EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.30.07

Microsoft Puppet (Frost & Sullivan) Praises ‘Intellectual Property’, Novell’s Patent Deal

Posted in Deception, FUD, Intellectual Monopoly, Interoperability, Microsoft, Novell, Patents at 11:27 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pay-to-say analyst speaks out

F&S is considered somewhat of a Microsoft shill, for it is publishing studies that are commissioned by Microsoft without proper disclosure. The research is self-serving rather than informative. They frequently do studies that are funded by Microsoft and it’s safe to assume that they are not more reliable than IDC and Gartner, which Microsoft holds by the pockets.

Anyway, F&S has just decided to kindly (and very arbitrarily) inform us that the Novell-Microsoft deal wins an award for “innovation” — a term that Microsoft favours for all the wrong reasons.

The Novell and Microsoft alliance is based on a foundation to expand innovation and collaboration through a mutual respect for intellectual property.

This press release (quoted at the bottom in full) smells rather bad. It can be said almost for certain that someone pulled a cheque or made these notorious phonecalls to have it dispatched. Mind the use of the weasel word (or term) 'Intellectual Property'. It’s there for a reason. F&S seems to have been very busy with Microsoft lately. Only 3 ago it also unleashed a press release that praises Microsoft. What does that firm do anyway? The 3-day-old press release says it best:

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Consulting Company, partners with clients to accelerate their growth.

”They will attack the European Commission, the FSF, the GNU GPL, and anything else that puts Microsoft’s business goals or ambition in jeopardy.“It’s safe to assume that F&S’s “client and partner” is Microsoft in this case, and it is trying to help Microsoft “accelerate their growth”. It pretty much sums up the role of such analysts. Remember CompTIA, a Microsoft lobbying arm? We mentioned it before and always in a negative context because it merely serves the Microsoft business agenda [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. That is what such parties are being paid for. When Microsoft needs a third-party proxy that serves as a seemingly-independent mouthpiece, a group of analysts and lobbying arms such as ACT will be available. They will attack the European Commission, the FSF, the GNU GPL, and anything else that puts Microsoft’s business goals or ambition in jeopardy.

Recent telling examples from CompTIA include:

1. Industry body to push OOXML in Philippines

Microsoft and industry body Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) have teamed up to drive the adoption of Office Open XML in the Philippines.

2. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs Top CompTIA Poll on Most Influential IT Industry Personalities of the Past 25 Years

The co-founders of two of the world’s most successful, recognizable and innovative information technology (IT) companies are the industry’s most influential personalities of the past 25 years, according to a poll by the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA).

All praise Mr. Gates. In another recent press release, CompTIA called Internet Explorer — as notorious as it may be — the most influential technology.

Here are some examples of individuals serving Microsoft using the hat of “independent analysts”. Michael Gartenberg was a Microsoft Evangelist (briefly), but that didn’t prevent him from commenting positively about Microsoft products and slamming Microsoft’s competitors with the hat of “just another pundit”.

After only three weeks at Microsoft as an “evangelist,” Michael Gartenberg is returning to his old job as vice president and research director at JupiterResearch.

Just a few days ago came this:

Defending Windows Vista

Vista hasn’t done so well in other year-end reviews. Last week, my former JupiterResearch colleague Michael Gartenberg observed that “Vista’s been really getting slapped around lately.” Oh, is that an understatement.

Here he is once again defending Microsoft’s products. Nothing in this article mentions his relationship with Microsoft.

“It’s a nice evolutionary development to the product line,” said Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg.

Here he is getting caught for slamming GNU/Linux baselessly.

There are other individual examples just like that. Jeff Gould, for instance, is frequently caught provoking, trolling, flame-baiting, and assisting his friends at Microsoft with such FUD. Laura DiDio, Maureen O’Gara and Dan Lyons fit the bill as well. And then there’s Rob Enderle, who appears to be struggling to have his stuff accepted for publication nowadays (he is embargoed in places).

We wrote a lot in the past about the coordinated smear campaign, which this leaked set of documents from Microsoft [PDF] says more than plenty about. It’s a strategic thing. It is deliberate and it is seen as vital.

Returning to the root of this post, here is the press release in full (appended for completeness and for future reference):


Microsoft & Novell win 2007 Frost & Sullivan Industry Innovation and Advancement Award for System Interoperability

Sunday December 30 6:09 PM

Frost & Sullivan awarded Microsoft & Novell the Industry
Innovation and Advancement Award for System Interoperability at its
recently held ’2007 India ICT Awards’. The award for Industry
Innovation is presented each year to companies for broader, more
comprehensive participation in the industry and contributions to the
advancement of the market. This is the first time the award has been
presented for interoperability.

Receiving the award, Mr. Radhesh Balakrishnan, Director- Platform
Strategy, Microsoft India, said, “Interoperability is one of the top
priorities for Microsoft and this award is a testament to our effort
and investments in this area. We are focused on achieving
Interoperability by design and by working closely with the industry,
community and the standards bodies. We are excited about this
prestigious award recognizing our approach to addressing the customer
needs in partnership with Novell. This award further strengthens our
commitment and we look forward to working closely with customers in
India to help systematically address their interoperability needs.”

Enterprises are familiar with issues associated with working in a
heterogeneous IT environment. Late last year, on November 2nd, 2006,
Microsoft and Novell signed a landmark agreement focused on bridging
the worlds of proprietary and open source technology with a focus on
to improving interoperability for mixed IT environments.

The Novell and Microsoft alliance is based on a foundation to
expand innovation and collaboration through a mutual respect for
intellectual property. As a result, both organizations have
collaborated to help improve Windows and Linux interoperability in
four areas: virtualization, systems management, directory integration
and identity, and office document formats. This technology will help
customers reduce costs in their data centers, gain new levels of
flexibility, and streamline operations, all with complete IP peace of
mind.

According to Dr. T.R Madan Mohan, Director (Consulting), ICT
Practice, Frost & Sullivan, South Asia & Middle East, “Enterprises
today have geographically dispersed complex, heterogeneous hardware
and software systems. The ability of systems to cooperate, communicate
and use the information transferred amongst them, is interoperability,
hence it becomes important to exploit the IT systems deployment. From
a software perspective, interoperability of the systems is to exchange
data based on common set of procedures, protocols, and formats.
Microsoft and Novell, by signing to support interoperability between
world’s largest OS and popular Open Source Novell Suse Linux have
committed to reduce the cost of operating hybrid systems.”

To choose a recipient of this award, the analyst team tracks
emerging and existing markets and evaluates the contributions of
industry participants. This is accomplished through interviews with
all the market participants, and extensive secondary research.
Industry contributions that are considered, are elements such as the
creation of new industry standards and the adoption of a product or
process by leading manufacturers. Finally, competitors are compared
and ranked for relative position. Frost & Sullivan then narrows down
and presents the award to the company that has most altered the
industry due to its creativeness and innovation.

In addition to the above methodology, there are specific criteria
used to determine final competitor rankings in this industry. These
criteria include, Technology innovation contrasted against
competitors, New product/process introduction, Adoption of the
technology/process by the leading market participants, Advancement of
the industry through research, Ability to conceptualize industry
activities while successfully addressing customer needs

About Frost and Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Consulting Company, partners with
clients to accelerate their growth. The company’s Growth Partnership
Services, Growth Consulting and Career Best Practices empower clients
to create a growth focused culture that generates, evaluates and
implements effective growth strategies. Frost & Sullivan employs over
45 years of experience in partnering with Global 1000 companies,
emerging businesses and the investment community from more than 30
offices on six continents. For more information about Frost &

Sullivan’s Growth Partnerships, visit http://www.frost.com.

About Microsoft

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (NASDAQ “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader
in software for personal and business computing. The company offers a
wide range of products and services designed to empower people through
great software-any time, any place and on any device. Microsoft
Corporation India Private Ltd is a subsidiary of the Microsoft
Corporation, USA. It has had a presence in India since 1990 and
currently has offices in Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata,
Mumbai, New Delhi, and Pune.

About Novell

Novell, Inc. (Nasdaq: NOVL) delivers Software for the Open
Enterprise(TM). With more than 50,000 customers in 43 countries,
Novell helps customers manage, simplify, secure and integrate their
technology environments by leveraging best-of-breed, open
standards-based software. With more than 20 years of experience, 4,700
employees, 5,000 partners and support centers around the world, Novell
helps customers gain control over their IT operating environments
while reducing costs. More information about Novell can be found at
http://www.novell.com.

Contact:

Frost & Sullivan
Caroline Lewis, +91 22 4001 3438
Corporate Communications, South Asia
Fax: +91 22 2832 4713
caroline.lewis@frost.com

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. ml2mst said,

    December 30, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Gravatar

    [quote]Anyway, F&S has just decided to kindly (and very arbitrarily) inform us that the Novell-Microsoft deal wins an award for “innovation” — a term that Microsoft favours for all the wrong reasons.[/quote]

    Well I’ve just [b]MS Innovated®[/b] and pasted the previous text block :-)

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 30, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Be very afraid. They have patents.

    …And we actually gave an example of copy & paste patents about 2 days ago.

What Else is New


  1. Some US Patents' Quality is So Low That There's a Garden Clearance/Fire Sale

    Rather than shoot worthless patents into orbit where they belong the Allied Security Trust (AST), collector of dubious patents, will try to sell them to gullible opportunists and patent trolls (even if the said patents would likely perish in courts)



  2. When Amplifying the Message of 'Global Innovation Index 2018' IP Watch Sounds Like WIPO and IP Watchdog (Watchtroll)

    In addition to senatorial efforts and misleading debates about patents, we now contend with something called “Global Innovation Index 2018," whose purpose appears to be similar to the debunked Chamber of Commerce's rankings (quantifying everything in terms of patents)



  3. Erosion of Patent Justice in Europe With Kangaroo Courts and Low-Quality European Patents

    The problematic combination of plaintiff-friendly courts (favouring the accuser, just like in Eastern Texas) and low-quality patents that should never have been granted



  4. Mafia Tactics in Team UPC and Battistelli's Circle

    Mafia-like behaviour at the EPO and the team responsible for the Unified Patent Court (UPC); appointments of loyal friends and family members have become common (nepotism and exchange of favours), as have threats made towards critics, authorities, and the press



  5. Australia Says No to Software Patents

    Rokt is now fighting the Australian patent office over its decision to reject software patents; Shelston IP, an Australian patent law firm (originally from Melbourne), already meddles a great deal in such policies/decisions, hoping to overturn them



  6. Links 19/7/2018: Krita 4.1.1, Qt Creator 4.7.0, and Microsoft-Led Lobby Against Android in EU

    Links for the day



  7. IAM is Pushing SEPs/FRAND Agenda for Patent Trolls and Monopolists That Fund IAM

    The front group of patent trolls, IAM, sets up an echo chamber-type event, preceded by all the usual pro-FRAND propaganda



  8. “Trade Secrets” Litigation Rising in the Wake of TC Heartland, Alice, Oil States and Other Patent-Minimising Decisions

    Litigation strategies are evolving in the wake of top-level decisions that rule out software patents, restrict venue shifting, and facilitate invalidation of patents even outside the courtroom



  9. The EPO -- Like the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and Unitary Patent System -- is an Untenable Mess

    The António Campinos-led EPO, nearly three weeks under his leadership, still fails to commit to justice (court rulings not obeyed), undo union-busting efforts and assure independence of judges; this, among other factors, is why the Office/Organisation and the UPC it wants to manage appear more or less doomed



  10. Links 18/7/2018: System76's Manufacturing Facility, Microsoft-Led Lobby for Antitrust Against Android

    Links for the day



  11. What Patent Lawyers Aren't Saying: Most Patent Litigation Has Become Too Risky to be Worth It

    The lawyers' key to the castle is lost or misplaced; they can't quite find/obtain leverage in courts, but they don't want their clients to know that



  12. Software Patents Royalty (Tax) Campaign by IBM, a Serial Patent Bully, and the EPO's Participation in All This

    The agenda of US-based patent maximalists, including patent trolls and notorious bullies from the United States, is still being served by the 'European' Patent Office, which has already outsourced some of its work (e.g. translations, PR, surveillance) to the US



  13. The European Council Needs to Check Battistelli's Back Room Deals/Back Door/Backchannel With Respect to Christian Archambeau

    Worries persist that Archambeau is about to become an unworthy beneficiary (nepotism) after a Battistelli setup that put Campinos in power, supported by the Belgian delegation which is connected to Archambeau, a national/citizen of Belgium



  14. PTAB and § 101 (Section 101) Have Locked the Patent Parasites Out of the Patent System

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) have contributed a great deal to patent quality and have reduced the number of frivolous patent lawsuits; this means that firms which profit from patent applications and litigation hate it with a passion and still lobby to weaken if not scuttle PTAB



  15. Patents on Computer Software and Plants in the United States Indicative of Systemic Error

    The never-ending expansion of patent scope has meant that patent law firms generally got their way at the patent office; can the courts react fast enough (before confidence in patents and/or public support for patents is altogether shattered)?



