EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.15.18

The Latest Lies About Unitary Patent (UPC) and the EPO

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 6:03 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

CIPA meeting with Stephen Jones

Summary: Lobbying defies facts; we are once again seeing some easily-debunked talking points from those who stand to benefit from the UPC and mass litigation

TEAM BATTISTELLI will be watching the UK today. The EPO‘s management doesn’t care about the EPO. It just wants the UPC. There’s a discussion among some patent attorneys right now about whether the EPO tries to make the UPC more attractive than the EPO/EPC. What would that say about Battistelli? Some EPO insiders believe, based on internal rumours, that he wishes to continue his reign of terror under the umbrella of “UPC” (or whatever they try to call it next).

Last night at around midnight (yes, midnight!) the anonymous “Kluwer Patent Blogger” (probably just Bristows LLP hiding its identity while it publicly lies or distorts facts about UPC) posted some more fake news about the UPC’s fake job advertisements, which in our view aren’t just unethical but should be dealt with as serious offenses (people invited to job interviews for jobs that will never exist). Bristows folks, i.e. the firm and also its staff, continue to show what a disgrace they are. They also spread some other fake news earlier this week. They just can’t help themselves.

Bristows is pretty radical even by Team UPC standards (however low these standards may already be). UPCtracker has just recalled: “From Boris Johnson‘s Valentine’s Day speech : „And as the PM has said repeatedly, we must take back control of our laws. It would obviously be absurd, as Theresa May said in her Lancaster House and Florence speeches [...] (1/2)” (there’s more there)

Thorsten Bausch‏ continued: “…such as the UPCA?”

Yes, obviously.

Even Alexander Esslinger‏, whose blog we mentioned yesterday, said: “I do not expect that the #UPC (if it enters into force) will significantly reduce the workload of the EPO BoA. 1. If an EP patent application is rejected, the UPC is of no help. 2.Oppositions are much cheaper than invalidity lawsuits under the UPC.”

Again, obviously.

It’s worth noting that none of the above (even the person who calls UPC opponents "idiots" and "trolls") honestly believes that the UPC will happen. That delusion if not lunacy is mostly Bristows’. It’s worth noting that Bristows’ person inside IP Kat stopped her UPC lobbying a few months ago. IP Kat‘s CIPA insider, however, is making photo ops with Battistelli while promoting the UPC (deception or collusion?), issuing PR to conflate/confuse UPC with EPO/EPC (which was never about the EU and predates it).

Sofia Willquist from Awapatent is the latest to piggyback this PR with this statement that she published yesterday to say:

At a meeting between the EPO and the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) in late January, it was confirmed that European patent attorneys who are based in the UK will be able to continue to represent applicants before the EPO. This means that ‘Brexit’ will not have any impact whatsoever on the membership of the UK in the European Patent Organisation, thus maintaining the number of member states at 38.

Mind what they’re trying to accomplish here. In our view, they are attempting to make politicians believe that because Britain remains in the EPO after Brexit (never mind if EPO recruitment of Brits is down by 80%) that must therefore mean that Britain is ready for the UPC. It’s a lie and it’s shrewdly constructed. It’s a lawyers’ tricks. The UPC is mentioned by name in the PR.

Meanwhile, based on this new blog post, Lisa Ouellette and Michael Risch are supplying EPO talking points (FDI); they are missing the point or several key facts and eventually sound like that so-called ‘study’ the EPO commissioned in Britain and the UK (effectively corrupting academia for lobbying purposes). From Ouellette today:

The Impact of International Patent Systems: Evidence from Accession to the European Patent Convention, which Michael Risch posted about yesterday, caught my eye as well. As Michael explained, economists Bronwyn Hall and Christian Helmers examined the impact on patent filings and foreign direct investment (FDI) for fourteen countries that joined the European Patent Convention (EPC) between 2000 and 2008. (The countries are Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Iceland, Lithuania, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Turkey.)

The premise is a false one and is hinged on a bogus correlation; it’s similar to the “patents equals innovation” canard. The number of patent filings depends on many factors including cost, patent scope and so-called ‘IP5′ dynamics. The numbers generally go up over time. There’s also a tax evasion element to it*. To suggest that investments go up owing to patents is ludicrous and dishonest.

By the way, how about those investments in European Patents (EPs) which recently turned out to be money down the drain? Like CRISPR patents…

Yesterday we saw this article titled “Cellectis to license recently-granted CRISPR patents” and it spoke of the EPO:

French cell therapy company Cellectis has announced plans to make two CRISPR patents, which were recently granted by the US Patent and Trademark Office, available for licensing.

[...]

Last year, Cellectis was granted European patent number EP3004337 by the European Patent Office (EPO) for a similar invention.

This patent would likely be voided if challenged right now. We already wrote about half a dozen posts on the subject last month.
_________
* In Italy, based on this week’s news, they too are in effect legalising tax evasion for massive corporations under the guise of “patents” (or “patent box regime”). To quote:

Italy’s patent box regime, which entered into force January 1, provides an exemption from the corporate income tax and regional tax on productive activities of 50 percent of the income derived from the exploitation or direct use of qualifying intellectual property.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/10/2019: More on DeX, Disney DRM and Linux 5.4 RC4

    Links for the day



  2. GNU/Linux is Bigger Than Ever (Used More Than Ever Before), But Communication Means and Brands Have Changed

    The GNU/Linux market is alive and healthy; it's how we measure its health that ought to adapt because things are constantly changing, more rapidly in the realm of technology than anywhere else



  3. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 20, 2019



  4. Samsung Does Not Say Why It's Dropping DeX, But the ASUS EEE Story Might Offer Clues

    It's not at all outlandish or unreasonable to suggest that Microsoft used patents or bribes or kickbacks as incentives for Samsung to abandon GNU/Linux as a desktop platform



  5. EPO: It's Only Getting Worse

    Inhaling Seagull meme for EPO presidents



  6. It Has Begun: EPO Staff Protests Against António Campinos (Starting Wednesday)

    Wednesday marks the resumption of EPO protests; it’s happening for the first time under Campinos and only a year after he took Office. Even Battistelli, the notorious thug, lasted longer before such escalations/actions or — put another way — he did better than that (if one checks the timeline of his presidency)



  7. Links 20/10/2019: GNU/Linux at Penn Manor School District, Wine-Staging 4.18, Xfce 4.16 Development, FreeBSD 12.1 RC2

    Links for the day



  8. Guest Post: Understanding Autism for More Complete Inclusion

    "...assuming that autistic people are all the same isn't only technically wrong, it is misleading and leads to harmful and needless misunderstandings."



  9. Guest Post: Free Software Freedom is Not a Freedom of Choice

    The concept of "Freedom of Choice" and how the ruling class uses it to give a false impression of "Freedom"



  10. Guest Post: Free Software Developers and Pursuing 'Market Share'

    "The only people interested in software freedom are (almost always) free software developers. And users are interested in freedom to a very limited extent: the "free beer" side. Even many free software developers are only interested in the "free beer" part of free software."



  11. The Assertion That Microsoft Uses Communist Tactics Against GNU/Linux and Free/Libre Software

    A study of Taistoism might help understand how Free/libre software is being undermined



  12. European Patent Office and US Patent and Trademark Office Cranks Discovered Buzzwords, Stopped Worrying, Started Granting Patents They Know to be Fake

    The world's patent repositories are being saturated with loads of junk patents or patents that have no legal bearing but can still be leveraged for extortion purposes; the EPO is resorting to lies and artificially-elevated buzzwords to justify granting such fake (yet ruinous) patents



  13. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 19, 2019



  14. “The True Hypocrite is the One Who Ceases to Perceive His Deception, the One Who Lies With Sincerity,” Said André Paul Guillaume Gide (Nobel Prize in Literature)

    Lies flow like water in the realm of EPO and its publishers, whose sole role is dissemination of deliberate falsehoods, misnomers and misinformation



  15. The EPO Cannot Guard Fake European Patents From Scrutiny (in the Long Run)

    Legal certainty associated with newly-granted European Patents is already pretty low and as long as the EPO refuses to acknowledge that its courts (or boards) lack autonomy the EPO merely brushes a growing problem under the rug



  16. Links 19/10/2019: DeX Discontinued, DXVK 1.4.3 and Wine 4.18 Released

    Links for the day



  17. 'Corporate Linux' Will Not Protect Software Freedom

    The corporate model is inherently not compatible with software that users themselves fully control (or Software Freedom in general), so we must rely on another model of sovereignty over code and compiled code (binaries)



  18. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 18, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, October 18, 2019



  19. 26,000 Posts

    We want to thank those who help spread the word; it gives us moral support and morale.



  20. The Myth of 'Analysts'

    People with exaggerated roles (exaggerated by corporate media and corporations that control them) distort public perceptions about their clients; they're in effect just elevated marketing or Public Relations (PR) operatives



  21. The FSF Has Two Acting Presidents Now

    Alexandre Oliva, who acted as a sort of deputy of Richard Stallman in recent weeks, sheds some much-needed light on the current situation



  22. Should Anybody Dictate the Free Software Movement?

    "There's a great myth, as Jagadees reminds us, that advocacy doesn't produce software. That myth is corporate, and proper advocacy has at times produced the greatest software in the history of computing. If we want great Free software to continue, we need advocacy more than ever."



  23. Links 18/10/2019: More KDE Events and OpenBSD 6.6

    Links for the day



  24. We Don't Know Who Will Run the Free Software Foundation, But We Know Who Will Run the GNU Project

    Software Freedom is under a heavy and perhaps unprecedented attack; some people out there are paid by the attackers to celebrate this attack and defame people (cheering for corporate takeover under the blanket of “Open Source”), but the founder of the Free software movement remains alive, well, and very much active



  25. New EPO Meme: Who Wants to Make Billions From a 'Public' Monopoly?

    What was supposed to be a cash-balanced patent office became a money-making monster that fakes ‘crises’ to attack hard-working examiners



  26. EmacsConf Without Richard Stallman

    Now that emacs is being 'rebranded' this kind of meme seems apt



  27. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 17, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, October 17, 2019



  28. Guest Article: In the Absence of Richard Stallman OEM Source Software ('Open Source') is Trying to Hijack Even Emacs

    "Now they have to create some fictional history. No need to worry."



  29. Guest Article: Techies Should Not Dictate the Free Software Movement

    "We should start a second phase of the Free software movement that's making good software and putting users at the center."



  30. Links 17/10/2019: Ubuntu Turns 15, New Codename Revealed, Ubuntu 19.10 is Out

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts