Bonum Certa Men Certa

The Anti-PTAB (Patent Quality), Anti-€§ 101 Lobby is Losing Its Mind and It Has Become Amusing to Observe

It is actually Watchtroll who should consider stepping down and maybe a career change

Watchtroll



Summary: The rants about the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), the courts and even the law itself have reached laughable levels; this reveals that the real agenda of patent maximalists is endless litigation and their methods boil down to those of an angry mob, not legal professionals

THE REFORMS implemented at the USPTO 7 years ago (AIA), combined with a long series of Supreme Court decisions, have changed the 'attack surface' of patent lawyers. Patents are no longer presumed valid because many are not.



"Patents are no longer presumed valid because many are not."We sometimes amuse ourself trying to see what patent extremists are saying. Watching their reactions can be literally funny. Just a few hours ago Watchtroll threw another tantrum, in which the blowhard in chief quote-mined the Director of the USPTO to come up with the headline Section 101 ‘weakens the robustness of our IP system’ (attributing this to Iancu, a friendly hand).

“...we generally view him as somewhat of a caricature of the patent microcosm -- a little bit like the "Fox News" of the patent world.”Attacks like these (on Section 101, courts, PTAB and so on) aren't uncommon. They're a case of quote-mining. This is Watchtroll's style. Whether he accepts it or not (we refer to the site and the person as "Watchtroll"), we generally view him as somewhat of a caricature of the patent microcosm -- a little bit like the "Fox News" of the patent world.

Watchtroll constantly attacks PTAB, hoping that it would magically go away like Michelle Lee did (after Watchtroll had sort of endlessly bullied her). Watchtroll last attacked PTAB again about 8 hours ago. When the US Supreme Court said that it was absolutely fine with PTAB (just under a month ago in Oil States) Watchtroll characteristically attacked the judges, the courts, and just about everyone! This too isn't uncommon. Watchtroll does it all the time. It last smeared the high courts only a couple of weeks ago. It smeared the US Supreme Court only about a week ago.

Truly pathetic is the fact that Watchtroll has just, once again, boosted the 'United States' (not really) Chamber of Commerce 2018 "Global IP Index," which is misleading propaganda of the highest order, delivered/put forth to officials on behalf of patent extremists (insulting their own country in an attempt to change policy). David Wanetick actually keeps promoting this nonsense, which many patent rationalists are openly rejecting (they mock this index).

Meanwhile (also earlier today), Professor Michael Risch mentions a Koch-funded AstroTurfer (or patent trolls' mouthpiece), Adam Mossoff. It's a pseudo-scholar whose goal seems to be feeding anti-PTAB talking points to Justice Gorsuch and others (on Koch's payroll). It worked in Oil States and he publicly bragged about Gorsuch citing/quoting him in the decision. This reaffirms the view that the Koch brothers control Gorsuch by proxy, but anyway, these are the concluding words from Risch:

But much of this work is historical. Of late, as the abstract notes, it's all about the what: What inventions? What classes? What litigation? How many claims? I think people clamor for stories about innovators; I believe my most downloaded (by far) SSRN paper, Patent Troll Myths, resonated because it looked hard at the innovators - individuals to small entities to large companies. Dan Burk looks at innovators (but without data) in Do Patents Have Gender?

I'm sure there are examples I'm not thinking of, but more data and analysis in this area would be welcome. Patents exist in service to their inventors, and so it makes sense to understand who those are to better understand whether patents are achieving their goals...or even what the goals are.


Patent scholars who work for universities and not for think tanks of billionaires do understand that patent balance is needed. Patent maximalism has no place in academia. Because it's simply irrational and detached from reality...

Looking at some other sites of the patent microcosm throughout the day, we've found Michael Loney speaking about PTAB changes that are relatively minor (they already leave Oil States well behind, perhaps hoping not to draw much attention to it). Loney wrote:

Patent owners may not benefit from the proposed shift to the Phillips claim construction standard at the PTAB if it reduces the chance of a stay and leads to a less nuanced Markman construction

Patent owners [sic] have long called for the change proposed by the USPTO last week for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to use the Phillips standard for claim construction. But it is questionable they would benefit much from it.


We wrote about this over the weekend. It's very much overblown. Michael Borella also wrote about the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), namely a kind of rant about €§ 101. His opening paragraph in the PTAB-hostile Patent Docs:

The Patent Trial and Appeal Broad (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has often been criticized [by patent maximalists] for being particularly harsh when reviewing appeals of claims rejected by an examiner of grounds of patent-ineligibly under 35 U.S.C. €§ 101. According to some sources, examiners are affirmed about 80-86% of the time in these matters.[1] Therefore, when the PTAB reverses an examiner's €§ 101 rejection, it is worthwhile to note how and why.


These rates say nothing about whether that's just or unjust; if some doctor deems/detects 90% of babies as having no birth defects, does that make the doctor "harsh" or "biased"? No. That's just very irrational an argument.

The truth of the matter is, the patent microcosm refuses to accept reality and protests against it by bashing the laws, bashing the court, bashing jurists/judges and so on.

Many patents are absolutely fine. They're not abstract. Here's a new example -- in the form of today's press release -- of patents on more physical things and here's another:

Sigma Labs, Inc. (NASDAQ:SGLB) (“Sigma” or the “Company”), a provider of quality assurance software under the PrintRite3D€® brand, today announced that the Company was allowed a seminal patent entitled “Method and System for Monitoring Additive Manufacturing Processes.” The patent provides protection for methods of assuring part quality using real time data from multiple sensor types.


Manufacturing and sensors aren't the same as some silly algorithms reducible to mathematics, which is the sort of patents that PTAB regularly deals with. If the patent maximalists refuse to accept that the law was corrected and that it actually helps technology companies, then they simply aren't interested in science and technology, only litigation. Let them sob...

Recent Techrights' Posts

Cindy Cohn Leaving the Electronic Frontier Foundation While Its Co-founder John Gilmore, Whom She Apparently Helped Oust, Will Celebrate 40 Years of the Free Software Foundation, Inc.
EFF has been busy hoarding GAFAM money, whereas the latter is where all the real activism is done
"Google is Googlebombing KDE's Project Banana"
So is Google googlebombing KDE's Project Banana? You decide.
Some Very Large IRC Networks Are Growing
IRC will turn 38 next year
What Ruben Amorim and Stefano Maffulli Have in Common
Censors Wikipedia and Social Control Media
Microsoft Won't Cooperate in Trying to Tackle EPO Corruption (Microsoft Profits From This Corruption)
Use something like BigBlueButton, Jami, Ring, and Jitsi instead
We Are Sad to Hear the Story of Jonathan Riddell, Champion of KDE and GNU/Linux on Desktops/Laptops
I have enormous respect for Jonathan and everything he has done
 
"Governments, local authorities, schools and hospitals can lead by example by procuring only Free Software"
Crossposted from Tux Machines
The Reach of Techrights Has Broadened
We nowadays cover a broader range of issues
Complicating Things for No Actual Benefit, Just Added Risk and More Difficulties Adding GNU/Linux and BSDs
Watch what it's like for people who wish to use BSDs
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, September 15, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, September 15, 2025
Links 16/09/2025: Autumn Party, RPG Planet, and Optical ROOPHLOCH
Links for the day
Geminispace Growing at Pace of Over 10% Per Year
Contrary to what some pessimists try to claim
Linux Mint Forums Today: Disable 'Secure Boot', It Doesn't Improve Security, It's Just a Microsoft Obstacle to GNU/Linux Users
They also mention MOK
Solved Less Than an Hour Ago: Trying to Escape Windows, 'Secure Boot' Gets in the Way
'Secure Boot' wasn't meant to even exist in the first place
Stefano Maffulli, Executive Director of the Open Source Initiative, Resigns or Gets Removed (We'll Continue Covering OSI Scandals)
A dozen mentions of "AI", not much about "Open Source"
Andy Has Just Nailed It (Regarding Complexity and Failure, a la UEFI)
The users no longer own or control what they buy
Compatibility Support Module (CSM) Versus GNU/Linux Simplicity
what Andy recently called "solutionism"
Links 15/09/2025: "Postal Traffic to US Down by Over 80%" and 'Smart' Spinozacampus Laundry Room Goes AWOL
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/09/2025: Dungeon Hustle and Deleting Oneself From the Net
Links for the day
Breach of EPO's Duty of Care or Cigna Reimbursement Issues
This is the sort of thing that motivated Luigi Mangione to assassinate a CEO
Ask Ubuntu About "Secure Boot" Violation and Laptops That Don't Boot GNU/Linux
Does anyone still believe that "Secure Boot" has anything at all to do with security?
Talking About the Problem vs Talking to the Problem
Wanting an audience is never a good excuse for compromising one's values and principles
Focusing on Patents
The reason we cover the EPO so much is that it's close to home
"Secure Boot Violation": The 'Joys' of Fake Security Gone Wrong
Not everyone reboots every day
Links 15/09/2025: Russia Invades Romanian Airspace, Penske Media Sues Google Over LLM Slop
Links for the day
Links 15/09/2025: Bitcoin ATMs Scam and "Conservative Cryptography" (Backdoors Fantasies)
Links for the day
EPO Imitates Microsoft: "Three Days or More Per Week" Inside the Office to Get a Desk to Work on; "the Office Breaches Its Promise Towards Staff and Acts in Breach of Its Duty of Care"
The EPO serves no actual function in Europe
Links 15/09/2025: Political Affairs, Censorship, and Copyrights
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/09/2025: Music Genres, Invisible Networks, and Akademy 2025
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, September 14, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, September 14, 2025
Satya's Plan B: Try to Hide the Massive Extent/Scale/Scope of Microsoft Layoffs
fewer people buy Microsoft
Red Hat News About De Facto Mass Layoffs (Bluewashing) Gone From Reddit (Censored by Gatekeepers), Still Online in The Register
With RTOs, PIPs, relocation etc. expect IBM to "shed off" many Red Hatters
UEFI "Secure Boot Doesn’t Play Nice at the Moment"
UEFI "Secure Boot" does not improve security. It's an artificial obstacle in service of monopoly.
Gemini Links 14/09/2025: ROOPHLOCH, Music, and Reddit
Links for the day
If You Want to "make your 'Windows PC' lean, mean, and fast" You Will Install GNU/Linux or Some BSD
That kind of article says a lot about IDG
Slopwatch: Google News Infested With Slop (About Half of the Results for "Linux" Today)
This is the sort of junk one finds when looking for "Linux" in Google News these days
Links 14/09/2025: Ricky Hatton Dies and McDonald's Declares War on Tipping Culture
Links for the day
Links 14/09/2025: Disasters for CEOs Obsessed With Slop and Slop Companies School Like Fish
Links for the day
"Bad Shim Signature" (Microsoft 'Secure' Boot)
"Fresh install not booting"
What Microsoft Garrett and Microsoft Lunduke Have in Common
Similar tactics, different "wings"
Links 14/09/2025: US "Economy Sagging", "Michigan Economy Wobbles From Tariffs"
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/09/2025: Minimalist Snippet Manager and Omarchy Linux
Links for the day
The Face of the Digital Far Right: Microsoft Lunduke
Microsoft Lunduke is an online extremist that belongs to and panders to the far right
20 Years Later and Academia Isn't the Same
"I never dreamed of being a professor"
'Cancel Culture' by the Right: Microsoft Lunduke Contacts People's Employers Trying to Get Them Fired
Microsoft Lunduke panders to extremists online
"Bad Shim Signature"; So 'Secure' That It Overrides Users' Preferences and Turns Itself Back on (Coercive Measure)
This was a few hours ago
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, September 13, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, September 13, 2025