THE EPO said "goodbye and good riddance" to Battistelli almost 4 months ago. He has since then maintained a low profile except when French media approached him as he may be criminally liable but immune nonetheless.
"In conclusion, IAM is still (more than 3 months later) grooming Battistelli and IP Kat has no interest whatsoever in EPO scandals (which carry on by the way)."So a firm involved in the case uses IP Kat for its own purposes; "The IPKat team [i.e. Bristows staff quoting other Bristows staff] will be back next week to report on the key findings of the Court of Appeal, with analysis to follow," she said.
What has IP Kat become? Aside from the fact that it doesn't write as much as it used to (and several writers very recently left), watch what it published on the same day about "blockchain" (the usual patent hype) and then in "Standards and Patents annual conference returns to London". IP Kat actively promotes an event in London that lobbies for software patents under the guise of "AI", "FRAND" and other nonsense (even software patents inside standards).
Later in the same day IP Kat started celebrating patents on food; the comments are better than the post. Last but not least, on the same day IP Kat mentioned the EPO (at long last). But remember this is the Kat which deleted the thread (about 40 comments) about António Campinos, whose friends he already brings to the EPO (just like Battistelli did). What did the blog write about the EPO? Nothing. It just plugged in the EPO's press release: "The Administrative Council of the EPO has appointed the next vice-presidents of the EPO: Stephen Rowan (UK), Christoph Ernst (Germany) and Nellie Simon (Austria). Find out more about the new vice-presidents here."
In conclusion, IAM is still (more than 3 months later) grooming Battistelli and IP Kat has no interest whatsoever in EPO scandals (which carry on by the way). This cat got neutered... ⬆