EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.05.10

More Microsoft Revisionism from the New York Times, Courtesy of Former Microsoft Employee

Posted in Bill Gates, Deception, Microsoft at 10:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Former vice president of Microsoft rewrites history in the New York Times, using a rant; new insight into the filthier tricks of Microsoft lobbying

YESTERDAY we wrote about BBC lies and whitewashing through Microsoft revisionism. The BBC show is available only for a UK audience, so we might expand on it later. We have already shown how the NY Times assists revisionism by Microsoft, which is still trying to rewrite its embarrassing history. The paper was almost bought by Microsoft, according to some rumours from last year. Bill Gates is apparently lobbying the publication (like he does at the BBC) because he does not practically own all of the press, yet (sometimes he has his employees put in it [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]). If he does not own this press, then he needs to at least ensure that this press tells the lies of the Gates Foundation for example; it’s about propagating illusions and by sheer repetition make them be seen as impenetrable, indisputable truth.

GatesKeepers seems encouraged to find that the Seattle Press is beginning to find the other side of the coin. As the site puts it:

Is mainstream media doing enough investigative journalism on the Gates Foundation? Here is a shining example of how mainstream media and professionals in civil society can complement one another in developing an analysis of the activities of the Foundation. Kristi Heim has referred her readers to Philippe Boucher’s blog. These two Cascadians living and working near the Foundation give Gates Keepers hope.

For those who think that Gates is fighting against smoking, it is worth mentioning that the Gates Foundation invests in tobacco giants. Talk about spin and deception.

Going back to the New York Times (see “Criticism of The New York Times”), shortly after Microsoft had announced bad results [1, 2, 3, 4], a former Microsoft employee wrote an essay titled “Microsoft’s Creative Destruction” and published it in the New York Times. The following parts are telling and truthful, but this former Microsoft employee also uses the piece to whitewash Microsoft and Bill Gates, using lies he might actually believe in.

The tablet required a stylus, and he much preferred keyboards to pens and thought our [Microsoft's] efforts doomed.

A lot of the rest might also explain why a lot of Microsoft boosters link to it. A lot of the article does not criticise Microsoft and even makes a statement like: “No one in his right mind should wish Microsoft failure.”

Really?

“[T]he employees always defend Microsoft though, even after they leave.”
      –Cubezzz
Here is the comical part: “At worst, you can say it’s a highly repentant, largely accidental monopolist.”

“Accidental”? Microsoft was hell bent on committing crimes to gain and maintain a monopoly. There is nothing accidental about it. We showed a lot of this yesterday.

Just because it’s an opinion piece does not mean that they should not check the facts. The New York Times needs to check what it prints instead deceiving many readers.

It seems like another one of those articles where they use dramatic headlines to “inject” FUD (like with the most recent “world without Windows” storyline from InfoWorld). They sometimes use headlines to draw in readers, then deliver Microsoft PR messages instead.

As one of our readers from Brazil puts it, “And William Henry, who was clueless about the Internet is now a pioneer? In which planet? The man wrote a book, The Road Ahead, and had no hint of the Internet.”

“Gates hangs himself a thousand times over with his own words.”
      –FurnaceBoy
Here is another talking point from the article: “Its founder, Bill Gates, is not only the most generous philanthropist in history, but has also inspired thousands of his employees to give generously themselves.”

What a load PR nonsense. Bill Gates is investing in patent trolls and creates scarcity using many patents on food and medicine. This is not philanthropy, it’s financing disguised as philanthropy. It is self serving.

The whole article might be an eye catcher to be used for revisionism, drawing in some of the Microsoft skeptics in particular.

As Cubezzz put it, “the employees always defend Microsoft though, even after they leave.”

“And because of them,” said another reader, “today my profession is not respected anymore.”

FurnaceBoy writes: “as I keep saying.. you only need to read the testimony in the various cases. Gates hangs himself a thousand times over with his own words.” (a reply to which is: “they have set the industry backwards I estimate 40 years backwards.”)

Separately, another reader of ours says that “Guido Fawkes (blogger Paul Staines) is going through the room bookings at the Houses of Parliament.” What he found is that “Andrew Miller held a reception for Microsoft after receiving a paid-for trip to Berlin by them. (Jun ‘08)”

Free trips paid for by Microsoft to promote its agenda, eh? We have seen these before, e.g. with journalists [1, 2, 3, 4]. It’s a form of bribery with which Microsoft recruits mouthpieces.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

10 Comments

  1. satipera said,

    February 5, 2010 at 12:42 pm

    Gravatar

    People often use the term revisionism as if it is a bad thing. All written history is revisionism. For whatever the reason bad historical analysis is the problem here not the process itself.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I think it’s one of those terms with associated connotations, like “reform”.

    your_friend Reply:

    True, the proper term for what we see here is “lying.” This propaganda piece also ran in the Wall Street Journal. It is not a revision, it is a twisted fabrication and a distraction from Microsoft’s poor financial results.

  2. Yuhong Bao said,

    February 5, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    Gravatar

    Accidental? Well, MS gained it’s monopoly thanks to MS-DOS, and the only reason IBM had to ask MS to “create” MS-DOS was that it’s attempt to license CP/M-86 from DR failed, another mess altogether.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Don’t forget the illegal things that Microsoft did before and after that.

    Yuhong Bao Reply:

    Yes, but none of them led to a MS monopoly as much as MS-DOS. For example, the licensing of MS BASIC for ROMs of computers like the IBM PC and Apple II eventually died.

    Dennis Murczak Reply:

    It is less the singular events that made MS a PC monopoly; these were merely convenient door-openers. What made them a monopoly is their persistent use of an elaborate pattern of locking the market by announcements, and spreading misconceptions about anything that can potentially compete with them.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    “[W]hat things an app would do that would make it run with MSDOS and not run with DR-DOS. Is there [sic] feature they have that might get in our way?”

    Bill Gates

  3. Yuhong Bao said,

    February 6, 2010 at 3:06 am

    Gravatar

    “A lot of the article does not criticise Microsoft and even makes a statement like: “No one in his right mind should wish Microsoft failure.””
    It happens that I discussed this topic on IRC. Here is the log:
    http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/irc-log-03022010.html

  4. Agent_Smith said,

    February 6, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Not to forget the sex scandals Micro$oft is involved in Israel… Remember ???

What Else is New


  1. More Threats From Elodie Bergot: The EPO is Back in a State of Disarray and That Authoritarian Atmosphere of Fear

    ‘Under the radar’ — so to speak — there have been further assaults and obvious deterioration at the EPO, where staff is being muzzled while robbed by people who gamble the EPO's money away



  2. Campinos Uses Donald Trump Associates to Attack the EPO's Staff Amid Coronavirus Pandemic (Whilst Also Threatening Staff Representatives)

    Mr. Blowhard “Breitbart” runs or does the EPO’s finances now; it doesn’t seem to bother EPO management that they’re relying on fraud — in fact, as one might suggest that this is exactly what they’re after (faking financial performance to implement unnecessary cuts)



  3. EPO Staff Union (SUEPO): “We Are Back to Battistelli's Times”

    The EPO‘s management continues its reckless and shameless attack on staff, based on complete lies and fabrications, even at times of uncertainty and stress



  4. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 09, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 09, 2020



  5. Links 9/4/2020: Qt and Free Software Contention, ReactOS 0.4.1, Jitsi Meet

    Links for the day



  6. The Fall of the UPC - Part XVII: Bardehle Pagenberg in 'Corona Zombie' Mode

    Gymnastics in logic and outright lies told by Bardehle Pagenberg, which spent endless time and money trying to pass the UPC(A) for its patent-trolling clients



  7. The Fall of the UPC - Part XVI: What's Reality Got to Do With It? Ask Hogan Lovells.

    Hogan Lovells, whose Counsel is Winfried Tilmann, wants us to think that UPC is dead only for formal reasons or that it's not really dead because they just need to vote again; reality, however, is far more complicated, but lawyers gonna lie...



  8. The Fall of the UPC - Part XV: A Three-Week Parade of Lies From Team UPC and Its Media Collaborators

    Team UPC continues to shamelessly lie about the fate of the Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA); we've studied all the responses we were able to find and we'll tackle them one by one (or firm by firm)



  9. Coronavirus Has Not Slowed Down the EPO's Promotion of Illegal Software Patents

    Using the latest buzzwords and weasel words (digital, games, videogames, digitalisation etc.) the EPO continues to invite bogus patents/applications and boasts about granting a lot more of them



  10. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 08, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 08, 2020



  11. Links 8/4/2020: Tails 4.5, Septor 2020.2, GNOME Money Awards and Mozilla's New CEO

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 07, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 07, 2020



  13. GitHug - A Guest Article by Thomas Grzybowski

    "Now, if Azure revenue has increased 72%, but the gross revenue in this category has only increased 25%, that means that the other components, primary GitHub, are actually a substantial negative."



  14. Links 7/4/2020: Firefox 75, Python 2.7.1 RC1

    Links for the day



  15. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIV: Media Owned and Controlled by Law Firms Did Not Properly Cover the Decision of the German Constitutional Court (FCC)

    We take another look at the shallow if not deliberately misleading coverage in sites that are literally owned and run by law firms, for the benefit of law firms rather than informing the public



  16. The Media Paints Bill Gates as the Man Who Will Save the World While Seattle's Police Department Obstructs Access to Documents About Pedophilia Arrest at His Home

    We're still unable to receive even one single page of the police report about arrest for pedophilia at the home of Bill and Melinda Gates; the media says nothing about this and instead it paints Gates as a national or international hero



  17. IRC Proceedings: Monday, April 06, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, April 06, 2020



  18. Software Patents Remain Junk Patents in the United States (Not Enforceable), Whereas the EPO Keeps Granting Them and Promoting Them

    We take note of the positive outcomes in the US, where courts continue to reject software patents, but in Europe the largest patent office, which sought to replace all the courts, still acts as if patent law does not exist and patents can be endlessly printed irrespective of their merit (or validity as judged by actual courts)



  19. The Fall of the UPC - Part XIII: A Death Worth Celebrating and Many Lies Worth Debunking

    We take stock of positive responses to the decision made by the German constitutional court (FCC) 2.5 weeks ago; we also explain why it has taken so long to piece together firm-by-firm scoresheet for UPC lies



  20. GitHub is Moving the Free Software Movement Into “Check”

    GitHub's growing levels of control over Free software projects (GitHub itself is proprietary and Microsoft-controlled) ought to alarm the community; it's a lot worse than most people care to acknowledge, based on weeks of detailed analysis of GNU/Linux distros



  21. Links 6/4/2020: New Red Hat CEO, elementary OS Hera Updates

    Links for the day



  22. When the Decision is OK and the Judge's Motivations Are Also OK

    Justice Huber made the right call; but the bullies and charlatans who conspired to undermine laws and constitutions will never be satisfied



  23. The Fall of the UPC - Part XII: Doing the Unthinkable by Blaming the Judge's (Justice's) Wife?

    Team UPC and its media partners never cease to amaze us; anybody who stands in their way is either portrayed as a Russian stooge or too ignorant to be worth talking to



  24. The Fall of the UPC - Part XI: Lies Told by Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) in Süddeutsche Zeitung

    Today we look at misleading claims (or lies) published by Süddeutsche Zeitung after the Germans' constitutional court (FCC) had pointed out the obvious, namely that UPC ratification would be in violation of the German constitution



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, April 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, April 05, 2020



  26. Links 5/4/2020: MindSpore, Covid-19 Projects and More

    Links for the day



  27. EPO is Just Like Some Cruel Political Party and Not a Patent Office

    The "cabal" which runs today's EPO (even the word "Mafia" seems suitable here) isn't acting -- not even remotely -- like a patent office; it's a patent-printing operation ("protection money" as income) that uses shallow political stunts to manufacture consent with the EU's 'generous' assistance



  28. Digitalisation and Digital Technologies as a Ploy to Justify Illegal Software Patents

    Say "hello" to the next weasel word/s; from the "hey hi" hype wave we've now moved to something "digital" (which can mean just about anything, including algorithms of all sorts)



  29. The Fall of the UPC - Part X: How We Shall Catalogue UPC Lies

    The cult that Team UPC became (one member lying to another member, maintaining a false version of reality) will be judged based on underlying facts, not lying about facts; we start with a token of contempt for IP Kat and Bristows LLP (there are overlaps)



  30. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, April 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, April 04, 2020


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts