01.07.15

Intellectual Property Judges’ Association (IPJA) Speaks Out Against EPO Tyrant Battistelli

Posted in Europe, Patents at 8:02 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Benoît Battistelli in the crosshairs of European patent professionals

Summary: As the new year starts (first week of the year) Battistelli is already in the firing line of yet more high-level departments/personalities

More criticism of Battistelli, this time from the Intellectual Property Judges’ Association (IPJA), is now reported by Merpel of IP Kat.

Merpel reveals that IPJA, which is the representative association of European National Patent Judges, is getting fed up. “Just in case you missed it,” wrote a source to us, the following letter may be of interest. We copy it below for future reference (Merpel put lots of Microsoft Word cruft in it, hence the poor formatting).


The Rt. Hon. Professor
Sir Robin Jacob
5th January
2015

Jesper Kongstad,
Chairman of the
Administrative Council of the EPO,
European Patent Office,
Bob-van-Bentham-Platz 1
80469 Munich
Germany                                                                                                                                            

            I am writing on behalf of the
Intellectual Property Judges’ Association (IPJA) to express the extreme concern
of European Patent Judges to the recent events concerning a Member of the
Boards of Appeal of the EPO. IPJA is the representative association of European
National Patent Judges. This letter has been written after consultation with
the IPJA membership.  It has near
unanimous support and no objection or reservation by anyone.

            As we understand it the Member was,
on the orders of the President acting on his own initiative, physically removed
from his office and possession was taken of his computer. It is not, as far as
we know, suggested that the Member has committed any criminal offence. That, in
any event would be a matter for action by the criminal law enforcement
authority, not the President.

            We do not know what it is that the
Member is alleged to have done wrong. Nor does it matter. What does matter is
that the Member has been treated in a manner we deem to be inconsistent with
the status and position of a Member of the Boards of Appeal as provided for in
the EPC.

            As
Judges we are not in a position to take any concluded view of the legality of
the President’s action – the point could well come up in a real case concerning
the status of Board of Appeal decisions. But we can say that according
to article 23(1) (read in conjunction with articles 10 and 11) of the EPC it
seems clear that it is for the Administrative Council and the Enlarged Board to
take action, not the President, and that the Administrative Council
should have so declared.

            More generally we make one further
observation. The present events seriously threaten the judicial independence of
the Boards of Appeal and by doing that call in question the guarantee of an
independent and impartial review of the European Office’s decisions by a
judicial body. Not tolerating that should be the common interest of all Member
States of the European Patent Organisation.

            A copy of this letter will shortly be
sent to EPLAW, IPKat and Managing IP magazine.
UCL
Faculty of Laws, Bentham House, Endsleigh Gardens, London, WC1H 0EG

 +44 (0) 20 7679 5831  rjacob@ucl.ac.uk

“Add this to other letters that we have shown before and sooner or later it becomes clear that Battistelli not only runs out of allies; he runs out of apathetic entities that neither support nor dennounce him.”As Merpel states: “This letter has the support of “all or virtually all” of the main patent judges of Europe and from 11 countries.” Add this to other letters that we have shown before and sooner or later it becomes clear that Battistelli not only runs out of allies; he runs out of apathetic entities that neither support nor dennounce him. The tide is quickly turning, much as we hoped all along. Here is Merpel’s summary of some other recent developments, some of which we covered here before:

On Christmas Eve according to the Gregorian Calendar, Merpel posted a round-up and summary of what has been going on at the EPO. Now that we have come to Christmas Eve according to the Julian Calendar, it seems appropriate to revisit the subject. There have been a large number of developments over the last couple of weeks, and the IPKat and Merpel have received an enormous amount of correspondence. There is actually too much for a single post, so Merpel will start with a round-up of brief news, in particular relating to the UK Parliament and the EU Parliament, together with some other snippets. In her next post, Merpel hopes to delve into the Business Distribution Scheme of the Boards of Appeal, where some interesting facts become apparent, and she will also look a bit more into Board 28.

[...]

As reported by the IPKat here, the MP for Cambridge, Dr Julian Huppert tabled a question to ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills:

What steps he is taking to protect the independence of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office.

[Incidentally, while Merpel congratulates Dr Huppert for tabling this question, it would have been better phrased without the "Enlarged"; fortunately, the response addresses the better formulation.]

Yesterday the IPKat learnt that there has been a response as follows:

Officials in the UK Intellectual Property Office are closely and actively involved in discussions relating to the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), including the Enlarged Board. It is the UK Government position that the Boards of Appeal should be independent of the executive of the EPO, and be seen to be so. This view is shared by other EPO member states and we expect proposals to make this clearer to be considered by the Administrative Council, the Office’s supervisory body, in March 2015.

Cautious Katpat to Her Majesty’s Government – if there are indeed proposals to make the independence clearer then the IPKat and Merpel applaud the efforts. Thanks to several readers who alerted the IPKat to this.

We too received information regarding that latter item. “There is no doubt that this is a setback for Battistelli,” noted one of our readers. “I think what emerges from this is that at least one significant member state of the AC is breaking from Battistelli’s public position.”

Over the weekend we began preparing some future exclusive posts about the EPO and they will be ready for publication very soon. Right now “we need an increasing drumbeat in the run-up to the next AC,” told us a reader. “It’s a real shame that EP industrial corporations haven’t spoken out yet – if they did he would be a dead duck real quickly.”

Combining some of the recent letters and considering the number of scandals we are about to show, Battistelli will almost definitely be out of office soon (no vacation), and he won’t be alone in leaving. It would be poetic justice if he was just “suspended” out of office, sitting outdoors in winter calling himself "President" repeatedly when all he really became was a thug in a suit, no better than Željko Topić (Topić too is in serious trouble and he knows it).

In other news, which is very sad, “Bernard Marris, economist against software patents, was killed today in Paris,” wrote Benjamin Henrion in Belgium. The articles cited by Henrion are in French. We need to fight for elimination of software patents, especially in Europe. Bernard Marris would have been happy to see that happen. Based on our sources, many in the EPO (science-oriented staff) are against software patents and are not willing to just “follow orders”. To Battistelli, quality of patents does not matter and those who don’t agree with him shall receive the ‘Putin treatment’ (EPO staff privately refers to Topić as “Putin”).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

This post is also available in Gemini over at:

gemini://gemini.techrights.org/2015/01/07/ipja-vs-benoit-battistelli/

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

  1. uspto said,

    January 11, 2015 at 9:34 am

    Gravatar

    Your site is full of pooh pooh.

What Else is New


  1. Richard Stallman: Sharing is Good... We Need to Legalise It

    Dr. Richard Stallman, the Free Software Foundation's founder, explains his take on copyright and the artificial restriction being used against sharing



  2. Nadine Strossen and Hannah Wolfman-Jones Rebut Accusations Against Stallman and Choose Him as Coauthor

    "Here are her thoughts and the response she received from Nadine, extracted verbatim with their permission from the original article"



  3. Links 17/4/2021: GNOME 40 in Tumbleweed, Devuan 4.0 Alpha, Kate Editor Makes a Leap

    Links for the day



  4. EPO Staff Union Takes the EPO 'to Court' (the ILO's Tribunal, as the EPO Cannot be Taken to a Proper Court)

    The Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO) Committees are preparing a legal battle over unlawful and unjust measures taken collectively against hard-working (overworked during pandemic) members of staff; the European public should support them



  5. The Latest Anti-RMS Coup Attempt Targets the GNU Project (Because the FSF Coup Has Clearly Failed) by Infringing and Disregarding Trademark Conventions

    A fake "GNU" (not the original GNU, just riding the coattails of the name "GNU") is trying to find/gain traction and we must oppose it because it's an extension of the very same coup attempt (same plotters) that manufactured a whole bunch of libel to incite people and blackmail the Free Software Foundation (FSF)



  6. Links 16/4/2021: Mozilla Dumping FTP, Corporations Still Concern-Trolling FSF

    Links for the day



  7. The EFF Attacks Software Freedom and Promotes Fake Privacy Linked to Microsoft

    Only weeks after attacking Software Freedom (the ad hominem way, which is easier) the EFF endorses a Microsoft-linked privacy abuse, misframing it as some sort of privacy champion



  8. Richard Stallman on How Corporate Media Limits What People Are Allowed to Think and Say (Updated)

    What the founder of the FSF told yours truly a number of years ago about the behaviour of corporate (funded and controlled by corporations) media



  9. Exposing Hard Truths is the First Step or the Path Towards Justice

    A reflection and a moment taken to set aside tribalism (shallow differences based on allegiances of personal comfort), for we need look back at actual facts — however inconvenient at times — and consider the reality of the situation



  10. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, April 15, 2021

    IRC logs for Thursday, April 15, 2021



  11. [Meme] Laundering Bribes as 'Cooperation Money'

    Germany has financial interest in ensuring that EPO abuses carry on and nobody holds the EPO accountable



  12. Articles in Support of Richard Stallman

    Reproduced with permission



  13. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 20: Taking Stock

    Benoît Battistelli's legacy at the EPO is a legacy of corruption and cover-up; we take stock of how illegality was defended and persists to this day



  14. Links 15/4/2021: Zorin OS 16 Beta and Pushing Linux to GitHub- and Microsoft-Connected Rust

    Links for the day



  15. [Meme] Enemies With Common Interests

    The Software Freedom Movement (or Free Software Movement) has many enemies; some of them just hide in the shadows or speak out through shadowy front groups/NGOs that they semi-officially sponsor



  16. [Meme] Germany's Red Cash Cow

    EPO brings a lot of money to the German state. But at what cost to citizens and Germany’s public image?



  17. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 19: The Deafening Silence of the Media

    "There has been speculation that Maas might have had his own political interest in protecting Battistelli and the Balkan Express because of certain allegations about financial irregularities involving the German Patents and Trademark Office (DPMA) which were doing the rounds at the time."



  18. The Indirection Game

    How to attack institutions and concepts by personifying them, then proceeding to character assassination based on lies and deliberate distortions



  19. Links 15/4/2021: LXQt 0.17, Proxmox Backup Server 1.1

    Links for the day



  20. The Patent Battles in Europe Are Connected to the War on GNU/Linux (as a Community-Led Effort)

    Monoplisers of GNU and Linux want us to think that OIN is the solution while they actively lobby for software patents in Europe and the people in charge of Europe’s second-largest institution and Europe’s largest patent office help them; this long video contains thoughts about news from the past couple of days



  21. Richard Stallman: Freedom is the Goal (Updated)

    What Richard Stallman (RMS) told me in person on his trip here



  22. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, April 14, 2021

    IRC logs for Wednesday, April 14, 2021



  23. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 18: Zero Tolerance for “Lawless Zones”?

    "It comes as no surprise that Maas appeared as a guest of honour at the European Inventor of the Year Boondoggle in Berlin in 2014 where he was seen on stage clapping along with the EPO President."



  24. Richard Stallman's Honors and Awards (and Why He Resigned in 2019)

    Reproduced with permission



  25. Links 14/4/2021: Alpine Releases and X.Org Server 1.20.11 Release (Security)

    Links for the day



  26. Links 14/4/2021: EasyOS Dunfell 2.7, Tor Browser 10.5a14

    Links for the day



  27. EPOLeaks on Misleading the Bundestag -- Part 17: Jawohl, Herr Minister!

    A French-German co-production of "Yes, Minister!" starring Raimund Lutz, Heiko Maas and Christoph Ernst. Directed by Benoît Battistell.



  28. Over 1,000 EPO Workers Initiate Legal Challenge Against the EPO's Attack on Salaries (in Defiance of Assurances Made to Workers Who Relocate to Another Country With Whole Families)

    The EPO’s attack on workers and pensioners isn’t going ahead without challenge; while the “Mafia” (what EPO workers call the management) loots the organisation it takes away money from the workers — i.e. from besieged folks who do all the work and face growing workloads during a pandemic



  29. Who is Richard Stallman?

    Reproduced with permission



  30. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, April 13, 2021

    IRC logs for Tuesday, April 13, 2021


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts