01.17.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

New Software Patents for Novell

Posted in Novell, Patents, SLES/SLED at 8:10 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Hypocrites

Is Novell antagonising software patents? Clearly it does not. In the pipeline Novell still has many more, including this latest:

Administration of protection of data accessible by a mobile device, patent No. 7,478,420, invented by Michael Wright of Sandy, Peter Boucher of Orem, Gabe Nault of Draper, Merrill Smith of Riverton, Sterling K. Jacobson of Saratoga Springs, Jonathan Wood of Orem, and Robert Mims of West Valley City, assigned to Novell Inc. of Provo.

It has been only one week since we last mentioned Novell's attitude towards software patents. It’s problematic in the Free software world, especially since Novell uses these patents to create fear of non-SLE* GNU/Linux distributions.

TechDirt has this good post about the desire of lawyers to have excessive patentability, whereas engineers don’t need or want this (a point that was stressed before, using evidence).

The Cultural Gulf Between Lawyers And Technologists On Patent Law

On Wednesday I attended the Brookings Institution’s conference on “The Limits of Abstract Patents in an Intangible Economy.” The conference was organized by software patent skeptics, so that perspective has been well represented. But I was struck by the dramatic differences between the views of lawyers on the one hand (who made up the majority of the panelists and audience members) and the handful of technologists on the other.

Over at Linux Today, Carla has just called Intellectual Monopolies “a mental illness” — a point that she explains thusly:

This whole “intellectual property” mania is a mental illness that deserves its own entry into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It’s like that great movie, “Aguirre: The Wrath of God.” Give yourself a treat and watch it; it’s a wonderful film that takes place after the fall of the Incan empire. Lope de Aguirre, played by the perfectly mad Klaus Kinski, leads a band of Spanish conquistadors on a quest for El Dorado, the legendary City of Gold. The quest is doomed, of course, as they struggle through hostile terrain and hostile locals, pushed onward by their own greed and ruthlessness.

[...]

The tech industry is notorious for thuggish Tony Soprano tactics. How did this come about? Pepsi doesn’t make you agree to a EULA. DeWalt doesn’t tell you what you can and cannot do with your own DeWalt tools that you have purchased. The fashion and automotive industries copy each other openly, and don’t waste time suing each other for poaching ideas. Instead they stick to the business of trying to win customers the old-fashioned way– by making cool things that people want to buy.

The proprietary software industry nearly succeeded in killing off the second-hand software market, and then had the two-faced gall to whine about copyright infringement– they tolerate it when it opens new markets and shuts out the competition, but sooner or later those bad pirates have to pay up. Every other industry has a thriving second-hand market, instead of this loony game of wink-nudge “piracy”, and it benefits everyone– it opens new markets, and reduces the financial risks of early adopters and customers who buy new.

Microsoft has devoted considerable energy to trying to kill off the second-hand hardware market as well by going after schools and non-profits that use old, donated equipment, and forcing them to purchase new software licenses. Most OEM Windows PCs come with crippled versions of Windows that can’t be moved to different PCs, but are locked to the original.

We saw a very major example of this yesterday.

“Small Software companies cannot afford to go to court or pay damages. Who is this software patent system for?” —Marco Schulze, Nightlabs Gmbh

Steve Ballmer license

Image from Wikimedia

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

20 Comments

  1. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not hypocrisy to file for patents, it’s just the Smart Thing To Do to protect yourself against other companies that might attack you with patents.

    What matters is what they do with those patents. If they attack people with their patents, then yes, they would be hypocrites (since they are working with the EFF to get rid of patents afaik).

    If they only use their patents for defensive purposes, then that’s not hypocrisy nor is that a bad thing.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 8:38 am

    Gravatar

    It’s not hypocrisy to file for patents, it’s just the Smart Thing To Do to protect yourself against other companies that might attack you with patents.

    Who from? Patent sharks/trolls? They have no products.

    What matters is what they do with those patents. If they attack people with their patents, then yes..

    That’s exactly what they already do. They attack Ubuntu, Red Hat and others using patents. But they use their friend, Big Mike, to do most of the scaremongering. Novell joined Big Mike several months ago (“intellectual property peace of mind”).

  3. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 8:49 am

    Gravatar

    Having patents obviously doesn’t protect you from patent trolls. I never claimed otherwise.

    However, it does protect you against other companies with real products. Until the patent system is reformed (which may require getting rid of it altogether), companies need to file for patents for their own protection, otherwise he-with-the-most-patents-and-willingness-to-use-them wins.

    That’s exactly what they already do.

    Uh, no they don’t.

    They attack Ubuntu, Red Hat and others using patents.

    Please show me evidence of Novell attacking Canonical or Red Hat with patent lawsuits. Oh wait, there aren’t any.

    Yet another instance of Roy making up the “facts” as he goes.

    But they use their friend, Big Mike, to do most of the scaremongering. Novell joined Big Mike several months ago (”intellectual property peace of mind”).

    “Big Mike” was scaremongering before they made a deal with Novell, which was not about attacking people over patents, it was about them not attacking each others customers over patents.

    Get a clue.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:00 am

    Gravatar

    Please show me evidence of Novell attacking Canonical or Red Hat with patent lawsuits. Oh wait, there aren’t any.

    Please show me evidence of me saying that “Novell [was] attacking Canonical or Red Hat with patent lawsuits.”

    Novell uses Microsoft to do this and it fuels Microsoft’s verbal attacks (FUD and extortion).

    “Big Mike” was scaremongering before they made a deal with Novell, which was not about attacking people over patents, it was about them not attacking each others customers over patents.

    Your revisionism does you no favours.

    Novell was Microsoft’s golden pellet:

    In mid-November, shortly after the pact was announced, Microsoft chief Steve Ballmer said companies that sell or run Linux, but aren’t covered under the Novell deal, are illegally using Microsoft’s IP. “We believe every Linux customer basically has an undisclosed balance-sheet liability,” he said.

    He said in a later meeting: “I do think it [Novell deal] clearly establishes that open source is not free.”

  5. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:19 am

    Gravatar

    Please show me evidence of me saying that “Novell [was] attacking Canonical or Red Hat with patent lawsuits.”

    It seemed pretty clear to me that the “They” in your statement “They are attacking Ubuntu and Red Hat” was referring to Novell, and that “attacking” must have meant attacking over patents. How do you attack with patents? Lawsuits. You certainly don’t flog them with the printouts.

    Novell also isn’t threatening anyone with patents.

    (Microsoft may be, but they were doing that before – and certainly aren’t doing it because Novell told/asked them to).

  6. Yfrwlf said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    “Administration of protection of data accessible by a mobile device.”

    When will this stupidity end.

    I’m going to patent making toast while baking a flan in the oven at the same time. They’re both completely and totally obvious and old separately, yet because the USPTO is a bunch of retards working for corporate interests and no one else, it’ll pass through just fine.

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Gravatar

    Dan O’Brian,

    Novell does this with words (“IP peace of mind”) and deeds (patent deal with Microsoft). It’s like a whispering campaign.

  8. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:24 am

    Gravatar

    In a world where companies do sue over patents, offering their customers “IP Peace of Mind” is something customers want. Microsoft has been spreading IP FUD about Linux for a decade or more and after SCO sued IBM, there are a lot of companies who are afraid that they could be sued by Microsoft for using Linux due to patents. They don’t want to take chances, so “IP Peace of Mind” is something that they want.

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:31 am

    Gravatar

    Does IBM boast “IP peace of mind” for IBM’s ‘version’ of Linux?

  10. Shane Coyle said,

    January 17, 2009 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    Novell FUDs Linux too, to their unique advantage.

    This was Stafford Masie at the CITI forum, just after the deal was announced:

    …when the covenant was not there, there was the inherent potential liability of patent infringement when the covenant wasn’t there. So, now we’ve created this covenant in the interest of our customers, not as a competitive advantage, the little guy, etc We’ve done it in the interest of big companies wanting us to explicitly state that they’ll never have this liability associated with Microsoft, because Microsoft is on 100% of their desktops.
    […]

    Yeah… I think this does give us a competitive edge. Yeah, it does and we’re gonna compete, and we want to compete, and we’re gonna do what it takes to compete- not to violate the GPL, not to violate the community members, etc But, with Red Hat toe-to-toe, with Ubuntu toe-to-toe we’re gonna do what’s necessary for our customers, based upon their demand. Now, if we do whats right for our customers, and they(Red Hat, Ubuntu, etc) choose not to, and what we’ve done is not exclusive, that’s their prerogative, I can’t be held liable for them not doing what we believe enterprise customers are asking us to do, I can’t be held liable for that, ok?

  11. Yfrwlf said,

    January 17, 2009 at 10:18 am

    Gravatar

    The point is that no one should want or need patent “protection”. This is racketeering. Either challenge someone about it, or STFU. Challenges can (not sure how often) result in removing the patent in question which was most likely “invalid” to begin with by USPTO standards even, and ALWAYS invalid by anyone’s sane standards.

  12. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 10:24 am

    Gravatar

    Yfrwlf,

    That too raises important questions.

  13. Yfrwlf said,

    January 17, 2009 at 10:42 am

    Gravatar

    Dell had established a “marketing program” to convince Linux users to migrate to SLES? Ha.

    Sure wish more companies would join together and say FU to software patents, among other kinds of patents…

    Also wish they’d take MS to court for all the threats and for doing this racketeering in the first place. They should have to refund that “patent protection” money back to all the customers who bought it.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 10:44 am

    Gravatar

    Dell and Linux are a complicated story, but this is not a SLES marketing program AFAIK.

  15. Andre said,

    January 17, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    Gravatar

    It’s not hypocrisy to file for patents, it’s just the Smart Thing To Do to protect yourself against other companies that might attack you with patents.

    What matters is what they do with those patents. If they attack people with their patents, then yes, they would be hypocrites (since they are working with the EFF to get rid of patents afaik).

    1) It doesn’t work that way. “Patent defense” means litigation.

    You cannot defend yourself against land mines by setting your own. Between large companies cross-licensing works, that is like an exchange of the land mine maps.

    If your opponent in a litigation has not a product of its own he can litigate you to the ground because without a product he cannot infringe.

    Nuclear or bio weapon deterrence does not work against terrorists who bear these arms.

    II. ) The EFF project is an embarrassement, they sold out. It is a premature fix. You would not expect that from the EFF. It is a project to raise money with ans play the fool.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 3:11 pm

    Gravatar

    “Fighting patents one by one will never eliminate the danger of software patents, any more than swatting mosquitoes will eliminate malaria.”

    Richard Stallman

  17. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Gravatar

    Andre: Yes, “patent defense” usually does come as litigation, but not always. Besides, would you not argue that having a defense is better than having nothing?

    I’m also well aware of patent trolls, but attacks by the trolls never goes to court, they are all settled before it ever goes that far because patent trolls are smart, they know:

    1. that it’s best to go after the big guys, because they have money and will be a lot less likely to take things to court

    2. to settle for a small amount (e.g. less than a quarter million USD, because it’d cost at least that much for the defendant in lawyer fees even if they win the case).

    3. if it does go to court, there’s a good chance they’ll lose

  18. Ian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    Gravatar

    “Fighting patents one by one will never eliminate the danger of software patents, any more than swatting mosquitoes will eliminate malaria.”

    –Richard Stallman

    I don’t think anyone would really claim otherwise. Regardless of your position on Novell filing for patents, whether they file or not won’t change the patent system without legislative change in the US.

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 17, 2009 at 7:05 pm

    Gravatar

    I think it’s better as a reference to the EFF’s project, which Glyn Moody criticised too. The “Linux Defenders” initiative adopts a similar(ly symbolic) approach.

  20. Ian said,

    January 17, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Gravatar

    Fair enough.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Germany's Lobbyists-Infested Government Sponsors the War on Ukraine via the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The chief UPC ‘judge’ is basically seeking to break the law (and violate constitutions, conventions etc.) to start a kangaroo court while dodging real courts, just like Vladimir Putin does



  2. [Meme] The Meme That Team UPC (the Collusion to Break the European Laws, for Profit) Threats to Sue Us For

    António Campinos and Team UPC are intimidating people who simply point out that the Unified Patent Court (UPC) is illegal and Klaus Grabinksi, shown above, strives to head a de facto kangaroo court in violation of constitutions and conventions (the UK does not and cannot ratify; Ireland hasn’t even held a referendum on the matter)



  3. Microsoft is Sacking People Every Month This Year, Even Managers (While Sponsored Media Produces Endless Chatbot Chaff)

    Lots of Microsoft layoffs lately and so-called ‘journalists’ aren’t reporting these; they’re too busy running sponsored puff pieces for Microsoft, usually fluff along the “hey hi” (AI) theme



  4. 3 Months Late Sirius 'Open Source' Finally Deletes Us From the Fraudulent 'Meet the Team' Page (But Still Lists Many People Who Left Years Ago!)

    Amid fraud investigations the management of Sirius ‘Open Source’ finally removed our names from its “Meet the Team” page (months late); but it left in the page about half a dozen people who left the company years ago, so it’s just lying to its clients about the current situation



  5. Amid Fraud at Sirius 'Open Source' CEO Deletes His Recent (This Month) Past With the Company

    Not only did the Sirius ‘Open Source’ CEO purge all mentions of Sirius from his Microsoft LinkedIn account; he’s racing against the clock as crimes quickly become a legal liability



  6. Web Survey Shows Microsoft Falling Below 15% Market Share in Africa, Only One Minuscule African Nation Has Windows Majority

    A Web survey that measured Microsoft Windows at 97% in Africa (back in 2010) says that Windows has become rather small and insignificant; the Microsoft-sponsored mainstream media seems to be ignoring this completely, quite likely by intention...



  7. Rumours of More Microsoft Layoffs Tomorrow (Including Managers!), Probably Azure Again (Many Azure Layoffs Every Year Since 2020)

    Amazon is laying off AWS staff and Microsoft has been laying off Azure staff for 3 years already, including this year, so it seems like the “clown computing” bubble is finally bursting



  8. [Meme] EPO's Management Brainstorm

    The story behind a misleading slogan told above



  9. The Photo Ops Festival of the Funky President António Campinos and Revolt From the Patent Examiners Whom He Perpetually Oppresses

    European Patents are being granted for no reason other than application and renewal fees, awarding European monopolies to companies that aren't even European (only about a third are actually European); staff of the EPO is fed up as it regards or views all this as an extreme departure from the EPO's mission (and it's also outright illegal)



  10. Links 21/03/2023: Trisquel GNU/Linux 11.0 LTS

    Links for the day



  11. Back Doors Proponent Microsoft Infiltrates Panels That Write the Security Regulations, Press Fails to Point Out the Obvious

    Cult tactics and classic entryism serve Microsoft again, stacking the panels and basically writing policy (CISA). As an associate explained it, citing this new example, Stanford “neglects to point out the obvious fact that Microsoft is writing its own regulations.”



  12. IRC Proceedings: Monday, March 20, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, March 20, 2023



  13. Links 20/03/2023: Curl 8.0.0/1 and CloudStack 4.18.0.0 LTS

    Links for the day



  14. Standard Life (Phoenix Group Holdings): Three Weeks to Merely Start Investigating Pension Fraud (and Only After Repeated Reminders From the Fraud's Victims)

    As the phonecall above hopefully shows (or further elucidates), Standard Life leaves customers in a Kafkaesque situation, bouncing them from one person to another person without actually progressing on a fraud investigation



  15. Standard Life Paper Mills in Edinburgh

    Standard Life is issuing official-looking financial papers for companies that then use that paperwork to embezzle staff



  16. Pension Fraud Investigation Not a High Priority in Standard Life (Phoenix Group Holdings)

    The 'Open Source' company where I worked for nearly 12 years embezzled its staff; despite knowing that employees were subjected to fraud in Standard Life's name, it doesn't seem like Standard Life has bothered to investigate (it has been a fortnight already; no progress is reported by management at Standard Life)



  17. Links 20/03/2023: Tails 5.11 and EasyOS 5.1.1

    Links for the day



  18. Links 20/03/2023: Amazon Linux 2023 and Linux Kernel 6.3 RC3

    Links for the day



  19. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, March 19, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, March 19, 2023



  20. An Update on Sirius 'Open Source' Pensiongate: It's Looking Worse Than Ever

    It's starting to look more and more like pension providers in the UK, including some very major and large ones, are aiding criminals who steal money from their workers under the guise of "pensions"



  21. Services and Users TRApped in Telescreen-Running Apps

    TRApp, term that lends its name to this article, is short for "Telescreen-Running App". It sounds just like "trap". Any similarity is not purely coincidental.



  22. Links 19/03/2023: Release of Libreboot 20230319 and NATO Expanding

    Links for the day



  23. Great Things Brewing

    We've been very busy behind the scenes this past week; we expect some good publications ahead



  24. Links 19/03/2023: LLVM 16.0.0 and EasyOS Kirkstone 5.1 Releases

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, March 18, 2023

    IRC logs for Saturday, March 18, 2023



  26. Links 18/03/2023: Many HowTos, Several New Releases

    Links for the day



  27. Links 18/03/2023: Tor Browser 12.0.4 and Politics

    Links for the day



  28. Links 18/03/2023: Docker is Deleting Free Software Organisations

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Friday, March 17, 2023

    IRC logs for Friday, March 17, 2023



  30. New Talk: Richard Stallman Explains His Problem With Rust (Trademark Restrictions), Openwashing (Including Linux Kernel), Machine Learning, and the JavaScript Trap

    Richard Stallman's talk is now available above (skip to 18:20 to get to the talk; the volume was improved over time, corrected at the sender's end)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts