Ballmer's FUD Makes a Comeback (and Microsoft Real 'Open Source' Plan is Unleashed) (Updated)
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2007-10-09 01:54:20 UTC
- Modified: 2007-10-09 09:04:51 UTC
Throughout a public talk in the United Kingdom, Microsoft's
CEO says some of the darnest (yet expected) things. For
example, consider this short summary:
Any plans to bring development tools to other platforms? No.
[...]
Open Source
What's our strategy
A. Compete--we need to offer better value where there is a direct overlap
B. Open Source innovation on Windows--our battle is product to product
Praise for Novell--"Novell says that IP matters, Red Hat doesn't."
Does anybody still think that the deal with Novell was not harmful? This is not the first time that Steve Ballmer uses it as ammunition. Matt Asay has apparently viewed the video as well and he is particularly interested -- for obvious reasons -- in Microsoft's approach towards
open source software.
Steve Ballmer apparently likes open source. Well, so long as it drives Windows revenue. And doesn't replace any. Ever. In fact, as he said at an event in Microsoft last week in London that he hopes to see all open-source innovation going to Windows, rather than Linux (more below).
None of this is surprising of course. It is also the reason for what we consider a
hijack of XenSource and the agreements with Novell on virtualisation. Microsoft uses money to make Windows more predominant in the server space (and later on in the desktop space too). All money which is spent is intended to optimise for Windows or to create more dependencies on Windows.
Matt proceeds to covering Ballmer's latest patent FUD.
In fact, in this Q&A, he all-but-declared something that I've been saying for many moons: Microsoft wants to tax open-source innovation. He said, with respect to Red Hat:
"People that use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation to compensate us."
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!!! Ballmer believes Linux violates Microsoft's patents (as he says earlier in his comments), and wants people to pay up.
Recall what
OIN and the
OSC had to say about such
insidious tactics from Microsoft. Also mind the fact that Ballmer talks about intellectual property and not software patents, which are
not the same. He talks in the United Kingdom where
software patents are not legal, so he throws patents into a collective bag that is
IP. This is a very nasty strategy from Microsoft and not the first time it uses it in Europe.
Update: at least
one article about this event has just been published. It poses things as though and it's attack on Red Hat and
Groklaw responds. Remember that Microsoft
sneakily escapes every chance to disclose its
own patent-sheet liability because it knows it's essentially armless (and thus harmless).
Comments
Jon
2007-10-09 15:57:02
How he (Steve B.) thinks that everyone owes him money, I have no idea.
It's stupid, really.
Shane Coyle
2007-10-09 17:38:02
Serenitude
2007-10-09 18:40:28
Stomfi
2007-10-10 01:17:01
Eventually all the little kids would get together and threaten to beat up the bully, who more often than not turned out to be a runaway cry baby.
This is already happening to Steve. The more the general community see the Microsoft CEO bullying the little guys, who are only trying to help make computing better for everyone, the more they wont want to be associated with Microsoft and will look for alternatives.
The FOSS community has already had one win through the EU litigation, although it remains to be seen whether the punishment is effective, and the Open Standards community has effectively delayed MS's attempt to fast track their own industry standard.
Bullies always respond to individual threats, so I think that the FOSS community needs to use a few of its Open Patents to sue MS. This will make them retaliate with some of theirs, and we will then be able to force them to show the rest at litigation, otherwise they will have a lose lose PR exercise on their hands.
Robuka Kenderle
2007-10-10 02:00:33
Ive had quite a few discussions with laissez faire Linux friends over the past few months and they've been slowly sipping the interoperability kool-aid served by people like Bill Milf, Miguel and other lackeys who are supposed to make us believe that the times are a changin at Microsoft. Sorry, but I base my beliefs based on what the head honcho says, not some smoke screen. Who signs the checks? Then I will take heed to HIS words first and foremost.
There are a lot of reasons I dont believe that Microsoft hasnt changed and one of the most important is BECAUSE THE BOSS HASNT CHANGED HIS TUNE since the days of Linux=Cancer.
Whenever a friend says "that was the old Microsoft", all I have to do is find the latest Ballmer threat and have them explain to me how their behavior has changed. And since Ballmer does this every few months, I always have fresh ammunition so no one can claim 'that was the old Microsoft'.
Im happy people like Serenitude have realized that you can whistle by the graveyard all you want, it doesnt change reality one bit.
There is NOTHING that the Chief Executive Officer of Microsoft Corporation has said in the past 18 months which even REMOTELY suggest that there has been a softening of their stance towards Gnu/Linux and FLOSS. The tone has been agressive and threathening as it ever was.
To claim otherwise is delusional.
Shane Coyle
2007-10-10 04:47:11
I wonder if the MS spokespeople will try to float the idea that Ballmer was taken out of context, like Novell tried last time he put his foot in his mouth.