Bonum Certa Men Certa

Technology: rights or responsibilities? - Part II

posted by Rianne Schestowitz on Oct 02, 2024

By Dr. Andy Farnell

Back to Part I

Outline

This thesis on technology and responsibility proceeds, albeit incoherently, through several stages. First from the very idea of "rights" and the fundamental duty of the State to protect citizens from arbitrary private power. Next to situate this in terms of "civic cybersecurity" and the growing realisation of security organisations that contemporary threats are not just cybercriminals and hostile foreign states but billionaire megalomaniacs and unruly corporate giants who have set digital technology on a dangerous trajectory. A marriage of convenience between these factions needs a swift divorce if the State is to stay on the "right side of history" in coming years.

Academia

I then move on to examine the debasement of science and (as Noam Chomsky predicted) the utter failure of Academia to rescue it (and itself) from moral dereliction. After mentioning my personal experience of academic decay in the field of computer science, and the wider cultural shift from valuing knowledge to valuing convenience which I've witnessed over 50 years, I'll conclude with a reprise of the unyielding bugle-call to "take back tech", but this time under the banner of personal and social responsibility for the future rather than our own parochial wish for gratification.

computer science

Who wants digital rights?

First let's talk about personalities and motives. We often begin computer security classes with a breakdown of the types of hacker, from the curious teenager DDOS-ing fellow gamers from their bedroom to international cybercriminals and state intelligence actors. Rarely do we extend that analysis to every corner of computer use and misuse, including developers, business founders, and the end-users themselves. That would seem an interesting exercise if we are to really understand cybersecurity and digital rights. Of all the people out there using devices for work, chatting, entertainment, where do they fit in their scheme of usage and attitudes around rights, ownership and boundaries with technology? From such a study I think we would quickly conclude that cybersecurity must concern itself with preventing the violation of rights as much as the violation of laws and technical protections.

motives

hacker

Rights?

But what are rights and how can they possibly extend to unreal electronic realms? What happens when your digital rights conflict with mine? Can there be natural rights around information? Surely well-meaning ideas like the "right to be forgotten" are impossible demands in practice, whereas the "right to repair" is almost a nonsense for the opposite reason; namely that it is a self evident natural right impeded only by the existence of egregious over-reaching "intellectual property" laws. Even if certain "technology rights" existed, what use are mere legal rights in a world where the rule of Law is continually being weakened, where arbitrary private authoritarianism is on the rise and de-facto law is determined by technical factors in far away lands or even out in space? Rights are a super complex can-o-worms, so it might be worth quickly tracing the history of rights.

violation

Modern ideas of rights really appeared in the late 1940s after the Holocaust in response to the realisation that laws alone could neither restrain nor define human conduct. That is of course something Sophocles' Antigone dug up the bones of in the Greek period. Pivotal in the 1940s was the testimony of Hermann Goering at Nuremberg, who shocked and deeply challenged established thought with his dogged insistence on the rational, legal and procedural basis of eugenics and genocide. Goering died unrepentant, satisfied that he had "served order" to the last. This resurfaced a contradiction at the heart of social contract theory that had been around since the 19th century. It upended our comfortable satisfaction with society based solely on the primacy of procedural, positivist logic.

genocide

To understand this is to grasp the oscillation between "legal" and "natural" concepts of rights which have existed in tension since humans could think. Greatly simplified, this comes from differing interpretations of social contract by Rousseau and Hobbes, differing accounts of human reason by Locke and Hume, and differing ideas about individual sovereignty arising from Mill and Bentham. One major turning point is the demise of 13th century Feudalism leading to documents like the Magna Carta that define legitimate government as having a duty to protect rights above private power interests. Again in the 18th century the United States yields and inflection in the time-line with its Declaration of Independence containing the famous words "self-evident and unalienable" with origins in Natural Law. Prior to this the British had been on a distinctly positivist trajectory into "legal rights" which generally tend toward a tyranny of those with the power to make laws.

legal

With that philosophy out of the way - if you want to see beyond the academic and philosophical takes on jurisprudence, social contract, constitutions and documents like the UDHR - then I highly recommend George Carlin's pragmatic commentary on what "rights" really mean. In practice, rights are limited by what you are prepared to defend, physically if necessary - and certainly using technical means. In other words, "rights" are as extremely political as you can get, since they ultimately concern the life of law (jurisprudence), social contract, and the right of the people to fight wars and take revolutionary action against defective social apparatus or hostile concentrations of power within society.

Having seen that "rights" exist in a quantum state between natural and legal types we should notice that despite highfalutin international treaties and conventions this century has seen a drift away from natural rights again. The resurrection of 13th century Feudalism as technological neo-feudalism has dealt a serious blow to rights of all kinds.

The "laws of the internet", and so called "cyber-law" as a recognised branch of law, and the conceit of "cyberspace" itself as a realm or place may indeed be a grave mistake. Thinkers like William Gibson, J. P. Barlow, and Lawrence Lessig may have done us a disservice in its cultural construction. There is a very real danger of forgetting reality is simply a bunch of people individually sitting at computers and a great deal of wire connecting us all together. A natural, political or technical event may render it all a useless pile of junk in an instant.

cybersecurity

Philosophers of technology as diverse as Debord, Einstein, Ellul, Freud, Fromm, Heidegger, Kaczynski, Marcuse, Mumford and Postman have sounded alarms over the insane subtext of "the technological society" as a project to shoehorn reality into something smaller, weaker, less durable, and less flexible. Such systems and their systemantics (Gall) are the one-dimensional vanities of the systematisers Nietzche mistrusted as having "a lack of integrity".

In plainer words; the Internet, AI and-all-that, is seriously over-rated if we take a moment to sober up and consider the big picture of human evolution. We have a lot on our plate right now. An Internet is a nice utility that exists to the extent we let it, engage with it, and defend it, but as McLuhan and Postman explained it's become an ideological battlegound in itself. We're now approaching the point where, as the charm wears off, our love may rapidly turn to hate. What were rights become encumbrances. There is nothing physical, legal or effective that would stop people turning en-masse away from "online".

Fear of "missing out" no longer has a hold on people like in the 2010's. We're more circumspect of bandwaggons and hype, and realise that with technology what we're mostly missing out on is life. Such a cultural paradigm shift, a great "logging-off", could spread very rapidly across the globe, and to not recognise the possibility of such upheaval is dangerously naive. We should anticipate that vendors and bureaucrats will employ more and more aggressive means to keep people dependent on technology, and to induct children into a "techno-socialised" mindset.

missing out

For example in Finland and Estonia, which have wholly embraced the "digital state", good internet connectivity is deemed a "right". While this may seem progressive, as Mr. T. (Laurence Tureaud) put it, regarding his success as a film and TV actor; (I paraphrase) "My ancestors from Africa wore chains as slaves. Today my chains are made of gold. But I am still a slave". Eve Ensler noted how we often neglect our right to be free from technology, free from security. Be careful what you wish for as a "right".

slave

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

BASIC Predates Microsoft by Over a Decade, Microsoft-Controlled Sites Like The Register MS Don't Want You to Know This
The state of the media is really bad when it relies a lot on oligarchs' money and is appointing editors who are working for oligarchs
Brian Kernighan, "Only Third to Dennis Richie and Ken Thompson" (UNIX), Agreed With Someone Who Said Rust Was Just Hype, Should Not Replace C
17 hours ago
Reminder: Microsoft's "Secure Boot" Certificate for "Linux" Will be Expired in One Week
Many PCs won't manage to 'rotate' to another certificate
 
Genini Links 05/09/2025: Community, ROOPHLOCH, and PITkit
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Vaccine Sceptics Poison the Well, Two Exploited Vulnerabilities Patched in Android
Links for the day
Gemini Links 05/09/2025: Logitech Lift and DIY Gemini Servers
Links for the day
Links 05/09/2025: Sainsbury's Caught Spying on In-Store Shoppers and Microsoft "OpenAI is Using Legal Threats to Harass its Critics"
Links for the day
Analogies for "Memory Safety" in Rust
Don't worry, it's Rust! It can do anything!
"Many of the Red Hat Employees Are Still Looking for Work"
Shame on IBM's CEO
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 04, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 04, 2025
Microsoft Started With Code Literally From The Trash, Nothing Has Improved Since
The reality is, there are systems and code that are reliable. But they're not Microsoft's.
Hypothesis That New McKinsey/Microsoft Executive Inside Red Hat Will Outsource Research and Development Operations to India (Like They Do in IBM)
IBM is floundering
Slopwatch: Scams, Fake Articles About "Linux", Plagiarism, and Worse
Perhaps some time soon the LLMs or the "Big LLMs" will run out of money (to borrow) and go offline, leaving those slopfarms in a tough place
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Means of Production and Rusting Out
Links for the day
Links 04/09/2025: Science, Hardware, and Eyes on China
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Digital Minimalism and Social Control Media
Links for the day
IBM's GNU/Linux Divestment, Based on Hard But Anecdotal Evidence (IBM Fails to Recognise How Much Money It Made and Can Still Make From "Linux")
Love us or hate us, a lot of what we've been saying about Red Hat under IBM turns out to be rather accurate
Links 04/09/2025: Massive Microsoft Staff Cuts (Barely Reported), "Strange Conspiracy Theory Is Reportedly Spreading Inside OpenAI"
Links for the day
Activists Can Win, But Keep an Eye on the Ball and on the Trophy
GitHub is dying, it was a loss-making trap, not free hosting
Gemini Links 04/09/2025: Katrina Remembered, Distracted Driving, and Virtual Economics
Links for the day
At This Point It's No Longer Matthew Garrett But People Who Fund Matthew Garrett (or Companies That Fund His SLAPPs Against My Wife and I)
The only thing worse than misogynists are misogynists who fail to respect other people's right to go on holiday
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 03, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 03, 2025
The UEFI 9/11 - Part VI - This Serious Harm Was Planned for Over a Decade, Not an Accident or Merely Some Misfortune
The term "Serious Harm" is legally meaningful here
GNOME Unfit for Diversity and Inclusion
GNOME's leadership is using "bad words"
Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments
Most people probably knew nothing about this until he wrote a response
Red Hat QA Team "Had Shrunk by Half Over the Past Year." (After IBM Divestment)
If Red Hat's workforce is being moved to the East, then RHEL can become a national security problem
Slopwatch: "Open Source" and "Linux" News Faked, Made by Bots and Entered Into Google News
Spam combined with slop about "Linux" has entered Google News
Links 03/09/2025: Microsoft Causes Mass Layoffs Outside Microsoft Also, "Google Can Keep Paying for Firefox Search Deal"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/09/2025: calendar.txt, Alhena 5.3.1, and ROOPHLOCH
Links for the day
The Theory That the Man From McKinsey, Whom Red Hat Took From Microsoft a Month Ago as Executive, Wants 'Efficiency' (Lower Salaries)
So far... no "official" word
When Your Site's Articles Are Being 'Cheapened' by Slop as Feature Images
Dr. Farnell should become an advisor to The Register MS
Certificate Authority Let's Encrypt Drops to Only Half a Dozen Capsules and 0.2% of the Whole in Geminispace, Self-Signed is the Way to Go
It used to have hundreds, according to Lupa
Doing to Red Hat What They Already Did (and Still Do) to IBM
there seems to be a drive to hire cheaper staff, and it may be led by somebody Red Hat hired from Microsoft
Links 03/09/2025: Salesforce's Latest Mass Layoffs, 93% in Large Poll at The Register MS Say UK Government Should Dump Microsoft
Links for the day
Preparations for Our 19th Anniversary Have Already Begun
When we get back we'll probably sort out some balloons and venue for the next party
Pleased After 2 Years With team.blue
Moving from a Content Management System (CMS, dynamic) to a Static Site Generator (SSG) was a wise decision that made life so much easier
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is Being Attacked by Organisations Jealous of Its Principled Stance and Longevity
Nobody is perfect, but imperfection does not instantaneously imply sinister intent
If You Reject the Google Verdict in the US, Then You Should Also Reject the "Modern" Web (Do Something About It)
Gemini Protocol is still open; it cannot be hijacked or subverted because it's frozen by design and by intention
Open Source Initiative IRS Filing: Almost All the Money is Corporate, Stefano Maffuli (Executive Director) Takes About a Quarter of That Money for Openwashing of "AI" Ponzi Scheme
OSI is currently little but a PR/marketing agency of Microsoft
Many People Are "Leaving" Red Hat, Even High-Level Managers
Something is definitely going on at Red Hat
Techrights Has Been Subjected to Calls of Violence (and Death Threats), It Never Condoned Violence
I have no sympathy for people who call violence "free speech" and then get in trouble
Condoning Violent Behaviour and "Free Speech"
perhaps Microsoft Lunduke lost touch with what constitutes violence
Takeaway From the Google Verdict: GAFAM Has Too Much Control (Even Over the US Government and Courts With Government Appointees)
Many people feel disappointed but hardly surprised by the verdict
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 in One Month
As noted a few days ago, several times in fact, many people now recognise the importance of the FSF's mission, even if most people don't know what the FSF is
Many Microsoft "Assets" Are Fabricated Baloney (to Game the Numbers)
At times it seems like what we deal with are many weak patents (on algorithms), valuations or speculations based on hype ("hey hi"), and stocks held by Microsoft and its own staff
"Voluntary" Layoffs at Microsoft (to Game the Numbers, Sugar-Coating a Crisis)
"Employees interested have until the end of October to volunteer."
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, September 02, 2025
IRC logs for Tuesday, September 02, 2025