Bonum Certa Men Certa

Microsoft Tells Antitrust Regulators to Sod Off For Another Couple of Weeks

Assassins and mercenaries



Summary: Microsoft delays EU response even further while ECIS lays charges against Microsoft

Yesterday we wrote about ECIS's strike against Microsoft and today it turns out that Microsoft keeps procrastinating while its existing products remain anti-competitive by design.

EU antitrust regulators have granted Microsoft yet another extension to respond to charges that the software giant abused its dominant market position by bundling Internet Explorer with Windows.

A European Commission spokeswoman confirmed to The Register this morning that Microsoft has been given a one-week extension. The company now has until 28 April to respond.


Someone has sent us a new document about Microsoft's crimes. Yes, found within the PDF in a recent complaint is one link to this other EU document [PDF]. It is reminiscent of the Comes petition, but it's more recent and a lot shorter. It is titled "Microsoft: A History of Anticompetitive Behavior and Consumer Harm" and it comes from ECIS. It happens to speak very concisely about Microsoft's version of "reasonable and non-discriminatory" (really meaning "predatory and anti-competitive").

To use an excerpt that contains references to GNU/Linux in particular, here is a new message from HPT in USENET (quoted text is unifont):

Table of contents of this document is a further indictment against the monopoly regarding its anti-competitive practises against competition.

Microsoft



A History of Anticompetitive Behavior and Consumer Harm



March 31, 2009




TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................1 II. MICROSOFT’S HISTORY OF ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT ..........3 A. Microsoft’s Campaign To Destroy DR-DOS ...................3 B. Microsoft’s Anticompetitive Per Processor License Fees ...5 C. Microsoft’s Retaliation And Price Discrimination Against IBM .............................................................6 D. Microsoft’s Organized Collective Boycott Against Intel ...7 E. Microsoft’s Elimination Of Word Perfect ..................7 F. Microsoft’s Deceptive WISE Software Program ..............9 G. Microsoft’s Elimination Of Netscape .....................10 H. Microsoft’s Attempts To Extinguish Java .................14 I. Microsoft’s Elimination Of Rival Media Players ..........16 J. Microsoft’s Campaign Against Rival Server Operating Systems ............................................................18 III. MICROSOFT CONTINUES TO ENGAGE IN ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT ............................................................19 A. Microsoft’s Failure To Comply With The Final Judgment ...20 B. Microsoft’s Campaign of Patent FUD against Linux and Open Source Software.............................................23 C. Microsoft’s Ongoing Misconduct Has Sparked Further European Commission Investigations ..................................23 IV. MICROSOFT’S FALSE PROMISES OF INTEROPERABILITY .........24 V. MICROSOFT’S MONOPOLIES HAVE HARMED CONSUMERS ............25 A. Microsoft’s Operating System Monopoly Has Harmed Consumers ............................................................25 B. Microsoft’s Office Monopoly Has Harmed Consumers ........26 C. Microsoft’s Web Browser Monopoly Has Harmed Consumers ...28 VI. CONCLUSION .............................................31



Section III.B discusses FUD against Linux:




B. Microsoft’s Campaign of Patent FUD against Linux and Open Source Software

€  €  “This is not a case of some accidental, unknowing infringement. There is an overwhelming number of patents being infringed.”

€  €  — Microsoft General Counsel and Intellectual Property and Licensing Vice President Horacio Gutierrez [128]



Here is an indicting observation about the anti-competitive practises through unsubstantiated patent violations in Linux:




The open source Linux operating system is the principal rival to Microsoft Windows. Linux has been taken up by both corporate customers and, increasingly, by private individuals for home use (e.g., with netbooks). In a recent interview with CNET, Steve Ballmer identified Linux as one of the top two competitive threats to Microsoft in the enterprise segment. [129]

Consistent with its behavior in response to other competitive threats, Microsoft has used unfair and anti-competitive tactics to try and slow the uptake of Linux. In particular, Microsoft has made and continues to make broad, unsubstantiated claims that software developers distributing Linux or other open source software, as well as their customers, are infringing Microsoft’s patents. [130] However, although Microsoft has claimed that as many as 235 patents may have been infringed [131], it has consistently failed to identify which patents are at issue.



It warns of possible future legal action by Microsoft, as a part of its FUD campaign against Linux and Open Source to kill Linux, requirement for additional licensing for "immunity". € According to this next paragraph, licensing fees have a certain ring of action for protection similar to action by organised crime:




Microsoft’s tactic is to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt (“FUD”) as to whether developers and users of open source software may be the target of future patent infringement suits, and thereby chill consumer enthusiasm and demand for Linux and open source solutions.

Indeed, Microsoft’s unwarranted threats have brought such pressure to bear on Linux users that some have felt compelled to enter into royalty-bearing patent licenses with Microsoft. [132] Microsoft’s campaign of FUD effectively works to impose a “tax” on the use of the most viable alternative software to Windows: faced with an intimidating and powerful potential litigant known for its hardball tactics, Linux users are driven to pay the licensing fee despite the speculative nature of the IP claims. Microsoft’s bullying tactics therefore raise the overall cost and slow down market penetration by innovative technologies intended to compete with Microsoft’s monopoly products.



Interesting is the comment about the US Law in regard to software patentability.




Moreover, there is a strong likelihood that Microsoft’s patent FUD campaign may be unfounded in law. Recent U.S. jurisprudence clarifies that the scope for patenting business methods, which lie at the heart of many software patents, is much narrower than was previously thought to be the case. [133] In addition, one of the thresholds for patentability – that an invention is not obvious to a person skilled in the art – has recently become harder to meet. [134] As such, many of the patents held by Microsoft are likely to be of questionable validity today.



According to this next paragraph, patents are a methodology to deter competition.




Furthermore, given the myriad of software patents in existence, consumers may often be unable to determine with certainty whether their use or distribution of certain software products actually infringes another company’s IP rights. Therefore, contrary to the broad and categorical statements of Mr. Gutierrez as to the intentional nature of any alleged patent infringements, it is widely recognized in the industry that, regardless of whether proprietary or open source software is used, there is a high likelihood that patent infringements will have been committed inadvertently. Microsoft has sought to exploit the current absence of clarity in patent law in order to deter consumers from taking up offerings competing with Microsoft’s own products.



Below mentions Microsoft suing TomTom regarding Microsoft's questionable patents.




In an apparent escalation of its patent FUD strategy, Microsoft sued the navigational system vendor, TomTom, for patent infringement at the end of February 2009. Three patent claims related to Linux are included in the lawsuit. [135] At least two of them are related to highly questionable patents on long file name support in Windows, which have been partially invalidated by an EC patent court on the grounds that Microsoft’s patent claims were “not based on inventive activity”. [136] While Microsoft has publicly claimed that its action is not directed against Linux or open source, and the case was settled in March 2009 pursuant to a mostly confidential agreement, this represents an aggressive development of Microsoft’s use of spurious or highly questionable patent claims to intimidate and eliminate competition from Linux in order to maintain or strengthen its dominant position in the OS market.





The full document is a compelling, fascinating read.

Recent Techrights' Posts

Rust People: Drain the Swap, You're Holding It Wrong
Does Rust make sense?
Slopwatch: LinuxSecurity, linuxconfig.org, and Plagiarised Phoronix
Many articles out there are nowadays fake
European Patent Office Illegally Gutting and Outsourcing Its Functions, Acting Like an Above-the-Law Commercial Business (It Won't Stop at Formalities Officers (FOs) and Classification Slop at the EPO)
breaking/violating laws and conventions
Links 19/09/2025: Lobbyist of American GAFAM Becomes Data Protection Commissioner in Europe
Links for the day
 
Links 20/09/2025: Internet Shutdowns, Media Censorship, and Climate Worries
Links for the day
About 700 New Gemini Capsules in 13 Months (or 54 Per Month)
4.8K would represent a 20% increase
Techrights the Name Turns 15
About 6 weeks from now we turn 19
Microsoft is Running Out of Time and Floating Fake Figures, Fake Projects, Fake Narratives, Fake Excuses
Also, a lot of Microsoft's "revenue" claims are circular financing (i.e. Microsoft buying from itself, which means Ponzi-like fraud)
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, September 19, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, September 19, 2025
Gemini Links 20/09/2025: Navigating the Pressures of Modern Life and SpellBinding Accidentally Wrote Another Gemini Server
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Press Freedom Dying in US, Anti-Austerity Strikes in France, and Alan Rusbridger to Leave 'Prospect'
Links for the day
Offloading to the Sister Site
In the interest of not overwhelming readers
Links 19/09/2025: Coffee Club and "SpellBinding is Now Absurdly Fast"
Links for the day
Links 19/09/2025: Media Freedom Ceases to Exist in US, "Consider Dropping Twitter/X"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/09/2025: Thinking and Insect Bites
Links for the day
Microsoft E.E.E.: Git Will Now (or Very Soon) Fully Depend on Rust, Which is Controlled by Microsoft
Microsoft now makes Git dependent on Rust, or making Git dependent on GitHub, which is proprietary
The Right to Punch People (Apparently)
At Brett Wilson, Brett's job title is "Head of Crime" and Wilson normalises calls for violence
Slop or Fake Articles Have Turned Linux Journal From a Pioneering/Trailblazing "Linux" Magazine Into a Nuisance
some sites with former reputation - good reputation - turn into cesspools
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, September 18, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, September 18, 2025
Brett Wilson LLP Seem to Have Had Only One Litigation Client in 2025, He Was Previously Charged, Just Like the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (Whom They Now Represent)
Karma is superstition, regulators are not
Project 2030 to Cover How "Project 2025"-Styled Anti-Media Zealots From America Targeted Techrights and Tux Machines
The common denominator is also their attacks on women
Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Meet Deadlines Set by Judge 7 Months Earlier, Tried to Ruin Our Holiday, Then Had the Audacity to Ask Us for Over 3,000 Pounds for Its Own Lateness
As a matter of principle we will never respond to assassin while we are on holiday
On Claims That After Bluewashing Red Hat Will Increasingly Become an Indian Company
Discussed this week (long and detailed)
Americans Attacking British Sites Only Months After They Leave America
We find it kind of funny if not ironic that this site, originally an American site, got legal harassment only from Americans and only months after it had moved to the UK
Despite Losing Over a Quarter Million Dollars a Year Software in the Public Interest (SPI) Gives Helping Hand to Libreboot
SPI's financial state depends a lot on its public image or its reputation
Slopwatch: Google Helps Plagiarism and Sends Traffic to Ripoff Artists
That Google as a company helps spamfarms is noteworthy
If You Want to Know the Future, Listen to the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and Andy Farnell
We're sure the FSF will have plenty of its own output
Links 18/09/2025: A Taliban Ban on Internet Access and Troubled US Job Market
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/09/2025: Computer Literacy and Accessing Alhena's Database
Links for the day
Links 18/09/2025: US War on Media (Truth Banned, Cancel Culture by the Hard Right), NYT Chief Executive Warns Cheeto is Deploying ‘Anti-press Playbook'
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, September 17, 2025
IRC logs for Wednesday, September 17, 2025