EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.23.08

“Independent” Studies… It’s Baaack

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Java, Microsoft, Mono at 8:01 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Independent, yet sponsored”

Time after time we’ve warned that Microsoft’s involvement in ‘open source’ would prove detrimental to Free software [1, 2]. One company of a ex-Microsoft employee spreads FUD while another company that houses former Softies uses and advocates Mono. Here is another one, Ohloh, which was founded by Microsoft people and tends to attract like-minded folks. In the following post, which is probably shared lacking background of the parties involved, an impression is given that everything but C# is declining.

I came across my name in a site called Ohloh. I remember it coming out a few years ago. Now it has had time to really get going, I thought it was about time that I review the site here.

Watch the Web page. These are some very bad charts to show. They are population-biased.

So, former Microsoft employees entered the FOSS world and they now publish ‘studies’ (or at least charts) about C# beating everything. For insight incorporating more comprehensive studies, one must consider recent results like:

There’s some similar stuff in the news, which reader ‘twitter’ brought to our attention.

We previously explained why it’s hard to trust academic work covering Free software. It is sometimes funded by Microsoft (e.g. anti-GPLv3 ‘studies’), which also uses academic kickbacks. There are other equally-appalling things that Microsoft does on campus, so the following — although evidence is missing — raised a brow.

Stanford and Harvard teach businesses how to squash open source

[...]

It’s nice to see that $48,921 in Stanford MBA tuition going to a such a worthy cause.

More intriguingly, despite open source’s still-small market share relative to the Microsofts and Oracles of the world, it’s surely meaningful that professors from the world’s elite business institutions are turning their attention to figuring out how to beat open source. If it weren’t a threat, there would be no market for research like this.

Who is funding this thing? It’s probably innocent, but anything that harms Free(dom) software and serves an exploiter is conspicuous, particularly due to precedence. Remember money and tables.

“Microsoft did sponsor the benchmark testing and the NT server was better tuned than the Linux one. Having said that, I must say that I still trust the Windows NT server would have outperformed the Linux one.”

Windows platform manager, Microsoft South-Africa
Reference: Outrage at Microsoft’s independent, yet sponsored NT 4.0/Linux research

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

48 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    September 23, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Gravatar

    I thought MS licenses still banned benchmarking. Anyone with recent copies of the M$ licenses?

    The originals (Java, perl, python, and everything else) still dust M$ imitations.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, it’s still forbidden [+], but the validity of this rule may not stand in some countries.

    __
    [+] Vista licensing also limits benchmarking
    http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2218/061101vistalicense/index.html

  3. Baby In The Bath Water said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    Gravatar

    The originals (Java, perl, python, and everything else) still dust M$ imitations.

    I’m guessing that you are comparing Java to .NET, but if that’s the case I think that “dust Microsoft’s implementation” is a bit naive.

    Microsoft’s Java implementation dusted Sun’s Java implementation.

    As far as .NET, I haven’t seen any comparisons there, but considering you can’t even say that Java “dusts” Mono using the Debian Language Shootout tests (which are more likely to favor Java than Mono), even there it’s not quite so clear-cut.

    Java is typically faster, but not by much and Mono typically uses a lot less memory than Java.

    http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=javaclient&lang2=csharp

    With the Linear IL work that Novell is putting into Mono, Mono 2.2 should be quite a bit faster than Mono 2.0 (which is already noticeably faster than 1.2)

    http://www.mono-project.com/Linear_IL

    Considering that it is very likely that Microsoft’s .NET implementation is faster still than Mono’s, I would not be surprised if it outperformed Java 6 in both memory usage and performance.

    Note: this comment was posted from Novell’s headquarters.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Gravatar

    ‘Baby’,

    Who are you with? Your comments in this site fit a pattern.

  5. AlexH said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Gravatar

    That pattern being unwilling to unquestioningly consume? :D

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    Gravatar

    The pattern of coming here to just shoot the messenger.

  7. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy: stop trying to shoot the messenger ;-)

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Gravatar

    You’re having fun trolling this site, aren’t you? :-)

  9. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Ironic that you consider uncovering the truth to be “trolling”.

    Says a lot about you, doesn’t it?

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Gravatar

    No, I talk about heckling. Your ‘truth’ is subjective and biased.

  11. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    Gravatar

    No, my fact is provable. Yours is subjective and biased.

    Don’t confuse my arguments with yours.

  12. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    Gravatar

    s/fact/truth/

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    Gravatar

    And yet, your refuse to disclose information. I asked you for disclosures before. All I know is that you want to hire a Mono fan from Novell.

