EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.14.18

European Patent Office Causes Physical Harm to Employees, Then Fires Them

Posted in Europe, Patents at 3:11 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Related:

ULD at EPO

Summary: Another one (among many) EPO documents about the alarming physical wellbeing of EPO employees and the management’s attitude towards the issue

I. The EPO Health Insurance:

II. Making Us Sick And Making Us Pay For It?

Summary

The administration has submitted a document to the next GAC which proposes amongst others to effectively remove the 2.4% (of basic salary) ceiling on the Vanbreda staff contribution. The staff representation considers such a proposal inappropriate and premature at a time when the alternative solutions (e.g. the internal insurance) unanimously agreed by the Vanbreda working group have not yet been implemented. More importantly, however, the staff representation strongly opposes any increase in staff costs as long as the Office neglects its duty of care towards staff by not protecting staff health and not implementing essential parts of the EPO health policy.

A. INTRODUCTION

In 2007, after a decade of nagging by the staff representation, the Office finally introduced a health policy and founded an occupational health department. The health departments have, however, been understaffed from the very beginning. Repeated requests from the staff representation to provide the newly hired occupational health physicians temporarily with a project manager to help them set up their departments were refused with the effect that they spent most of their first year battling their way through the Office’s red tape in order to order their material, hire staff etc. Two years later “sick leave management”, essentially: staying in touch with sick staff in order to offer support for a return to work1, is in place. The ergo-WUC network has also largely been reactivated and “work-pace” soft-ware has been made available to staff. But more remains to be done.
_____
1 Contact with the Occupational Health Service is voluntary. If you feel that the contact is not helpful for you, you need not continue. The Occupational Health Service furthermore cannot challenge sick leave (full-time or part-time) prescribed by your treating physician. Only the Medical Advisor to the Administration (Dr. Koopman) can verify sick-leave, following the procedure foreseen under Art. 62(nn) of the ServRegs.


B. UPPER LIMB DISORDERS

In 2004, TNO2 found that a whopping 39% of the EPO staff suffered from Upper Limb Disorder3 (ULD), and that 19% had been treated for those complaints. Even the best ergo-WUC is helpless when faced with un-ergonomic software, especially when combined with long hours on the computer and high work pressure. Since 2004 our software has not improved significantly from an ergonomic point of view, the time spent on the computer has not diminished, and neither has the work pressure. There is thus no reason to believe that the situation has improved insofar as ULD / RSI is concerned4.

We note that the EPO’s health policy prescribes regular risk analyses. These should include a follow-up on the TNO study. The Occupational Health Department is working on a proposal for a risk analysis. However, none has been made thus far and, obviously, any follow-up in practical measures is even further away.

The major overhaul of the Office’s computer systems now planned could provide an opportunity to greatly improve the ergonomics of the Office’s software. We do not, however, have much evidence that ergonomics has a very high priority compared to e.g. (perceived) “efficiency”. In particular: we have seen no clear ergonomics policy or guidelines for the soft-ware, we have not seen a dedicated budget etc.

C. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS

Another major factor for staff ill-health, and apparently the most frequent cause of invalidity, are psychological problems. It is our impression that a high percentage of these problems are caused by, or at least aggravated by the Office, in particular by a frequently inappropriate management style at all levels. This is confirmed by all psychosocial studies done so far, including the staff surveys, and also by the psychiatrist5 whom the staff representation advises to staff in need of support. Our highest management displays a serious lack of understanding of, and respect for, the work of the EPO staff. Constant, badly thought-through changes in working methods and tools, constant reorganisations and more recently: a constant threat to the working conditions make things worse. For some staff the situation is further aggravated by the Office’s inability or unwillingness to control and take measures against line managers who cause serious distress to their subordinates. Last but not least, there is furthermore a lack of effective support for staff with work-place related health problems. In particular for examiners there are no alternatives for search and examination work. A high work diversity (search and examination for examiners, several “procedures” for formalities staff, a whole range of services for staff in the Personnel Dept. etc.) is asked from all staff, including staff in bad health. The department as a whole is furthermore penalized for keeping sick staff on board on reduced time and/or capacity since the number of budgeted posts has been reduced to the minimum and there are no super-numery posts for staff with reduced capacity. Simpler work elsewhere is no longer available since almost all such work has been out-sourced. The above deficiencies seriously hinder effective reintegration and contribute to high sick leave and invalidity levels.

We note that a psychosocial health risk management, starting with a psychosocial health risk analysis, is now generally considered an integral part of any modern staff health policy. Extensive

____
2 TNO report
3 also called RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury)
4 Dr. Bosch expresses the opinion that the level of RSI has gone down based on the lower number of complaints received by her department. This can, however, have other reasons like staff with long-term complaints no longer seeking advise from the Occupational Health department.
5 Report Dr. Teuschel, 2008


information about psychosocial health management is provided by World Health Organisation6. We are, however, not aware that the Office has undertaken any serious initiatives in this respect. On the contrary: existing psychosocial support staff (by the Personnel Department, Amicale, Kids e.a.) is constantly under threat of budgetary savings.

D. THE PRICE TO PAY

Under the circumstances, it is not surprising that the sickness and invalidity figures in the Office are relatively high. This in turn leads to relatively high costs, in particularly in Munich where the charges made by the medical establishment are higher than in most of the other places of employment. In order to address these specific local problems, the staff committee has repeatedly requested support from the Office against medical doctors who are blatantly over-charging, but staff is still left to struggle on their own with bloated invoices and aggressive “Abrechnungsstelle”. Similarly we have asked for a “white list” of reasonably priced doctors and ideally “preferred providers” near the Office buildings to whom staff can go, if they so wish. Thus far no progress has been made in this respect.

We note that e.g. the EU has a separate insurance for the costs incurred due to accidents at work and/or occupational disease, which is entirely funded by the employer. It stands to reason that health costs that have been caused through the work are carried by the employer. This also provides a motivation for the employer to keep the working place as healthy as possible (the sort of direct link between “performance” and “pay” that the Office seems to favour for its staff!).

E. THE OFFICE’S “CURE”

The “cure” proposed by our administration is, however, neither improving the health of the staff through improved prevention at work, nor taking over the costs of work-related health problems: the Office is proposing to make staff pay for the consequences of the increase in health costs. Already working spouses have been excluded from cover or been made to pay. As a next step the Office proposes the removal of the 2.4% of basic salary as the ceiling on the staff contribution. The next in line are the pensioners who will be charged a percentage of their final salary rather than a percentage of their actual pension, as well as spouses of pensioners who will have to make use of their primary insurance.

Whereas we would possibly understand such measures if everything else, in particular all more reasonable measures (e.g. the 6 unanimous measures of the Vanbreda working group), had been tried first and costs would remain well above the ceiling for several years, at this stage such measures are inappropriate:

at present the Office is making us sick and making us pay for it!

If the legislator has built in a ceiling then the intention must have been to protect staff from higher charges and to force the Office to manage staff health correctly. The latter has clearly not been done: a health policy has been adopted but essential parts such as risk analyses and management have not been implemented.

The staff representation therefore demands that the Office:

1) awaits the effect of the cost-saving measures already taken (amongst others increased reliance on the primary insurance),
2) implements the 6 further measures7 unanimously agreed by the Vanbreda working group, and awaits their effectiveness, and
3) awaits the full effective implementation of the OH policy,

_____
6 PRIMA-EF brochures
7 e.g. the self-insurance, which should save around 1,5 million Euro per year; see su09117cp


before considering introducing further changes in the financing of the EPO health insurance scheme that negatively affect staff, either in the short term or in the longer term.

The Staff Committee will reiterate this position in the GAC that takes place in the second week of September and, if necessary, again in the October Budget and Finance Committee and Administrative Council meetings. If all this will be in vain we will file internal appeals. In our opinion such appeals would have a good chance of success.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. This Article About GitHub Takeover Never Appeared (Likely Spiked by Microsoft and Its Friends Inside the Media)

    And later they wonder why people distrust so much of the media (where paying advertisers set the agenda/tone)



  2. Raw: How Microsoft and/or the EPO Killed an Important EPO Story About Their SLAPP Against Techrights and Others

    Spiking a story about spiked stories about corruption



  3. The Linux Foundation 'Bootcamp' -- Badly Timed and Badly Named in June 2020 -- Only Uses Linus Torvalds Like a 'Prop' (for Legitimacy) While Promoting Militarised Monopolies

    Sometimes a picture says a lot more than words, especially in light of political events in the US and a certain Chinese anniversary we cannot name (Microsoft censors mentions of it)



  4. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 04, 2020



  5. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part II: When Media That You Bribe Calls All Your Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists' (to Keep Them Silenced, Marginalised)

    The assault on the media by Bill Gates is a subject not often explored by the media (maybe because a lot of it is already bribed by him); but we're beginning to gather new and important evidence that explains how critics are muzzled (even fired) and critical pieces spiked, never to see the light of day anywhere



  6. GitHub is Not Sharing But 'Theft' by Microsoft

    Microsoft buying GitHub does not demonstrate that Microsoft loves Open Source (GitHub is not Open Source and may never be) but that it loves monopoly and coercion (what GitHub is all about and why it must be rejected)



  7. The Huge Damage (Except for Patent Lawyers' Bottom Line) Caused by Fake European Patents

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps granting fake patents that cause a lot of real harm (examiners are pressured to play along and participate in this unlawful agenda); nobody is happy except those who profit from needless, frivolous lawsuits



  8. Red Hat/IBM Got 'Tired' of RMS. Is It Getting 'Tired' of GPL/Copyleft Too?

    After contributing to the cancellation of Richard Stallman (RMS) based on some falsehoods perpetuated in the media we're seeing the sort of thing one might expect from IBM (more so now that it totally controls Fedora and RHEL)



  9. Links 4/6/2020: Proton 5.0-8 Release Candidate, GNU Linux-libre 5.7

    Links for the day



  10. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 03, 2020



  11. Social Engineering of Free Software, Based on Corporate Criteria

    What "professional" nowadays means in the context of coding and honest assessment of technical work



  12. Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

    The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"



  13. Sword Group Violates Its Own Commitment by Working for the EPO

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps outsourcing its work to outside contractors (for-profit private entities) to the tune of hundreds of millions if not billions — all this without any oversight



  14. In 2020 Canonical No Longer Fights for Freedom

    Freedom requires a GNU/Linux distro other than Ubuntu, which seems unwilling or unable/incapable of speaking about and promoting the ideals of GNU/Linux



  15. We Need to Use the F Word (Freedom) to Promote Adoption of GNU/Linux

    "People get the government their behavior deserves. People deserve better than that." -Richard Stallman



  16. People Who Want to Explore GNU/Linux With Ubuntu See This Today

    "Wait, am I in a GNU/Linux blog or another Windows blog," a visitor might think... or, is Microsoft 'taking over' messaging at Canonical? (Same with code)



  17. Links 4/6/2020: Septor 2020.3, Nextcloud and Blender 2.83

    Links for the day



  18. Hey, Where's Red Hat (IBM)?

    Red Hat is conspicuously silent at these critical times (in its home country); Must be too busy hailing and cashing in on Trump's military (state) while dishing out shallow and self-contradictory diversity PR/fluff…



  19. Microsoft's Latest Vapourware About Supercomputers

    Microsoft has spent almost two decades dropping supercomputers vapourware on the media, but those misinformation dumps always turn out to be 100% hot air, no substance



  20. 2020: A Time for Resolutions or Revolutions?

    There are nonviolent means by which the current system can be corrected; we need to convince peers and relatives to change the way they behave and not cooperate with unjust elements of the system



  21. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, June 02, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, June 02, 2020



  22. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part I: Lost the Job After Writing an Article Critical of Bill Gates for Attacking Some Actual, Legitimate Charities (Because They Had Spread GNU/Linux)

    The sociopaths from the fake 'charity' of Bill Gates would go to great lengths to squash criticism and also to eliminate critics; this series tells the story of some of those personally affected



  23. Don't Fall for the Spin, Microsoft is Laying Off Workers and It's Not Just Because of the Pandemic





  24. All They Want is Litigation, Not Innovation

    It's getting difficult to ignore or to overlook the fact that the 'litigation lobby' (the likes of Team UPC and today's EPO management, guided by groups like the Licensing Executives Society International) doesn't care about innovation and is in fact looking to profit by crushing innovation



  25. Reminder: Microsoft Profits From Crushing Protesters for Donald Trump

    Don't lose sight of the fact that what's going on in the United States right now is very profitable to Microsoft



  26. No, GNU/Linux Isn't at 3% and Windows Isn't at Over 90%, Either

    This ludicrous idea that "Linux" (however one defines it) enjoys just 3% of the "market" is false and it should be treated as laughable spin (it is being widely promoted this week, often by Microsoft boosters looking to make charts where Windows stays at above 90% and Vista 10 is 'gaining'... at the expense of Windows)



  27. Links 3/6/2020: Devuan Beowulf 3.0.0 and Tails 4.7 Released

    Links for the day



  28. Links 2/6/2020: New Firefox Release (77), Debian-based MX Linux 19.2, KDevelop 5.5.2, GNU/Linux Growth on Desktops/Laptops

    Links for the day



  29. Techrights Can Figure Out Source Protection/Anonymisation Whilst Operating Very Transparently

    We're still quite radically transparent whilst at the same time enjoying 100% source protection record; we're also improving the software we use to publish more quickly and efficiently



  30. IRC Proceedings: Monday, June 01, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, June 01, 2020


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts