EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.16.11

Triumph Against Software Patents in Europe as EU Treaty Brought Up

Posted in America, Antitrust, Europe, Law, Microsoft, Mono, Novell, Patents, Red Hat at 6:49 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Face with question marks

Summary: Catchup post on the subject of software patents, led by good news from Europe and plans to hamper patent trolls in the US

The European Court of Justice Advocates General said last year that a pan-EU patent court would violate the principles of the EU founding treaties and it turns out that he was right. Having struggled to keep software patents out of Europe, we are pleased to find out that, as a UK-based lawyers’ blog puts it, it’s “bad news for unified European patent litigators” (which means it’s wonderful for everybody else):

Bad news for unified European patent litigators — in Avis 1/09 Creation of a unified patent litigation system the Court of Justice of the European Union has given its verdict on the proposed Unified Patent Litigation System (UPLS) and the European and Community Patents Court (‘the PC’). Following an 89 paragraph ruling it says:

“The envisaged agreement creating a unified patent litigation system (currently called ‘European and Community Patents Court’) is not compatible with the provisions of the EU Treaty and the FEU Treaty”.

Glyn Moody adds that “another #swpats [software patents] by the backdoor attempt blocked” (and the parasites will carry on trying).

Over in Germany, there is quiet celebration among the likes of André Rebentisch and Karsten Gerloff from the FFII and FSFE, respectively. On the other hand, Microsoft booster Florian the mobbyist is daemonising Red Hat again (using old news) and saying utter nonsense, as Rebentisch helps expose:

Priceless:

Florian “Mueller also noted that a less costly European patent system would also help open-source developers and companies to obtain and, if necessary, enforce patents on a Europe-wide scale. He also suggested that at some point the EU will want to have a “unified patent system, including a single patent court”.”

Florian turns out to be the next Benoît. Hardly surprising his most recent “change of mind”.

It is not clear why David Meyer plugged in claims from a known liar. These claims are lunacy, a bit like the recent claims that open source is a “cartel”. Anyway, leaving aside aggravators like Florian, FFII founder Hartmut Pilch weighed in as well. Almost nobody in Germany would ever benefit from software patents, no matter how loudly mobbyists speak out and how many journalists they mass-mail to ‘inject’ disinformation on behalf of corporate clients.

APRIL, a Free software advocacy group in France, has a strongly-worded announcement about this major development and there are many articles on the matter including some in German. “ECJ says that Commission proposal for unitary EU #patent is incompatible with EU treaties” is how Gerloff summarises it.

The FSF’s Bradley Kuhn addresses the problem with Novell’s Mono trap when he writes that “#Tomboy is part of !GNOME desktop, so #Microsoft #swpats attack could impact. Glad to learn dependency won’t increase”

The OSI’s Simon Phipps speaks about Novell’s atrocious deal with Microsoft, wherein a patent transfer is being arranged. To quote the new article:

When we consider software patents, it’s easy to believe they are something outside the open source communities. Mentally, many of us model them as a weapon belonging to “patent trolls” – companies who don’t make products in the area of the patents they own (they may have other business interests they are funding) but instead create their income by shaking down businesses who unwittingly stray into their patent minefields.

But I suggest that many of the patents these “non-practicising entities” (as they are known to lawyers) use actually come directly from the development of software and potentially open source software. They start life in “friendly” hands, but there’s every chance they will eventually be used in harmful ways. Just look at the proposed sale of Novell’s patent portfolio to CPTN to get the idea how. Right now the US Department of Justice seems to agree it’s a problem and may even intervene in the sale.
Parallel Filing

In the corporations where I have worked, programmers have been incented along with other engineers to constantly watch their work for ideas that could be encapsulated in a patent. This “parallel filing” – developers doing work and filing patents on their innovations at the same time – results in the creation of a ring-fence around each activity in which the engineers participate.

CPTN may end up just dying if the deal gets blocked by the US DOJ or anti-cartel authorities. And guess who’s getting sued again? That would be Google. The plaintiff stays mum: “In a brief response, the company tells me that they will not comment on either this case or the complaint they’ve just filed against Google, revealing that the search giant is effectively already under legal attack by the software maker.” Obama plans fundamental rethink of software patents, but it won’t be enough. In fact, it’s more like lip service based on what we’ve seen all along (even before Obama took office). Also see “FTC recommends patent reform”; “US FTC report recommends improvements in patent system”; “FTC Targets Patent Trolls”; “FTC Puts Patent Trolls On Notice” and “US patent law change to protect innovators”. It’s likely that nothing will change in the US because once bad laws are passed, it is extremely hard to reverse/retract them. Other news about software patents which we lack time to cover are added below.

- A Practical Rant about Software Patents
- Why are a paltry number of patents registered in Africa?
- Patent trolls fatten up on vaguely worded patents
- Apple And PayPal Hit With Lawsuit Over Patent For ‘One-Click’

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. Jose_X said,

    March 17, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    Gravatar

    Muller should have added that cutting red tape to the process of acquiring nuclear armaments would also make it easier for FOSS to acquire nukes and use them to protect the software.

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  2. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  3. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  4. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  5. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  6. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  7. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  8. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  9. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  10. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  11. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  12. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  13. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."



  14. Guest Article: Techies Should Not Dictate the Free Software Movement

    "We should start a second phase of the Free software movement that's making good software and putting users at the center."



  15. Links 17/10/2019: Ubuntu Turns 15, New Codename Revealed, Ubuntu 19.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  16. Free as in Free Speech (Restrictions May Apply)

    When limits of speech are not safety-related rules but political correctness or conformism



  17. There Won't be Patent Justice Until Patent Trolling Becomes Completely and Totally Extinct

    SLAPP-like behaviour and extortion/blackmail tactics using patent monopolies are a stain on the patent system; it's time to adopt measures to stop these things once and for all, bearing in mind they're inherently antithetical to the goal/s of the patent system and therefore discourage public support for this whole system



  18. EPO Staff Union and Staff Representatives Ought to Demand EPO Stops Bullying Publishers and Censoring Their Sites

    An often neglected if not forgotten aspect of EPO tyranny is the war on information itself; EPO management continues to show hostility towards journalism and disdain for true information



  19. Bribes, Lies, Fundamental Violations of the Law and Cover-Up: This is Today's European Patent Office

    It has gotten extremely difficult to hold the conspirators accountable for turning Europe’s patent office into a ‘printing machine’ of the litigation industry and amassing vast amounts of money (to be passed to private, for-profit companies)



  20. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Lost Almost Half (3 Out of 8) Board Members in Only One Month

    As the old saying goes, a picture (or screenshot) is worth a thousand words



  21. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, October 16, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, October 16, 2019



  22. Startpage and System1 Abuse Your Privacy Under the Guise of 'Privacy One Group'

    Startpage has sold out and may have also sold data it retained about its users to a privacy-hostile company whose entire business model is surveillance



  23. Links 16/10/2019: Halo Privacy, Ubuntu Release Imminent

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, October 15, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, October 15, 2019



  25. No, Microsoft is Not an 'Open Source Company' But a Lying Company

    The world’s biggest proprietary software companies want to be seen as “open”; what else is new?



  26. Meme: Setting the Record Straight

    Stallman never defended Epstein. He had called him “Serial Rapist”. It’s Bill Gates who defended Epstein and possibly participated in the same acts.



  27. EPO Staff Resolution Against Neoliberal Policies of António Campinos

    “After Campinos announced 17 financial measures,” a source told us, “staff gathered at multiple sites last week for general assemblies. The meeting halls were crowded. The resolution was passed unanimously and without abstentions.”



  28. Satya Nadella is a Distraction From Microsoft's Real Leadership and Abuses

    "I’m merely wondering if his image and accolades that we’re incessantly bombarded with by the press actually reflect his accomplishments or if they’re being aggrandized."



  29. Raw: EPO Comes Under Fire for Lowering Patent Quality Under the Orwellian Guise of “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI)

    Stephen Rowan, the President’s (António Campinos) chosen VP who promotes the notorious “Collaborative Quality Improvements” (CQI) initiative/pilot, faces heat from the CSC, the Central Staff Committee of the EPO



  30. Making The Most of The Fourth Age of Free Software

    "For better or for worse, we can be certain the Free Software Foundation will never be the same."


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts