Bonum Certa Men Certa

EPO-Bribed IAM 'Media' Has Praised Quality, Which Even EPO Staff (Examiners) Does Not Praise

Purple people
Office run by lying, law-breaking 'suits' instead of scientists



Summary: It's easy to see something is terribly wrong when the people who do the actual work do not agree with the media's praise of their work (a praise motivated by a nefarious, alternate agenda)

As we noted earlier this month and last month -- preparation and publication, respectively -- IAM had (once again, as usual) orchestrated the "quality" festival for Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos, seeking to mislead and manipulate EPO governance by a false sense of calm. Are they supposed to feel like their mis-governance accomplished success?



Over the years we published many articles about patent quality. We also saw EPO staff coming under exceptional threats/fire for merely pointed out the fact quality of European Patents (or validity of them) was rapidly decreasing. Instead of giving traffic/attention to the annual IAM lies (Watchtroll has just written about the EPO as well), let's repost below a publication of relevance from earlier this year. We never reproduced it as HTML (and Gemini), but it's never too late:

Time and Timeliness vs. Quality and Production Pressure?



Management is very proud of the quality of EPO products. Indeed, Goal 3 of the Strategic Plan 2020-2023 is to "Deliver high-quality products (and services efficiently)".

But have you ever wondered how the quality of a search and a grant is actually defined? We have, and have previously written in detail on the topic.

The Office has also thought a lot about this issue, dedicating an entire intranet page ("Creating a common definition of quality") to the search for a proper definition.

From that page, it can be derived that on the one hand:

● quality is still to be defined, i.e. one of the EPO's projects is to 'Develop a common definition of quality for EPO search and examination products that is agreed and shared with internal and external users'”,

but on the other hand

“quality is our top priority”.

Thus, as soon as quality is properly defined, it will be our top priority. Let's assume that to be true.

Elsewhere on the intranet ("Early Certainty: EPO’s plan to improve timeliness and address business‘ needs") we can read that "The EPO strives to provide high quality products which withstand potential post-grant proceedings. This establishes legal certainty". So we can derive that quality is based, among other things, on whether the best prior art was found before examination.

Let's now take a step back and look at what happens in reality.

The Office sets production targets that have considerably reduced the time available per application for each examiner. However, the less time you have, the less probable it will be that you can find the best prior art, thoroughly examine the application to check the requirements of the EPC, and draft your findings in a way that the applicant can understand them.

Therefore, this lessens the probability that your granted patent will withstand potential post-grant proceedings. This in turn can only worsen the quality, should it be defined as maximum legal validity. A detailed treatise on quality using this definition authored by the CSC inter alia can be found here1.

There are known counter-arguments to any pleas for increased (or even maintained) time for processing searches and examinations:

"If you can do this dossier in 3 days, you can do it in 3 days minus 1 hour". This implies, if taken to its absurd, iterative conclusion, that every dossier could eventually be completed in zero minutes. Taken to an even more absurd extreme, we would be completing dossiers in negative time.

"The Applicant cannot wait for our products, we have to deliver them ASAP". Should this really be at the expense of quality, as defined by maximum validity at grant? It is well known to applicants that if they want to proceed faster they can request accelerated search / examination. Such requests remain rare.

This situation by itself is bad enough, but it is complicated yet further by all sorts of “nice-to-haves” which have now been given to examiners as "must have" objectives. For example, for unclear reasons dossiers at the beginning of examination (Priority 3 in the dossier management system) also now have to be dealt with ASAP, so that they will be finished by the end of the year. However, such actions often do not lead to a grant, considering the normal patenting practice of applicants. Many further parameters of various sorts are also given to examiners as objectives, with questionable value as hard objectives. An earlier paper on “over-parameterisation” can be found here2.

In conclusion, we still cannot understand how a system with ever-higher production targets, and ever-more “unproductive” but mandatory goals, can be reconciled with the quality target the EPO has set for itself.

Your Staff Representation

_______ 1 “Good enough? A discussion paper about Patent Quality at the EPO”, LSC Munich & Berlin paper (sc18003mp) of 19.04.2018 2 “All the President’s Peas”, CSC paper (sc18008cp) of 17.01.2018


Of course IAM et al won't be writing about such simple facts; they're paid to ignore reality or look the other way while the EPO spews out lots of Invalid Patents (IPs) instead of proper European Patents (EPs). We'll publish more material related to this tomorrow (Sunday).

Recent Techrights' Posts

A Free Software Foundation (FSF) Led by Dr. Richard Stallman Can Still Raise a Lot of Money
Give people more time (e.g. until end of January) and maybe hit the target
Good Gains for Android for GNU/Linux in New Zealand This Year
Notice that GNU/Linux rose to its highest point (this month)
2024 a Record Year for Android (Almost 50% "Market Share"), Which is Now Bigger in Europe Than Microsoft Windows
a look at Europe
Wishing for a Wikileaks Renaissance in 2025
as a site that facilitates whistleblowers, hosting large leaks
[Meme] Getting Banned From Social Control Media 2 Days or Two Weeks Before Leaving Office
Seems like interference using dinners with an insurrectionist
Jimmy Carter on Globalisation of "Tech"
Carter's legacy in the area of science (and technology)
The True Importance of Diversification
Monopoly or monoculture breed fragility
This New Talk Helps Explain Why Crimes at the European Patent Office (EPO) and Patent Policy Deficits Remain Unaddressed by the European Commission
Corporations write and enforce the law
Enshittification is Everywhere
Computer Science has been reduced to just "computer" (spyphone)
Move to GNU/Linux and Save the Planet, CCC Talk Explains
video of the talk
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Tells Us All to "Keep Putting Pressure on Microsoft"
"Grassroots organization against a corporation as large as Microsoft is never easy"
 
Links 30/12/2024: Fentanylware (TikTok) Concerns and Aftermath of Cut Cables
Links for the day
Is Microsoft's Plundering of Africa Coming to an End?
Microsoft had many layoffs in Africa this year
Microsoft Windows Down From 23% to 20% This Year in Asia (Android Up From 54% to Almost 60%)
Less and less of Windows, more of the Linux-powered Android
15 Years Ago Mozilla Firefox Had Over 50% of the Slovakian Market, Now Google's Chrome Has Over 70%
Peaked at 72.4% earlier this year
Remembering When Photography Meant Realistic Captures of Reality, Not "Hey Hi" (AI) and 'Instagrammed' (Filtered, Manipulated)
Fake pictures predate the "hey hi" hype; Instagram in particular was full of these
Apple's Main Stronghold (North America) at Risk From GNU/Linux
Apple had several rounds of layoffs in the US this year
statCounter: Microsoft Windows Down a Percent This Year in South America, GNU/Linux Up to 3.2%
Microsoft down, freedom up
The Threat of Googlebombing and LLMs
There are many Carters, but search engines and LLMs lack the "logic" (or common sense) to tell the difference
Social Control Media (Not Just TikTok) is a "Modern Challenge" to Democracy
Society is worse off with Social Control Networks
IBM's Bad Leadership is a Threat to GNU/Linux
We worry that since Red Hat controls so much of the GNU/Linux stack difficulties at IBM will result in divestment
Putting Some Eggs in the Geminispace Basket
Do not bet on the future of the Web
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 29, 2024
IRC logs for Sunday, December 29, 2024
Gemini Links 30/12/2024: Countdown to New Year, Tinylogging, and LLM Hype
Links for the day
Incredible! Beta'News' Now Runs Ads as 'Articles' About 'Hey Hi' (AI), Written by LLMs
Does it get any more rogue than this?
Our Most Relaxing Christmas Ever?
this Christmas was our most calm every (in recent memory at least)
Bad Year for Microsoft in India (and Another All-Time Low, Windows at 12% "Market Share")
Microsoft is the next Intel
Keeping Online Even During Wars
the Internet is still quite robust
Fascistic Regimes and Their Justices Will Leverage Social Control Networks to Their Advantage (Power Grab), They Won't Protect Constituents From Them
"controlling the voices and all the narratives, including the press because they too buy into the lies that it is a communications medium"
New Year's Resolution for Techrights: No More Very Short Posts
If we publish memes, as above, then we'll try to at least contextualise them somewhat
Links 29/12/2024: Phytium Sells Chinese CPUs and Landing Gear Malfunction Crashes Plane in Korea
Links for the day
Links 29/12/2024: Facebook Wants More Bots and Slop, Whistleblowers and Bloggers Under Attack
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 28, 2024
IRC logs for Saturday, December 28, 2024
Gemini Links 29/12/2024: Supernatural Mystery and Mechanical People
Links for the day
Links 28/12/2024: Standards Emphasised, Putin Implicitly Admits Taking Down Passenger Plane
Links for the day
Links 28/12/2024: BRICS-Controlled Social Control Media Defended by GOP, "Paper Passport Is Dying"
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 27, 2024
IRC logs for Friday, December 27, 2024
Links 28/12/2024: Having Bosses, Ada's Dependent Types
Links for the day