There may be several more of these paid-for puff pieces for Infosys, a.k.a. 'Microsoft India' (they do some of Microsoft's own operations). That's like 80% of what they published yesterday!
Summary: Infosys was mentioned and promoted in at least half a dozen 'articles' in MIT Technology Review yesterday (there may be more; the above is not exhaustive); days prior to that MIT Technology Review published a lot of Microsoft SPAM that helped distract from Microsoft's waves of layoffs, so this publication is clearly defunct (coverage 'on sale')
If the election is run by platforms that have back doors "baked-in" and if the communications are overseen by GAFAM, you would not have to be a "nutty MAGAt" to dispute the outcome
"It means a situation in which somebody accuses someone else of a fault which the accuser shares, and therefore is an example of psychological projection, or hypocrisy. Use of the expression to discredit or deflect a claim of wrongdoing by attacking the originator of the claim for their own similar behaviour (rather than acknowledging the guilt of both) is the tu quoque logical fallacy."