  14. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Gravatar

    If what I state is factually correct, what difference does it make who my employer is? Fact is, it doesn’t matter.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Gravatar

    Sites that I find factually unsuited for my perspective I hardly spend time leaving comments in. I just stay in my side of the fence. What compels you?

  16. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    Gravatar

    So what you are saying is that you avoid any discussions where your viewpoint is challenged?

  17. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I don’t see where ‘Baby’ has attempted to shoot the messenger in this thread (haven’t searched any others). Instead, ‘Baby’ has provided an alternate viewpoint from the first poster and has provided supporting evidence (something the original poster did not).

  18. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 2:41 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: Your claims about Ohloh are trivially checkable; I went to their site and used the Language tools and your claim about it showing C# in number one position is just clearly incorrect.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 3:42 am

    Gravatar

    Dan O’Brian,

    My point was that I do not endlessly argued with people whose site says stuff I disagree with.

  20. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:02 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: probably because you never have any evidence to disprove them ;-)

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:07 am

    Gravatar

    No, because I have my own sites to disprove them. I don’t need to s* in their own back yard.

  22. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:14 am

    Gravatar

    I’m guessing that Roy didn’t actually look at the charts that were posted on that site. C# is at about 1.5% usage. Java has also been increasing in usage and is up around ~6%. C usage has been coming down from around 10% to 7% and is starting to go back up again. C++ has been more steady, but is also starting to increase again. Ruby and Python are both steadily rising. Perl and Tcl are both on the decline (Tcl isn’t as surprising to me).

    Where Roy gets his ideas about how “everything is declining but C#” is beyond me. I can only assume he didn’t read the article and that instead he wanted to badmouth Microsoft/C# and thought he could fool his readers into not clicking the links to actually read for themselves.

  23. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:18 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan:

    I think he looked at the graphs; I don’t think he realised that the scales were not the same and therefore can’t be compared directly…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:22 am

    Gravatar

    Graphs can be scaled and statistics cooked to give a particular impression. That’s just the point.

    Microsoft did a lot of this to give a false impression of Silverlight adopted (and got smacked for it).

  25. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:28 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: Except, that’s not what has happened here.

    Someone created a graph on Ohloh to compare C# to Objective C. Not surprisingly, C# looks stronger on that one graph. But that article also says C# is “not heavily used in free/open source software” (true) and doesn’t seek to compare them to other languages.

    The article doesn’t state that C# is the only language growing, and no-one who can read a graph is going to think that either.

    But because Ohloh has some ex-Microsoft people on board, you’ve quickly misinterpreted the article and shot the messenger, again.

  26. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:45 am

    Gravatar

    Roy’s hypocrisy is one of the things that keeps me coming back for more laughs ;-)

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:47 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH: should we start learning about F/OSS also from CodePlex stats?

  28. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:51 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    CodePlex is a project hosting system, and stats on CodePlex are only useful for judging projects on CodePlex.

    Ohloh do not host projects; indeed, all the projects I work on are tracked by Ohloh. So, there is an obvious difference there that I’m surprised you missed.

    Can you give an example of the bias you think they have?

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:59 am

    Gravatar

    I don’t have time to check this now, but here comes something:

    http://www.ohloh.net/licenses/Microsoft%20Shared%20Source%20Permissive%20License

    This may not mean much, but I expect projects to earn inclusion based on the inclinations of Ohloh staff, who are former Microsoft chaps.

  30. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:12 am

    Gravatar

    So again you write something which you know is completely unsubstantiated…

    The MS-PL is a free software license, and you can find out how inclusion works just by visiting Ohloh (hint: they automatically track any project hosted on known free software hosting systems, and you can self-include any other project for free).

  31. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:17 am

    Gravatar

    The fact that Ohloh tracks software licensed under a recognised free software licence is “evidence” that they’re biased?

    Maybe you should go to Ohloh’s site and actually find out how inclusion works before speculating about, because you’re way off the mark.

  32. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I just searched all of the C# projects listed on Ohloh and not a single one of them was even licensed under the Microsoft Shared Source Permissive License, so it’s irrelevant anyway.

  33. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:37 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I just searched all of the C# projects listed on Ohloh and not a single one of them was even licensed under the Microsoft Shared Source Permissive License, so it’s irrelevant anyway.

    The mentioning of the licence of the saturation of C#?

  34. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:44 am

    Gravatar

    Since none of the projects even use the license, how is it relevant?

  35. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, they track ~200 active C# projects. and over 1000 in Java (as one example).

    On what planet is that “saturation”?

  36. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Seems about right to me.

    http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20080807/Language_540x404.jpg

  37. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:54 am

    Gravatar

    A 1×1 gif is evidence of what, exactly?

  38. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:58 am

    Gravatar

    It’s bizarre. Let me try that again.

    http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20080807/Language_540x404.jpg
    It’s almost as though the site blocks references from other sites. See the figure here:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10009669-16.html

  39. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:58 am

    Gravatar

    That he’s mentally insane? ;-)

    j/k

  40. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:59 am

    Gravatar

    Very amusing, Dan. Try referencing that figure from CNET directly and see what happens. There’s some Web server trick there (referrer probably).

  41. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: that doesn’t disprove Ohloh.

    Ohloh gathers statistics on F/LOSS software based on actual source repositories.

    From the article:

    The TIOBE Programming Community index gives an indication of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. The popular search engines Google, MSN, Yahoo!, and YouTube are used to calculate the ratings. Observe that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.

    So basically, the TIOBE stats are not based on code sampling, they are based on other criteria.

  42. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    In summary, neither source (Ohloh nor TIOBE) is necessarily representative of the actual market.

    Ohloh represents only F/LOSS projects which may or may not be a representative sampling of the entire market.

    TIOBE is based on guess-timation based on web searches, # of books on the topic, etc. This is hardly an accurate statistic.

  43. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    The graph you link to shows Java at ~22% right now, and C# at ~2.5%.

    The Ohloh stat mentioned (which is commits per month, a different metric) says Java is ~15%, C# ~2%.

    So they’re about the same. An indeed, if we look at the monthly lines of code metric on Ohloh we see Java regularly bounces over the 20% mark. So for the month of August, 2008 – when the Tiobe study was done – they’re actually in complete agreement.

    And your point is, again?

  44. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:09 am

    Gravatar

    Neither can be accurate and that’s the whole point. Mind the fact that the main criticism is directed at the second part of this post. A followup confirms that money came from foes of Free software to manufacture some ‘knowledge’.

  45. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:15 am

    Gravatar

    There’s no evidence that Ohloh manufactured anything.

  46. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    Your “main criticism” defence doesn’t stand up. We’re not looking at the second part of the article. We’re looking at claims like this one:

    So, former Microsoft employees entered the FOSS world and they now publish ’studies’ (or at least charts) about C# beating everything

    … which have been thoroughly and factually debunked. Ohloh didn’t “publish” any “study”, let alone those charts (users create them), and the charts do not show C# beating everything – they just show you didn’t read them properly. We’ve also seen that Ohloh’s numbers are in line with other studies that you trust.

  47. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:22 am

    Gravatar

    Dan O’Brian,

    Read what I wrote a moment ago. It has nothing to do with Ohloh. it’s the study Asay links to.

  48. Baby In The Bath Water said,

    September 24, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Gravatar

    I see that instead of arguing with my undisputable statements, Roy has instead elected to “shoot the messenger”.

    I guess he has concluded that if he can’t fight the facts, he’ll try his best to attack the messenger. Luckily, the Free Software community is made up of intelligent people like myself who do not fall for such garbage.

    If I back up my claims with facts, what difference does it make who I work for?

    (FWIW, I’m an undergrad student)

    Note: this comment was posted from Novell’s headquarters.

What Else is New


  1. Links 27/5/2020: CoreOS Container Linux Reaches Its End-Of-Life, 2020 GNOME Foundation Elections Coming

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 26, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 26, 2020



  3. GNEW Seedlings vs. Free Software Deforestation

    “The idea of the GNEW Project really is about keeping the goals of the GNU Project alive — hopefully, they won’t destroy or co-opt too much of the GNU Project, that people like the Hyperbola devs can’t fix it with BSD.”



  4. Joi Ito Already Admitted on the Record That Bill Gates Had Paid MIT Through Jeffrey Epstein

    An important exhibit for the accurate historical record (because MIT has been trying to deny truth itself)



  5. It's Convenient to Call All Your Critics Nuts and/or Jealous

    Bill Gates antagonists are not motivated by hatred or jealousy but a sense of injustice; spoiled brats who break the law aren’t a source of envy any more than mass murderers are subject of admiration



  6. Real History of Microsoft and How It Became 'Successful'

    New video that contains a portion about the history of Microsoft -- the part paid-for 'journalists' (paid by Microsoft and Bill Gates) rarely or never speak about



  7. Hostility and Aggression Towards Staff That Does Not Use Windows After Windows Takes Entire Hospital Down

    Microsoft Windows, with NSA back doors, continues to take hospitals offline (with records copied by criminals if not stolen by effectively locking the originals out of reach for ransom money); but guess who’s being punished for it…



  8. They Came, They Saw, We Died...

    It cannot be overstated that we're under attack (or a "Jihad" against Linux as Bill Gates himself put it) and failing to act upon it will be costly as time may be running out and our groups are being 'bought off' by Microsoft in rapid succession, as per the plan/strategy



  9. The GitHub Takeover Was an Extension of Microsoft's War on GPL/Copyleft (Because Sharing Code to Anyone But Microsoft is 'Piracy')

    Licences that make it easier for Microsoft to 'steal' (or a lot harder for Free software to compete against proprietary software) are still being promoted by Microsoft; its GitHub tentacles (see GitHub's logo) further contribute to this agenda



  10. ZDNet is Totally a Microsoft Propaganda Machine

    The site ZDNet has become worse than useless; it lies, defames and launders the reputation of famous criminals (that's the business model these days)



  11. When Microsoft's Mask Falls (or When Times Are Rough)

    Microsoft loves Linux in the same sense that cats love mice (they might play with them until they get hungry)



  12. Careers in Free Software Aren't Careers in the Traditional Sense

    With historic unemployment rates and people 'stranded' inside their homes there's still demand and need for technology; these times of adaptation present an opportunity for Software Freedom



  13. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish 2020 Edition

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (E.E.E.) is alive and well, but the corrupt (paid by Microsoft) media isn't talking about it anymore; in fact, it actively cheers and encourages people/companies to enter the trap



  14. Links 26/5/2020: SHIFT13mi GNU/Linux Tablet, Linux Kodachi 7.0 and Some Qt Releases

    Links for the day



  15. EPO Propaganda on Steroids (or on EPO)

    What EPO management is saying and what is actually happening



  16. Breton (EU) 'Joins' Team UPC to Help His Buddy Battistelli... Again

    As expected, Breton acts as little but an EPO tool, looking to prop up supremacy of patent litigation over science and innovation



  17. Removing Free/Libre Software as an Inadequate Response to Microsoft Windows (With Back Doors) Getting Compromised, Killing People

    GNU/Linux takes the blame (in a sense) for incidents that are purely the fault of Microsoft and its deficient software with deliberate back doors; it's believed that this boils down to opportunistic retaliation against those looking for a solution to the problem (or merely speaking about the problem)



  18. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 25, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, May 25, 2020



  19. Under Distributed Denial of Service Attacks Lately, But We're Too Robust For Those

    Efforts to take Techrights offline have been ramped up lately; but it's not working and it hardly even distracts us from publishing



  20. The Art of Giving: Why Free Software Will Inevitably Survive Attacks Against It

    Societies that share and look after their peers/neighbours will always be better off than predatory societies, which breed exploitation, distrust, discord and eventually systemic collapse



  21. 'Journalism' in 2020: Far More Articles About What Computer Linus Torvalds Bought Than About Linux Releases

    Yesterday's (or late Sunday's) Linux announcement (RC7) is symptomatic of a broader issue we've long spoken about; it restricts people's ability to express an opinion, which can cloud any meritorious and substantial debate about technical matters journalists cannot grasp or comment on (it takes more effort and research)



  22. Links 25/5/2020: Wrapland Redone, DebConf20 Plans, Many More Games

    Links for the day



  23. Media Covers WSL Like People Actually Use This Trash (a Failed Distro Which Only Works With Windows)

    Lots of abundantly redundant puff pieces have appeared in paid-for (by Microsoft) media this past week covering WSL/2, but that's grossly disproportional to the people who care and actually use those types of things (because money talks, not technical substance)



  24. Working From Home on Patent Monopolies Would Lower Their Quality and Perceived Legitimacy

    The patent system wherein people grant monopolies from their sofas and bedrooms isn't helping the already-eroded perception/image of patent offices that mostly grant patents to massive multinationals (and far too many patents overall)



  25. The Attitude of António Campinos Toward Courts and Toward Justice Same as Benoît Battistelli's

    6 years down the road we're still dealing with unaccountable tyrants who laugh at the law, laugh at lawmakers and disregard law enforcers (like the Trump regime across the Atlantic)



  26. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 24, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 24, 2020



  27. Asking Microsoft If It Loves Linux is Like Asking Google If It's Evil

    The media keeps bombarding us with lousy, weakly-sourced messages about Microsoft regretting its stance on “Open Source” and loving “Linux” (both are lies that are very easily debunked), so journalism has an existential problem and maybe too much dependence on ad money (a form of bribery) from “Big Tech” that does “clown computing” and “apps”



  28. Features Considered Harmful

    "But the benefits of Free software, free candy and new features are all meaningless, if the user isn't in control."



  29. Free, as in “App”

    "As everyday users, we need to be able to configure our applications, and this process must/needs to be made as easy and understandable as possible."



  30. Links 25/5/2020: Linux 5.7 RC7 and TeleIRC 2.0.0

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts