What Microsoft Reputation Laundering (With a Weaponised Law Degree) Looks Like in a Foreign Continent
You would expect this in uncivilised and primitive countries, not in the UK (by a foreign national for another foreign national)
Some people have no manners. They have no standards, either. All they have in their eyes are dollar (or pound) signs.
Imagine them openly admitting that their law degrees are... for PR. They use them for Public Relations. Yes, that's right!
Can't make that up! They say so themselves.
Committed fraud? Spent time in prison as a Microsoft employee for strangling women?
Come pay us, we'll do some PR for you. We'll attack people for merely talking about you! We'll send threats not only to them but also to their spouses!
How cool is that?
Welcome to Brett Wilson, the PR experts. In their own words (to the audience of "customers"; this is how they market themselves with their "Services"):
They've been doing this for Microsoft (Australian working for Americans on data erasure in London, Europe).
Oh, yeah?
Of course, whilst also trying to misuse UKGDPR to censor (delete) evidence of crime connected to Microsoft.
Yesterday the firm boasted that this person was quoted for conflating lawyering up with Public Relations. Maybe there's a confusion. The PR industry should not misuse law degrees for PR purposes, that's outright abusive:
They even boast about PR... by lawyering up!
On "litigation and PR" (yes, that's known as reputation laundering... in this case through legal muscle and aggression):
Can't make that up! Their own words.
This is what they do... for Microsoft. Against me.
The company is so pathetic and misguided that it is now trying to find new revenue sources for itself, as it runs out of money and is low on staff (it 'borrows' from other law firms):
56 "Winding Up Petitions" in just less than 2 years (there's not much money in it; many law firms fill up such forms every hour of the day).
It's basically a formality or paper-filling task, akin to conveyance. It doesn't bring in much income and some law firms - the more respectable ones too - deem it unworthy of their time.
The firm that's serving Microsofters ("funny" and "reduced rate") is desperate for business, though it is losing a lot of staff (especially women; turns out attacking women on behalf of violent men isn't a great idea for a law firm).
Becoming a PR firm that weaponises law degrees? Tell that to SRA. It's not acceptable and it disgraces this whole occupation.
What compels or at least convinces women to attack other women on behalf of bad men?
Tell me...
After you do your "Public Relations" or "PR" work, basically attacking me and bullying me with piles of accusations on behalf of or on the payroll of Microsoft (for the Serial Strangler from Microsoft) you have the audacity to demand that a Judge orders me to pay for your own PR work for Microsoft mobsters? For people who assault women? (Of course the Judge declined)
Why would I pay the salary of bullies who are busy doing PR work against me? "Power of Attorney" does not entitle anyone to commit abuse (nor should it).
This bullying isn't "PR", it's just bullying. Forcing and compelling people to say and do things (under threat or duress) is more of a racket, not the practice of law. Then again, remember it's Microsofters we're dealing with here. Crime is the norm because their experience suggests they can throw money at covering that up (bribing officials, rigging courts, rigging justice, "lobbying" etc.) and eventually nobody will get punished for anything. █