  16. Yesterday's Misleading News From Team UPC and Its Aspiring Management of the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court (UPC) enthusiasts — i.e. those looking to financially gain from it — continue to wrestle with logic, manipulate words and misrepresent the law; yesterday we saw many law firms trying to make it sound as though the UPC is coming to the UK even though this isn’t possible and UPC as a whole is likely already dead



  17. Time for the European Commission to Investigate EPO Corruption Because It May be Partly or Indirectly Connected to EU-IPO, an EU Agency

    The passage of the top role at the EU-IPO from António Campinos to Christian Archambeau would damage confidence in the moral integrity of the European Council; back room deals are alleged to have occurred, implicating corrupt Battistelli



  18. Links 17/7/2018: Catfish 1.4.6 Released, ReactOS 0.4.9, Red Hat's GPL Compliance Group Grows

    Links for the day



  19. Links 16/7/2018: Linux 4.18 RC5, Latte Dock v0.8, Windows Back Doors Resurface

    Links for the day



  20. Alliance for US Startups and Inventors for Jobs (USIJ) Misleads the US Government, Pretending to Speak for Startups While Spreading Lies for the Patent Microcosm

    In the United States, which nowadays strives to raise the patent bar, the House Small Business Committee heard from technology firms but it also heard from some questionable front groups which claim to support "startups" and "jobs" (but in reality support just patents on the face of it)



  21. 'Blockchain', 'Cloud' and Whatever Else Gets Exploited to Work Around 35 U.S.C. § 101 (or the EPC) and Patent Algorithms/Software

    Looking for a quick buck or some low-quality patents (which courts would almost certainly reject), opportunists carry on with their gold rush, aided by buzzwords and hype over pretty meaningless things



  22. PTAB Defended by the EFF, the R Street Institute and CCIA as the Number of Petitions (IPRs) Continues to Grow

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) come to the rescue when patently-bogus patents are used, covering totally abstract concepts (like software patents do); IPRs continue to increase in number and opponents of PTAB, who conveniently cherry-pick Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions, can't quite stop that



  23. IAM/Joff Wild May Have Become a de Facto Media Partner of the Patent Troll iPEL

    Invitation to trolls in China, courtesy of the patent trolls' lobby called "IAM"; this shows no signs of stopping and has become rather blatant



  24. Cautionary Tale: ILO Administrative Tribunal Cases (Appeals) 'Intercepted' Under António Campinos

    The ILO Administrative Tribunal (ILO-AT) is advertised by the EPO's management as access to justice, but it's still being undermined quite severely to the detriment of aggrieved staff



  25. Asking the USPTO to Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 101 is Like Asking Pentagon Officials to Pursue Real, Persistent Peace

    Some profit from selling weapons, whereas others profit from patent grants and litigation; what's really needed right now is patent sanity and adherence to the public interest as well as the law itself, e.g. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decisions



  26. BT and Sonos Are Still Patent Bullies, Seeing Patents as a Backup Plan

    The companies seeking to complement their business (or make up for their demise) using patents are still suing rivals while calling that litigation "research and development" (the same old euphemism)



  27. Jim Skippen, a Longtime Patent Troll, Admits That the Trolling Sector is Collapsing

    Canada's biggest patent troll (WiLAN) bar BlackBerry doesn't seem to be doing too well as its CEO leaves the domain altogether



  28. From East Asia to the Eastern District of Texas: XYZ Printing, Maxell, and X2Y Attenuators

    The patent aggression, which relies on improper litigation venues, harms innocent parties a great deal; only their lawyers benefit from all this mess



  29. Links 14/7/2018: Mesa 18.1.4, Elisa 0.2.1, More on Python's Guido van Rossum

    Links for the day



  30. Number of Oppositions to Grants/Awards of European Patents at the EPO Has Skyrocketed, Based on Internal Data

    The number of challenged patents continues to soar and staff of the EPO (examiners already over-encumbered by far too much work, due to unrealistic targets) would struggle to cope or simply be compelled to not properly deal with oppositions


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts