Bonum Certa Men Certa

Where Slop Meets Ghostwriting: It's a False Analogy

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Feb 17, 2026,
updated Feb 17, 2026

Hours-old examples of IBM "ghostwriting"/churn: (words recycled, same misleading talking points or face-saving lies)

ibm layoffs

In our latest Daily Links an associate of Techrights added Chuck Grimmett's "On using AI in blogging".

"There is an awful lot of handwringing about AI-generated writing," Grimmett wrote, "but ghostwriting is not controversial in the same way, and the end result is the same: someone else wrote it."

"Someone else wrote" is not the same as "bot spewed this out" (moreover, a bot of sleazy companies).

"AI might be an extension of that," Grimmett argued. "I don’t see AI composition as fundamentally different from ghostwriting."

I disagree with Grimmett. It's a false or deeply flawed analogy. Slop (or text from chatbots in the context of text) isn't the same as an unnamed author. Sometimes we publish articles here anonymously attributed to unnamed authors. That's not slop. The words spoken are of a real person with real thoughts, potentially seeking discreet platforms for avoidance of retaliation.

But when people use the term "ghostwriting" they often mean marketing spam, wherein sites republish a bunch of garbage for rich companies (sometimes in exchange for payment, sometimes due to utter laziness).

I don't have contacts/links with Grimmett, but I wanted to illuminate this point.

Slop is a real problem, for instance this very prolific slopfarm in Google News, which has just plagiarised another article to come up with a fake copycat:

Windows User Switches to Linux, Misses Windows Hello

And another slopfarm promoted by Google News some hours ago:

Slop or fake: Canonical releases improvement package for Ubuntu with kernel 6.17 and optimization for Linux games

This one sometimes admits that it just throws a bunch of articles of other people into a plagiarism blender to come up with something that only seems new and unique. In this case, the site seems to be Brazilian (Portuguese language), so they might use language barrier as a reason/excuse for the slop.

Either way, slop is a very inherently different problem; it's not the same as spam, even though slop (LLMs) can produce spam and sometimes SEO-enhanced spam to trick search engines into bringing a real audience to slop.

Other Recent Techrights' Posts

The Register MS: "AI" More Than 80 Times in One Article. But It's Not an Article, It's Sponsored Keyword-stuffed Page.
The Register MS is being paid to actively promoted this scheme
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 09, 2026
IRC logs for Thursday, July 09, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 08, 2026
IRC logs for Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 07, 2026
IRC logs for Tuesday, July 07, 2026
Links 07/07/2026: Microsoft Cuts Doom "id Software" and Turkey Detains Journalists
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/07/2026: Old Computer Challenge (OCC) and Hardware Tests
Links for the day
A Break From the Routine
What matters is what whistleblowers keep feeding information to us
SLAPP Censorship - Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But Have a Strong Community
Techrights compensates for its fiscal poverty with a wealth of community spirit
European Patent Office (EPO) Series: Czech Mate: EPO Kingmaker or Merely a Pawn in the Game?
recent "missions" of the EPO President
Fame is Not the Goal
"Fame" kills
Mental Health in Free Software Communities
clearly there is a subject that merits debate and it ought not be a taboo anymore
The Era of Sponsored Spam
There is no "era of AI", there is era of BRIBES to PRETEND there is an "era of AI"