10.24.11

Gemini version available ♊︎

Microsoft’s RICO Act Violations Only Supported by Spinners

Posted in Antitrust, GNU/Linux, Google, Microsoft, Novell, Patents at 8:12 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Steve Ballmer original

Summary: Compal is the latest subject of Microsoft’s racketeering/PR campaign, which seeks to distort the way business is being done and ultimately ‘normalise’ corruption

IN THE PAST few posts we have concentrated on Apple and Microsoft, showing quite clearly that they don’t compete (they can’t), they cheat instead.

Nearly 5 years ago this site was created to challenge the beginning of this distortion of ‘competition’, where one turns one’s competition into its own cash cow. The customer suffers enormously and businesses suffer as well, except those which violate the law and get away with it (like the mafia when the police turns a blind eye, due to complicity or fear).

“Microsoft is a reactionary company whose mode of operation is: spot potential threat, then extinguish/buy out, and of course repeat.”Novell is utterly destroyed and all that’s left of it are products that act as Microsoft cash cows and masquerade as “GNU/Linux” (or as “open” and “community-driven”, thanks to gullible people who help OpenSUSE approach another public release). Then there are products like GroupWise, whose future seems uncertain to us based on recent talks (some management left and they lose customers at a rapid pace). Groklaw keeps track of the 'old Novell' case against Microsoft, which Pamela Jones is very familiar with. Microsoft managed to kill both the ‘old Novell’ and the ‘new Novell’, which became too much of a threat to Windows and Office around 2006 when SLE* 10 came out. Microsoft paid to remove Novell as a competitor from the market, in fact paying very cheaply in order to control its opposition through SUSE/OpenSUSE, Go-OO (with OOXML), Mono, etc.

Microsoft is a reactionary company whose mode of operation is: spot potential threat, then extinguish/buy out, and of course repeat. There are many examples of this kind (involving companies or form factors like sub-notebooks) and Microsoft is now focusing on Android. Why don’t people ever learn properly from the past? Microsoft never changed. Only the PR changed.

“Now that we know what both Novell and Microsoft lawyers said in their opening statements Tuesday at the antitrust trial just starting in Utah over WordPerfect and QuattroPro,” writes Jones, “folks here are Groklaw are starting to find exhibits from the Comes v. Microsoft antitrust trial collection here on Groklaw that do seem to raise questions about the facts asserted in the Microsoft opening statement.

“So I decided to put the report about the Microsoft opening statement from the courtroom up again, with some of the exhibits we’ve uncovered, in the hope that it will be useful by comparing them. If you find more, please add them in your comments. We’re still transcribing the exhibits, so feel free to help with that as well, by all means. We’re concentrating on this page now, but you can work on whatever interests you.”

This is where antitrust exhibits and especially their meticulous archival come handy (e.g. Comes vs Microsoft). We already know many of Microsoft’s tactics and can use them in a legal context to make real impact.

“We know based on antitrust material that the act of “planting” articles is very real. We also know that Microsoft pays Florian for sure.”Looking at the Android side, Microsoft lobbyists continue to amplify the fear with a new PR campaign for FUD. They help ‘normalise’ racketeering, making the unthinkable seem acceptable. For instance, after another secret extortion deal Microsoft’s lobbyist Florian Müller and shameless Microsoft booster Jon Brodkin push this new Microsoft talking point (which we prefer not to repeat). Google should “wake up” and file an antitrust complaint, a complaint for violation of the RICO Act, and also file a lawsuit for this criminal activity from Microsoft (which has gone on for years and motivated the creation of this Web site). Microsoft’s PR people keep ‘planting’ Microsoft spin and attacks on Android (Florian messaged me about it several times even though he knows I ignore him). We know based on antitrust material that the act of "planting" articles is very real. We also know that Microsoft pays Florian for sure. Put 2 and 2 together.

CNET calls it “patent-protection”, playing along with euphemisms as we very much expect it to. Quoting this shallow article (one among many):

China-based Compal Electronics will pay undisclosed royalties to the software giant for use of Google’s Android and Chrome operating systems used in smartphones, tablet, and other consumer electronics, the company said.

Microsoft cannot sell, so it is trying to tax those who do by means of divide and conquer with litigation and threats.

Nobody doubts that extortion is a crime, but there are ‘political’ reasons for the way it is handled (antitrust equilibrium) and the endless spin is vital for Microsoft in ensuring people don’t view this logically. They will be running lobbying and PR campaigns to whitewash their habitual crimes (keeping both critics and regulators at bay).

“They will be running lobbying and PR campaigns to whitewash their habitual crimes (keeping both critics and regulators at bay).”A case of accurate reporting will ignore the PR and delve into the issues, then explain what really happens there. But there is cowardice and compliance in the corporate press and lobbyists along with PR agents exploit this to seed deceptive coverage. For instance, Microsoft PR puppets like Preston Gralla go with the “Android/Linux hard to use” FUD, but then again, this is typical Gralla. They are pretending to be journalists, but their job is to boost Microsoft on behalf of publishers that receive big payments from Microsoft (for advertising and ‘consulting’).

Here is a nice new cartoon about the hilarity of patents. More people ought to understand that patents are merely monopolies that a lot of the time cannot be justified. The inventor of Java, which Oracle sues Android over, is now quoted in the news as saying that the patent system is “a disaster”. From Wired Magazine:

The patent system is fundamentally flawed thanks to a combination of ridiculous litigation, really trivial patents and a landscape where you can’t know what is patented, according to James Gosling, the father of the Java programming language and chief software architect at Liquid Robotics.

Gosling , speaking at The Economist’s Innovation Summit, admitted that there was “a kernel of principle that I actually believe in”, which is the value in being able to compensate innovators for what they do. However, he maintained: “The patent system is, frankly, a disaster. It’s one of these things I feel really frustrated about.

One reader wrote to us today: “got email about it this morning: ;There’s one good reason not to buy an Android phone, you’ll be likely paying up to $15 to MS for royalties…’”

“Their goal is to impose desperation and eventually make Android as expensive as Windows Phone 7, with little help from other oligarchs or trolls.”Well, they push this FUD repeatedly, along with fake costs. Their goal is to impose desperation and eventually make Android as expensive as Windows Phone 7, with little help from other oligarchs or trolls. Fortunately, the Oracle vs. Google case is tracked again by Pamela Jones [1, 2, 3], whose site does a fantastic job defending Android, probably the most mainstream ‘distro’ of Linux. Pamela has all along (since last year) warned everyone about Florian’s relationship with Microsoft and raised the need for antitrust action over the Android extortion. A lot of the corporate press never did any of that. Instead, it played along with the Microsoft PR and also quoted Florian extensively (after his mass-mailing campaigns).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

6 Comments

  1. Michael said,

    October 24, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    Gravatar

    HUMOR:

    IN THE PAST few posts we have concentrated on Apple and Microsoft, showing quite clearly that they don’t compete (they can’t), they cheat instead.

    Yes… all the while insisting you are not focusing on Microsoft. Good to see you drop that lie.

    FUD:

    Google should “wake up” and file an antitrust complaint, a complaint for violation of the RICO Act, and also file a lawsuit for this criminal activity from Microsoft (which has gone on for years and motivated the creation of this Web site).

    What criminal activity? Oh, as far as has been shown – none.

    FUD:

    CNET calls it “patent-protection”, playing along with euphemisms as we very much expect it to.

    What “euphemism”?

    FUD:

    A case of accurate reporting will ignore the PR and delve into the issues, then explain what really happens there. But there is cowardice and compliance in the corporate press and lobbyists along with PR agents exploit this to seed deceptive coverage.

    Yeah, all a big conspiracy and only you can see through it. Let me guess: it is the tinfoil hat that keeps your mind safe.

    tinus61 Reply:

    Michael (“Snit” Glasser), you are a known Microsoft agent. You are defacing Techrights with your outright lies, FUD and smear campaigns. Techrights should simply IP-ban you.

    Thanks for the very well written and informative article Roy!

    Michael Reply:

    Ah, you cannot refute my claims so you lie about me. Got it.

    For the record: I do not now nor have I ever worked for MS. I am not even posting from Windows… I only use it, for my work, in a VM.

    But if you think I am wrong then by all means point out what points of mine are flawed.

    And don’t trip over your laces!

  2. powered_by_tux said,

    October 25, 2011 at 2:07 am

    Gravatar

    I don’t begrudge Microsoft about collectiong royalties from Android sellers. They are losing much more with Bing after all. http://money.cnn.com/2011/09/20/technology/microsoft_bing/index.htm

    Michael Reply:

    I do not begrudge MS collecting royalties *as long as their claims are honest*. I do not believe it has been shown either way.

    Same thing with Apple – I am all for their going after Samsung and the like *as long as their claims are honest*. So far the courts are siding with them and it seems they are in the right… but the verdict is still open as far as I am concerned. Apple clearly did not like Android… but was he justified in his claims? Did Android do more than just get inspired by iOS? These are not black and white issues.

  3. pinguinpat said,

    October 25, 2011 at 4:25 am

    Gravatar

    Hey Michael… hey…
    Do you know Anoying orange?

    http://annoyingorange.com/2011/10/the-microwave-effect/

    He’s funny,
    You are anoying…

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 03/02/2023: OpenSSH 9.2 and OBS Studio 29.0.1

    Links for the day



  2. Links 03/02/2023: GNU C Library 2.37

    Links for the day



  3. Sirius Finished

    Yesterday I was sent a letter approving my resignation from Sirius ‘Open Source’, two months after I had already announced that I was resigning with immediate effect; they sent an identical letter to my wife (this time, unlike before, they remembered to also change the names!!)



  4. The Collapse of Sirius in a Nutshell: How to Identify the Symptoms and Decide When to Leave

    Sirius is finished, but it's important to share the lessons learned with other people; there might be other "pretenders" out there and they need to be abandoned



  5. Links 03/02/2023: WINE 8.1 and RapidDisk 9.0.0

    Links for the day



  6. Links 02/02/2023: KDE Gear 22.12.2 and LibreOffice 7.5

    Links for the day



  7. Linux News or Marketing Platform?

    Ads everywhere: Phoronix puts them at the top, bottom, navigation bar, left, and right just to read some Microsoft junk (puff pieces about something that nobody other than Microsoft even uses); in addition there are pop-ups asking for consent to send visitors’ data to hundreds of data brokers



  8. Daily Links at Techrights Turn 15, Time to Give Them an Upgrade

    This year we have several 15-year anniversaries; one of them is Daily Links (it turned 15 earlier this week) and we've been working to improve these batches of links, making them a lot more extensive and somewhat better structured/clustered



  9. Back to Focusing on Unified Patent Court (UPC) Crimes and Illegal Patent Agenda, Including the EPO's

    The EPO's (European Patent Office, Europe's second-largest institution) violations of constitutions, laws and so on merit more coverage, seeing that what's left of the "media" not only fails to cover scandalous things but is actively cheering for criminals (in exchange for money)



  10. European Patent Office Staff Votes in Favour of Freedom of Association (97% of Voters in Support)

    The Central Staff Committee (CSC) at the EPO makes a strong case for António Campinos to stop breaking and law and actually start obeying court orders (he’s no better than Benoît Battistelli and he uses worse language already)



  11. Links 02/02/2023: Glibc 2.37 and Go 1.20

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 01, 2023

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 01, 2023



  13. Links 01/02/2023: Security Problems, Unrest, and More

    Links for the day



  14. Links 01/02/2023: Stables Kernels and Upcoming COSMIC From System76

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 31, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 31, 2023



  16. Links 31/01/2023: Catchup Again, Wayland in Xfce 4.20

    Links for the day



  17. Links 31/01/2023: elementary OS 7

    Links for the day



  18. Intimidation Against Nitrux Development Team Upsets the Community and Makes the Media Less Trustworthy

    Nitrux is being criticised for being “very unappealing”; but a look behind the scenes reveals an angry reviewer (habitual mouthpiece of the Linux Foundation and Linux foes) trying to intimidate Nitrux developers, who are unpaid volunteers rather than “corporate” developers



  19. Links 31/01/2023: GNOME 44 Wallpapers and Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM) and KU Leuven Boosting Americans and Cancellers of the Father of Free Software

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), along with the SFLC one might add, have been under a siege by the trademark-abusing FSFE and SFC; Belgium helps legitimise the ‘fakes’



  21. Techrights in the Next 5 or 10 Years

    Now that I’m free from the shackles of a company (it deteriorated a lot after grabbing Gates Foundation money under an NDA) the site Techrights can flourish and become more active



  22. 60 Days of Articles About Sirius 'Open Source' and the Long Road Ahead

    The Sirius ‘Open Source’ series ended after 60 days (parts published every day except the day my SSD died completely and very suddenly); the video above explains what’s to come and what lessons can be learned from the 21-year collective experience (my wife and I; work periods combined) in a company that still claims, in vain, to be “Open Source”



  23. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 30, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, January 30, 2023



  24. Taking Techrights to the Next Level in 2023

    I've reached a state of "closure" when it comes to my employer (almost 12 years for me, 9+ years for my wife); expect Techrights to become more active than ever before and belatedly publish important articles, based on longstanding investigations that take a lot of effort



  25. The ISO Delusion: When the Employer Doesn’t Realise That Outsourcing Clients' Passwords to LassPass After Security Breaches Is a Terrible Idea

    The mentality or the general mindset at Sirius ‘Open Source’ was not compatible with that of security conscientiousness and it seemed abundantly clear that paper mills (e.g. ISO certification) cannot compensate for that



  26. Links 30/01/2023: Plasma Mobile 23.01 and GNU Taler 0.9.1

    Links for the day



  27. EPO Management Isn't Listening to Staff, It's Just Trying to Divide and Demoralise the Staff Instead

    “On 18 January 2023,” the staff representatives tell European Patent Office (EPO) colleagues, “the staff representation met with the administration in a Working Group on the project “Bringing Teams Together”. It was the first meeting since the departure of PD General Administration and the radical changes made to the project. We voiced the major concerns of staff, the organization chaos and unrest caused by the project among teams and made concrete proposals.”



  28. Links 30/01/2023: Coreboot 4.19 and Budgie 10.7

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 29, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 29, 2023



  30. [Meme] With Superheroes Like These...

    Ever since the new managers arrived the talent has fled the company that falsely credits itself with "Open Source"


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts