EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

06.14.11

What Software Patents Bring to Society

Posted in Patents at 11:33 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Match ball

Summary: How patents on software algorithms smash progress in the field

SOFTWARE PATENTS are nothing but trouble to everyone but patent lawyers/trolls and monopolists. What is it that such patents actually bring to an industry? What about the fabric of society? Let’s look at a preliminary list:

  • Patent trolls abundance
  • Incentive to non-practising entities including patent hoarders
  • Researchers being fenced out or faced with barriers of appropriation
  • EU patent (unitary patent), which increases damages and scale of the patent menace
  • Distrust among public figures (e.g. due to software patents in the USPTO)
  • Patent deals with Android/Linux royalties
  • Removal of features from Linux-based devices, using patents
  • Suppression of inclusion or development of features, e.g. ZFS
  • Reducing the speed of software development (patent reviews, surveys, licensing, etc.)
  • Increasing uncertainty and doubt among software developers, discouraging the occupation
  • FUD campaigns based on software patents (claiming Linux to be disrespectful or prone to litigation)
  • Suppression of GPLv3 adoption (which impedes TiVoisation)
  • Reduced trust in politics and politicians, who are subjected to heavy lobbying and disinformation
  • Increased cost of products that the public buys
  • Excessive preoccupation/overburdening of public courts, which deal with petty patent feuds rather than real offences
  • Encouragement of software cartels that pool patents to make up a thicket
  • Discouragement of standards that have patents applying to them (including submarine patents)
  • Derivative works de-emphasised
  • Misuse of taxpayers’ money (e.g. NASA auctioning of patents)
  • Distraction from technical skills due to bureaucracy and unavoidable complexity associated with otherwise-unnecessary skills
  • Wasted effort due to reimplementation and patent workarounds
  • Reduced staffing of developers and increased staffing of lawyers (and patent applications-geared professionals), thus less market for programmers
  • Decrease in the number of programming languages and frameworks (duplicity and inspiration as a violation)
  • Syntax plurality, which puts more learning burden on developers
  • Increased tension and distrust between companies and respective developers
  • Degraded access to multimedia (codec patents for the most part), impeding information access especially in developing nations
  • Reduced interoperability and resultant inefficiency
  • Code and pseudo-code turned to legalese/text, harming the teaching of technical skills

Any more? Any biases noted? How can it be objectivity improved to overcome bias?

Disclosure: from a professional point of view, I have no vested interests in patents except that they impede my work. I work in algorithms research, software development, Web development, systems administration/monitoring, and also media and fitness on the side.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. slave5tom said,

    June 14, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    Gravatar

    Excellent article to add some perspective on software patents. Monopolists try to use patents to create a scarcity where one does not exist. The best explanation I have read on this subject is from a book called “Against Intellectual Monopoly” by Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine. http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstfinal.htm. The authors articulately outline the barriers to innovation that patents cause–much to the detriment of society. They go on to debunk all of the Monopolist’s arguments (without an incentive or exclusive right, innovation will not occur – incorrect because innovation tends to occur most rapidly in unregulated industries, where knowledge is shared and rapid improvements can occur – such as with open source software). Basically, patents reward a lucky few, who have the means and influence to acquire more patents and enact favorable legislation to the detriment of everyone else, who must pay monopoly rents (inflated prices) for substandard products or services. Many alternative models to generate innovative ideas are possible once we can look beyond the rhetoric and propaganda of the Monopolist hollow arguments. Consider, for instance, the X-prize to stimulate the space race and the development of the Linux system, created in a free and shared environment, where ideas build upon other ideas in a continuous improvement process.

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 21, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, October 21, 2019



  2. SUEPO Protest Tomorrow. All EPO Staff in Munich Ought to Attend and Prepare to Strike Too.

    Tomorrow’s planned protest should be a bridge towards a full strike, which takes more time to plan for and get authorisation for (because of increasingly strict restrictions)



  3. Looking for Explanations About Samsung's DeX and Other FOSS Initiatives Being Canned

    DeX was primarily a threat to the desktop/laptop monopoly of Microsoft, so its sudden abandonment — without even an explanation — continues to attract speculations



  4. EPO Will Need a Lot More Than Photo Ops and Hoax 'Studies' to Restore the Perception of Lawfulness

    Battistelli‘s illegal attacks on European Patent Office (EPO) judges have tarnished any impression that the EPO serves justice and the current regime torpedoes an assessment of these attacks; EPO workers understand that to follow guidelines from the management may be a breach of the EPC



  5. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  6. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  7. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  8. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  9. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  10. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  11. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  12. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  13. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  14. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  15. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  16. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  17. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  18. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  19. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  20. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  21. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  22. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  23. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  24. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  25. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  26. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  27. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  28. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  29. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  30. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts