Getting Aggressive Suggestive of Loss - Part III - Threats From Burner Accounts Formally Treated as a Crime
Talking about the spouse, Matthew J Garrett, 2 hours ago:
On his litigation buddy: He Strangled Women, Was Charged for Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft) (When Cruelty is the Point)
In Part I we gave (not verbatim; awful language) or merely dropped a hint about the sorts of messages we've been receiving from burner accounts and what they gave away (the latest one has Garrett in the subject line). In Part II we showed some British solicitors were recently convicted for having stalked and harassed bloggers, resulting in serious sanctions against them. They're playing with fire if they attack the media, even 'just' so-called 'bloggers'. 2 days ago the head of Brett Wilson LLP publicly complained in the media about LIPs like me, portraying hired guns as the victims and the media as the aggressor. He clearly has no remorse. He's also blasting the SRA not for being too soft but for being too harsh. Weird, isn't it? How far would self-serving hired guns go?
Yesterday, not long after a threat was made to my "existence" (quote), the police decided there was a threat to my life. My wife was mentioned in the same message. The matter is now formally being treated or dealt with as a crime. I spoke to some local solicitors about this, not just several cops.
Always remember how, with Julian Assange in various forms of UK detention, the foremost attack was waged against his mind. Countries that cannot preserve freedom from self-censorship are countries where free press ultimately cannot prevail. █