EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

09.23.08

“Independent” Studies… It’s Baaack

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, Java, Microsoft, Mono at 8:01 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Independent, yet sponsored”

Time after time we’ve warned that Microsoft’s involvement in ‘open source’ would prove detrimental to Free software [1, 2]. One company of a ex-Microsoft employee spreads FUD while another company that houses former Softies uses and advocates Mono. Here is another one, Ohloh, which was founded by Microsoft people and tends to attract like-minded folks. In the following post, which is probably shared lacking background of the parties involved, an impression is given that everything but C# is declining.

I came across my name in a site called Ohloh. I remember it coming out a few years ago. Now it has had time to really get going, I thought it was about time that I review the site here.

Watch the Web page. These are some very bad charts to show. They are population-biased.

So, former Microsoft employees entered the FOSS world and they now publish ‘studies’ (or at least charts) about C# beating everything. For insight incorporating more comprehensive studies, one must consider recent results like:

There’s some similar stuff in the news, which reader ‘twitter’ brought to our attention.

We previously explained why it’s hard to trust academic work covering Free software. It is sometimes funded by Microsoft (e.g. anti-GPLv3 ‘studies’), which also uses academic kickbacks. There are other equally-appalling things that Microsoft does on campus, so the following — although evidence is missing — raised a brow.

Stanford and Harvard teach businesses how to squash open source

[...]

It’s nice to see that $48,921 in Stanford MBA tuition going to a such a worthy cause.

More intriguingly, despite open source’s still-small market share relative to the Microsofts and Oracles of the world, it’s surely meaningful that professors from the world’s elite business institutions are turning their attention to figuring out how to beat open source. If it weren’t a threat, there would be no market for research like this.

Who is funding this thing? It’s probably innocent, but anything that harms Free(dom) software and serves an exploiter is conspicuous, particularly due to precedence. Remember money and tables.

“Microsoft did sponsor the benchmark testing and the NT server was better tuned than the Linux one. Having said that, I must say that I still trust the Windows NT server would have outperformed the Linux one.”

Windows platform manager, Microsoft South-Africa
Reference: Outrage at Microsoft’s independent, yet sponsored NT 4.0/Linux research

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

48 Comments

  1. Needs Sunlight said,

    September 23, 2008 at 12:35 pm

    Gravatar

    I thought MS licenses still banned benchmarking. Anyone with recent copies of the M$ licenses?

    The originals (Java, perl, python, and everything else) still dust M$ imitations.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    Gravatar

    Yes, it’s still forbidden [+], but the validity of this rule may not stand in some countries.

    __
    [+] Vista licensing also limits benchmarking
    http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2218/061101vistalicense/index.html

  3. Baby In The Bath Water said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    Gravatar

    The originals (Java, perl, python, and everything else) still dust M$ imitations.

    I’m guessing that you are comparing Java to .NET, but if that’s the case I think that “dust Microsoft’s implementation” is a bit naive.

    Microsoft’s Java implementation dusted Sun’s Java implementation.

    As far as .NET, I haven’t seen any comparisons there, but considering you can’t even say that Java “dusts” Mono using the Debian Language Shootout tests (which are more likely to favor Java than Mono), even there it’s not quite so clear-cut.

    Java is typically faster, but not by much and Mono typically uses a lot less memory than Java.

    http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=javaclient&lang2=csharp

    With the Linear IL work that Novell is putting into Mono, Mono 2.2 should be quite a bit faster than Mono 2.0 (which is already noticeably faster than 1.2)

    http://www.mono-project.com/Linear_IL

    Considering that it is very likely that Microsoft’s .NET implementation is faster still than Mono’s, I would not be surprised if it outperformed Java 6 in both memory usage and performance.

    Note: this comment was posted from Novell’s headquarters.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Gravatar

    ‘Baby’,

    Who are you with? Your comments in this site fit a pattern.

  5. AlexH said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:49 pm

    Gravatar

    That pattern being unwilling to unquestioningly consume? :D

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 5:52 pm

    Gravatar

    The pattern of coming here to just shoot the messenger.

  7. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy: stop trying to shoot the messenger ;-)

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    Gravatar

    You’re having fun trolling this site, aren’t you? :-)

  9. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:30 pm

    Gravatar

    Ironic that you consider uncovering the truth to be “trolling”.

    Says a lot about you, doesn’t it?

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Gravatar

    No, I talk about heckling. Your ‘truth’ is subjective and biased.

  11. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    Gravatar

    No, my fact is provable. Yours is subjective and biased.

    Don’t confuse my arguments with yours.

  12. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    Gravatar

    s/fact/truth/

  13. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    Gravatar

    And yet, your refuse to disclose information. I asked you for disclosures before. All I know is that you want to hire a Mono fan from Novell.

  14. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    Gravatar

    If what I state is factually correct, what difference does it make who my employer is? Fact is, it doesn’t matter.

  15. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 23, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    Gravatar

    Sites that I find factually unsuited for my perspective I hardly spend time leaving comments in. I just stay in my side of the fence. What compels you?

  16. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    Gravatar

    So what you are saying is that you avoid any discussions where your viewpoint is challenged?

  17. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 23, 2008 at 9:59 pm

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I don’t see where ‘Baby’ has attempted to shoot the messenger in this thread (haven’t searched any others). Instead, ‘Baby’ has provided an alternate viewpoint from the first poster and has provided supporting evidence (something the original poster did not).

  18. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 2:41 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: Your claims about Ohloh are trivially checkable; I went to their site and used the Language tools and your claim about it showing C# in number one position is just clearly incorrect.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 3:42 am

    Gravatar

    Dan O’Brian,

    My point was that I do not endlessly argued with people whose site says stuff I disagree with.

  20. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:02 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: probably because you never have any evidence to disprove them ;-)

  21. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:07 am

    Gravatar

    No, because I have my own sites to disprove them. I don’t need to s* in their own back yard.

  22. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:14 am

    Gravatar

    I’m guessing that Roy didn’t actually look at the charts that were posted on that site. C# is at about 1.5% usage. Java has also been increasing in usage and is up around ~6%. C usage has been coming down from around 10% to 7% and is starting to go back up again. C++ has been more steady, but is also starting to increase again. Ruby and Python are both steadily rising. Perl and Tcl are both on the decline (Tcl isn’t as surprising to me).

    Where Roy gets his ideas about how “everything is declining but C#” is beyond me. I can only assume he didn’t read the article and that instead he wanted to badmouth Microsoft/C# and thought he could fool his readers into not clicking the links to actually read for themselves.

  23. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:18 am

    Gravatar

    @Dan:

    I think he looked at the graphs; I don’t think he realised that the scales were not the same and therefore can’t be compared directly…

  24. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:22 am

    Gravatar

    Graphs can be scaled and statistics cooked to give a particular impression. That’s just the point.

    Microsoft did a lot of this to give a false impression of Silverlight adopted (and got smacked for it).

  25. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:28 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy: Except, that’s not what has happened here.

    Someone created a graph on Ohloh to compare C# to Objective C. Not surprisingly, C# looks stronger on that one graph. But that article also says C# is “not heavily used in free/open source software” (true) and doesn’t seek to compare them to other languages.

    The article doesn’t state that C# is the only language growing, and no-one who can read a graph is going to think that either.

    But because Ohloh has some ex-Microsoft people on board, you’ve quickly misinterpreted the article and shot the messenger, again.

  26. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:45 am

    Gravatar

    Roy’s hypocrisy is one of the things that keeps me coming back for more laughs ;-)

  27. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:47 am

    Gravatar

    AlexH: should we start learning about F/OSS also from CodePlex stats?

  28. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:51 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    CodePlex is a project hosting system, and stats on CodePlex are only useful for judging projects on CodePlex.

    Ohloh do not host projects; indeed, all the projects I work on are tracked by Ohloh. So, there is an obvious difference there that I’m surprised you missed.

    Can you give an example of the bias you think they have?

  29. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 7:59 am

    Gravatar

    I don’t have time to check this now, but here comes something:

    http://www.ohloh.net/licenses/Microsoft%20Shared%20Source%20Permissive%20License

    This may not mean much, but I expect projects to earn inclusion based on the inclinations of Ohloh staff, who are former Microsoft chaps.

  30. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:12 am

    Gravatar

    So again you write something which you know is completely unsubstantiated…

    The MS-PL is a free software license, and you can find out how inclusion works just by visiting Ohloh (hint: they automatically track any project hosted on known free software hosting systems, and you can self-include any other project for free).

  31. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:17 am

    Gravatar

    The fact that Ohloh tracks software licensed under a recognised free software licence is “evidence” that they’re biased?

    Maybe you should go to Ohloh’s site and actually find out how inclusion works before speculating about, because you’re way off the mark.

  32. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:24 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I just searched all of the C# projects listed on Ohloh and not a single one of them was even licensed under the Microsoft Shared Source Permissive License, so it’s irrelevant anyway.

  33. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:37 am

    Gravatar

    FWIW, I just searched all of the C# projects listed on Ohloh and not a single one of them was even licensed under the Microsoft Shared Source Permissive License, so it’s irrelevant anyway.

    The mentioning of the licence of the saturation of C#?

  34. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:44 am

    Gravatar

    Since none of the projects even use the license, how is it relevant?

  35. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:45 am

    Gravatar

    Roy, they track ~200 active C# projects. and over 1000 in Java (as one example).

    On what planet is that “saturation”?

  36. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Seems about right to me.

    http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20080807/Language_540x404.jpg

  37. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:54 am

    Gravatar

    A 1×1 gif is evidence of what, exactly?

  38. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:58 am

    Gravatar

    It’s bizarre. Let me try that again.

    http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20080807/Language_540x404.jpg
    It’s almost as though the site blocks references from other sites. See the figure here:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10009669-16.html

  39. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:58 am

    Gravatar

    That he’s mentally insane? ;-)

    j/k

  40. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 8:59 am

    Gravatar

    Very amusing, Dan. Try referencing that figure from CNET directly and see what happens. There’s some Web server trick there (referrer probably).

  41. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Gravatar

    Roy: that doesn’t disprove Ohloh.

    Ohloh gathers statistics on F/LOSS software based on actual source repositories.

    From the article:

    The TIOBE Programming Community index gives an indication of the popularity of programming languages. The index is updated once a month. The ratings are based on the number of skilled engineers world-wide, courses and third party vendors. The popular search engines Google, MSN, Yahoo!, and YouTube are used to calculate the ratings. Observe that the TIOBE index is not about the best programming language or the language in which most lines of code have been written.

    So basically, the TIOBE stats are not based on code sampling, they are based on other criteria.

  42. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    In summary, neither source (Ohloh nor TIOBE) is necessarily representative of the actual market.

    Ohloh represents only F/LOSS projects which may or may not be a representative sampling of the entire market.

    TIOBE is based on guess-timation based on web searches, # of books on the topic, etc. This is hardly an accurate statistic.

  43. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:05 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    The graph you link to shows Java at ~22% right now, and C# at ~2.5%.

    The Ohloh stat mentioned (which is commits per month, a different metric) says Java is ~15%, C# ~2%.

    So they’re about the same. An indeed, if we look at the monthly lines of code metric on Ohloh we see Java regularly bounces over the 20% mark. So for the month of August, 2008 – when the Tiobe study was done – they’re actually in complete agreement.

    And your point is, again?

  44. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:09 am

    Gravatar

    Neither can be accurate and that’s the whole point. Mind the fact that the main criticism is directed at the second part of this post. A followup confirms that money came from foes of Free software to manufacture some ‘knowledge’.

  45. Dan O'Brian said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:15 am

    Gravatar

    There’s no evidence that Ohloh manufactured anything.

  46. AlexH said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    @Roy:

    Your “main criticism” defence doesn’t stand up. We’re not looking at the second part of the article. We’re looking at claims like this one:

    So, former Microsoft employees entered the FOSS world and they now publish ’studies’ (or at least charts) about C# beating everything

    … which have been thoroughly and factually debunked. Ohloh didn’t “publish” any “study”, let alone those charts (users create them), and the charts do not show C# beating everything – they just show you didn’t read them properly. We’ve also seen that Ohloh’s numbers are in line with other studies that you trust.

  47. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 24, 2008 at 9:22 am

    Gravatar

    Dan O’Brian,

    Read what I wrote a moment ago. It has nothing to do with Ohloh. it’s the study Asay links to.

  48. Baby In The Bath Water said,

    September 24, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Gravatar

    I see that instead of arguing with my undisputable statements, Roy has instead elected to “shoot the messenger”.

    I guess he has concluded that if he can’t fight the facts, he’ll try his best to attack the messenger. Luckily, the Free Software community is made up of intelligent people like myself who do not fall for such garbage.

    If I back up my claims with facts, what difference does it make who I work for?

    (FWIW, I’m an undergrad student)

    Note: this comment was posted from Novell’s headquarters.

What Else is New


  1. Reactions to Last Week's Thierry Breton Hearing

    Nobody is particularly impressed by Thierry Breton except those who know little about him (and he contributes to this lack of knowledge by obstructing, omitting, and misleading)



  2. The Open Invention Network Has Become a Guard Dog of (Some) Patent Trolls and It Misrepresents Us Under the Guise of 'Open Source'

    The Open Invention Network (OIN), in collaboration with Fraunhöfer, is promoting software patents and all sorts of other nonsense as part of ‘open’ standards in a new paper sponsored by the EU and edited by the former EPO Chief Economist Nikolaus Thumm (not Battistelli's choice); this is another reminder of the fact that OIN misrepresents Free/Open Source software (FOSS) developers and their interests



  3. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, November 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, November 16, 2019



  4. Unitary Patent is Dead Partly Because the EPO Demonstrated That EPC is Being Routinely Violated, Illegal Patents Granted

    Some elements of Team UPC have given up, whereas others try to push the lie that Unitary Patent/Unified Patent Court (UPC) is not an EU thing and that therefore everything is fine



  5. USPTO Rewards Microsoft for Corruption at ISO by Teaching People Proprietary OOXML and Promoting Its Use

    The world's most important patent office promotes Microsoft lock-in, revealing not only corporate bias but also highlighting ways in which Microsoft crimes continue to pay off



  6. No, Startpage is Not Dutch Anymore

    Startpage is still clinging onto perceptions rather than truths; it means that Startpage isn't just betraying privacy but it's also dishonest and untrustworthy



  7. Understanding Thierry Breton: Chirac's Entrepreneurial “Joker”

    Minister in charge of the public treasury was not a career politician but an “entrepreneur” with a proven track-record as a financial wizard and “cost-killer”



  8. Links 16/11/2019: New Debian Release, Wine staging 4.20

    Links for the day



  9. IRC Proceedings: Friday, November 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, November 15, 2019



  10. Microsoft Doesn't Love Linux, It Just Buys Linux

    Microsoft's takeover or abduction of its opposition's voice isn't an act of love but an act of occupation, a hostile colonisation that enables digital pillage and plunder



  11. Koch's Reply to EPO Through ILO and Techrights' Interpretation of Koch v EPO Documents Help Show That ILO-AT is Played by EPO Management

    Sending cases back and forth, without the complainant being involved, means that justice is in eternal ‘limbo’ and thus the abusive management of the European Patent Office (EPO) — first Team Battistelli and now Team Campinos — can get away with anything the bullies do (no judgment of substance being delivered)



  12. EPO Running ILO's Tribunal (ILO-AT) 'in a Loop' to Perpetually Delay and Drain the EPO's Complainants (Aggrieved Staff) Out of Money

    ILO’s Administrative Tribunal — a court for aggrieved EPO staff and other international organisations’ staff (usually known as ILO-AT for short) — is a major farce; when “time is money” and lawyers charge as much as 400 euros an hour the EPO’s management can exploit/misuse its cash reserves to also game justice and buy legal outcomes



  13. ILO is Not Functioning and ILO-AT Helps the Abusive Management of the European Patent Office

    It is becoming increasingly clear, based for example on Koch v EPO, that ILO-AT is where a lot of money will be spent on lawyers and rarely will that result in real justice (but it certainly helps EPO management pretend that staff has safeguards)



  14. Links 16/11/2019: Wine 4.20, Picolibc 1.1

    Links for the day



  15. Understanding Thierry Breton: Moral Responsibility for “a Capitalism That Kills”?

    "...France Télécom which had previously been defined by an ethos of public service, by egalitarian working conditions and by a sense of universal mission, had now been transformed into a "cash machine” whose sole purpose was to generate shareholder value on international financial markets."



  16. FOSSPatents Conference is Against FOSS, Promoting the FOSS-Hostile Construct Known as RAND or FRAND

    Do not be misled by the term Free/Open Source software (FOSS) in the name FOSSPatents and whatever relates to it (e.g. FOSSPatents Conference); it's not about FOSS but against FOSS, or pro-FRAND



  17. Europe is Under Attack

    European politicians or political candidates pretend to be 'candid'; but they're agents of Power, or put another way, they're there to make the rich and powerful class even richer and more powerful by passing new, ruinous laws in the name of 'the people' or 'for SMEs'



  18. Links 15/11/2019: New Opera and Brave, GNU/Linux Flatpa(c)ked

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, November 14, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, November 14, 2019



  20. Understanding Thierry Breton: Toxic Management Goes on Trial in France

    "In each of these cases, the suicide served as a symbolic act of protest to denounce workplace conditions at France Télécom and attract public attention to its practices."



  21. Thierry Breton's Video/Live Grilling is Over, But the Grilling Continues Online

    Elite politicians aren't reluctant to give Thierry Breton the high seat (or throne); but everyone else realises that this resembles a corporate takeover more than anything



  22. The EPO's Low Patent Quality is Not Just Suicidal; It is Illegal

    With help from the besieged Boards of Appeal (BoAs), which complain that they can no longer judge cases (appeals/referrals) autonomously and independently, the Office in Munich continues to grossly violate the EPC and mimic China's ridiculously low patent bar, which even formally permits patents on algorithms



  23. Links 14/11/2019: Mesa 19.2.4 and GCC 7.5 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Microsoft is Not an Open Source Company But Microsoft Bribed and Took Over Many Open Source Authorities (Rivals' Voice Hijacked)

    Free/Open Source software (FOSS) and GNU/Linux are being taken over by Microsoft moles, bought by Microsoft Corporation, and the collective voice of the alternative to Microsoft and Windows is being muzzled (they tell us they "love" us while they're attacking us and sometimes suing us)



  25. Techrights' Interpretation of Koch v EPO: The EPO's Management Still Attacks Staff Representatives

    The EPO hopes to get its victims (of EPO abuse) to not only foot their own bills but also the EPO's



  26. Understanding Thierry Breton: “Mister Cash” Arrives at France Télécom

    The psychological harassment of the France Télécom workforce led the "suicide wave" after Breton had left France Télécom



  27. The Breton-Battistelli Relationship and Breton Hiding His Employment Record at Rothschild & Cie Banque

    EPO scoundrels such as Battistelli are closer to Breton than most people care to realise; Breton is hiding part of his career ahead of today's grilling



  28. A Lot of EPO Staff on Dutch Land Protested (Despite Abusive Threats From Management) and a Strike is Reportedly Next

    EPO management in Rijswijk tried hard to prevent workers from protesting on their free time (lunch break), reaffirming that same old belief that nothing is changing at the EPO and nothing will change without truly disruptive action



  29. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, November 13, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, November 13, 2019



  30. Links 13/11/2019: Docker Enterprise Bought, WordPress 5.3, Qt 5.12.6 Released

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts