Bonum Certa Men Certa

Technology: rights or responsibilities? - Part II

posted by Rianne Schestowitz on Oct 02, 2024

By Dr. Andy Farnell

Back to Part I

Outline

This thesis on technology and responsibility proceeds, albeit incoherently, through several stages. First from the very idea of "rights" and the fundamental duty of the State to protect citizens from arbitrary private power. Next to situate this in terms of "civic cybersecurity" and the growing realisation of security organisations that contemporary threats are not just cybercriminals and hostile foreign states but billionaire megalomaniacs and unruly corporate giants who have set digital technology on a dangerous trajectory. A marriage of convenience between these factions needs a swift divorce if the State is to stay on the "right side of history" in coming years.

Academia

I then move on to examine the debasement of science and (as Noam Chomsky predicted) the utter failure of Academia to rescue it (and itself) from moral dereliction. After mentioning my personal experience of academic decay in the field of computer science, and the wider cultural shift from valuing knowledge to valuing convenience which I've witnessed over 50 years, I'll conclude with a reprise of the unyielding bugle-call to "take back tech", but this time under the banner of personal and social responsibility for the future rather than our own parochial wish for gratification.

computer science

Who wants digital rights?

First let's talk about personalities and motives. We often begin computer security classes with a breakdown of the types of hacker, from the curious teenager DDOS-ing fellow gamers from their bedroom to international cybercriminals and state intelligence actors. Rarely do we extend that analysis to every corner of computer use and misuse, including developers, business founders, and the end-users themselves. That would seem an interesting exercise if we are to really understand cybersecurity and digital rights. Of all the people out there using devices for work, chatting, entertainment, where do they fit in their scheme of usage and attitudes around rights, ownership and boundaries with technology? From such a study I think we would quickly conclude that cybersecurity must concern itself with preventing the violation of rights as much as the violation of laws and technical protections.

motives

hacker

Rights?

But what are rights and how can they possibly extend to unreal electronic realms? What happens when your digital rights conflict with mine? Can there be natural rights around information? Surely well-meaning ideas like the "right to be forgotten" are impossible demands in practice, whereas the "right to repair" is almost a nonsense for the opposite reason; namely that it is a self evident natural right impeded only by the existence of egregious over-reaching "intellectual property" laws. Even if certain "technology rights" existed, what use are mere legal rights in a world where the rule of Law is continually being weakened, where arbitrary private authoritarianism is on the rise and de-facto law is determined by technical factors in far away lands or even out in space? Rights are a super complex can-o-worms, so it might be worth quickly tracing the history of rights.

violation

Modern ideas of rights really appeared in the late 1940s after the Holocaust in response to the realisation that laws alone could neither restrain nor define human conduct. That is of course something Sophocles' Antigone dug up the bones of in the Greek period. Pivotal in the 1940s was the testimony of Hermann Goering at Nuremberg, who shocked and deeply challenged established thought with his dogged insistence on the rational, legal and procedural basis of eugenics and genocide. Goering died unrepentant, satisfied that he had "served order" to the last. This resurfaced a contradiction at the heart of social contract theory that had been around since the 19th century. It upended our comfortable satisfaction with society based solely on the primacy of procedural, positivist logic.

genocide

To understand this is to grasp the oscillation between "legal" and "natural" concepts of rights which have existed in tension since humans could think. Greatly simplified, this comes from differing interpretations of social contract by Rousseau and Hobbes, differing accounts of human reason by Locke and Hume, and differing ideas about individual sovereignty arising from Mill and Bentham. One major turning point is the demise of 13th century Feudalism leading to documents like the Magna Carta that define legitimate government as having a duty to protect rights above private power interests. Again in the 18th century the United States yields and inflection in the time-line with its Declaration of Independence containing the famous words "self-evident and unalienable" with origins in Natural Law. Prior to this the British had been on a distinctly positivist trajectory into "legal rights" which generally tend toward a tyranny of those with the power to make laws.

legal

With that philosophy out of the way - if you want to see beyond the academic and philosophical takes on jurisprudence, social contract, constitutions and documents like the UDHR - then I highly recommend George Carlin's pragmatic commentary on what "rights" really mean. In practice, rights are limited by what you are prepared to defend, physically if necessary - and certainly using technical means. In other words, "rights" are as extremely political as you can get, since they ultimately concern the life of law (jurisprudence), social contract, and the right of the people to fight wars and take revolutionary action against defective social apparatus or hostile concentrations of power within society.

Having seen that "rights" exist in a quantum state between natural and legal types we should notice that despite highfalutin international treaties and conventions this century has seen a drift away from natural rights again. The resurrection of 13th century Feudalism as technological neo-feudalism has dealt a serious blow to rights of all kinds.

The "laws of the internet", and so called "cyber-law" as a recognised branch of law, and the conceit of "cyberspace" itself as a realm or place may indeed be a grave mistake. Thinkers like William Gibson, J. P. Barlow, and Lawrence Lessig may have done us a disservice in its cultural construction. There is a very real danger of forgetting reality is simply a bunch of people individually sitting at computers and a great deal of wire connecting us all together. A natural, political or technical event may render it all a useless pile of junk in an instant.

cybersecurity

Philosophers of technology as diverse as Debord, Einstein, Ellul, Freud, Fromm, Heidegger, Kaczynski, Marcuse, Mumford and Postman have sounded alarms over the insane subtext of "the technological society" as a project to shoehorn reality into something smaller, weaker, less durable, and less flexible. Such systems and their systemantics (Gall) are the one-dimensional vanities of the systematisers Nietzche mistrusted as having "a lack of integrity".

In plainer words; the Internet, AI and-all-that, is seriously over-rated if we take a moment to sober up and consider the big picture of human evolution. We have a lot on our plate right now. An Internet is a nice utility that exists to the extent we let it, engage with it, and defend it, but as McLuhan and Postman explained it's become an ideological battlegound in itself. We're now approaching the point where, as the charm wears off, our love may rapidly turn to hate. What were rights become encumbrances. There is nothing physical, legal or effective that would stop people turning en-masse away from "online".

Fear of "missing out" no longer has a hold on people like in the 2010's. We're more circumspect of bandwaggons and hype, and realise that with technology what we're mostly missing out on is life. Such a cultural paradigm shift, a great "logging-off", could spread very rapidly across the globe, and to not recognise the possibility of such upheaval is dangerously naive. We should anticipate that vendors and bureaucrats will employ more and more aggressive means to keep people dependent on technology, and to induct children into a "techno-socialised" mindset.

missing out

For example in Finland and Estonia, which have wholly embraced the "digital state", good internet connectivity is deemed a "right". While this may seem progressive, as Mr. T. (Laurence Tureaud) put it, regarding his success as a film and TV actor; (I paraphrase) "My ancestors from Africa wore chains as slaves. Today my chains are made of gold. But I am still a slave". Eve Ensler noted how we often neglect our right to be free from technology, free from security. Be careful what you wish for as a "right".

slave

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

A Year Ago, Only a Few Weeks After We Countersued the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI', Our Webhost Came Under Attack
At the end of September 2024 our webhost received several threats
The Register - Kissing the hand that feeds it
hired to manage the publication several people connected to Microsoft, including the new Editor in Chief
 
Links 28/09/2025: Windows TCO, Security Breaches, and Deutsche Bahn Woes
Links for the day
Datacentres Aren't Reliable for Backups
bad practices cause immeasurable levels of permanent data losses each and every day
Links 28/09/2025: Science, Censorship, and Security Incidents/Advisories
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/09/2025: Golem and Cybertrucks
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Moldova Elections, LLM Slop Failing Again to Accomplish Anything
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Slop Does More Harm, Newly Released Epstein Estate Documents
Links for the day
Links 28/09/2025: Fentanylware (TikTok) 'Going Private' (the Dictator's Media Allies) and UK Mirror Lays Off More Journalists
Links for the day
If Only Someone Warned Us About This...
Ubuntu is committing suicide with Rusty code
The Myths of "Linux" and of "Intelligence"
As noted this morning
People Remembered GNU's Birthday (Which Helps Remind People It All Started in 1983, Not 1991)
Have the FSF and GNU earned the respect they deserve?
Slopwatch: Ponzi Schemes Promoted by Media Companies, Linux Journal Turning Its 30-Year Reputation to Dust, and Serial Slopper Brian Fagioli Plagiarising, As Usual
This bubble will end up very badly
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 27, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, September 27, 2025
Links 27/09/2025: Squashing Software Patents and When Hospitals Become For-Profit
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/09/2025: Young Feet and Online Bots
Links for the day
GNU Project Turns 42
In 2033 it'll be 50
Next Step: Find Out Who's Funding the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' to SLAPP Us
We now have the 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' working alongside a strangler of women, who as a Microsoft employee spent time in prison for it
Web Sites That Are Independent Are Also Like Software Projects (Sometimes Literally So)
Roll out your own 'stack'
Pieter Hintjens on Codes of Misconduct a Decade Ago
original is still online
Links 27/09/2025: Australia Might Ban Microsoft GitHub for Young People, Likely Illegal Executive Order Turns TikTok Into Cheeto Propaganda
Links for the day
Repeating the Lies to Promote a Ponzi Scheme is Not OK Because "Many Other Sites Do This" (Including Slopfarms)
They already work on the next Ponzi scheme
The Register MS (Situation Publishing) is Participating in a Ponzi Scheme
The market in "tech" seems awful when a lot of it sells a fraud and journalism about this market is part of the fraud
Glimmer of Hope: More People Realise and Come to Accept "AI" is Just a Giant, Elaborate Ponzi/Pyramid Scheme That Will Leave Everyone Worse Off (Except the "Top of the Pyramid")
quoting Einhorn and some comments
Mass Layoffs in Starbucks... and Society Loses Nothing of Value
Society might even be better off if Starbucks shuts down entirely
Do Your Job and Demand Your Compensation - But in That Order.
We'll do our best to convince the Judge to award all costs to us (lawyers, barrister, LIP bills etc.) plus judgements against them, for abusive litigation and needless suffering associated with that abuse
Matthew J. Garrett Behaved in a Similar Fashion to 4Chan and Kiwi Farms
Opposites attract? Are they opposites at all?
Drew DeVault Suggests "CoC Enhancement", Starts Trolling Projects in Microsoft GitHub
And it backfires immediately
Like Nazi Germany and Volkswagen
Tell us all about "freedom" when your government runs a Ponzi scheme
Microsoft Sponsored This Man, Microsoft Sponsored His Behaviour (and He Controls Microsoft)
They get what they paid for
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 26, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 26, 2025
He Talks Too Much, He Says Dumb Things
only British when that suits him
Slopwatch: FUD and Plagiarism (Working Against Linux) Promoted and Rewarded by Google News
Shame on Google News
Reminder: We're Unloading Some Publications to Tux Machines
About 15 years ago I was struggling to keep up with TechDirt
The E-mail Protocol is for Text
bad netiquette
Gemini Links 26/09/2025: Slop in OpenStreetMap and MOPML (My Own Private Markup Language)
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: More Provocations Against NATO by Russia (Near Alaska, USA), Microsoft Booster Accenture Has Mass Layoffs
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: Hardware, Security, Health, and Nuclear Armament
Links for the day
Links 26/09/2025: "Digital Fatigue" and Slop Frenzy (Hype) Ruining Work Productivity, Culture, Languages
Links for the day
Brett Wilson LLP Unwilling to Disclose or Explain How 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' Pays for His SLAPPs Against Us (He Cannot Afford These), So We Are Escalating
Escalated in the British authorities
What 'Hulk Hogan of UEFI' Could Learn From Jimmy Kimmel About the 'Streisand Effect'
Lawyering up is risky and is usually doesn't work
Linux is Replacing Apple
Apple is money down the drain. Not only are the gadgets overpriced; they cost a lot to maintain and keep going over time
"We don't have that kind of relationship with Microsoft. The only public key that every UEFI firmware is guaranteed to have is Microsoft's, and only Microsoft owns the private key."
This is how to sabotage GNU/Linux distros that Microsoft does not control
Slopwatch: linuxconfig.org, linuxsecurity.com, and Google's Promotion of the Worst and Most Prolific Slopfarms
Over in Google News it has been quite chaotic this past day
Gemini Links 26/09/2025: Reading RSS Feeds, ROOPHLOCH 202
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 25, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 25, 2025