"Headcount" as Distraction From Mass Layoffs and Salary Reductions
There's this discussion today about how many Americans IBM is laying off, with recent comments pointing out there are IBM layoffs in companies it buys, e.g. HashiCorp last month and Confluent this month.

This was a few hours ago (so-called 'AI' in New York):

Suppose IBM has about 50,000 workers in the US and each year it buys about 5 American companies with a total of 5,000 workers, then culls (or 'PIPs') about half their staff within 5 years. That would be 12,500 culled workers in half a decade in only the companies acquired by IBM, not counting IBM itself. The "headcount" delusion gives a false sense of stability. Things aren't looking well when one considers revenue is acquired, not earned. The acquisitions are funded by debt. █
