Why BBC is Microsoft Media (Video)
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
- Modified: 2008-06-25 09:52:49 UTC
Recent Techrights' Posts
- [Meme] Free Software and Socially-Engineered Groupthink (to Serve Big Sponsors Like Google and Microsoft)
- They do this to RMS all the time
- Daniel Pocock's ClueCon 2024 Presentation Was Also Streamed Live in YouTube and Later Removed by Google, Citing "Copyrights". Now It's Back.
- The talk covers social control media, Debian, politics, and more
- Improving Daily Links by Culling Spam, Chaff, and LLM Slop
- the Web is getting worse
-
- The January 20 Public Talk by Richard Stallman (Around Midday ET), Livestream 'Assassinated' by Google's YouTube
- our guess is that the 'cancel mob' sabotaged it, possibly by making a lot of false reports to YouTube
- [Video] Daniel Pocock's Public Talk About Free Software Politics, Social Engineering, Debian Deaths and Suicides, Coercion and Exploitation of Women
- took many months to get
- BetaNews Cannot Survive If Its Fake Articles Are Just SPAM for Companies Like AOHi and Aren't Even Composed by Humans
- This is what domains or former "news" sites do when they die and look very desperately for "another way"
- Pocock shot in the face, shot in the back, shot on Hitler's birthday saving France, Belgium and FOSDEM
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- Dr Richard Stallman in Montpellier, Robert Edward Ernest Pocock in France
- Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 20, 2025
- IRC logs for Monday, January 20, 2025
- Links 20/01/2025: Conflict, Climate, and More
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 20/01/2025: Conflicted Feelings and Politics
- Links for the day
- Google 'Cancels' RMS
- Is the talk happening?
- Microsoft Revisionism Debunked by Microsoft's Own Words About “the Failure of OS/2”
- The Register on “the failure of OS/2”
- Links 20/01/2025: Indonesia to Prevents Kids' Access to Social Control Media (Addiction and Worse), Climate News Catchuo
- Links for the day
- [Meme] EPO Targets
- Targets mean nothing if or when you measure the wrong thing
- EPO Union Says Monopoly-Granting Targets at EPO "Difficult to Achieve Without Compromising [Staff] Health, Personal Time or the Quality of the Final Products" (Products as in Monopolies, Not Real Products)
- To those of us (over 99.999% of people impacted by this) who do not work at the EPO the misuse of words like "products" (monopolies are not products) should be disturbing
- The EPO is Nowadays Trying to Trick Staff Into Settling Instead of Solving the Underlying Problems of Corruption and Injustice
- This seems like a classic case of "divide-and-rule" or using misled/weak people to harm the whole group (or "the village")
- Links 20/01/2025: More PR Stunts by ByteDance and MLK’s Legacy Disrespected
- Links for the day
- Gemini Links 20/01/2025: Magnetic Fields, NixOS, and Pleroma
- Links for the day
- BetaNews Spreads Donald Trump Propaganda, Promotes Scams, and Publishes Fake 'Articles' About "Linux"
- This is typical BetaNews
- Richard Stallman 'Unveils' His January 20 Talk in Montpellier, France
- It's free (gratis)
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 19, 2025
- IRC logs for Sunday, January 19, 2025
- Links 19/01/2025: Gaza Ceasefire and PR Stunt by Fentanylware (TikTok), Faking It by "Going Dark" to Incite American Addicts (Users)
- Links for the day
- [Meme] Hardware RAID and Hardware Raid
- We're expecting attacks on the press in Trump's second term (no need to impress anyone for another election cycle) to be far worse than the first
- What's Running on the Laptops
- 12 months have passed
- They Won't Buy Vista 11 PCs or "Hey Hi" Copilot+++++++ PCs of Microsoft (With TPM)
- Windows at 8%
- No Time Left for President Biden to Pardon Julian Assange
- At least they tried
- [Meme] 404, Not Found
- Kuhn: I'd like to interject for a moment, we made an alliance with the Microsoft-dominated LF to outsource projects to Microsoft GitHub and rich people gave us money to do this
- Total Lock-down Ambitions - Part IV - The Latest Examples and the Perils (in Summary)
- For further reading take a look at Musial's nice outline
- FOSDEM is Called "FOSDEM" Because of Richard Stallman (RMS)
- The overlap there seems timely; yesterday RMS spoke in French-speaking (in part) Switzerland where questions in French were accepted
- Links 19/01/2025: TikTok (Fentanylware) Now Banned in the US, Convicted Felon Talks to Fentanylware CEO and Pooh-Tin About Undoing the Ban Despite the Supreme Court Unanimously Upholding It
- Links for the day
- FTC Realises Microsoft Buying Fake 'Clients' to Fake "Revenue" (Microsoft 'Buying' Services and Products From Itself!)
- Ponzi scheme
- Total Lock-down Ambitions - Part III - The Web Browser as DRM Pusher
- A lot of "streaming" stuff is DRM
- Video: University in Peru Honours Richard Stallman
- Tomorrow, January 20, Richard Stallman speaks in France
- IBM Termination Story and Information From Microsoft About Mass Layoffs
- In 2 weeks of 2025 Microsoft already had 2 waves of layoffs
- Over at Tux Machines...
- GNU/Linux news for the past day
- IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 18, 2025
- IRC logs for Saturday, January 18, 2025
Comments
Faemir
2008-06-25 21:25:35
In fact I wouldn't be surprised if they swapped to using dirac for the iplayer, atleast optionally at some point.
This is almost as bad as MS FUD.
Ben
2008-06-26 07:44:14
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 07:59:36
As for DIRAC, that's the 'Old BBC'. The new BBC (media division) is managed by Microsoft folks, some of whom came from Microsoft.
Ben
2008-06-26 10:33:44
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-26 14:18:21
This post contains only a video (showing you a hearing at the Parliament) and 4 links. Where are accusations made? If you challenge previous posts, then be specific and I'll gladly provide evidence. Don't rush and shoot the messenger.
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:19:14
Some of the links are pretty suspicious too - one, still being links to your own site, and 2, the fact that BBC made a documentary on Bill (a series called the Money Programme about history of many of todays biggest businesses) and while it focused more on his retirement, still had time to bring up some criticism including "talking head" sections from his critics. While it wasn't comprehensive, it seemed to be something a little more lighter anyway rather than a hard case expose.
Then, as already mentioned, the investment in Dirac.
There's been a spotty past, but even so they've tried, and are mostly tied by what is currently popular (flash, and at one point using Realmedia/WMP based players, which they realised they had to move away from and did).
RyanT
2008-06-26 17:45:50
Watchnig that video, there is so much stuff said in the text that makes us out as no worse than the people we're accusing of FUD. First of all:
It's easy to be a smart arse when you're not under interview pressure and have google to hand to check the figures, while she, being a human being, is not a perfect human being, and even so did remember the rough estimate (as noted during the interview, excuses staff payment, so I don't really see how the figure mentioned in the text is debunking or showing anything - it was clear to all it seemed that this was excusing that, and if it wasn't, it was mentioned by her anyway).
Unfounded claims of Silverlight wrapper (despite it's linux based back end and the fact it uses flash, and works fine for streaming on all systems), and while downloading is a bitch to not have, you have to remember is copyrighted original works, therefore has to be protected, making it harder to get around the Linux/open source side of things, and even if they did they'd probably complain because they wouldn't release the source of something that is meant to seal off/protect the content entirely (Firefox can get away with it because a lot of exploits are down to bugs and such, not that it has to protect copyrighted works from piracy of course - that's down the content of the page, not the browser).
Then the incredibly presumptive text in general that doesn't bring up anything - it just spins and suggests FUD to make the interviewees sound suspicious when for the most part they haven't said anything deserving of that, except for the interoperability part being on all platforms, which considering the confusion they seemed to have over what they meant, could've been an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue. The clip itself sadly only shows a very specific part too, not the whole thing, which would be better.
Ben
2008-06-27 12:26:24
During the video, the subtitles were serious accusations but no evidence to back it up. Some examples:
at 0:43 : "In fact, the IPlayer cost more than 130 Million! (See Grocklaw.net)." Your accusing the BBC of giving dodgy figures yet no direct links to any evidence, asking viewers to search through a huge site or take our word for it. (And for the record I did find the interview, 130 Million was the cost of modernising the entire BBC from tape based to digital based, Iplayer itself was about 4.5 Million.) And a real citation ;) http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 look for [14:49]
at 3:25: "Because his pals at Microsoft Told him to". That's a serious allegation against both the BBC and Microsoft. And without any evidence its pure FUD.
at 3:54: "No its a monopoly tool created by Microsoft". Well firstly that makes no sense given the context. MP "Why did you build Iplayer, why not use BitTorrent or BTVision" BBC Director "Actually Iplayer isn't an internal BBC creation* we did use external tools" * Subtitle appears here
at 3:13: "By Microsoft...", He doesn't actually name the various components (and why should he, it wouldn't answer the question). And the strong implication is that using Microsoft technology is bad, probably is but unless you say why (and it has to be a good reason), or specifically link to someone who says why, its nothing but FUD.
Roy Schestowitz
2008-06-27 12:46:50
BBC iPlayer protest report
"We have 1500 fliers to distribute, that focus on the key issue with the iPlayer, and why $130 Million and 4 years of development don't get you much when you choose Microsoft DRM."
http://www.defectivebydesign.org/blog/iPlayerProtestReport
re: second point
Bear in mind that I didn't edit or produce the video, but just to bear in mind: Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee who also attended antitrust proceedings in Europe (over Windows Media Player abuses, IIRC).
re: third point
Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?
Feeling the heat at Microsoft
[CNET]: If I ask you who is Microsoft's biggest competitor now, who would it be?
[Ballmer:] Open...Linux. I don't want to say open source. Linux, certainly have to go with that.
http://www.news.com/Feeling-the-heat-at-Microsoft/2008-1012_3-6232458.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc
re: fourth and last point
Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this.
Mark Kent
2008-06-27 13:01:08
The BBC DG (the top bod, responding to a parliament questioning) could only admit to "more than €£20 millions", which indicates quite clearly that it's a lot more, and they were not going to say quite how much. Suggesting that the BBC's DG and his advisers would be so incompetent as to be unable to answer "what does it cost" to a parliamentary committee specifically set up to investigate the iPlayer is ludicruous. If he's really that incompetent, he should find another job, along with his advisers.
The Dirac codec was developed years before the Microsoft iPlayer disaster came along, which was the result of some ex-Microsoft people joining the BBC in their new "media" section, and doing a deal back with Microsoft. There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft's interests.
The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions with Microsoft for something which is so locked to a specific version of windows that hardly anyone can use it, cost a tiny fraction of the Microsoft version, and has been very succesful.
The BBC's main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was "DRM", amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one.
The key party in the BBC eventually lost his job over the whole fiasco, and rightly so in my view. I was disgusted, and remain disgusted, at the amount of my own money (licence-fee) wasted on this ill-advised proprietary junk from Microsoft.
Ta,
Mark
Ben
2008-06-28 07:39:46
"Bear in mind that I didn’t edit or produce the video," Dosn't matter. Posting it on your blog without commentary is a full endorsement, if you do that you have to take responsibility for any inacuracies.
I have no idea why they said >€£20 Million to parliament, but that's a guestimate, if you want accurate figures read the interview where he actually had them on hand. http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171
"Erik Huggers, group controller at BBC Future Media & Technology at the time, is a former Microsoft high-level employee" If he's part of an evil plot to take over the BBC from within then take him down. But unless you have actual evidence he's deliberately doing evil its pure FUD to claim he's part of a sinister plan.
"Why would the BBC exclude the #1 rival of its new media partner then?" Technical reasons, prioritising by user count, maybe they wanted to get the public response and make changes before they started porting. Who knows? But jumping to the worst conclusion without evidence is FUD. Besides the online verison is cross platform and it was worth a little teathing troubles to get hold of.
"Microsoft has a proven track record of abuse and delivery of shoddy software which, by design, does not play nice with competitors. The iPlayer and its constituent parts are a brilliant example of this." Nope, Iplayer's online Flash version is compliant with internet de-facto standards (and its not like there is an official standard to use anyway), cross platform and pretty high quality. I don't know if there's any web 2.0 features people are missing but if you want to watch some BBC TV online, its great.
The Downloadable client according to the digital grapevine (I never used it) shoddy and tied to Microsoft. But that dosn't prove anything. You can say the same about any badly written peace of Windows software in existence.
"There has never been any real intention to support Linux, and it will never happen. This would not be in Microsoft’s interests." Iplayer has an online flash version. Its far more popular than the downloadable version (even with Windows users) and fully supports Linux. I use it and I have no complaints.
"The BBC’s main argument *for* the Microsoft solution was “DRM”, amazingly, this argument was forgotten in moments when the flash solution was pushed out. Clearly, the DRM line had been a Microsoft one." The BBC isn't pro-DRM, if you read what they actually said http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071118205358171 its that DRM was a nessacary evil, not because of pirates, but because they needed to convince the copyright holders to allow Iplayer to allow their shows online, DRM convinced them. If they can convince them to allow their shows on the Flash version of Iplayer without DRM, nice work BBC!
"The successful iPlayer, the one built in a few weeks on the Adobe platform, after the humiliating failure of spending up to €£120 millions" IPlayer itself did not cost €£120 million, the €£120 million was spent restructureing the BBC without witch the Flash Iplayer could not have been built. I agree the downloadable Iplayer was a waste of time and money, I just don't see an evil intent, but please, get your figures right.