable" with origins in Natural Law. Prior to this the British had been on a distinctly positivist trajectory into "legal rights" which generally tend toward a tyranny of those with the power to make laws.

legal

With that philosophy out of the way - if you want to see beyond the academic and philosophical takes on jurisprudence, social contract, constitutions and documents like the UDHR - then I highly recommend George Carlin's pragmatic commentary on what "rights" really mean. In practice, rights are limited by what you are prepared to defend, physically if necessary - and certainly using technical means. In other words, "rights" are as extremely political as you can get, since they ultimately concern the life of law (jurisprudence), social contract, and the right of the people to fight wars and take revolutionary action against defective social apparatus or hostile concentrations of power within society.

Having seen that "rights" exist in a quantum state between natural and legal types we should notice that despite highfalutin international treaties and conventions this century has seen a drift away from natural rights again. The resurrection of 13th century Feudalism as technological neo-feudalism has dealt a serious blow to rights of all kinds.

The "laws of the internet", and so called "cyber-law" as a recognised branch of law, and the conceit of "cyberspace" itself as a realm or place may indeed be a grave mistake. Thinkers like William Gibson, J. P. Barlow, and Lawrence Lessig may have done us a disservice in its cultural construction. There is a very real danger of forgetting reality is simply a bunch of people individually sitting at computers and a great deal of wire connecting us all together. A natural, political or technical event may render it all a useless pile of junk in an instant.

cybersecurity

Philosophers of technology as diverse as Debord, Einstein, Ellul, Freud, Fromm, Heidegger, Kaczynski, Marcuse, Mumford and Postman have sounded alarms over the insane subtext of "the technological society" as a project to shoehorn reality into something smaller, weaker, less durable, and less flexible. Such systems and their systemantics (Gall) are the one-dimensional vanities of the systematisers Nietzche mistrusted as having "a lack of integrity".

In plainer words; the Internet, AI and-all-that, is seriously over-rated if we take a moment to sober up and consider the big picture of human evolution. We have a lot on our plate right now. An Internet is a nice utility that exists to the extent we let it, engage with it, and defend it, but as McLuhan and Postman explained it's become an ideological battlegound in itself. We're now approaching the point where, as the charm wears off, our love may rapidly turn to hate. What were rights become encumbrances. There is nothing physical, legal or effective that would stop people turning en-masse away from "online".

Fear of "missing out" no longer has a hold on people like in the 2010's. We're more circumspect of bandwaggons and hype, and realise that with technology what we're mostly missing out on is life. Such a cultural paradigm shift, a great "logging-off", could spread very rapidly across the globe, and to not recognise the possibility of such upheaval is dangerously naive. We should anticipate that vendors and bureaucrats will employ more and more aggressive means to keep people dependent on technology, and to induct children into a "techno-socialised" mindset.

missing out

For example in Finland and Estonia, which have wholly embraced the "digital state", good internet connectivity is deemed a "right". While this may seem progressive, as Mr. T. (Laurence Tureaud) put it, regarding his success as a film and TV actor; (I paraphrase) "My ancestors from Africa wore chains as slaves. Today my chains are made of gold. But I am still a slave". Eve Ensler noted how we often neglect our right to be free from technology, free from security. Be careful what you wish for as a "right".

slave

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

Confirmed in the Mainstream Media: A Lot of Microsoft "Workloads" Were Just LLM Slop (Helping to Fake Growth for Years, as Microsoft Had Paid "Open" "AI" to Become a "Client") and Demand is Rapidly Waning, Datacentres Canceled and/or Shut Down
Anything to facilitate further accounting fraud
Taiwan's Media Covers Closure of Microsoft's "AI" Lab, It's Time to Talk About the Gradual Death of Windows and Implosion of the "AI" Bubble
Earlier this week we showed that mostly Asian media had the 'nerve' to mention Microsoft silently shutting down its 'AI' lab
More Gains for GNU/Linux, Based on Web Surveys
the Steam site shows rapid growth for "Linux" this month
 
Links 03/04/2025: SoftBank Money for Microsoft "Open" "AI" Probably Doesn't Even Exist, Wikimedia Foundation Blasts LLM Nuisance While Microsoft Admits Demand Has Shrunk
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/04/2025: Patch Panel and Pictures
Links for the day
Islamic Republic of Iran: GNU/Linux at All-time High This Month, Windows Falls to 12%
Vista 10 is up this month despite being "end of life" (EoL) soon
Indonesia: All-Time Highs for GNU/Linux
What's noteworthy right now is the growth of GNU/Linux
statCounter Says GNU/Linux Usage is Up Again (Internationally)
some preliminary April data
Only on April 1st Can the Free Software Foundation Associate With Microsoft's Open Source Initiative (OSI)
We saw some pranks that day linking the FSF to Microsoft (e.g. "endorsing" Windows)
IBM Gets Rid of Kelly Chambliss as Mass Layoffs Reported in IBM Consulting, IBM Loses Key Contracts/Graft
IBM Consulting has been in disarray lately
Slopwatch: Anti-Linux Articles, Not Even Written by Humans
Why aren't Web sites more vocal about this problem?
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 02, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, April 02, 2025
Links 03/04/2025: Apple Fined Over Secret Surveillance, "Elegant Writer For A More Civilized Age"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 02/04/2025: Books and Cold Tea
Links for the day
Links 02/04/2025: More Layoffs, Nokia Again Takes Advantage of Illegal and Unconstitutional Patent Court With Nokia Staff as 'Judges'
Links for the day
Links 02/04/2025: Seizures and Returns to Windows of 24 Years Ago
Links for the day
LLM Slop Helps Obscure and Distort News About Layoffs (IBM, GAFAM)
It's hard to find accurate information
Links 02/04/2025: Microsoft Developers Are Threatening to Go on Strike, World Backup Day Noted
Links for the day
Gemini Protocol Has Growing Appeal (the Web Got Too Bloated and Full of LLM Slop)
For any "data plan" with bandwidth limits or "tiers" it would be cheaper to use/browse Geminispace
The Web Can Survive LLM Slop, But Only If We Collectively Shun and Discourage Serial Sloppers
Doing nothing ought not be a possibility
Amid Secret Shut-downs and Mass Layoffs at Microsoft (4 Waves of Layoffs in 3 Months of 2025) Some Microsoft Staff Expected to Go On Strike
workers going on strike
Gemini Links 02/04/2025: No more on Mastodon and Gemini Mention Script in Go
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 01, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, April 01, 2025
My Motion Disbarring or “Striking Off” Brett Wilson LLP for Enabling Violent Americans Who Try to Crush Microsoft Critics in the United Kingdom by Multiple SLAPPs
"Guns for hire" (for Microsoft people who received Microsoft salaries)
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Hijacked Again by Patent Litigation Industry, as President Cheeto Prioritises Aggressors
The "mafia" has taken over the "industry" and the Federal system (justice and constitutions trampled upon)
Ubuntu Slop and FUD Manufactured With LLMs and Funded (by Oneself) 'Studies'
Slop and FUD are ruining the Web
Gemini Links 01/04/2025: Games and More
Links for the day
Links 01/04/2025: Apple Fined $162M for Privacy Abuses, Disinformation Online a Growing Concern
Links for the day
Why We're Reporting Brett Wilson LLP for Apparently Misusing Their Licence to Protect American Microsofters Who Attack Women
For those who have not been keeping abreast
Newer Press Reports Confirm That Microsoft Shuts Down 'Hey Hi' (AI) Labs Despite All the Hype
The "hey hi" (AI) bubble is not sustainable
Links 01/04/2025: Mass Layoffs at Eidos and "Microsoft Pulls Back on Data Centers" (Demand Lacking); "Racist and Sexist" Slop From Microsoft
Links for the day
Stefano Maffulli and His Microsoft-Funded OSI Staff Are Killing the OSI and Killing "Open Source" (All for Money!)
This is far from over
Gemini Links 01/04/2025: XKCDpunk and worldclock.py
Links for the day
50 Years of Sabotage and a Gut Punch to Computer Science (and Science in General)
Will we get back to science-based computing rather than cult-like following?
Techrights Headlines as Semaphore
"If you are hearing this, thank you"
3 Months in 2025, 4 Waves of Mass Layoffs at Microsoft, Now Offices Shut Down Permanently
"A recent visit by the South China Morning Post confirmed that the office was dark, unoccupied, and had its logo removed."
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 31, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, March 31, 2025