EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.30.07

Microsoft Puppet (Frost & Sullivan) Praises ‘Intellectual Property’, Novell’s Patent Deal

Posted in Deception, FUD, Intellectual Monopoly, Interoperability, Microsoft, Novell, Patents at 11:27 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pay-to-say analyst speaks out

F&S is considered somewhat of a Microsoft shill, for it is publishing studies that are commissioned by Microsoft without proper disclosure. The research is self-serving rather than informative. They frequently do studies that are funded by Microsoft and it’s safe to assume that they are not more reliable than IDC and Gartner, which Microsoft holds by the pockets.

Anyway, F&S has just decided to kindly (and very arbitrarily) inform us that the Novell-Microsoft deal wins an award for “innovation” — a term that Microsoft favours for all the wrong reasons.

The Novell and Microsoft alliance is based on a foundation to expand innovation and collaboration through a mutual respect for intellectual property.

This press release (quoted at the bottom in full) smells rather bad. It can be said almost for certain that someone pulled a cheque or made these notorious phonecalls to have it dispatched. Mind the use of the weasel word (or term) 'Intellectual Property'. It’s there for a reason. F&S seems to have been very busy with Microsoft lately. Only 3 ago it also unleashed a press release that praises Microsoft. What does that firm do anyway? The 3-day-old press release says it best:

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Consulting Company, partners with clients to accelerate their growth.

”They will attack the European Commission, the FSF, the GNU GPL, and anything else that puts Microsoft’s business goals or ambition in jeopardy.“It’s safe to assume that F&S’s “client and partner” is Microsoft in this case, and it is trying to help Microsoft “accelerate their growth”. It pretty much sums up the role of such analysts. Remember CompTIA, a Microsoft lobbying arm? We mentioned it before and always in a negative context because it merely serves the Microsoft business agenda [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. That is what such parties are being paid for. When Microsoft needs a third-party proxy that serves as a seemingly-independent mouthpiece, a group of analysts and lobbying arms such as ACT will be available. They will attack the European Commission, the FSF, the GNU GPL, and anything else that puts Microsoft’s business goals or ambition in jeopardy.

Recent telling examples from CompTIA include:

1. Industry body to push OOXML in Philippines

Microsoft and industry body Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) have teamed up to drive the adoption of Office Open XML in the Philippines.

2. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs Top CompTIA Poll on Most Influential IT Industry Personalities of the Past 25 Years

The co-founders of two of the world’s most successful, recognizable and innovative information technology (IT) companies are the industry’s most influential personalities of the past 25 years, according to a poll by the Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA).

All praise Mr. Gates. In another recent press release, CompTIA called Internet Explorer — as notorious as it may be — the most influential technology.

Here are some examples of individuals serving Microsoft using the hat of “independent analysts”. Michael Gartenberg was a Microsoft Evangelist (briefly), but that didn’t prevent him from commenting positively about Microsoft products and slamming Microsoft’s competitors with the hat of “just another pundit”.

After only three weeks at Microsoft as an “evangelist,” Michael Gartenberg is returning to his old job as vice president and research director at JupiterResearch.

Just a few days ago came this:

Defending Windows Vista

Vista hasn’t done so well in other year-end reviews. Last week, my former JupiterResearch colleague Michael Gartenberg observed that “Vista’s been really getting slapped around lately.” Oh, is that an understatement.

Here he is once again defending Microsoft’s products. Nothing in this article mentions his relationship with Microsoft.

“It’s a nice evolutionary development to the product line,” said Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg.

Here he is getting caught for slamming GNU/Linux baselessly.

There are other individual examples just like that. Jeff Gould, for instance, is frequently caught provoking, trolling, flame-baiting, and assisting his friends at Microsoft with such FUD. Laura DiDio, Maureen O’Gara and Dan Lyons fit the bill as well. And then there’s Rob Enderle, who appears to be struggling to have his stuff accepted for publication nowadays (he is embargoed in places).

We wrote a lot in the past about the coordinated smear campaign, which this leaked set of documents from Microsoft [PDF] says more than plenty about. It’s a strategic thing. It is deliberate and it is seen as vital.

Returning to the root of this post, here is the press release in full (appended for completeness and for future reference):


Microsoft & Novell win 2007 Frost & Sullivan Industry Innovation and Advancement Award for System Interoperability

Sunday December 30 6:09 PM

Frost & Sullivan awarded Microsoft & Novell the Industry
Innovation and Advancement Award for System Interoperability at its
recently held ’2007 India ICT Awards’. The award for Industry
Innovation is presented each year to companies for broader, more
comprehensive participation in the industry and contributions to the
advancement of the market. This is the first time the award has been
presented for interoperability.

Receiving the award, Mr. Radhesh Balakrishnan, Director- Platform
Strategy, Microsoft India, said, “Interoperability is one of the top
priorities for Microsoft and this award is a testament to our effort
and investments in this area. We are focused on achieving
Interoperability by design and by working closely with the industry,
community and the standards bodies. We are excited about this
prestigious award recognizing our approach to addressing the customer
needs in partnership with Novell. This award further strengthens our
commitment and we look forward to working closely with customers in
India to help systematically address their interoperability needs.”

Enterprises are familiar with issues associated with working in a
heterogeneous IT environment. Late last year, on November 2nd, 2006,
Microsoft and Novell signed a landmark agreement focused on bridging
the worlds of proprietary and open source technology with a focus on
to improving interoperability for mixed IT environments.

The Novell and Microsoft alliance is based on a foundation to
expand innovation and collaboration through a mutual respect for
intellectual property. As a result, both organizations have
collaborated to help improve Windows and Linux interoperability in
four areas: virtualization, systems management, directory integration
and identity, and office document formats. This technology will help
customers reduce costs in their data centers, gain new levels of
flexibility, and streamline operations, all with complete IP peace of
mind.

According to Dr. T.R Madan Mohan, Director (Consulting), ICT
Practice, Frost & Sullivan, South Asia & Middle East, “Enterprises
today have geographically dispersed complex, heterogeneous hardware
and software systems. The ability of systems to cooperate, communicate
and use the information transferred amongst them, is interoperability,
hence it becomes important to exploit the IT systems deployment. From
a software perspective, interoperability of the systems is to exchange
data based on common set of procedures, protocols, and formats.
Microsoft and Novell, by signing to support interoperability between
world’s largest OS and popular Open Source Novell Suse Linux have
committed to reduce the cost of operating hybrid systems.”

To choose a recipient of this award, the analyst team tracks
emerging and existing markets and evaluates the contributions of
industry participants. This is accomplished through interviews with
all the market participants, and extensive secondary research.
Industry contributions that are considered, are elements such as the
creation of new industry standards and the adoption of a product or
process by leading manufacturers. Finally, competitors are compared
and ranked for relative position. Frost & Sullivan then narrows down
and presents the award to the company that has most altered the
industry due to its creativeness and innovation.

In addition to the above methodology, there are specific criteria
used to determine final competitor rankings in this industry. These
criteria include, Technology innovation contrasted against
competitors, New product/process introduction, Adoption of the
technology/process by the leading market participants, Advancement of
the industry through research, Ability to conceptualize industry
activities while successfully addressing customer needs

About Frost and Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Consulting Company, partners with
clients to accelerate their growth. The company’s Growth Partnership
Services, Growth Consulting and Career Best Practices empower clients
to create a growth focused culture that generates, evaluates and
implements effective growth strategies. Frost & Sullivan employs over
45 years of experience in partnering with Global 1000 companies,
emerging businesses and the investment community from more than 30
offices on six continents. For more information about Frost &

Sullivan’s Growth Partnerships, visit http://www.frost.com.

About Microsoft

Founded in 1975, Microsoft (NASDAQ “MSFT”) is the worldwide leader
in software for personal and business computing. The company offers a
wide range of products and services designed to empower people through
great software-any time, any place and on any device. Microsoft
Corporation India Private Ltd is a subsidiary of the Microsoft
Corporation, USA. It has had a presence in India since 1990 and
currently has offices in Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata,
Mumbai, New Delhi, and Pune.

About Novell

Novell, Inc. (Nasdaq: NOVL) delivers Software for the Open
Enterprise(TM). With more than 50,000 customers in 43 countries,
Novell helps customers manage, simplify, secure and integrate their
technology environments by leveraging best-of-breed, open
standards-based software. With more than 20 years of experience, 4,700
employees, 5,000 partners and support centers around the world, Novell
helps customers gain control over their IT operating environments
while reducing costs. More information about Novell can be found at
http://www.novell.com.

Contact:

Frost & Sullivan
Caroline Lewis, +91 22 4001 3438
Corporate Communications, South Asia
Fax: +91 22 2832 4713
caroline.lewis@frost.com

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

2 Comments

  1. ml2mst said,

    December 30, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Gravatar

    [quote]Anyway, F&S has just decided to kindly (and very arbitrarily) inform us that the Novell-Microsoft deal wins an award for “innovation” — a term that Microsoft favours for all the wrong reasons.[/quote]

    Well I’ve just [b]MS Innovated®[/b] and pasted the previous text block :-)

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 30, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    Gravatar

    Be very afraid. They have patents.

    …And we actually gave an example of copy & paste patents about 2 days ago.

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/11/2017: LibreELEC (Krypton) v8.2.1 MR, Mesa 17.3.0 RC5

    Links for the day



  2. PTAB Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) Are Essential in an Age When One Can Get Sued for Merely Mocking a Patent

    The battle over the right to criticise particular patents has gotten very real and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) fought it until the end; this is why we need granted patents to be criticised upon petitions too (and often invalidated as a result)



  3. Chinese Patent Policy Continues to Mimic All the Worst Elements of the American System

    China is becoming what the United States used to be in terms of patents, whereas the American system is adopting saner patent policies that foster real innovation whilst curtailing mass litigation



  4. Links 20/11/2017: Why GNU/Linux is Better Than Windows, Another Linus Torvalds Rant

    Links for the day



  5. “US Inventor” is a “Bucket of Deplorables” Not Worthy of Media Coverage

    Jan Wolfe of Reuters treats a fringe group called “US Inventor” as though it's a conservative voice rather than a bunch of patent extremists pretending to be inventors



  6. Team Battistelli's Attacks on the EPO Boards of Appeal Predate the Illegal Sanctions Against a Judge

    A walk back along memory lane reveals that Battistelli has, all along, suppressed and marginalised DG3 members, in order to cement total control over the entire Organisation, not just the Office



  7. PTAB is Safe, the Patent Extremists Just Try to Scandalise It Out of Sheer Desperation

    The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which gave powers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through inter partes reviews (IPRs), has no imminent threats, not potent ones anyway



  8. Update on the EPO's Crackdown on the Boards of Appeal

    Demand of 35% increases from the boards serves to show that Battistelli now does to the 'independent' judges what he already did to examiners at the Office



  9. The Lobbyists Are Trying to Subvert US Law in Favour of Patent Predators

    Mingorance, Kappos, Underweiser and other lobbyists for the software patents agenda (paid by firms like Microsoft and IBM) keep trying to undo progress, notably the bans on software patents



  10. Patent Trolls Based in East Texas Are Affected Very Critically by TC Heartland

    The latest situation in Texas (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in particular), which according to new analyses is the target of legal scrutiny for the 'loopholes' it provided to patent trolls in search of easy legal battles



  11. Alice Remains a Strong Precedential Decision and the Media Has Turned Against Software Patents

    The momentum against the scourge of software patents and the desperation among patent 'professionals' (people who don't create/develop/invent) is growing



  12. Harm Still Caused by Granted Software Patents

    A roundup of recent (past week's) announcements, including legal actions, contingent upon software patents in an age when software patents bear no real legitimacy



  13. Links 18/11/2017: Raspberry Digital Signage 10, New Nano

    Links for the day



  14. 23,000 Posts

    23,000 blog posts milestone reached in 11 years



  15. BlackBerry Cannot Sell Phones and Apple Looks Like the Next BlackBerry (a Pile of Patents)

    The lifecycle of mobile giants seems to typically end in patent shakedown, as Apple loses its business to Android just like Nokia and BlackBerry lost it to Apple



  16. EFF and CCIA Use Docket Navigator and Lex Machina to Identify 'Stupid Patents' (Usually Software Patents That Are Not Valid)

    In spite of threats and lawsuits from bogus 'inventors' whom they criticise, EFF staff continues the battle against patents that should never have been granted at all



  17. The Australian Productivity Commission Shows the Correct Approach to Setting Patent Laws and Scope

    Australia views patents on software as undesirable and acts accordingly, making nobody angry except a bunch of law firms that profited from litigation and patent maximalism



  18. EPO 'Business' From the United States Has Nosedived and UPC is on Its Death Throes

    Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot further accelerate the ultimate demise of the EPO (getting rid of experienced and thus 'expensive' staff), for which there is no replacement because there is a monopoly (which means Europe will suffer severely)



  19. Links 17/11/2017: KDE Applications 17.12, Akademy 2018 Plans

    Links for the day



  20. Today's EPO and Team UPC Do Not Work for Europe But Actively Work Against Europe

    The tough reality that some Europeans actively work to undermine science and technology in Europe because they personally profit from it and how this relates to the Unitary Patent (UPC), which is still aggressively lobbied for, sometimes by bribing/manipulating the media, academia, and public servants



  21. Links 16/11/2017: WordPress 4.9 and GhostBSD 11.1 Released

    Links for the day



  22. The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) is Rightly Upset If Not Shocked at What Battistelli and Bergot Are Doing to the Office

    The EPO's dictatorial management is destroying everything that's left (of value) at the Office while corrupting academia and censoring discussion by threatening those who publish comments (gagging its own staff even when that staff posts anonymously)



  23. EPO Continues to Disobey the Law on Software Patents in Europe

    Using the same old euphemisms, e.g. "computer-implemented inventions" (or "CII"), the EPO continues to grant patents which are clearly and strictly out of scope



  24. Links 16/11/2017: Tails 3.3, Deepin 15.5 Beta

    Links for the day



  25. Benoît Battistelli and Elodie Bergot Have Just Ensured That EPO Will Get Even More Corrupt

    Revolving door-type tactics will become more widespread at the EPO now that the management (Battistelli and his cronies) hires for low cost rather than skills/quality and minimises staff retention; this is yet another reason to dread anything like the UPC, which prioritises litigation over examination



  26. Australia is Banning Software Patents and Shelston IP is Complaining as Usual

    The Australian Productivity Commission, which defies copyright and patent bullies, is finally having policies put in place that better serve the interests of Australians, but the legal 'industry' is unhappy (as expected)



  27. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Defended by Technology Giants, by Small Companies, by US Congress and by Judges, So Why Does USPTO Make It Less Accessible?

    In spite of the popularity of PTAB and the growing need/demand for it, the US patent system is apparently determined to help it discriminate against poor petitioners (who probably need PTAB the most)



  28. Declines in Patent Quality at the EPO and 'Independent' Judges Can No Longer Say a Thing

    The EPO's troubling race to the bottom (of patent quality) concerns the staff examiners and the judges, but they cannot speak about it without facing rather severe consequences



  29. The EPO is Now Corrupting Academia, Wasting Stakeholders' Money Lying to Stakeholders About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Unified Patent Court/Unitary Patent (UPC) is a dying project and the EPO, seeing that it is going nowhere fast, has resorted to new tactics and these tactics cost a lot of money (at the expense of those who are being lied to)



  30. Links 15/11/2017: Fedora 27 Released, Linux Mint Has New Betas

    Links for the day


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts